sally yates was fired after she refused to defend that. tomorrow night on 360, tune in for my interview with sally yates. she and i had an extensive conversation this morning. her first and only television interview was fascinating. she talked about the firing of james comey, her own dismissal, the version of events from the white house. that's at 8:00 eastern right here tomorrow night on cnn. time to hand things over to chris cuomo hosting the cnn town hall with fancy pelosi. [ applause ] good evening. we are here in washington, d.c. for a live special cnn town hall event with house minority leader democrat nancy pelosi of california. i'm chris cuomo. we are continuing to bring you

breaking news. "the washington post" reporting that president trump revealed highly classified information to russia in his oval office meeting with russia's foreign minister and ambassador just last week. the classified information involves potential terror plots by isis and the possible u.s. response. white house denies these reports. how they deny them has become very relevant. to be sure, there are shock waves reverberating around washington. we have one of the highest ranking democrats in washington here to weigh in. please welcome leader nancy pelosi. [ applause ] >> well, the timing and the

importance of the conversation has changed in light of this washington post report. at the onset, what do you believe from what you have heard so far about the reports from "the washington post" and the response from the white house? >> let me first say, when you extended the invitation to have this town hall a couple of weeks ago, little did we know that fbi director would be fired. that's going to change the town hall. little did we know we would have a matter of this consequence. as you may know, for over 20 years i've been a member of the intelligence committee or the gang of eight. longer than anybody, actually, in history. our work there -- we had some differences over time. has never been political. hopefully, this won't be as well. but from what we have heard -- again, the facts are what are important. from what we have heard, this is a very serious matter. this is code word source highly

classified information revealed to an adversarial country. to do so in a way, they are very sophisticated on intelligence. this is what they do. >> the concern would be what? if the report is true. >> well that even if the president didn't reveal a source or method that what he did reveal could be traced very directly to a source and method. >> what would that mean? >> that endangers a couple things. it endangers the person or persons, the activity. it could undermine an operation that could be saving lives. and it undermines the trust that we would have with our allies, our liaison relationship, intelligence relationship that we have with other countries that they share carefully not expecting the president of the

united states to be wittingly or unwittingly. >> if this is true, it might accelerate a time frame by isis? >> it could. >> we have heard that from security experts. >> of course. you never want the target to know they're the target. or that you are on to them in a certain way. that has accelerated their actions in the past. that's another danger. >> very important for reporting purposes, "the washington post" has their headline. they say it's well sourced. the white house came out quickly and aggressively in the form of general h.r. mcmaster. he gave a rejection of the story. let me play it for you now. >> good evening, everybody. i have a brief statement for the record. there's nothing that the president takes more seriously than the security of the american people.

the story that came out tonight as reported is false. the president and the foreign minister reviewed a range of common threats to our two countries, including threats to civil aviation. at no time -- at no time were intelligence sources or methods discussed. the president did not disclose any military operations that were not already publically known. two other senior officials who were present, including the secretary of state, remember the meeting the same way and have said so. they' their on the record accounts should outweigh anonymous sources. thank you. >> the general did not take any questions. "the washington post" says they stand by their story. are you satisfied with what you heard from the white house? >> no. what the general said that was very telling to me is the president did not reveal

anything that was not in the public domain. >> in terms of operations. >> he said in terms of -- did he say the public domain or in the public whatever. >> publically known, military operations. >> the fact is that anyone who has anything to do with intelligence, the one thing you always say is, i cannot confirm or deny that that is true. the president could be saying something that's in the public domain but confirming it to the russians in a way that is very dangerous. as i say, if it was on purpose, that would be terrible. and if it was not, if it was accidental, that would be very terrible, too. >> so let's talk about the impact of this on several different levels. the first one is, it seems as though general mcmaster was saying, the president didn't say anything about who was giving us this information. which is a primary concern. you don't want to reveal a source or ally. however, that's not what the washington post is reporting.

