call wanting hundred 208 1721. now a heart attack. do they have life insurance? >> no but we have life insurance john trying to find something we can afford fortunately, it only a few minutes, select boat found john a $500,000 policy for only $29 a month and his wife and a $500,000 policy for only $21 a month go to select quote.com now and get the insurance your family needs at

and they're all coming? those who are still with us, yes. grandpa! what's this? your wings. light 'em up! gentlemen, it's a beautiful... ...day to fly. doctors preferred better science, better results i'm kdigo laylah in washington and then cnn it is just passed 9:00 p.m. here in new york today, the defense, the former president's hush money trial exploded the tightly crafted narrative. >> the prosecution and scored hit against a key witness whose credibility has been issued from the star and michael cohen were a lot of us were sitting in the courtroom along with a

room full of people were watching the cross-examination very closely. it turned into a methodical dissection of cohen by defense attorney todd blanche. blanche presented text messages between cohen and trump's bodyguard, keith schiller from october 24, 2016. now on monday cohen to characterize these exchanges with schiller as a way to just to get to then candidate trump, to get trump on the phone. and get final approval for the stormy daniels payment scheme instead, the texts do not speak of that. rather they show that cohen wanted schiller's help with a 14-year-old crank color who had apparently been antagonizing cohen for days, a short time ago. cohen's texts with the 14-year-old were shown that were shown in court were released. cohen text. this number has just been sent to secret service for your ongoing and continuous harassment to both my cell, as well as to the organizations may end line the person then responds, it wasn't me, my friend told me to call. i'm sorry for this. i won't do it again cohen then replies, you will need to

explain this to secret service as we have been receiving dozens of these harassing calls over the past three days. if you are a minor, i suggest you notify your parent or guardian the person responds in all caps. i didn't do it and then texts i'm 14 so bizarre sorry we're joining former federal former federal prosecutor elie honig and michael cohen's former turning current legal advisor, lanny davis. >> so were you were you surprised the defense? appeared effective and undermine cohen's credibility about that phone call with keith schiller. i mean, when he testified earlier in the week that call was portrayed as it was a call to keith schiller to get to trump. there was no mention of this 14-year-old and wanting to talk to keith schiller to trace the number and figure out some way to get back with this person so no, i wasn't surprised and i don't think the jury is going to be persuaded by those kinds of mistakes are making.

>> michael cohen, the accused, and everybody having fun calling him a liar on television. this case is about, as i first was introduced to it by the process security by first-day this case is about documents testimony, and corroboration. michael cohen is a confirming witness donald trump loves to change the subject in his lawyers love to change the subject. they want michael cohen to be the one who's indicted and accused. so let me just remind you what we've seen in evidence so far. i'm not going to speculate or downgraded juries focus on facts. i don't disparage juries, but i'm also not a trial lawyer, so maybe travelers who do disparage story juries are correct, but i think that to remember, the first element of this crime was corroborated. you don't need michael cohen? yeah. david pecker you add hope hicks everybody knew that the money being paid to stormy daniels was for the campaign. it wasn't to protect him from being embarrassed in front of

his wife. that's what the testimony has been so far and the second most important part of the climb is did donald trump lie when he said there were legal fees? well, there's a hot document, meaning a document that's very powerful and the handwriting verified to be allen weisselberg, in which he has three categories of money that michael spent on behalf of donald trump won was $130,000 written down in his handwriting times two and the three categories to edit up to $420,000 divided by well, let me just do it because we've gone this is all very clear. but michael cohen sorry, michael cohen is clearly important to the prosecution i mean, he's a critical witness for the prosecution in order. i mean, he's really the only one who can speak to whether donald trump was aware of how this stuff was going to be build the full nature of this scheme. he's the one who gives

testimony, which is why they're devoting so much time and taking the risk of putting him on the stand. i know it doesn't go well for michael cohen if he's shown to be lying you're not doesn't it seem like today at the very least in the end of this morning's session, he seemed to be caught in the very least, a mistake in memory great about this phone call that he had just testified, not some old lie, but this testimony from in front of this jury isn't that a big deal i can't predict. i don't think juries will find it a big deal compared to the corroborating evidence of allen weisselberg's document that proves that if i was going to say use for 20 divided by 12 equals $35,000. those are the checks that is sitting president each month wrote to michael cohen. its the mad stupid i was going to do a joke before anderson about james carville. it's the economy stupid it's the mat. that allen weisselberg, that document proves these could not have been legal fees. he divided i did port 20 by 12. he

came up with $35,000 and the sitting president in the oval office wrote michael cohen $35,000 checks on his personal bank account and paid him $35,000 those weren't legal fees if they're not legal fees, they were reimbursements that makes it a crime. so those are the documents that's the testimony of 30 parties, including kopecks, very favorable to mr. trump. and so whether michael cohen made mistakes or is shouted out by hello, or whatever happens that is entertaining or a gotcha moment, which i can definitely understand. anderson, the documents speak for themselves testimony speaks for themselves, and we know that the jury will ultimately here the prosecution, some the case focus on the weisselberg argument he never said i'm sorry, go ahead, caitlin lanny, it's kaitlan. that answer that you just gave to anderson. there was a look a little over a minute, close to 90 seconds. that is how long the phone call

