we will get into that in our weekly segments, ai decoded about here is the sport first. sport and for a full round—up, from the bbc sport centre, here's will perry. hello from the bbc sport centre. xander schauffele carded the lowest round ever in a us pga championship with a first round 62 to lead by three shots. the american cae up with nine birdies at valhalla to beat jose maria olazabal's course record set 2a years ago. rory mcilroy is hoping to end his 10—year major drought, he's in the clubhouse four shots off the lead. world number one scottie scheffler got an eagle on his first hole, he's three under through four. four times winner tiger woods is one over, john rahm two over through four. the fight for premier league promotion continues with leeds taking on norwich in the second leg

of their chaampionship play—off semifinal. the first leg at carrow road finished goalless, but leeds have the advantage, 2—0 they lead in the first half, thanks to an ilia gruev free kick and joel peru's header. southampton play west brom in the other second leg semi on friday. manchester city's goalkeeper ederson will miss sunday's premier league title decider at home to west ham and next week's manchester derby fa cup final. the brazilian was forced off with an eye injury during city's 2—0 win at tottenham on tuesday that left pep guardiola's side on the brink of their fourth consecutive title. scans have confirmed ederson suffered a small fracture to his right eye socket following a collision with cristian romero. now as we were telling you this time on wednesday, wolverhampton wanderers want var scrapped next season and forcing a vote at next month's english premier league agm. they'll need the support of 13 other clubs if they're to succeed. we heard from manchester

united's erik ten hag and brentford's thomas frank on thursday, but neither manager voiced their support for wolves. in principle, it makes the football more fair. but there are some problems, i think. more fair. but there are some problems, ithink. we more fair. but there are some problems, i think. we have to find solutions for those problems, so we have to make improvements. i can't see us going back. i think it is there. — i can't see us going back. i think it isthere, i_ i can't see us going back. i think it is there, i think it will be there — it is there, i think it will be there for— it is there, i think it will be there for the future and i have said it before, — there for the future and i have said it before, it— there for the future and i have said it before, it is not perfect, it is fine, _ it before, it is not perfect, it is fine, still— it before, it is not perfect, it is fine, stillthere, needs fine, still there, needs improvement, fine, stillthere, needs improvement, they are working on it. iga swiatek won her 11th straight clay—court match on thursday as the top seed moved closer to another record with a comprehensive semifinal defeat of coco gauff at the italian open. swiatek, the world number one now stands one victory away from duplicating the madrid—rome clay trophy double achieved by serena williams 11 years ago. she beat gauff for the 10th time

in their 11 meetings. swiatek and is due to defend her french open title starting in paris a week on sunday. and that's all the sport for now. well, thank you very much. you are watching the context. it is time for our our regular weekly segment — ai decoded. welcome to ai decoded. if you are a regular viewer of this programme, you'll know by now, that each week we devote half an hour every thursday, to the extraordinary advances in artificial intellligence. and this week, we took a giant step forward, with the release of chatgpt 4.0 which is signifanctly easier to operate. it comes with audio, vision, and text in real time. an always helpful, always available human—like robot, to interact whenever you like. do you worry about that? look how obsessed people have become with twitter and social media.

what if chatgpt replaces human interaction. what if we become so obssessed with this new technology, that people would share their special moments with a computer rather than you 7 like this man, introducing his dog to his ai companion. i want to introduce you to somebody. 0h, hello there, cutie! what's your name, little fluffball? this is bowser. well, hello, bowser. aren't you just the most adorable little thing. yeah. look at you! this is one of his favourite things to do. oh, well, i can see why! look at that focus! catching balls is serious business for bowser. maybe no longer man's best friend! now, let's take a look at how the papers covered the release of chatgpt 4.0. the laughing, chatting, singing ai, so responsive, says the guardian, you could almost forget it is not a sentient being. you could use it as a dating concierge. this week, says the mail, the founder of dating app bumble

suggested we use our customised al, to seek out the perfect partner. or maybe you don't need a partner if the ai is the super sexy robot. it is coming at you fast. but who is holding the reigns? news this week from axios, that sam altmans, 0penai have shed three of the doomers, the more cautious members of the board, who had been pushing the safer and slower approach. tonight we will talk to the author of "human rights, robot wrongs", lawyer susi alegre, who has written extensively about the way ai is threatening our rights, in war, sex, publishing and creativity — and what we might do, to fight back. there were two triggers that spurred susi alegre to write this new book. we will come to that shortly. and also here is is our regular ai contributor samir mallal who's ceo of ai creative company one day. have you used it? yes, it is pretty