they are saying that he gave highly classified information about the what -- about what the threat is, what may be done, what may be the response. are those different in your mind as well? >> the fact is is that -- i may not give you somebody's name, but if i describe a certain circumstance, you can engineer back and figure out by the process of elimination what the source or the method is. sources and methods are very protected. and you don't -- the president of the united states is not likely to come out and say chris cuomo is the person. but if he describes a situation that by the process of elimination endangers you, that's a bad thing. we have an expression, there are signs up in the intelligence roo rooms that say lose lips can sink ships. it's really true. these shall we say accidental --

i don't know what word to describe for the president. this messy approach to intelligence that is very endangering. our intelligence people around the world are super patriots. they work very hard to protect the american people. when first went on intelligence, it was about protection, in case we were going into a military operation, how we avoid it in the first place, have the proper intelligence so our military can succeed and quickly. then it's expanded to all kinds of things, terrorism, still force protection very important. but they take -- what they and their families sacrifice is so much. we have to have so much appreciation for what they do. we cannot have the president of the united states being casually loose lipped about confirming something, even if it's in the public domain, to an adversarial

nation. >> by that you mean russia and who he was meeting with there. in terms of getting to the bottom of it, have you reached out to the white house? do you believe there's a need for the gang of eight to convene and find out from any existing transcript what was said, what it means, what must be done? >> you know, i would hope we will be able to proceed in a none pa non-parts s non-partisan way. this is as serious as it gets. our first responsibility to protect the american people. the intelligence community is a very important part of that. this really needs to be addressed. my understanding from the report is they talked about something that has to do with aviation. and they have scheduled an aviation briefing, classified briefing for thursday. maybe totallycoincidental. nonetheless, they scheduled an

aviation briefing. up until now we had not received word from the white house that this had happened. >> how do you read that? >> i think there's really -- they are disorganized. i thought the statement of mcmasters was sad for him, for him to come out and speak in that way. >> why? >> because you have to know that to say nothing i -- the president said was anything that wasn't in the public domain completely opened the door to, what's that? what's that? the other part of it is -- i think it's really important to -- this is very serious business -- activity with other countries. what was revealed in that is highly classify ied code word source. this is as high level of classification as -- this is nothing casual just stamp secret because you just assume people didn't talk about it.

this is dangerous. i would hope that it would be a lesson to the president to have his daily intelligence briefings. so he understands the connection from one report to the next about how thorough everyone else is on this, how important our liaison relationships are about information -- intelligence we share with other countries. and that he has a higher respect for what the intelligence community does. >> you have what it means about the president and what it means for the president. the first question. do you believe that this is true, what is reported in the washington post, that this goes to the competency of donald trump to be president? >> i think it goes to the preparedness or lack thereof of president donald trump to be president. this is sloppy and he can

correct it. but we have to know more about it. >> how does he correct it if he already told them the information? >> he can't do it again. this can't be -- i don't know. did he -- let me put this in context. he is meeting with the russian foreign minister. usually a president meets with heads of state. he is meeting with the russian foreign minister. two days before, he fired the director of the fbi with some suspicion that he did so because he didn't like, in his own words, the russian investigation. two days after that firing was the day when the director of the fbi was supposed to address the intelligence committee with the global threat report, may 11th is the day of global threats report. so why would he fire him two days before he is going to be making this very important presentation with our intelligence and security people

to the congress of the united states? what did he not want them to hear? >> what is your suspicion? >> and then at the request of putin, he meets with the foreign minist minister. >> do you think there's a correlation. >> has loose lips. it's too much of a coincidence to be a coincidence. there's something wrong with this picture. all at the same time as people are saying -- this you have to be careful because this is its own incident. but it's about russia. and every day i ask the question, what do the russians have on donald trump? financially, politically or personally that he is always catering to them. >> that goes to the second question. what does this mean for the president? members of your party have been very critical. they are using this as proof of his not being up to the job. republicans, senator corker used

the phrase, downward spiral for the white house. do you see a level of crisis or do you just see sloppiness in getting their sea legs in a new administration? >> in my work -- this is over 20 years in intelligence and a long time on the ethics committee where we make judgments about people's behavior, it's only about the facts, the rules and the law. so we have to see what the facts are in this situation. and how far did he go and what this was about. i think that -- in some ways i'm sorry this is all so public. because it's very, very, very damaging. it's very damaging. but the fact is, it is public and the president has to answer for this. we expect to have some briefings in the congress about this. i would be on the gang of eight. the four leaders of the committee, house and senate,