was with keith schiller that night. and what michael cohen argued today is that he simultaneous easley talked about the okay for the hush money deal and these prank calls that he was getting from a 14-year-old, i mean, is the dory really going to find that credible that in 96 seconds they had both of those conversations i think it could be that the jury will hold that against michael cohen is not being truthful, but it's not going to change where i said this case is about documents that speak for themselves. >> the weisselberg document is more powerful for the jury to look at to prove that donald trump lied. who's by the way the one who's indicted, not michael cohn whether michael us about holding lanny, that's right. >> but you also mentioned der the other night that michael cohen has been over 100 hours with prosecutors, not just this office would this district attorney, but in general, in the new york and new york did these prank calls ever come up in those conversations that this is what he was worried about that night? so you know, i'm a lawyer behind closed doors with prosecutors. i

wasn't with the federal prosecutors these prosecutors, right. i can't answer that question. let me just say that the story that keith schiller is saying now, let's see if he testifies, and then we'll see who's believable. and that's up to the jury. but i also am affecting donald trump to testify because he said i would testify. he's never taken it back. so maybe we'll get a chance to see what donald trump says. he's not exactly known for truthfulness, but no, michael is definitely suffered these things and arrows when he came to me, he was known to be a liar for donald trump. i don't want to go on another 90 seconds. kaitlan all right. >> but you're allowed to go 90 seconds. i do different to have it as a question as well but do you think they should want to call them? i mean, it sounds like what you're saying, lanny, is that all this evidence was already in do you really think they shouldn't have called michael cohen as a witness i think they had to because he's a corroborating witness to testimony,

documents, emails, text messages, the timeline. so he is the narrator confirming what is already in evidence. now, they attack the narrator. they changed the topic i can make it a bad. the narrator confirming. and of course, the drama of the case is made by michael cohen. and when a lawyer shouts at him, you lie. i wanted to see if he puts up a witness and we'll see who's telling the truth. but of course, he had to testify jeffrey, but all he's doing is confirming the testimony of others and documents don't lie. >> he has a question. >> i'm sorry, i don't have a question i have something to say. oh, michael cohen got blown apart today. let's be real clear about that. and what was different about this than all his other lives that he's told over the years, all his things he pled guilty to his leinz, the congress is this goes to the heart of his testimony prosecutors, by the way, whatever happened to the burden of proof, where did these defense lawyers saying who's got a better story? it's not who's got a better story that prosecutors have to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt if the jury decides michael cohen lied, they have every right to reject his

testimony. this case is over. there's only two possibilities for what happened today. michael cohen lied about this meeting which seems to be a conclusion that a lot of people were in the courtroom or draw or drawing or he made a massive mistake. but you know what, when you're a prosecutor and you're putting your star witness on, you don't get a whoop. see, you don't get an oops. we messed up they prepared michael cohen to an inch of his life. lanny davis had 100 plus hours. they went through everything with them. they saw that phone call 8:02 pm like a constant, yeah, that's oh, yeah. yeah. >> corroboration is too badly reflect on corroboration cooperation. they miss those texts. prosecutor screwed up because if they had seen those texts, lex poorly on the prosecution was not this is not just about how a jury feels about michael cohen. this is a very sad thing for the prosecution and what you're going to hear in summation is all this nonsense about witnesses and so forth if if the jury doesn't believe that the prosecution was well-founded and starch to hate

the government's case. and this is an area where the prosecution, you know, overlooked something major. and missed the boat or sponsored something without taking him through this and tried to turn this conversation into more than it really was, which is to say something other than it really was that that's not just a problem for the witness. that's a problem for the process. that is true. but ellie, i was there michael cohen did not get blown apart. they landed one we're on a distinct minority. >> i've talked to people i was there alone, i would feel the same way they landed one punch on his shirt. that is not enough in a cross-examination like this, you've got to land multiple punches. this is a witness now let me speak it's your job as a who had bonded with this jury. it is a witness who has been corroborated by more than 18 days of trial testimony by other witnesses. many hostile to cohen positive

for trump. there's a larger mosaic of evidence now, i've gotten on for 90 seconds how much want to make that point to, you see how much you can pack into 90 seconds. there's room to talk about a 14-year-old prank caller hush money payment this was enough. >> norman by certainly not enough, but but ellie's point is, whatever happened to beyond a reasonable doubt and the presumption of entity, the government's room. this was a civil case, this sequence is not enough to create reasonable doubt across the entire case. it was one time that blanche tagged him. did he tag him? yes. was it a punch on the chin? yes. did he knock michael cohen out? no. cohen stood his ground. he said in there, when you say you lied, i did not lie. and cohen was much stronger in the afternoon the prosecution was a head-on points. it's a closer case now, they needed a knockout punch they wouldn't knockout

punch be if not that told me what would be your theories of lies and it would be shall make you need it wouldn't be checking michael cohen would be getting him to retrench he didn't back off his point and your norm, no one's listening. would you, norm eisen send a man to prison take away his liberty based on the testimony of michael cohen this is not bow yes or no unlike unlike the witnesses on the stand, i don't have to accept that your yes or no insistence and 82 this is not about the testimony juries. >> they get to decide vast amount of operation for michael cohen. >> one bad answer is not going to sync this. >> let me, let me agree with what i'm going to agree with norm for a second. it's way past 92nd. there is substantial corroboration for parts of this transaction, but ultimately, let me ask you this. i actually don't know. i'm interested in your answer if the jury decides gets back in that deliberation room and says, we're not going