impressive _ have you used it? yes, it is pretty impressive. the _ have you used it? yes, it is pretty impressive. the video _ have you used it? yes, it is pretty impressive. the video sounds - have you used it? yes, it is prettyj impressive. the video sounds may understand text, natively, so it is almost like before there was a translator between us and the model, so that has now gone. it is taking on more information and some of the things that were lost in translation are now native to the model. it is more expressive. me are now native to the model. it is more expressive.— more expressive. we have talked before about _ more expressive. we have talked before about whether _ more expressive. we have talked before about whether it - more expressive. we have talked before about whether it feels - more expressive. we have talked before about whether it feels like more expressive. we have talked i before about whether it feels like a sentience being. could you have a relationship with this? i sentience being. could you have a relationship with this?— relationship with this? i think you can. personally, _ relationship with this? i think you can. personally, you _ relationship with this? i think you can. personally, you know, - relationship with this? i think you can. personally, you know, i'm i relationship with this? i think you i can. personally, you know, i'm nai evangelist, and i think... it is better that this guy is showing his ai his dog rather than going on at tiktok and trying to get attention like that. but tiktok and trying to get attention like that. �* ., ., ,., tiktok and trying to get attention like that. �* ., ., , ., ., tiktok and trying to get attention like that. �* ., ., ,., ., , like that. but what about what is he teachin: like that. but what about what is he teaching its? _ like that. but what about what is he teaching its? where _ like that. but what about what is he teaching its? where does _ like that. but what about what is he teaching its? where does that - like that. but what about what is he teaching its? where does that go? |

teaching its? where does that go? the pictures he is taking, the things that he says to this ai model? of those being recorded by chatgpt? model? of those being recorded by chatgpt? , ., , , chatgpt? yes, that is interesting. the have chatgpt? yes, that is interesting. they have different _ chatgpt? yes, that is interesting. they have different tiers. - chatgpt? yes, that is interesting. they have different tiers. if - chatgpt? yes, that is interesting. they have different tiers. if you i they have different tiers. if you are on a free data tier, they can use your data to edit it. and try new models. if you're a business user, they don't, for example. there are options there, but it is a big question, where it is going what are they doing. let question, where it is going what are the doinu. ., . i. question, where it is going what are the doinu. ., . ., they doing. let me introduce you to susie. they doing. let me introduce you to susie- there — they doing. let me introduce you to susie. there were _ they doing. let me introduce you to susie. there were two _ they doing. let me introduce you to susie. there were two reasons - they doing. let me introduce you to susie. there were two reasons that | susie. there were two reasons that you wrote this book. one was the sudden explosion of chatgpt, which we are talking about, this narrative that everyone overnight has become a novelist or painter, and then there was another story about this man who took his own life after a six week intensive relationship with nai chatbots, which is the alarming part of this. which is the bit that most

concerns about where we are going to? , , ~ , concerns about where we are going to? , , ~' , ., , to? the news this week is really the e - itome to? the news this week is really the eitome of to? the news this week is really the epitome of it. _ to? the news this week is really the epitome of it, with _ to? the news this week is really the epitome of it, with what _ to? the news this week is really the epitome of it, with what is - to? the news this week is really the epitome of it, with what is al - to? the news this week is really the epitome of it, with what is al for? l epitome of it, with what is al for? is it epitome of it, with what is al for? is it for— epitome of it, with what is al for? is it for replacing humanity, replacing human connection and if that is— replacing human connection and if that is what is for, is that what we really— that is what is for, is that what we really want? — that is what is for, is that what we really want? the case that you mentioned about the belgian man who tragically— mentioned about the belgian man who tragically took his own life earlier this year. — tragically took his own life earlier this year, afterjust six weeks with a relationship with a chatbots, which — a relationship with a chatbots, which was _ a relationship with a chatbots, which was literallyjust texting or writing _ which was literallyjust texting or writing into a computer, it wasn't chatting — writing into a computer, it wasn't chatting to— writing into a computer, it wasn't chatting to a sexier, flirty chatbots, it wasjust chatting to a sexier, flirty chatbots, it was just texting. chatting to a sexier, flirty chatbots, it wasjust texting. he left behind a widow and two small children— left behind a widow and two small children because he believed that he wanted _ children because he believed that he wahted to— children because he believed that he wanted to be with his ai chatbots and that— wanted to be with his ai chatbots and that she would provide the future — and that she would provide the future to— and that she would provide the future to save us from the perils of climate _ future to save us from the perils of climate change. it is really disturbing to think that people's mines _ disturbing to think that people's mines can be manipulated in that way so quickly _ mines can be manipulated in that way so cuickl . ., , mines can be manipulated in that way so cuickl. ., , p so quickly. that is difficult with something _ so quickly. that is difficult with something you're _ so quickly. that is difficult with something you're having - so quickly. that is difficult with something you're having to - so quickly. that is difficult with | something you're having to text