democratic and republican, and the four leaders of the congress. we expect to have it soon. but again, to try to take us to a safer place. the president did not do that. >> what do you need to hear from president trump? is this about an apology? is this about a recognition of a need to do things differently? do you expect to hear anything at all? >> well, i would hope that the president would say -- since this all centers around russia -- let the investigation of the russian connection continue. you cannot separate this behavior of trying to please the russians from what is this. what is this? we have a call over 75% of the american people support a commission -- an outside commission, not the congress, to do the investigation. i think that congress can do some investigating or special prosecutor, an outside counsel. this might be the place where the republicans stop hiding the truth from the american people

about the russian connection. >> that is a good point to stop our one on one conversation. let's bring in the audience. the idea of what will our leaders in washington, of all political stripes, do to ensure the safety of the american people. let's bring in jody pratt. she's a state at home mom from washington, d.c. she has a check about checks and balances. thank you for being with us. >> thanks. i have lost faith in the willingness of the republican led congress to stand up to president trump. in this current environment, can we have any assurances our system of checks and balances is working and that congress is holding him to account? >> there were concerns about checks and balances before this issue came out tonight. this is in its own place. this is a very discreet indiscreet happening. on the checks and balances, there was very serious concern

about the firing of director comey in the manner in which it happened. you know what? you always have to be hopeful. when we had the majority and president bush was president, we worked with him. what could be worse than starting a war in iraq? despite that, we worked very closely with president bush on many issues. the biggest energy bill in the history of our country, the aids drugs, we wanted it big. with h we had our agreement on that. the list goes on and on of so many things that we did working with president bush. he was one of the best presidents in terms of immigration in our country. his father was, too. all of our presidents have been except president trump. the party -- we have a responsibility to the american people to find common ground where we can. when president obama was president, the republicans made clear was the most important

thing we can do is to make sure he doesn't succeed. again, we can't follow that example. >> what do you say -- >> we want to work together, if it's infrastructure bill, if it's legislation for work/home balance in terms of issues that relate to family leave. some of the things that he said in the campaign. a tax reform simply if i indicati -- simpsi simplification. we always have to strive for that. we did not make any declaration against him that the republicans made against president obama. >> what do you say about the practical affect some of your members, mostly al green. said this is time for impeachment. that word is getting thrown around. do you say to your members of your party, slow down? that is not a way to bridge any

kind of divide with the republicans. >> no. but it's what they -- it's a reflection of what they're hearing in their own constituencies. we have been -- some of that is picked up this past week. we have been out of session. he will see them tomorrow when i come back. they know i don't subscribe to that. in other words, again, if you are talking about impeachment, you are talking about what are the facts. not i don't like him and his hair and -- what are the facts? i don't like what he said about this. what are the facts that you would make a case on? what are the rules that he may have violated? if you don't have that case, you are just participating in more hearsay. that's not the basis of -- we owe the american people some stability in all of this. this is the time where he is

supposed to be having his honeymoon. what a marriage. we watch and see what he is going to do, what is his vision, how is he going to implement it. it's been sloppy. >> we are 20 minutes in. let's take a break. we have more audience questions about a lot of topics, including the breaking news. we have an urgent question about the future of health care from an audience member who says her life may be at stake. stay with us for more with house democratic leader nancy pelosi. cnn town hall continues.

i was thinking around 70. to and before that?re? you mean after that? no, i'm talking before that. do you have things you want to do before you retire? i'd really like to run with the bulls. wow. hope you're fast. i am. get a portfolio that works for you now and as your needs change with investment management services. tired of paying hundreds more a year in taxes and fees for your unlimited plan? only t-mobile gives you unlimited data with taxes and fees included. that'll save you hundreds. get two lines for a hundred dollars. that's right. two lines of unlimited data. a hundred bucks. all in. and right now, we're giving you even more. for a limited time, get a free samsung galaxy s8 when you buy one. that's two galaxy s8s for the price one! plus, two lines of unlimited data for a hundred bucks. taxes and fees included. only at t-mobile.

heri think i might burst..... totally immersed weekenders. whatever kind of weekender you are, there's a hilton for you. book your weekend break direct with hilton.com and join the summer weekenders. find fast relief behind the counter allergies with nasal congestion? with claritin-d. [ upbeat music ] strut past that aisle for the allergy relief that starts working in as little as 30 minutes and contains the best oral decongestant. live claritin clear, with claritin-d.