to credit michael cohen, eliminate him, pull him out of the case. is there enough left to convict know okay. so there's the problem. i'm wondering how cohen's word i want to go back to lenny. >> lenny, you're at a disadvantage because you're on remote so hard with so i know you're probably chomping and i want to give you 90 seconds and we got to but first of all totally shocked at elie honig makes declarative statements of guilt. it's just shocking but no surprise there. thank you, ellie. >> and norman. thank you. is this thank you thank you norman, for reminding everybody that michael has stood up very well. >> and if you're a juror you can see an imperfect witness and still look at facts as some lawyers said, they don't look at back. so let me just end by this note corroborating testimony on the money being a the campaign is nearly honored. present and that's what michael cohen has testified to. the jury doesn't have to believe him on that. we have david pecker. we have hope hicks, we have others on the issue of

whether they were legal fees or reimbursements, which is what the key second element of the crime is whether they were falsely large as legal fees. we do know from allen weisselberg's handwriting that he took a number, doubled it, and divided it by 12 as james carville would say, it's the mat stupid. there's nothing about legal fees and that math. so those two elements of the crime have been proven michael cohen can be attack. all you all rightfully might say that he wasn't perfect. but there's no doubt that weisselberg wrote in his own handwriting, $420,000 divided by 12, and that 420 from three buckets of money doubled up because of income taxes. that's the case and whatever you say about michael cohen, he has stood up to corroborate corroborate is a corroborating witness. that's my view. >> lanny davis. i appreciate your time. and norm eisen as well, thinking on scraping in court with you coming up. oh, examine how the former

president's defense team tried to tried to punch holes and michael cohen's testimony continually throughout the day will finally just it's got the full transcript from today's testimony will have that next so we decided to put in an in-ground pool. i literally went on angie and typed in pool and then got choices, getting to talk the different contractors, see different bids in kind of look at their reviews, look at what other people think of them. and it's nice to know that you're meeting with people who already are at a certain level we wanted something beautiful, we wanted something that our children will feel happy zooming in and we love and still connect with skilled professionals to get all your home projects done well, get started today at andy.com inflated all week for this. >> mr. saturday morning. so rise and shy, your chariot awaits you didn't get a, green works just to hurt you linfield gas most feelings you got it

because green perfected lawn care on the world's most powerful commercial for platform and use that innovation to develop the ultimate platform for home the maximus. see all in one utility zero turn from greenwood's with more power, more runtime, and all the versatility of one battery powers over 75 products. you'll forget all about how long have, you been, out here? >> no, 45 minutes here now, quiet power, start kicking gas today with up to 25% off plus free shipping for a limited time visit participating retailers or greenwood whose.com now, it's coming for anyone who needs help i found in the body, you recognizing never seen him before.

>> the obvious theory is an alkyl or use the flood to cover their tracks i'd be careful if i were you no application fee. >> if you apply by may 31st at university of maryland global campus, offering online and hybrid courses and lifetime career services. learn about are more than 125 degrees and certificates at when gc dot edu victims mesothelioma and their families may be entitled to receive a cash award from the estimated 30 billion and asbestos trust funds with over $50 billion awarded. we have over 30 years of experience and have successfully recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for thousands of clients, even if a family member number has passed due to mesothelioma or lung cancer, you may still be entitled to a cash award if you or a loved one has been diagnosed withthis mutual physi

mutual i learned thoughts on capitol hill and this moments go we've got the full transcripts from today's testimony, including that moment about the text exchange between michael cohen and trump's bodyguard, keith schiller that define the trial today. >> john berman joins us now. so what else have you found? >> all right. so we have the transcript now of that moment, it begins with the text messages that you showed before michael cohen text keith schiller, who can i speak to regarding phone? phone calls to my cell and office. the dope forgot to block one of them. so that was at 7:48. this is todd blanche saying this. >> and by the way, the importance of that is he has testified that he was calling keith schiller to get to trump quickly because he had to get approval to move forward in the stormy daniels, blanche's walking through here at 8:02 that call me. i can put it up back again. he's putting the texts up at 8:00. one is when he leaves that voicemail, michael cohen says, yes. blanche says you call it back at 8:02 for one minute and 36

seconds. kaitlan collins with the clock there at 8:04, you texted the number of the 14 year-old who was prank calling you, correct? cohen says i did, yes. immediately texts you back within a few seconds. he said, okay, blend in cohen says, yes, sir. blanche says the very next morning at 7:58, you say, did you reach the family? cohen says, yes, sir. blanche says, take it down now, here's the question here. when you testified on tuesday that you had a specific recollection that that one minute and 36 second phone call on a teuber 24th was not with keith schiller. that you called keith schiller any past the phone to president trump, you finalize the deal with stormy daniels and you said, we're going to move forward and he said yes, because you kept them informed all the time. that was your testimony, right? michael cohen says that's correct. blanche says that was a lie. you were actually talking to mr. schiller about the fact that we're getting harassing phone calls from a 14-year-old, correct? cohen says part of it was the 14 year-old, but i know that keith was with mr. trump

at the time and there was more than potentially just this. that's what i recall based upon the documents i reviewed it goes on. i mean, blanche says five minutes ago, i asked you if you remembered harassing phone calls and you said no and then i refresh your recollection. it's totally fair if you don't remember, but now your testimony is that you were testifying truthfully on tuesday to a one-minute and 36 second phone call and you had enough time in that one minute and 36 seconds to update mr. schiller about all the problems you're having with those harassing phone calls. >> and also update president trump on the status of the stormy daniels situation. >> i'll stop here, but it went on to say that it might have been just a few words of president trump like moving forward, stormy daniels. is that okay? from set agreed might have been just that, but cohen says based upon the records that i was able to review in light of everything that was going on. i believe i also i believe i also spoke to mr. president trump and told him everything regarding the stormy daniels matter was being worked on. and it's going to be resolved. blanche says,