so quickly. that is difficult with - something you're having to text as a text back to you. if it is a conversation with someone who is voicing changes, whose avatar you could make whatever you want, then you can see how it would become more addictive. ~ , , ., , ., , addictive. absolutely. i was really . uite addictive. absolutely. i was really quite surprised — addictive. absolutely. i was really quite surprised when _ addictive. absolutely. i was really quite surprised when i _ addictive. absolutely. i was really quite surprised when i started - addictive. absolutely. i was really quite surprised when i started to l quite surprised when i started to look into— quite surprised when i started to look into it further to find how marry — look into it further to find how many millions of people have signed up many millions of people have signed up to services to have ai relationships and ai companions which _ relationships and ai companions which are — relationships and ai companions which are effectivelyjust chatbots with an _ which are effectivelyjust chatbots with an avatar you have designed, this ideal— with an avatar you have designed, this ideal person. 0ne with an avatar you have designed, this ideal person. one of the big this ideal person. 0ne of the big problems— this ideal person. one of the big problems with it i think, is if you insist— problems with it i think, is if you insist on— problems with it i think, is if you insist on having a relationship with something — insist on having a relationship with something you have created in this own ideal. — something you have created in this own ideal, how will you deal with a relationship with a real person? fine relationship with a real person? one ofthe relationship with a real person? one of the stories _ relationship with a real person? one of the stories we _ relationship with a real person? que: of the stories we have relationship with a real person? iez of the stories we have focused relationship with a real person? i9: of the stories we have focused on this week, is this from the bumble founder, whitney wolfe, she said the future of dating could be filled with al powered personas, setting each other up to help women in their search for a connection. the idea would be that the ai model would be

like a concierge, sifting through all the different programmes to pick you the perfect partner. i all the different programmes to pick you the perfect partner.— you the perfect partner. i think that is all— you the perfect partner. i think that is all in _ you the perfect partner. i think that is all in one _ you the perfect partner. i think that is all in one hand, - you the perfect partner. i think that is all in one hand, that. that is all in one hand, that announcement, the sign that online dating _ announcement, the sign that online dating has _ announcement, the sign that online dating has a problem, that people are frustrated and not finding the kind of— are frustrated and not finding the kind of human connection they want through— kind of human connection they want through online dating. if you could use at _ through online dating. if you could use al to— through online dating. if you could use al to filter out inappropriate messages and block anyone who sends them, _ messages and block anyone who sends them, maybe that would be fantastic. i'm them, maybe that would be fantastic. i'm not— them, maybe that would be fantastic. i'm not quite seeing how this would work _ i'm not quite seeing how this would work. �* , :, , . work. but if you find the perfect artner, work. but if you find the perfect partner. you — work. but if you find the perfect partner. you are _ work. but if you find the perfect partner, you are not— work. but if you find the perfect partner, you are not on - work. but if you find the perfect| partner, you are not on bumble! work. but if you find the perfect - partner, you are not on bumble! yes, exactl ! partner, you are not on bumble! yes, exactly! but— partner, you are not on bumble! yes, exactly! but what _ partner, you are not on bumble! yes, exactly! but what we _ partner, you are not on bumble! yes, exactly! but what we have _ partner, you are not on bumble! yes, exactly! but what we have here - partner, you are not on bumble! yes, exactly! but what we have here is - exactly! but what we have here is another example _ exactly! but what we have here is another example of _ exactly! but what we have here is another example of technology i exactly! but what we have here is - another example of technology being inserted into people's lives to replace human connections, human relationships and interactions. why do you think that is specifically dangerous to social control? i think it is about corporate _ dangerous to social control? i think it is about corporate capture - dangerous to social control? i think it is about corporate capture of- dangerous to social control? i think it is about corporate capture of a i it is about corporate capture of a society, — it is about corporate capture of a society, and creating dependence as

well, _ society, and creating dependence as well, making us, separating us off from _ well, making us, separating us off from our— well, making us, separating us off from our friends, loved ones, isolating _ from our friends, loved ones, isolating us effectively and making us emotionally, psychologically and practically dependent on what is effectively a business model, i think— effectively a business model, i think that is really worrying. what happens _ think that is really worrying. what happehs if— think that is really worrying. what happens if you switch off the electricity? that was one of the things— electricity? that was one of the things with one of the companies that run— things with one of the companies that run these ai chatbots relationships, replica,, when they were _ relationships, replica,, when they were having problems with abuse free to link— were having problems with abuse free to link -- _ were having problems with abuse free to link —— filtering through the system, — to link —— filtering through the system, and they took off the idea of a texting, people were bereft of these _ of a texting, people were bereft of these relationships that they thought they were having. —— textihg~ — thought they were having. —— texting. people were separated off from their— texting. people were separated off from their social environment, i think— from their social environment, i think that — from their social environment, i think that is very worrying. what i have always _ think that is very worrying. what i have always had _ think that is very worrying. what i have always had with _ think that is very worrying. what i have always had with the - think that is very worrying. what i have always had with the premise j think that is very worrying. what i i have always had with the premise of this programme is we highlight this, but we also show how it can be used to create benefits. i want to show