[ applause ] all right. welcome back to the cnn town hall. we have minority leader nancy pelosi on such an important night given the breaking news. we want to get back to audience questions. we have a history professor from pennsylvania. you have a question about russian influence. >> i do. good each, leader pelosi. thank you for having me. my question is, is there any evidence that the political rhetoric of the trump administration has been influenced by the views and practices of the putin

government? >> well, good question. thank you for asking it. one of the concerns that we have is that russia is an adversary to the united states. and yet when the president became president-elect, he was putting putin on a pedestal and he was questioning whether we should even have sanctions against russia for their aggression in ukraine and crimea. questioning the undermining the relationship we have with nato, which is our transatlantic friendship for security. it was like, why on earth is he undermining our allies and praising putin? so that's one of the things that we want to see about the investigation. because it relates to -- as i said, financial. what is the financial connection? political. they did -- it's an absolute fact disrupt our election by

hacking and leaking. the question is, was there collusion? third, personally. what is it that is making him do all these special things for the russians? you only know that if you base it on fact and not just rumor and hearsay if you have this. that's why we are saying, let's find out the truth. let the chips fall where they may. he has nothing to hide, he shouldn't be opposing nor should my republican colleagues in congress be opposing the release of the tax returns, any of the investigation into other aspects of the trump/russia connection. that's why when something like this comes up, it's like predictable almost sadly. >> then you have the connection to what happened with the dismissal of the director of the fbi. we have a question about that from the audience. jake lee, small businessowner from west hollywood, california. >> hello. good evening, madam leader. >> thank you.

>> before the election on november 8, your side of the aisle were asking for the former head of the fbi to resign. now that he has been let go, why the sudden and selective outrage from your side of the aisle? >> i appreciate that. some people were asking him to be let go. i said i thought it wasn't a good -- he wasn't well suited to the heat that comes with the job. i never said he should be fired. for the president of the united states to fire somebody with his own self-admission that he didn't like -- he was tired of the russia/trump probe is distressing. it's distressing. we believe and the fbi is being an independent law enforcement agency to be respected. and not to be fired by the president because he's tire of

about an investigation they're doing. that's what was the nature and timing of it. if he had these concerns about how hillary clinton was treated, he could have let him go a long time ago, not two days before he was supposed to do the global threat assessment that may have included russia. >> the window into potential motivations before the president gave his interview and basically said that everything we have been told by the white house was not so was a paragraph about how the director of the fbi james comey had told him on three occasions that he was not a subject of the investigation. do you believe that those conversations took place? >> i believe that the president putting in that -- in a letter of dismissal but thanking him for saying i'm not was weird. that was really weird. we're talking weird. weird means, what? highly unusual. inappropriate. why is he doing this? in the same way as i thought

that the memo from the deputy attorney general was not -- i'm not disagreeing factuall aboy a what he said. but to go on and on about -- titling titling it, restoring the reputation of the fbi. the president asked him make a case against comey. that's what he did. he did it in a way was not prosecutorial. it was more like, i will do an op-ed for "the wall street journal." it was a very -- that was -- i felt sorry for mcmaster. what? this is not professional. this is beneath your dignity of the service that you have both given to our country. to have the kinds of statements that they made. your question is a good one. >> speaking about service to the

country, let's bring in retired colonel emily buckman. thank you for your service. she has a question about north korea. you and your husband served? >> thank you so much for spending the evening with us tonight. as a 26-year veteran as chris mentioned having served in iraq and afghanistan and actually having served when general mcmasters was in afghanistan, i have the utmost respect for him. >> wonderful. >> he is a man of integrity, when he says what he says, i believe what he says. that's from 26 years. but i can tell you that having been in the military, there's no room for divisiveness or division when you are talking about national security. given that and the importance of unity when you are fighting or when you are fighting countries like isis or the isis regime and also when you look at north korea and the threat that they