we're not asking for your belief. this jury doesn't want to hear what you think happened then there's an objection which is sustained huge see, michael cohen getting caught. >> they're good. can you go about this when michael cohen realizes that he's in trouble here with the first, the first page you rent this one here? yeah. when he says michael cohen realizes he's caught now, he says, part of it was the 14 year-old first time he's ever said that on cross-examination, he's never mentioned the 14th this has never been in testimony and it didn't even seem like and what todd blanche later revealed is he wasn't briefed on the 14th. the prosecutors, to your point, they didn't catch it. here's part two of the retreat by michael cohen. and there was more than potentially just this potential i mean, why it's so dangerous for a prosecutor here to try to rely on testimony from somebody that certainly from the federal government's perspective is not somebody they would ever have put on trial. this is dangerous stuff because stuff like this happens, mistakes are made. and if they're made your point

that's devastating. >> can i can i just ask minimize and to the contrary, notwithstanding well it's like devastating, what i am curious about and i'm genuinely curious. i mean, isn't it also true that he had other conversations with trump about completing this transaction, including some the next day. so even if you believe that he's completely wrong about this conversation is that devastating? >> i mean, by the way, you're saying he had other conversations according to him? >> the other phone calls, including phone calls that we're not with keith schiller that we're that were two donald trump's phone number. >> right. but but he's testifying about what the content of those phone calls. so you don't if you believe if you can just one, they're entitled to believe that he's isn't lying about all the other ones. right. there are entitled to disbelieve his entire testimony and that's and that's the instruction. >> there'll be given absolutely. >> but my question is if he's mistaken about this, isn't it possible that he is genuinely mistaken about this? and there

are other phone calls. i mean, he was obviously in evolved in these negotiations. is it is it believable that he had all these negotiations and didn't discuss them with trump. i mean, that seems clearly yeah. i'm feel like a broken record, but it's we know the payments were made. we know that they were hush money trump is not on trial for paying stormy daniel's he's he's just not and that the end of the day, they have to get to this point where the jury is like, okay, we believe that donald trump understood that these were going to be falsely recorded on his business records. that's the only thing really at this point that matters. if you also believe i think as i think most rational people do that trump cared about the election that was a factor, but i just i think it's a credibility thing. 100% about michael cohen. do you believe michael cohen when he says he was in a room with allen weisselberg and they talked about x, y, and z. do you believe and what he said

he was on the phone? those things might all be true, but it hinges on that one guy because all the other people involved are not especially in a situation here where the prosecution made a mistake because what it looks like is that they were trying to sponsor a narrative with this witness and boy wants the jury gets a hold of that. that's troubling. know that's trouble for the prosecution. >> the room today, and clearly after the morning session in that moment and then they took a break, todd blanche says, now a good time for a break, and they had that lunch break, but an hour or so before they came back in trump's demeanor and the courtroom was so different than it's been at any other point in this trial. typically, even when they're cross-examining stormy daniel's or other people, he said he sits back in his chair he has his eyes closed for sustained periods of time. he's passing notes. his attorneys furiously today, he had his body language shifted towards the direction of the witness stand. he was looking at michael cohen. sometimes you look back at todd blanche as he was asking him a question, his body language was completely different today. he seemed much happier.

>> you've got some more french troops trump. >> i do, although i'm not fully sure which ones here now i have only one time he was asked about his desire to work at there was a lot of that when i do frankly, i didn't think really was that one. >> i do have exist. do you remember telling congress that it was a lie that you did not want to go to the white house. do you remember saying that the congress, this was blanche spent a long time trying to get cohen to admit that he wanted to work in the white house. and this has been something that was taken up in congress if you years ago, cohen says, i remember telling congress i did not want to work in the white house. blanche said as well, do you remember saying what you testified to on tuesday is that you didn't want to go to the white house. cohen says yes. and then a little bit later, blanche says, do you recall on or around november 13, president trump pick mr. priebus to be the chief of staff, right? cohen says, yes, sir. blanche says you told your daughter you were disappointed. cohen says that i wasn't considered. yes, sir. in the middle of all of that, blanche also brought up all these people that cohen had apparently said he wanted to warn the white house to include expenses.

>> and mr. room at the time to be a wash on this because michael cohen just stuck to it saying, essentially, they're equivalent about semantics. and michael cohen was saying, i want it to be personal turn in all all along. i want it to be personal attorney to donald j. trump and they were quibbling of your daughter said you want it to be special assistant and he said, no, that's semantics. anyway, what and everly, this would be a decent, nice little piece of peace across because a, it goes to his motivation. >> you want to get this guy back your bitter and b, it's probably a lie. i know well, for a fact its ally because i was in a room with two other people who we all know and believe 100% and respect who said he said to me he was ticked that he didn't go to the white house. i mean, he said it too. i think every journalist he was talking to at the time. so he absolutely lied about that he talked about it in a more nuanced view when he was up, initially, the prosecutor and he said he didn't necessarily think he was as qualified to be the chief of staff in the west wing. he wanted his name to be considered. >> he wanted he acknowledged he said for ego nuanced is a nice

