flashforward 20-some-odd years to today. ferdinand is long deposed and dead. and imelda back in the philippines following exile is now a member of congress who has just been named chair of a committee that is charged with implementing the u.n.'s goal of cutting the poverty level in her country in half in five years. i wish her the best of luck. it's a noble cause. should might start with a shoe sale. thanks to all of you for being part of my program this week. i will see you next week. stay tuned to "reliable stay tuned to "reliable sources." -- captions by vitac -- www.vitac.com the media narrative has hard efrnd like quick dry cement. these tea party candidates are shaking up what's left of the republican establishment but just can't win in november. but what if the pundits are once again wrong? are journalists raising legitimate questions about delaware's senate candidate christine o'donnell, her financial problems, her past comments about sex, her dabbling in witchcraft, or ganging up on the latest conservative winner? the white house denounces "forbes" magazine for saying that president obama "got his

anti-colonial views from his kenyan father." and newt gingrich talks about the theory. is this fringe journalism? from breathless coverage of a kooky pastor here to the phone-hacking tabloid crooks in britain, are the media sinking into an ethical swamp? conversation with the daily beast's tina brown. plus a new york jets reporter gets cat calls in the locker room and some commentators are blaming her for dressing too provocatively. we'll ask espn's christine brennan whether that's out of bounds. i'm howard kurtz, and this is "reliable sources." a couple of weeks ago no pundit on the planet would have wagered a nickel on diehard conservative candidate christine o'donnell winning the republican nomination for joe biden's old senate seat in delaware. shows what we know. and when o'donnell upset veteran congressman and former governor mike castle this week she stepped into a blazing hot media spotlight. >> a triumphant night for the

upstart tea party. christine o'donnell with sarah palin's backing. >> the republican leadership is just stunned by what happened last night in delaware and now they are scrambling to get control of a movement that seems to be taking over their party. >> and here's what went viral. o'donnell talking up abstinence in an mtv special back in 1996. >> the bible says that lust in your heart is com misting adultery. so you can't masturbate without lust. >> but it wasn't just the so-called liberal media raising questions about her record of financial struggles and other problems. bill crist ol has chided her as no sarah palin and his "weekly standard" magazine found out that o'donnell had lied about taking graduate courses at princeton and had filed suit against her former employer for gender discrimination, citing mental anguish. on primary night it was bush strategist turned fox news commentator karl rove who questioned o'donnell's character and said she was a sure loser in november. >> the serious questions about

how does she make her living, why did she mislead voters about her college education, how come it took her nearly two decades to pay her college bill so she could get her college degree, how does she make a living, i mean, there's just a lot of nutty things she's been saying that don't add up. this is not a race we're going to be able to win. >> so have the media, including the conservative media, been fair to christine o'donnell and the tea party movement she represents? joining us now here in washington, craig crawford, columnist for "congressional quarterly." in new york john avlon, senior political columnist for the daily beast and a cnn contributor. and in san francisco debra saunders, columnist for the "san francisco chronicle" who also blogs at token conservative. john avlon, christine o'donnell has a checkered history no, question about that, but is the press piling on now? >> no. i think they're doing their due diligence after the fact, though. and that's part of the problem. a lot of conservative magazines, "weekly standard, "reason," "even "national review" tried in the late innings of this primary

campaign to start raising very legitimate questions about her fitness for office, her qualifications, her honesty. that's what we're supposed to do, is hold political figures accountable and to try to be the honest brokers here. the problem is it came very late and now it's all happening after the fact. she has the nomination. and of course the gop's very nervous about what that means. and the fact that she's withdrawn from the sunday shows is another sign i think of a campaign and a candidate in crisis and on defensive. >> i think the reason that you didn't see that media scrutiny during the primary is because most of us in the establishment press didn't take her seriously. debra saunders, when journalists report that she only made $6,000 in the last year or that she had her home foreclosed upon or wasn't honest on her college education, aren't those legitimate questions to raise about christine o'donnell? >> those are very legitimate questions to raise about her. voters in delaware have a right to know about these issues. and i'm glad that the media reported them. but i have to tell you, howie, there's never going to be a bill in washington about masturbation and there's only one reason to show that video, and that is to make fun of her.

and i do think that there's been a bit of a pile-on where people are -- that's it. we just want to make fun of her. it's like the media are the cool kids and she's the geek or the nerd or whatever and we're just going to -- we're going to find every stupid thing she said 15 years ago, we're going to put it on tv, ha, ha, ha, aren't we cool and isn't she a nut. >> and on that point -- >> it's -- >> i'll come back to you, debra. on that point, craig crawford, the latest video to surface, some people have a paper trail she has a video trail. was from bill maher on "politically incorrect" in the '90s. here's a little bit of that. >> i dabbled into witchcraft. i hung around people who were doing these things. i'm not making this stuff up. i know what they tell me they do. >> what do they -- >> one of my dates -- >> i want to hear about the puppies. >> wait-i want to hear about -- >> one of my first dates with a witch was on a satanic altar. i didn't know it. there was a little blood there. >> what about debra's point that the media are trying to