represent, we have to lean on your experience and with the intelligence community, with leading in the congress, to go across party lines and make things better. i'm just looking to you on how you are doing that. giving your experience instead of being divisive and just creating division. how are you changing that story for us? >> thank you, colonel, for your service and your husband's, for your family's patriotism. when i said i was story about the general and i agree with you, i have seen him in afghanistan. i know of his great service to our country. all i said was he said one sentence that left the door open. he didn't say anything that wasn't in the public domain. that kept him honest and left the door open for us to look further. i've been to north korea. i'm one of the few members of congress that have been to

pyongyang as a member of the intelligence committee a number of years ago. you are playing with fire when you mess with them without a real plan, without listening to our military who, by the way, we're so proud of. i advocate the use of force as a last resort, as a last resort. even with the president cutting the state department budget 30%, general mattis said i'm going to have to have more ammunition. we have to have our diplomacy as part of our national security. in terms of the subjects, you are right. we take an oath to protect and defend the constitution and, of course, the american people. we have to try to do that in the most non-partisan way. i do not though think it's inappropriate for us to object to the militarization of our foreign policy, to cut diplomacy and increase the defense budget

without -- what is the mission? if we need this money, we're all there for it. but show us the mission. is this just to cut investments in the alevation of poverty, eradication of disease, lowering the fury that exists in some places for terrorist recruitment and the rest. so we have to have balance. i think we do. i think we will have bipartisan cooperation to fight that budget cut on the state department. i think you would be pleased to see the collaboration that happens in the congress in terms of respecting the work of our men and women in uniform. that's one of our -- we talk about honoring the vision of our founders. respecting the sacrifice of our men and women in uniform and recognizing the aspirations of our children. that's our purpose there.

that's what guides us. >> the colonel put her finger on a very important issue, which is how do we bridge that gap? how do we get more out of washington that affects political culture but also health care. let's talk about that when we come back. stay with us. we have house democratic leader nancy pelosi. talking about the future of health care and more when the cnn town hall continues. [ applause ]

when this bell rings... ...it starts a chain reaction... ...that's heard throughout the connected business world. at&t network security helps protect business, from the largest financial markets to the smallest transactions, by sensing cyber-attacks in near real time and automatically deploying countermeasures. keeping the world of business connected and protected. that's the power of and.

[customer] have you ever walkedp into the paint store feeling like you should really know more than you know? satin versus semi-gloss, and...i don't know! [team member] yes...i know the feeling. [customer] that's how i feel right now about all the financing options for this project i'm doing. i feel like i should know more than i know. [team member] don't sweat it. we have this new tool--my credit options guide-- that gives you a customized comparison like this, which helps you discover which credit options might be right for you. [customer] oh, this is better. they should make one for paint. [team member] want to get started? [customer] sure. you need one of these. you wouldn't put up with an umbrella that covers you part way, so when it comes to pain relievers, why put up with just part of a day? aleve, live whole not part. tell you what, i'll give it to you for half off.

♪ whatever it is that floats your boat... ...or tickles your tastebuds... ...or brightens your day... ...even if you've never tried it before... ♪ ...just know that... you can, in portland. some build walls to keep people out. but these are walls that welcome you in. within these walls, california's educators create safe places for every student to learn and grow. where teachers open minds to history... unleash creativity... and show our kids the future. some build walls to divide us. but the california teachers association knows these are walls that bring us together. because quality public schools build a better california for all of us. because quality public schools ♪ whatever it is that floats your boat... ...or tickles your tastebuds...