way to put it. i call it like a mealy mouth weasel explanation by cohen. the former president seemed a little more uplifted as to caitlin is point after his lawyer cornered of cohen today, much up what to caitlin said don't hear that. and when i'm trump's former attorneys on whether this might be a turning point for the defense will be right back hi it's christina again. i'm here to tell you about an all new special offer from my friends at jacuzzi bathroom model that you don't want to miss? you already know jacuzzi has been making water-filled great for more than 65 years. and now they're bringing you this special tv offer. were waving all installation costs and postponing all payments for up to one year to cruzy bathroom model has a design you'll love at a price you can afford and best of all, they can install it. and as little as one day with no stress and no mess, are you ready to see your new shower here it is it's fabulous

taking a shower, had gone from being a joy to being a burden. i was afraid i would fall i called and just one day i had a shower. i could feel safe in no matter your situation, jacuzzi bathroom model has a solution for you from a hey, for easy entry shower with features like grab bars and a custom seats to keep you feeling comfortable and independent at home to a stunning family bath or how about a luxurious it's upgrade with a timeless design that will look great for years to come. plus, they're built to last with a lifetime warranty from an iconic brand. you know, you can trust it was done in the same de we did not have to wait at absolutely perfect and exactly what i was dreaming of. if you haven't already experienced what jacuzzi bathroom model can do for you? you your family, and your home, don't wait any longer. now, is the best time to call. it's never been easier. take advantage of this special tb offer today. call, or go online

right now for a limited time offer, only weeks left to get waves installation and no interests and no payments for a to one year go-to jacuzzi bathroom model.com or call 800 163978. >> that's 805, 1639 plane seven, eight. call now how does climb inspector get among the most big verdicts and settlements of any law firm the country, because climates spectrum is an award winning team with five dr. lawyers the most up at firm in the united states. >> and that's why the new york times calls klein inspector powerhouse law firm so if a defective product motor vehicle accident, or medical malpractice caused a catastrophic injury. call klein inspector how far would. you go to control the fragrance in your home? there's an easier way. dry air wake vibrant with two times more natural

essential oils, but up to 120 days of amazing fragrance product dual pack. now that's a breath of fresh air, wick, yg's asleep numbers, smart bad. >> can i make my side softer my sayyed firmer? sleep number. does that now say 50% on the speed number lim norman, bad news... i never graduated from med school. what? but the good news is... xfinity mobile just got even better! now, you can automatically connect to wifi speeds up to a gig on the go. plus, buy one unlimited line and get one free for a year. i gotta get this deal... that's like $20 a month per unlimited line... i don't want to miss that. that's amazing doc. mobile savings are calling. visit xfinitymobile.com to learn more. doc?

me. a charm.com this is cnn the world's news network donald trump walking out of the courtroom today after its defense lawyer cornered his former fixer, michael cohen on a phone call of the heart of this case and may have scored some major points with the jury. >> here's the feedback from the former president i think there's a very interesting day fascinating and it shows what a scam herself thing joining us now is one of trump's former attorney's, william brennan. he represented a trump during his second impeachment trial. mr. brennan, appreciate you

being with us. i'm wondering what the fact that the they went to it's gonna be a three-day weekend now how beneficial is that for the defense that jurors have the next three days to think about what they just heard. todd blanche, and michael cohen discuss anderson. thanks for having me. it's not only beneficial to leave them marriage date and ruminate on what they just heard. it also gives mr. blanche and his team three long days to scour that transcript and really the fine tune. whatever is left of cross-examination gives prosecutors the ability to do the same thing for a redirect as well it does, but in that particular comparison, it's like tie goes or the runner kind of thing. >> it really is advantageous to the defense because, you know, he's he's a defense witness this point. >> caitlin, i know it has a lot more when it comes to something that happened at the end of court today todd blanche would not say whether or not still if

donald trump is going to testify when they were talking about other witnesses, that they may bring it this conversation that we were just talking out with michael cohen where he insisted that he spoke to donald trump about that stormy daniels payment on that night when they're saying it might have actually just been about a prank caller. why shouldn't donald trump testify and say that called never happened? >> kaitlan, there's a very good and simple reason for that, because this isn't who should you believe this isn't i want to hear two sides you have a story and pick the winner. this is a criminal prosecution where the burden is solely on the prosecution. it never, ever shifts judge merchan, who i have immense respect for. i spent eight weeks with him in a trump-related case and just to total gentlemen to deal with. but respectfully, he got it wrong in a sidebar, i read a transcript that said he told mr. blanche, well, you know, you open the door one stormy

daniels bye in your opening saying that your client denied that there was a relationship and he said something akin to the jury you'll have to decide who to believe really they don't. the prosecution has the burden of proof. it never, ever shifts the defendant in any case can just sit there and do the crossword puzzle if he or she chooses. and in this particular case, they may call no witnesses. i doubt very much of this defendant will testify there's talk that they may call an elections expert. there's talk that they may call mr. costello, but i would be very, very surprised kaitlan, if this defendant testifies, so you don't think do you think that they should call any other witnesses or just be done after michael cohen well, i don't want to fall into the rabbit hole of armchair quarterback because i hear a lot of people critiquing especially before he really hit its stride, mr. blanche, and when you're in that position, so like being a quarterback of