you how chatgpt 4.0 can be used to help someone who is blind? is the king in residence at the moment? yes, it looks like the king is in residence right now. the royal standard flag is flying above buckingham palace, which is the signal that the monarch is present. how exciting to be there while the king is home. try and tell me exactly what they are doing right now, please. um, right now the ducks are gently gliding across the water. they are moving in a fairly relaxed manner, not in a hurry. occasionally, one of them will dip its head onto the water, probably looking for food, and then pop back up. i even know when a taxi is coming with its orange light on. i think i'll hail it to get home. yes, i spotted one just now. it's heading your way on the left side of the road. get ready to wave it down. that is pretty extraordinary. it shows how responsive it is. i

listens voice and ijust shows how responsive it is. i listens voice and i just went to another chapter in your book which is about six robots and chatbots, which is where the dangerous thing comes in. —— six robots. you can make it dramatic, serious, you can make it dramatic, serious, you can make it dramatic, serious, you can make it sultry. and sexier. that, i think, is where you might become concerned. are we going to have young men particularly in the bedrooms who don't interact with one another, who lose the ability to communicate? it is what we are seeing already. this communicate? it is what we are seeing already.— communicate? it is what we are seeing already. as with the basic chatbots, this _ seeing already. as with the basic chatbots, this is _ seeing already. as with the basic chatbots, this is really _ seeing already. as with the basic chatbots, this is reallyjust - chatbots, this is reallyjust supercharging it. and i think we look_ supercharging it. and i think we took at — supercharging it. and i think we look at use cases what we have just seen, _ look at use cases what we have just seen. that— look at use cases what we have just seen. that is— look at use cases what we have just seen, that is fantastic. but that doesn't — seen, that is fantastic. but that doesn't mean that you necessarily heed _ doesn't mean that you necessarily need it— doesn't mean that you necessarily need it for— doesn't mean that you necessarily need it for everything all of the time, _ need it for everything all of the time, everywhere. ithink need it for everything all of the time, everywhere. i think that is one of— time, everywhere. i think that is one of the — one of the things that we see, with the way— one of the things that we see, with the way that al is being rolled out, and creating dependencies, social

phenomena, instead of looking at discrete _ phenomena, instead of looking at discrete use cases. i think the relationship question is really problematic, and when we look at where _ problematic, and when we look at where we — problematic, and when we look at where we are already, this come in at two _ where we are already, this come in at two years' — where we are already, this come in at two years' time and it is going to be _ at two years' time and it is going to be hugely problematic.- at two years' time and it is going to be hugely problematic. there was another story _ to be hugely problematic. there was another story i _ to be hugely problematic. there was another story i wanted _ to be hugely problematic. there was another story i wanted to _ to be hugely problematic. there was another story i wanted to look - to be hugely problematic. there was another story i wanted to look at - another story i wanted to look at before the break, who has got the reins on this, who is holding irrigation within companies. there were these three figures within open ai who were known as the duma is? they were saying that they need to exercise great caution. —— doomers. they were seen as a drag on the corporate profit. they are now gone. yes, it is hard to know what the circumstances were, whether this is fallout from what had happened before, a few months ago, and the one to wait and wait,... but before, a few months ago, and the one to wait and wait,...— before, a few months ago, and the one to wait and wait,... but some of this was mixed _