...or brightens your day... ...even if you've never tried it before... ♪ ...just know that... you can, in portland. [ applause ] welcome back to the cnn town hall. it's a big night. we're handling a number of topics with the democratic house leader nancy pelosi. it's good to have you with us with all this breaking news. let's take on the topic of how to create positive change in washington on the policy of health care. we have a question from the audience. katie, college student from arkansas. she confronted senator tom cotton about health care at one of his town halls, the message was loud and clear to people.

thank you for joining us. what's your question? >> thank you. leader pelosi, i was diagnosed with a rare, incurable genetic connective tissue disorder several years ago. i keep getting worse. they are talking feeding tube, they're talking pacemaker. i have a chemo port to get fluids and nutrients. basically, my parents are dead. i'm a college student. i can't work. without the aca that saved my life, without the protections of the aca, i will die. that's not hyperbole. i'm going to die. i'm only 26 years old. i want to be a music teacher. i want to be maybe a doctor. i don't -- even with the pain and operations, i don't want to die yet. so my question to you is, what will you do to ensure lower out-of-pocket expenses, not higher, with the same or better

benefits regardless of age, income or pre-existing condition and sustaining medicare and medicaid expansion? in short going against everything that the current ahca is standing for. what will you do in short, congresswoman to save my life and the lives of americans like myself? >> thank you, katie, for sharing your story with us. it all gives us solemn moment to pause and again thank god for the blessings that he has given others of us. so many people in our country, over 123 million people or more, have a pre-existing medical condition. your case is, as you described, something very exceptional. nonetheless, a child born with heart defect, this or that, it's the kimmel baby is -- that's repeated all over the country without the same kind of resources to care for it.

the whole point right now is to defeat that bill. because that bill raises costs for fewer benefits, has an age tax for anyone 50 to 64, kicks 24 million people -- 24 million fewer people will not have access to health care, undermines medicare and the point that you made is, it has the essential benefits like pre-existing conditions are left up to the states. the way people have said it to me at town meetings and across the country and airports and wherever i see people is, they will say, this is a death panel bill. because people will die. martin luther king said of all the inequalities, the most unjust and stunning is the injustice of access to health care, because people will die. so what we're doing is to fight

that legislation and to make it now -- it passed the house. it has only gotten worse. you have to understand, it's part of a deconstruction of government. they want to privatize social security, take the guarantee away from medicare, devastate medicaid and not have the affordable health care as we know it but some -- i call it up -- it's a cowardly act to say i'm going to take away your pre-existing conditions. i'm going to say to the states, you do it. you make the judgement as to what pre-existing conditions you will cover or not. that's why across the country people are telling their stories. their stories have sad endings in many cases without the affordable care act. what we're saying is, hey, once we can put this thing to bed, once and for all, and let's hope that same kind of advocacy that prevailed at first in the house

will prevail in the senate, then we can talk about how we expand te pool. the more people in the pool, the healthier the pool, the lower the cost. how he can with have more middle income people have access to the tax credits. how we lower the cost of prescription drugs, because that's one of the biggest contributors to the increase in costs in medical care. how we do this, much of this is a part of affordable care act. some of it has expired. our colleagues do who don't want the affordable care act have not allowed some of that to continue. you see when you pass a bill and it's implemented what things you can do better and we are prepared to do that. we think this -- affordable care act, otherwise known as obamacare, has good bones. it needs some renewal of some of it and it needs some expansion of other of it. >> let's talk about that.

we have a question that goes to that point specifically from dave. he runs a bed and breakfast. >> tell me your name again. >> dave mcdonald. >> leader pelosi, chris, thank you. leader pelosi, earlier you said we all have a responsibility to pull together to govern the country. >> that's right. >> can you commit to specific policy areas that the democrats will work with republicans on to make health care better for all americans, even if that means that we have to repeal certain provisions of a law that you worked so lard to pass? >> well, i think that -- i know how we can improve the affordable care act. the bill that the republicans have put forth is not a bill in good faith. as i say, it's called by many a death panel bill because it is there to eliminate that access to affordable care. if the president were to say to me, come in and see what we can do about this, we could get it done. if your goal is the

deconstruction of government and to say we're not going to have an affordable care act, we're just going to have a death panel bill posing as a -- let me say this other thing. i think it's really important for you to know this. this bill -- this death panel bill is a tax bill disguised as a health care bill. it moves $600 billion from working class families to the richest people in our country. it's a tax bill in disguise as a health care bill. it's a very dangerous bill to people, children and other living people. it must be stopped. again, you have to understand, there is no good faith in that bill. they don't want to expand medicaid. do you know how many people -- one in eight people in our country are dependent on