the super bowl, that people should really just as greyhound used to say, sit down to leave the driving, us i don't know who they should call the case seemed to really please hinge a lot on coal with all due respect to lanny davis well, i've affection and respect for i heard is filibuster earlier about it. >> it's no big deal. come on you. it's this is what it comes down to. hush money payments are not illegal nda's are not illegal. i think abby hit it right when she said it all depends on tying it that extra crime is yet to do that. ladies, big on this document. but where's weisselberg? trump and weisselberg and cohen. he only are from cohen who has an allergy to veracity. i think that the phases hello, good shape. you laid out a lot there and sorry, get tvc because it would take me over 90 seconds, but on the point of what you're no one is saying that nda's are illegal here. and i know todd blanche tried to frame them today is just commonplace among the wealthy and the famous that

is just pretty normal. no one is saying that, that donald trump is going to go to jail fell because of a nondisclosure agreement. if falsifying business records is at the heart of this and one point that todd blanche had michael cohen make today was that he has never had a legal retainer while working for donald trump so the question in turn is then why did donald trump cut michael cohen 11 checks and sign them pursuant to an invoice that it said it was because of illegal retainer. >> i think norm eisen address this briefly, but in my home state, the commonwealth and pennsylvania, we have rules of professional conduct as they do in new york. in fact, i sit on hearing panel for the disciplinary board and our rules say the following. when you have a new client, you must express in a either you called an engagement letter or fee agreement, or a retainer agreement. the terms and scope of your representation. however, when it's a recurring client, you need not do so. so i think it's kind of a term of art that we lawyers him

pursuant to a retainer that's the product that's the whole point is if there's not a retainer, then why did he pay him pursuant to a retainer it caitlin, i mean, again it's tomato tomato to me, when somebody says, what's your retainer, i hear what you're phi i mean, there's no doubt that cohen worked for him for a long time, whether he was a fixer or a lawyer or a combination of both? >> just paid for those services, but bell urine attorney have you you worked for donald trump? >> have you ever gotten have you ever had a retainer of $100,000 and gotten at grossed up by hundreds of thousands of dollars feel like i can take the fifth on that, but i i've certainly gotten big retainers, but did you have a retainer that was $100,000 and then you got $360,000 from your client? it really is not as black and white as lanny or even the way your phrasing would have you believe there's lots of ways you can structure an agreement

with the client. you can have cost outside or cost inside my law firm can outweigh the cost. and then i can bill you for those cost in addition to whatever legal service so we provide so that document all due respect to lanny. that's no smoking gun and not only du i predict we certainly won't hear from weisselberg, the prosecution said, colin's are witness, i'd asked merchan for a missing witness charge because if three people were involved in this alleged deal, trump weisselberg and cohen and cohen's the only one they're hearing from. and cohen's credibility was shred badly today. i think that there's a long way to go to get beyond a reasonable doubt difference even has a question for you, but but quickly after today though, is there any chance that there's an acquittal maybe after today and your view has it changed how you you see this now? is there any chance that there's an acquittal you mean a not guilty or not a hung jury? i mean, trump's team seem to think going into this, there's no way they're getting an acquittal, but it's a great

question, but i can tell you from joanne decades and decades of predicting what juries will do. you just never know. i think there's a very strong likelihood of a hung jury which would result in a mistrial. and then the prosecutors would have to decide if they want to bring this thing back a second time. there's always the possibility of a conviction or an acquittal, but all 12 would have to agree. it can't be like 758466 if one juror has a problem and can't get beyond a reasonable doubt. it will be declared a mistrial because of that hung jury i was just you were having this discussion about retainers and what are the rules and pennsylvania or new york isn't the issue here? >> yes, it is true if this were a continuing legal representation, it wouldn't matter at our exactly how they they phrased it. but what's different here is that this is a reimbursement for $130,000. that's what this payment was. it wasn't any sort of

retainer. so isn't that really much different than how you characterize a continuing legal relations i'm sure jeffrey, it really is not because it's not there's no one definition for a retainer. we won't know what weisselberg's intent and thoughts were when he allegedly wrote that document goes prosecutors didn't call them, so we have to look at this document like it's like saying hence grit and the rosetta stone, we have to try to glean what it is. and then there's other things. there's ink in the milk, jeffrey, there's 50,000 for some polling place. there's some bonus. he was whining about. i mean, i know lanny thinks that this thing is really going to bring it home, but i don't think so after what happened to cohen today we shall see we shall william brennan, thanks so much. always good to have, your honor. i appreciate. thank. you. anderson, coming up next, how soon could the jury actually get the case? >> will ask the judge who's known this judge for years a

heart attack. >> do they have life insurance? >> no. >> but we have life insurance john i'm trying to find something we can afford fortunately, it only a few minutes. select pope found john a $500,000 policy for only $29 a month, and his wife and a $500,000 policy for only $21 a month go to select quote.com now and get the insurance your family needs at a price you can afford. >> select quote, we shop you save victims of mesothelioma and their families may be entitled to receive a cash award from the estimated $30 billion in asbestos trust funds with over $50 billion awarded. >> we have over 30 years of experience and have successfully recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for thousands of clients, even if a family member has passed du to mesothelioma or lung cancer, you may still be entitled to a cash award if you or a loved one has been diagnosed with mesothelioma, call wanting hundred 208 1721. now, why is