one to wait and wait,... but some of this was mixed up _ one to wait and wait,... but some of this was mixed up with _ one to wait and wait,... but some of this was mixed up with getting - one to wait and wait,... but some of this was mixed up with getting saml this was mixed up with getting sam altman out of the company. yes. this was mixed up with getting sam altman out of the company. yes, when i look at this. — altman out of the company. yes, when i look at this, some _ altman out of the company. yes, when i look at this, some of _ altman out of the company. yes, when i look at this, some of this _ altman out of the company. yes, when i look at this, some of this looks - i look at this, some of this looks like it was something they wanted to decide a while ago, but they didn't want to do it all at the same time, for the good of the company. i understand that some of them have gone to entropic which is more... has more ethical safeguards in place... has more ethical safeguards in lace... �* :, , :, has more ethical safeguards in lace... :, , ., ., , has more ethical safeguards in lace... �* :, , :, :, place... but does that worry you that these _ place... but does that worry you that these sorts _ place... but does that worry you that these sorts of _ place... but does that worry you that these sorts of people - place... but does that worry you that these sorts of people are i place... but does that worry you . that these sorts of people are being pushed out? in a that these sorts of people are being pushed out?— pushed out? in a way, but i'm a la er, pushed out? in a way, but i'm a lawyer. so _ pushed out? in a way, but i'm a lawyer. so i— pushed out? in a way, but i'm a lawyer, so i believe that - pushed out? in a way, but i'm a lawyer, so i believe that while l lawyer, so i believe that while the wheels— lawyer, so i believe that while the wheels of— lawyer, so i believe that while the wheels ofjustice turn very slowly, in effectively, they will provide the guard rails, so it is notjust about— the guard rails, so it is notjust about corporations and the people in corporations to guarantee our future. — corporations to guarantee our future. so — corporations to guarantee our future, so i think we are seeing regulators— future, so i think we are seeing regulators and courts catching up, even _ regulators and courts catching up, even with — regulators and courts catching up, even with things like we mentioned earlier. _ even with things like we mentioned earlier, with social media, things are starting to catch up, but it takes — are starting to catch up, but it takes a — are starting to catch up, but it takes a while, i don't think it is 'ust takes a while, i don't think it is just about _ takes a while, i don't think it is just about who is in the corporations. it is also who is about— corporations. it is also who is about in— corporations. it is also who is about in the corporations, and regulating those. i�*m about in the corporations, and regulating those.— about in the corporations, and regulating those. i'm glad you said that, regulating those. i'm glad you said that. because _ regulating those. i'm glad you said that, because i _ regulating those. i'm glad you said that, because i will— regulating those. i'm glad you said

that, because i will speak- regulating those. i'm glad you said that, because i will speak to - regulating those. i'm glad you said that, because i will speak to a - that, because i will speak to a commission investigating at brussels, i will speak about the rules and regulations with a focus on some of that in us congress as well. susie allegro, thank you for coming on. the book is really great, you should pick up a copy. —— alegra. after the break, the world in your pocket — the new ai app, released just 30 hours ago, that can translate any language in real time on your phone. i'll show you how it works, will give you a demo,

welcome back. let me paint you a picture. you are the creator of a new product, that could be sold in almost any market around the world. but you are limited by language. you don't have an interpreter. but then, no one really sells your product as well as you can. what if you could speak to your new clients, maybe a room of clients who all speak different languages, at the same time, in real time, and in their language. welcome to interprefy.

ever found yourself in a work—related situation where not everyone is fluent in the same language? introducing, interprefy now. instant ai—powered live translation for face—to—face gatherings, without the need for av equipment. you no longer need to default to only one language. interprefy now instantly unlocks every language with your phone, and is the key to seamless multilingual communication. whether you're in business meetings, guided tours, coaching sessions, negotiations and more. once the initial setup is done, all you have to do is share your qr code with your participants. participants scan the code to access as interprefy now. each attendee chooses the language they want to listen, read and speak in. and just like that, your gathering

is officially multilingual. how i've needed this for so long! with me, sven schumacher, marketing director of interprefy, and also here for our demo tonight, the ceo of interprefy, oddmund braaten. thank you for both coming in. how does it work? lets go through how it works? . ~ does it work? lets go through how it works? :, ~' , :, does it work? lets go through how it works? :, ,, , :, , does it work? lets go through how it works? :, ,, i. , . does it work? lets go through how it works? :, ,, , . ., works? thank you very much a leasure works? thank you very much a pleasure to — works? thank you very much a pleasure to be _ works? thank you very much a pleasure to be here. _ works? thank you very much a pleasure to be here. going - works? thank you very much a pleasure to be here. going to l works? thank you very much a l pleasure to be here. going to be showcasing for you tonight, an innovative of how people can communicate. we are going to be introducing interprefy now, allowing you to connect in over 6000 different language combinations using ai speech translation and captions at the click of a button on your phone. ii captions at the click of a button on your phone-— your phone. if were in a meeting, and we're — your phone. if were in a meeting, and we're all _ your phone. if were in a meeting, and we're all going _ your phone. if were in a meeting, and we're all going to _ your phone. if were in a meeting, and we're all going to link - your phone. if were in a meeting, l and we're all going to link together on our mobile phones, what have you got on your phone? show your phone to camera two, can you see that? there is a bar code there which i'm now going to scan, with my normal photo app, so then it brings up