medicaid. seniors take advantage of it for long-term health care. people with disabilities, poor children. there are many of them, they are the least costly of the whole bill. medicare, they want to -- separate legislation, take away the guarantee of medicare because they want it to in their words wither on the vine. you have to -- you have to talk to both sides of this and say, are we ready to say that health care is a right for all americans and not just available for the privileged few who could afford it? >> the criticism of the aca is you know it has problems. you said a moment ago it's got good bones. it needs to be fixed. the criticism is you know those bones have been broken for a while. you didn't make the fixes. it allowed for there to be animosity that grew towards the bill and created political currency with it and that now the republicans are in control but the democrats have been content to sit back and watch their problems with the ahca

instead of reaching across doing what dave and others are talking about and maybe taking some losses in terms of what's in the aca, but in the interest of bettering it for everybody. are those fair criticisms? >> i think that you have to understand this. now we're going to talk a little bit about how things are done. the only way to fix the affordable care act is to kill the republican bill. because they can't mate. there is no reconciliation between the two. because one is for health care for all americans, not just the privileged few. the other one is a tax break for the wealthiest people in our country. when we say about the affordable care act, no, some of these things have expired since the re-insurance provision of the bill. some of these things were in the affordable care actmajority, thd not renew them. >> you have marketplaces where you have people leaving. spiking premiums. >> if you have -- if you have an -- by the way, you have to be

agnost agnostic. put it on table. this is not about being wedded to something it's because something we wrote. you go to a negotiation, find every good idea you can, right, left, center. it's not about pride of ownership. it's the simple fact that if you have a bill and the fundamental piece is to expand the pool to have newer, younger people in it and the republicans come in and say we're not going to do any more outreach to this, we're not going to have navigators to take care of it, then you have a problem. yes, every bill that has been passed, social security, medicare, civil rights act, voting rights act, they have all been subjected to scrutiny to see how they were implemented and the rest. we haven't had the majority since the bill passed and came into being in 2014. we haven't had the majority to see if this works better than

that. whatever works for the public. what does this mean in your life? that's how the bill should be interpreted. what this means in your life is that 24 million people will no longer have access, pre-existing conditions are very jeopardized by what they are doing. there's an age tax and a tax for young people if they change premiums or policies. it goes on and on. there's a philosophical disagreement as to whether we should have health care. one of the things that's holding it up in the senate is that some of the republicans want to go even worse. even worse. so this is a tactic. you can't say, we will put more money in for navigators. that's how we will defeat this health care bill. you have to show this bill for what it is.

the same way we did when president bush wanted to privatize social security. everybody said, why don't you have your own plan for social security? we do. it's called social security. if you want to talk about how we do that, we can sit down and talk about that. if if you want to talk about how we destroy it, let's talk about what president obama -- >> we have another question for you, i want you to meet norman brown. he was sentenced to life in prison for drug crimes in the '90s. president obama commuted his sentence. you want to talk about criminal justice. what do you have? >> yes, good evening, madam pelosi. i'm concerned with the latest statement from the attorney general sessions on rolling b ik the reform on mandatory minimum drug sentences. i served 24 1/2 years of a mandatory life sentence for a nonviolent drug offense. now we're for second chance and i'm able to work with troubled youth and returning citizens coming home from prison. all of this is real in my life

because of reform to the laws. what, if anything, you plan to do to prevent the attorney general from rolling back the helpful reform of president obama's administration? >> well, thank you, norman, for your question, and c congratulations on your freedom. we work together in a bipartisan way to reform the disparity and sentencing that was in -- that existed before. just for the rest of you, if it was crack cocaine, you -- if it's crack, you spent a longer period of time, cocaine, a shorter period of time and the disparity was in communities of color. served longer sentences because of what they were accused of. crack or crack cocaine. so, democrats and republicans worked together in good faith to lower the disparity. we want it even lower. so some of the people who had