vihj perfect for allergies? people who have allergies will have lots of problems if someone's exposed to allergens, they can get rid of those immediately by washing out the notes. device works by pulling saline in one nostril through the nose and out the other nostril sucking out allergens, mucus dustin germs, experience on the spot relief. so he could breathe easier, sleep better, feel healthier if you have seasonal allergies, device can help nevada now available as select sam's club's there are giant so much they are the men and women building or daibes next generation summerhays they are giants and what they do because they work in a place where they can grow we're they can learn the skills to build careers as powerful as the beast they four, we build to because it takes to build one brighter

teeth, whiter teeth in just two weeks. guaranteed after using male actors, my teeth are the widest. >> they have ever been. my teeth are sensitive and most at-home whitening kits made my teeth her. mile active is designed to whiten teeth without causing painful sensitivity using smile actives couldn't be any easier. >> just add smile actives, whitening gel to your favorite toothpaste, and then brush like normal morning and night. smile actors becomes a powerful microfilm with patented poly clean technology to gently penetrate enamel surface and safely lift and remove stains without strips, without gimmicky goop and without going to the dentist. 100% of users saw whiter teeth up to eight shades wider in just two weeks, i never thought that whitening my teeth could be so easy. i just put the gel on the brush, the toothpaste on it, brush and i can see my whitey smile actives, new pro whitening gel

has 33% greater whitening power. clinically shown to whiten teeth faster. even on veneers crowds, and dentures i eat the blueberries at during the coffee and i know that smile actives will keep my teeth wife every day. >> smile actives new pro whitening gel is only 24, 95, but today get just buy one, get one free offer plus free shipping with three easy ways to order. call 18008, 183625 scan the code, or go to smile actives this is after using smile active. and you can really see how white my teeth are now, next to my son. >> this is your chance for brighter teeth, whiter teeth? guaranteed or return it within 60 days for your money back to claim this buy one, get one free offer with free shipping, golf, 18008, 183625 scan the code or go to smile actives, now deliberations and the trump

hush money trial could begin as soon as next week, judge merchan told the attorneys today to be prepared to make closing arguments on tuesday, which are instructions quickly to follow. he also indicated a court could possibly start early your run late some days to make up for lost time with many dark days upcoming on the court's calendar for his part of the foreign president is attacking the speed at which the trial is moving after spending months attempting to delay the proceedings it's very sad then we're story after story about how there's one that you, as they said, never been charged to have never been brought again ago was going to be brought. >> it should have been brought years ago. you know, they tried to rush to get it done before the election. so that they can arm so they can hurt their political opponent. they are rushing. all this rush there's no refuse. charles take forever but this one, they're rushing here early in the morning or will the evening. now, the

judge wants to extend the time periods. >> so the we can get this thing done fast before the election joining us now is from new york, judge gel khan visor, who we should also mention has no judge merchan for more than 15 years bill brennan was talking about i missing witness charge. can you explain? what that is? >> sure. missing witness charge is where there is a witness that a party in this case, presumably the people should have called because they had relevant and material information that was non-cumulative that the witness would give favorable information and a witness's available. >> importantly, the defense has to ask for that charge before the people rest. if they don't, it is on timely and they will not get the charge because you have to give the people a chance to say okay, i'm going to call that witness so they might be entitled to weisselberg charge based on that. but the truth is you have these available, they know where it is, isn't rikers island. they know that he has

non-cumulative information. you can talk about that meeting. but in terms of favorability, which is we use the term control and favor ability interchangeably. and new york law, i don't know that he would give favor favorable testimony, and i think that's what the people favorable testimony. i mean, it would be it would potentially be favorable to donald trump, wouldn't it? >> right? it has to be favorable to the party calling that witness, so it's not favorable to the people they're not going to call him and the defendant wouldn't be entitled to that missing witness because with allen weisselberg i mean, he could plead the fifth or he could not tell the truth that's my exact question. >> is that if the prosecution knows that allen weisselberg would take the fifth is he actually a mixed missing witness because they know he wouldn't testify well, that's i think that's a very good question. and from my perspective, if i were the one there, i would be telling the people, if you want to avoid that missing witness charge. and of course, this may happen just before the people rest

bring them in here. bring him in here. let's put them on the stand outside the presence of the jury. and i asked him, what are you going to say? we're going to ask you this question, this question, this i'm taking the fifth amendment on the advice of counsel and that becomes an unavailable witness or i'm going to say defense count i wasn't in that meeting and donald trump is correct. and your witnesses are wrong, then he's not a favor well, witness and then testimony you could he change his mind when he is actually called in front of a jury he could i suppose i don't think that would happen, but he could he sure could because weisselberg has gone to prison and which is certainly i mean, it can be viewed as a favor to the but but but if he changes his testimony, then the defendant isn't going to get them. >> the defendant isn't going to get the benefit of the missing witness charges and the prosecution had wanted to put into evidence the sort of separation agreement that he had that basically said he couldn't say anything negative about the trump organization, about trump's so they didn't

get that. so i think they were trying to make the case that allen weisselberg wouldn't can't be trusted to testified truthfully about donald trump because he still has financial ties to the trump organization. that's paying him and he would be the only on trustee witness in the case keith schiller, though. >> is that severance agreement? he got paid $2 million. he could only cooperate with law enforcement if he was subpoenaed for allen weisselberg keith schiller, trump's body man, who was the person on that call that night that caught michael cohen up he is not in prison. he lives in florida. i believe he when he left the white house, that's very when at least. and so that's the other question, you know, if your thought on the jury, i'm wondering where as allen weisselberg because i haven't heard that he's in prison where is keith schiller because i haven't heard why he hasn't been on the whip, but it's the same analysis. i don't think keith schiller is going to be in a position to offer favorable evidence to the people and therefore, they should have called that witness. >> but of course, the people have to make those noises in