interprefy now, i typing my name. it says christian fraser. i am joining this group. it says here, there are two functions, basically on the left side, it says english which is what i'm going to hear, and it has english which will be the text which will appear on my phone. this is where you come in. so you're going to speak norwegian, because you speak norwegian and i don't! hopefully... we try all sorts of things, let's see if this will work. you have a microphone, let's see if people can hear. talk to us in norwegian. he speaks norwegian. thank you so much for having us here today _

thank you so much for having us here today we _ thank you so much for having us here today we are — thank you so much for having us here today. we are very _ thank you so much for having us here today. we are very pleased _ thank you so much for having us here today. we are very pleased to - today. we are very pleased to present — today. we are very pleased to present our— today. we are very pleased to present our new _ today. we are very pleased to present our new product - today. we are very pleased to| present our new product which today. we are very pleased to i present our new product which is based _ present our new product which is based on — present our new product which is based on the _ present our new product which is based on the technology- present our new product which is based on the technology that - present our new product which is based on the technology that we | based on the technology that we have developed _ based on the technology that we have developed in — based on the technology that we have developed in the _ based on the technology that we have developed in the last _ based on the technology that we have developed in the last couple - based on the technology that we have developed in the last couple of- developed in the last couple of years — developed in the last couple of years if— developed in the last couple of years. if you _ developed in the last couple of years. if you are _ developed in the last couple of years. if you are an _ developed in the last couple of. years. if you are an international organisation _ years. if you are an international organisation or— years. if you are an international organisation or have _ years. if you are an internationall organisation or have international guests. _ organisation or have international guests. then _ organisation or have international guests. then you _ organisation or have international guests, then you can _ organisation or have international guests, then you can offer- guests, then you can offer interpretation _ guests, then you can offer interpretation in _ guests, then you can offer interpretation in 18- guests, then you can offer. interpretation in 18 different languages _ interpretation in 18 different languages it— interpretation in 18 different languages. it is— interpretation in 18 different languages. it is very - interpretation in 18 differentj languages. it is very simple. interpretation in 18 different - languages. it is very simple. you only need — languages. it is very simple. you only need mobile _ languages. it is very simple. you only need mobile phones- languages. it is very simple. you only need mobile phones and - languages. it is very simple. you| only need mobile phones and our simple _ only need mobile phones and our simple application. _ only need mobile phones and our simple application. this - only need mobile phones and our simple application.— simple application. this is, come on! then you _ simple application. this is, come on! then you let _ simple application. this is, come on! then you let technology - simple application. this is, come on! then you let technology to i simple application. this is, come | on! then you let technology to the ma . ic. .. on! then you let technology to the magic- -- yes. _ on! then you let technology to the magic... yes, but _ on! then you let technology to the magic... yes, but everyone - on! then you let technology to the magic... yes, but everyone so - on! then you let technology to the magic... yes, but everyone so you can do this — magic... yes, but everyone so you can do this on _ magic... yes, but everyone so you can do this on a _ magic... yes, but everyone so you can do this on a google! _ magic... yes, but everyone so you can do this on a google! can - magic... yes, but everyone so you| can do this on a google! can speak magic... yes, but everyone so you i can do this on a google! can speak a language and it will translate it into another language but the point is that you then has to share your phone with someone else, writes? and there's a difference with this. everyone can have their mobile phone to me don't need any special kits, and you can have as many languages in the room you want because it is translated into that language. one is the practical application of that? explained to me how it will create profit for businesses, small and medium sized businesses who

can't afford an interpreter. so a ractical can't afford an interpreter. so a practical solution, _ can't afford an interpreter. so a practical solution, a _ can't afford an interpreter. sr 5. practical solution, a scenario, where london, we have the opening tour buses, with those buses, we have multiple different cultural aspects of terrorism which is entering and visiting london on a daily basis. —— tourism. those buses have specific times for specific languages depending on which translators were available at that time. we are allowing them to do with interprefy now is that they can equip their guests all the tourists with the interprefy now app regardless of which language they speak and they will be able to listen, hearand read. speak and they will be able to listen, hear and read. you don't need german — listen, hear and read. you don't need german buses _ listen, hear and read. you don't need german buses on - listen, hear and read. you don't| need german buses on particular listen, hear and read. you don't - need german buses on particular day, you have a different number of buses, to up your buses. those buses don't have to — buses, to up your buses. those buses don't have to have _ buses, to up your buses. those buses don't have to have time _ buses, to up your buses. those buses don't have to have time slots. - buses, to up your buses. those buses don't have to have time slots. as - don't have to have time slots. as ou don't have to have time slots. as you said at the top, equally, if you have a product that you wanted to sell me don't necessarily speak the language, you are working with vodafone, vodafone in europe, all the different countries they reveal