served the -- once the sentences were lowered, we want to make it retroactive. you know, if you've got ten years and now the mandatory sentence is six years, and you're in there -- you've served ten years, you should be released and this gentleman was. so i think that we can -- we will work together in a bipartisan way. what the attorney general did was irresponsible and, again, while president obama was president at the time, we had to do the bill. bobby scott of virginia was a leader of this effort in reducing the disparity and having some people's sentences reduced because of that, but this is a very important issue in our country because it's about justice. it's about fairness. and i think we will have bipartisan support to stave off what the attorney general did. >> it's one of the reasons that we seem to be an important point

in history, and we'll use that as a pivot to a question i'm going to tease. that's how good it is. i want you to meet professor meter carmichael. he teaches history at gettysburg college in pennsylvania. he has a very interesting question for you that involves you and the president. i say we hold it. we take a break and when we come back, we'll let leader pelosi take a thought about it and then we'll be right back. we'll hear the question and we'll get the answer here on the cnn town hall. thank you for being with us. stay with us. a naturally aspirated 5.0-liter v8 engine. a 10-speed direct-shift transmission. a meticulously crafted interior. all of these are feats of engineering. combining them with near-perfect weight distribution... ...is a feat of amazing. experience the first-ever 471-horsepower lexus lc 500 or the multistage hybrid lc 500h. experience amazing.

who's the new guy? they call him the whisperer. the whisperer? why do they call him the whisperer? he talks to planes. he talks to planes. watch this. hey watson, what's avionics telling you? maintenance records and performance data suggest replacing capacitor c4. not bad. what's with the coffee maker? sorry. we are not on speaking terms.

at panera, a good salad is so this smuch? what's with the coffee maker? more than a bowl of something green. more than an obligation to be good. more than just something you have on the side. more than just one flavor, or texture, or color. a good clean salad is so much more than green. and with panera catering, more for your event. panera. food as it should be. doctors recommend taking claritin every day distracting you? of your allergy season for continuous relief. claritin provides powerful, non-drowsy, 24-hour relief. for fewer interruptions from the amazing things you do every day. live claritin clear. every day.

all right. welcome to this cnn town hall with house minority leader nancy pelosi. we have professor peter c carmicha carmichael. he teaches history at gettysburg college in pennsylvania. what is your question? >> it's a brief one. what lessons from presidential history would you convey to president donald trump? >> interesting, huh. >> it's my job to stump. >> well, professor, before i respond to that question, i just have to stay one more thing because so many of the questions

were about how we work together, how we defend our country, how we deal with affordable care act. one thing i want you to know, under the republican health care bill, 7 million veterans will lose their tax credit for access to what else their families need for health care. 7 million veterans. something i wanted you to know. lessons for president, well, we've had such great presidents. i would just say that where the president probably needs some direction today is in the world scene, and i, in my -- we were at president kennedy's inauguration and in his speech the whole world knows he said to the citizens of america, "ask not what your country can do for you, but what withdrew can do f for your country." but the very next question most people don't remember "to the

citizens of the world, ask not what america can do for you but what we can do working together for the freedom of mankind." i think that's something president trump should take into consideration, that we're talks about freedom, we're talking about peace, we're talking about working together. and that is about security which is the oath we take to protect and defend. in our country, we've had so many great leaders and the one i quote the most is president lincoln. president lincoln said, "public sentiment is everything. with it, you can accomplish almost anything, without it, practically -- almost nothing. "public sentiment is everything." public sentiment can determine everything that happens here in washington, d.c. you're speaking out, katie, about your situation in your town meeting. that's really changed everything in terms of how we intend to

fight that republican bill and take us to a place where we can work together either starting from scratch or building what we have but being sincere about what we're going to do. >> our thanks to house minority leader nancy pelosi. thank you for being with us. thank all of you, and thank you at home for watching the cnn town hall. we want you to join us tomorrow night at 9:00 eastern, cnn debate night, two former presidential contenders, potential 2020 candidates, are going to face off in their first televised debate. you got vermont senator bernie sanders versus ohio governor john kasich. that's tomorrow night at 9:00 p.m. eastern. i'm chris cuomo. "cnn tonight" starts right now. i'll see you in the morning. thank you very much. chris, thank you very much. much more now on our breaking news. stunning reports that the president of the united states shared classified information with the russians i