order to prevent the missing witness charge and they i don't think they don't question why can't the defense the defense can call witnesses, why can't they call while well, they can. >> but they have no burden right. so they don't have to they don't have to. >> if it turns out that you would decide against giving the missing witness charge because the testimony wouldn't be favorable, would you allow the defense to then stand up and say to the jury, argue to the jury in closing, folks, where's allen weisselberg numbers case. you would align now that yes. >> can i can i assume that's why the instruction i don't think really makes right the end of the day that much during the instruction is permissive. it's right. it doesn't it's such a week instruction in my experience, i'm not sure the jury pays as much attention to that as they do the closing argument where the defense stands up and says eight government has the burden of proof here and you heard was in that meeting, you never heard from this witness. >> all right. what does that tell you about the people's case? >> we've had a lot of talk about hung juries you you've been in the center street courthouse for you were and are very long time. can you estimate what percentage of criminal cases and in hung juries?

>> very few. like five, 1%. i don't know. i mean, i've here just to estimate dozens and dozens of cases, maybe hundreds. i don't think i had a hung jury okay. >> well, that's a data point i mean, do you know in the case of a hung jury, some people would say it usually takes two jurors to actually hang a jury because if just one award is based is that i don't know if that's true. >> i've told you before that i do talk to jurors. are all of my jurors after i i always have a conversation with them. i get a little bit of insight and sometimes i hear when we weren't so sure and then jira two said this and i accepted it. so sometimes i don't get involved in their deliberations, but sometimes they just tell me something, but i just have one thing to that. i think there's one exception to the general rule than the judge's quite right. people have a super belief and the fact that hung juries are actually a possible result and that they happen with some regularity. they don't. i will

say in high-profile cases particularly ones with a lot of publicity, this obviously falls into those those are the places where you see them. >> yeah, the rare situation happens in high-profile cases. >> that's at least that's been my experience. >> i may be no good, but i tried to cases that ended up in hunter and they're both high-profile. one was very high-profile. >> oh profile case that ended in a there you go there's the judge also. >> there's a lot of institutional pressure in a good way on the jury to reach unanimity. i mean, if they give an indication during their deliberation, if they send a note saying judge, we're having a problem, the judge will then eventually deliver what we call an alan charge, meaning it is your job if humanly possible, to read which unanimity you need to all keep open-mind. you need to get back in there. i think that's serious work. >> works, right. they follow the judge's instruction about that. and i think they really do try to make a concerted effort if at all possible, even if certain jurors are tending to go, one way to listen to

their fellow jurors and to try to resolve it. and arrive at a human unanimous verdict, whatever that verdict i'm been really struck by judge merchan and how kind he is with the jury and thoughtful. he is about them not only saying good morning and things like that, but today he was hoping to have court next wednesday. but he said to the jury, i'd like to do court next wednesday. but if even one of you on this panel has any conflict with that and it would be a hardship just let our bailiffs know when during the next break and we won't do it at all. and they came back and said, jury couldn't do it. >> i happy jury is a verdict rendering jury to say the court staff staff has been so professional and so great with handling such a high profile case, they had to handle the trump's civil fraud case, but they really have been amazing. they have caught up with as are fabulous. it's incredible to have the privilege of going into that courtroom and watching it all it's it really changes once perspective. thank

you, everyone. great, great panels. and that's it for us. the news continues right here on cnn i've got good news is a murder. >> looking i'm sorry. what? >> she watches a lot of true crime. >> welcome to the family there's so much new stuff happening out there i can't keep still far to swim back now, it's just amazing i promise you, i'll not let you down during the best of british tv william brit box, which we the free trial at britt box.com. we had to take our old gas heating and radiant heat. that was a really, really huge project. who has the type as a toddler mom, i do not. i was so overwhelmed. so i started contacting people often ganges to be able to see contractors that are licensed and real people refuse to work with people that obviously knew what they were doing. it was a game changer, connect with skilled professionals to get all your

home projects done well, get started today at angie university of maryland global campus, getting a bachelor's degree doesn't have to mean starting from scratch here, you can earn up to 90 undergraduate credits for relevant experience. what will your next success speaks? >> get your yard done right. grows everywhere. trust green works for instant on runoff de commercial grade absolute power and now you can unleash all that power at home with the all new, all electric maximus see the most versatile zero turn utility mower on the planet is 30% more powerful than gas with 31 horsepower, cutting up to three-and-a-half acres on a single charge with a consistent maximum blade tip speed for a more precise, beautiful cut. and the only zero row turn mower with a rear dump bed, no gas, no fumes, no maintenance, just absolute power from an intelligent battery system that works with over 75 tools saving you time, money, and hassle for

a quieter, faster, easier job, well done, more power, more versatility, more fun for limited time get up to 25% off plus free shipping, visit participating retailers or brain works tools.com. now that's life power, bi green works when you're cooking on a black stone, you get a better experience. you'll have bigger adventures a bucket, part of the outdoor cooking rebel do with your blackstone jolla of every breakfast, lunch, and dinner you create from fast and font to low and slow well, cook anything anytime, anywhere, go to your nearest black stole retailer or blacks decisions

you can make. decisions mute, you physicians, you cnn this morning with kasie hunt. next closed captioning brought to you by guilt visit guilt.com today for up to 70% off designer brands, it