to speak to them in real—time. what about dialect? the are semi different dialects. how good is this. does it capture everything? it is very good. it this. does it capture everything? it is very good-— is very good. it is better than most --eole at is very good. it is better than most people at understanding _ is very good. it is better than most people at understanding accents i is very good. it is better than most i people at understanding accents and dialects _ people at understanding accents and dialects if— people at understanding accents and dialects. if they speak normal english — dialects. if they speak normal english as their language, is the use very— english as their language, is the use very slang words it might not -et use very slang words it might not get it. _ use very slang words it might not get it. but— use very slang words it might not get it, but it is trained on a lot of data — get it, but it is trained on a lot of data and _ get it, but it is trained on a lot of data and is getting better all the time — of data and is getting better all the time on dialects... so of data and is getting better all the time on dialects. . .- of data and is getting better all the time on dialects... so we tried it in ukrainian _ the time on dialects... so we tried it in ukrainian today, _ the time on dialects... so we tried it in ukrainian today, there - the time on dialects... so we tried it in ukrainian today, there are - the time on dialects... so we tried it in ukrainian today, there are 80| it in ukrainian today, there are 80 different languages, 80 times 80 is 6000 and something... it can do... what do you make of this, the evangelist of ai? is this what you would take to the altar? i noticed that the real-time _ would take to the altar? i noticed that the real-time streaming - would take to the altar? i noticed that the real-time streaming is i that the real—time streaming is really strong, i noticed... i do wonder about how you, which is a

question that i face, how do you compete with open ai? is open ai decide to do something like this, how do you stay ahead? [10 decide to do something like this, how do you stay ahead?- decide to do something like this, how do you stay ahead? do you get swam ed how do you stay ahead? do you get swamped by _ how do you stay ahead? do you get swamped by the — how do you stay ahead? do you get swamped by the big _ how do you stay ahead? do you get swamped by the big boys? - how do you stay ahead? do you get swamped by the big boys? we - how do you stay ahead? do you get. swamped by the big boys? we actually utilise the technology _ swamped by the big boys? we actually utilise the technology from _ swamped by the big boys? we actually utilise the technology from the - swamped by the big boys? we actually utilise the technology from the big - utilise the technology from the big boys. _ utilise the technology from the big boys. we _ utilise the technology from the big boys, we don't develop our own core technology— boys, we don't develop our own core technology and actually the big boys when they are the corporate gatherings, they are using our technology for their own internal meetings — technology for their own internal meetings or for the customers. they have embraced this development and we developed it for the professional users _ we developed it for the professional users. so— we developed it for the professional users. . we developed it for the professional users. , :, :, ., ,, . . users. so it is more of a specific users. so it is more of a specific use case? _ users. so it is more of a specific use case? specific— users. so it is more of a specific use case? specific book - users. so it is more of a specific use case? specific book for - use case? specific book for professional _ use case? specific book for professional use _ use case? specific book for professional use cases, - professional use cases, multi—language, multilingual... where — multi—language, multilingual... where does this technology go, do you think? fist where does this technology go, do ou think? : . where does this technology go, do ou think? : :, ., ~ , you think? at the rate that al is advancing _ you think? at the rate that al is advancing and _ you think? at the rate that al is advancing and some _ you think? at the rate that al is advancing and some of- you think? at the rate that al is advancing and some of the - advancing and some of the innovations that we have been producing, i would say the sky is the limit. for the technology

itself, that is. from the interprefy now side of things we have definitely got more innovations coming out, that will really excite the world and advance our interprefy now solutions, but the technology itself, it is really going to evolve into something, ifeel, is going itself, it is really going to evolve into something, i feel, is going to be a human aid. there is lots of conversations that this is going to replace, but i think this is ageing not replacing. take interprefy now, this is helping us reach the language barrier, and create connections with different people, cultures and languages. lots connections with different people, cultures and languages.— connections with different people, cultures and languages. lots of oaky medications — cultures and languages. lots of oaky medications these _ cultures and languages. lots of oaky medications these days _ cultures and languages. lots of oaky medications these days are - cultures and languages. lots of oaky medications these days are through | medications these days are through conference sites, through teams. do you have it incorporated into those sorts of websites? that you have it incorporated into those sorts of websites?— you have it incorporated into those sorts of websites? that is where we are coming — sorts of websites? that is where we are coming from. _ sorts of websites? that is where we are coming from. we _ sorts of websites? that is where we are coming from. we are _ sorts of websites? that is where we are coming from. we are integrated into 80 different _ are coming from. we are integrated into 80 different platforms, - are coming from. we are integratedj into 80 different platforms, teams, zouma _ into 80 different platforms, teams, zouma. this is where our product, 'ust zouma. this is where our product, just for— zouma. this is where our product, just for onside, having it on site,

but also — just for onside, having it on site, but also the _ just for onside, having it on site, but also the integration of the online — but also the integration of the online platforms. —— zoom. | but also the integration of the online platforms. -- zoom. i have set my vista _ online platforms. -- zoom. i have set my vista very _ online platforms. -- zoom. i have set my vista very large, _ online platforms. -- zoom. i have set my vista very large, but - online platforms. -- zoom. i have set my vista very large, but i'm i set my vista very large, but i'm looking at this, thinking, the next time i go to spain and i need a plumber! time i go to spain and i need a plumber i can talk about the technical things that i can't say. lots of my language is colloquial, but it arrives —— revolves around a bar. you could talk to anybody about literally anything. we are out of time, some extraordinary technology coming out which we try to show you every week on this programme. sven, gregory, thank you very much for that. samir, thank you as ever for your guiding prescence. —— presents. next week on the programme, our theme will be the rules governing ai. stay with us here on bbc news. hello. today has brought a real patchwork of weather across the uk. for some, it's been a story of blue sky and sunshine. northern scotland doing

very well for brightness and indeed for warmth, whereas in derbyshire, it was a very different affair — some very heavy rain. and for others, well, it stayed pretty misty and murky for a good part of the day, especially close to north sea coasts. now, the wettest of the weather is sliding away westwards, taken away by this little wiggle on this weather front. so the rain tending to clear away from wales as we head into the night, but a band of cloud left behind across the north of wales, the north midlands, northern england — quite murky and drizzly in places here. some fog patches elsewhere as well. temperatures generally between 7—12 degrees. we mayjust see a few places getting a little bit chillier than that. into friday morning, there will be some areas of mist and murk. this band of cloud sitting in place across parts of northern england, but all of that mist and low cloud and fog tends to lift up and break in most places to give some spells of sunshine. may just stay a bit murky for some north sea coasts, which will suppress the temperatures, but in the best

of the sunshine, values up into the low 20s celsius, maybe 23 in parts of western scotland. now, as we head towards the weekend, it stays pretty mixed — mist and fog at night and early in the morning. some spells of warm sunshine, but also a scattering of heavy showers. in fact, some more persistent rain to start saturday morning across parts of south—east england as this next wriggling weather front just bends its way in, so could be a wet start down towards the south and the south—east. elsewhere, quite a lot of mist and murk and low cloud as we start the day. could be a grey and gloomy start. and for some, it could be a slow process to clear that mist and murk, but most places should see some sunshine by saturday afternoon. small chance for a shower, particularly seeing some showers down towards the south. temperatures in glasgow up to 23 degrees, but i think we will see more cloud generally across scotland on sunday, perhaps into northern ireland, the far north of england as well — could see the odd spell of rain with that. england and wales seeing more sunshine, just the chance for one or two showers, and temperature—wise, most places into the high teens or low 20s celsius.

hello, i'm christian fraser. you're watching the context on bbc news. there is literally no branch of government that michael cohen has not lied to.

he lied to investigators, he lied the judge who sentenced him, he lied to the united states congress and he committed these lies for his own benefit. the defence continues their attack against michael cohen, of course, because he is the star witness, the one on which the outcome of this trial really hinges, because he is the only one who directly ties donald trump to the business falsification alleged scheme. the jury just the juryjust might the jury just might believe the juryjust might believe michael cohen _ the juryjust might believe michael cohen and — the juryjust might believe michael cohen and if— the juryjust might believe michael cohen and if they— the juryjust might believe michael cohen and if they believe - the juryjust might believe michael cohen and if they believe him, - the juryjust might believe michael cohen and if they believe him, it i the juryjust might believe michael cohen and if they believe him, it is over _ cohen and if they believe him, it is over michaei— cohen and if they believe him, it is over. michael cohen _ cohen and if they believe him, it is over. michael cohen has _ cohen and if they believe him, it is over. michael cohen has given- over. michael cohen has given testimony— over. michael cohen has given testimony that— over. michael cohen has given testimony that if— over. michael cohen has given testimony that if believed, - over. michael cohen has given- testimony that if believed, donald trump _ testimony that if believed, donald trump very— testimony that if believed, donald trump very well— testimony that if believed, donald trump very well knew _ testimony that if believed, donald trump very well knew what - testimony that if believed, donald trump very well knew what the i trump very well knew what the payments — trump very well knew what the payments were _ trump very well knew what the payments were for. _ joining me tonight are the former conservative mpjustine greening and david litt, author and former speech writer for president barack obama. looking forward to talking to our panel this evening.

first, the latest headlines... a man has been charged with the attempted murder