marginalize her by focusing on masturbation and witchcraft? >> i think it's very true that it was time to scrutinize her because she was on the national stage. but -- >> it's fair scrutiny? >> it's fair scrutiny because she's new on the national stage and these things happen. the problem for the media, as always in these cases, is her responses are the liberal media and this is what so often happens. it plays into that narrative for her. another narrative for her. you mentioned the home foreclosures, trouble paying for college. she talks about how she's not elite. she talked about john kerry and said i didn't have to find a place to park my yacht to save on taxes, you know. so that's her response to those. so it plays into two of her narratives and makes her stronger. >> you have set me up with that phrase, liberal media, to play some tape because the morning after her primary victory on tuesday she did the network morning shows and none of the anchors particularly pressed her on the specifics of her record. then she went on sean hannity and he seemed upset that she had gone to the mainstream media. let's roll this montage.

>> boy, they've said some terrible things about you. you're unelectable, unqualified. most people thought i'd be sitting here this morning talking to a guy named mike castle. >> all right. so my question is why have you decided to subject yourself to the -- what i would argue probably biased, tough questions and obviously the advancement of some of the attacks against you? >> well, because i wanted an opportunity to counter those attacks. my opponent is putting out lies. they're being exasperated -- or was. and they're being exasperated by the liberal media. >> john avlon, the exasperation aside -- i think she meant exacerbated. has now led her, as you alluded to at the top, to cancel an appearance on "fay the nation," cancel one on fox news sunday as well. what does that tell you about her view of the media? >> it tells you the campaign is in crisis containment mode, they're trying to figure out just how much is out there, because that sort of due diligence wasn't done either by

the media or her campaign. but i've got to say, what carl said is right, the idea of playing defense, of playing the victim card, which is one of the narratives she's going to play when there is accountability for what she said in the past. people have to be held accountable for what she said in the past. these are statements of principle presumably she made. and she put herself out there and she made herself into this caricature of a social conservative activist. and now they're in defense mode. but she can't play the victim card. the campaign she ran against mike castle which was ugly and full of smears and innuendos so much so the media had trouble figuring out how to cover that because you don't want to address those smears by addressing them. but then to turn around and play the victim card in the face of the liberal media, well, that doesn't strike me as credible. >> well, it wasn't covered much because the race wasn't seen as a competitive race. den rah saunders, karl rove says look, my job now is to go on fox and call them as i see them and that's why he said those things about christine o'donnell although now he's kind of pulled back and at least endorsed her. what did you make of rush limbaugh and michelle malkin and

other conservatives going after rove for daring to speak hz mind about this candidate? >> well, you know, i tuned in to some talk radio shows the day after she won and i kept thinking boy, they sound like she lost, all they're doing is complaining about the people who criticized her. obviously, karl rove and everybody else has a right to criticize her on fair issues, especially if she hasn't been honest. there are questions about her finances. these are things that delaware voters would want to know about. i still think -- i mean, she's made herself -- it's true -- the first facebook senate candidate. except she's facebook squared because she's got this youtube background and let's face it, this stuff is horrible. but we didn't get into journalism so we could just point at people and laugh. we ought to be looking at her record and her positions and what she said about witchcraft -- >> but she has no record. >> well, she does have a record of positions. i understand what you're saying. but she does have positions. she has run before. in fact, there have been stories about her past campaigns. i mean, those seem to me a lot more substantive.

this is just prurient. >> john avlon, you want to respond to that? >> she has a record and they're based on all her past statements and on her previous campaigns. so i don't think it's prurient to focus on what she has said in public in the past, especially because she's never held elected office. all she's really been is a professional social conservative activist who's gone on television shows. >> right. and when you say things in front of a camera obviously that becomes part of the public record. craig crawford, let's look at the political fallout. whether we're talking about christine o'donnell in delaware or joe miller in alaska or sharron angle in nevada, these people went out and beat establishment candidates, often without a lot of money. shouldn't journalists respect that? instead there seems to be -- well, there's this mutual antagonism. we seem to be -- some of us, i don't want to include everybody, some of us seem to be looking down our noses at these insurgents and they don't seem to be big fans of the mainstream media. >> and i hate to see the mainstream media doing that because i certainly respect them. they're politics. their tactics have been very successful. the thing about the tea party that strikes me is it's very

similar in particularly their fiscal conservative views to the perot movement. and this argument that they're bad for republicans doesn't wash as much with me because as least they're inside the republican party. the perot people were outside the party and much more damaging to republicans. >> craig, just briefly, what about this instant journalistic wisdom when these candidates, christine o'donnell being the latest, well, of course it hurts republicans because they're all going to lose in november, they're too extreme, it's one thing to win 30,000 votes in delaware, another thing to win in state election. we've been wrong all year on these races. could we -- >> sometimes we're wrong when we listen to the democratic message. that's the democratic party message, that the tea party is bad for them. i think we should scrutinize that a bit more, be a little more skeptical of it. the other is that they're all crazy. and that's the trouble with focusing on all these statements and everything. we're playing into the democratic message that these candidates are insane. >> journalists of course are perfectly sane. we all know that. when we come back, the white

house slams "forbes" magazine over an article painting the president as a crusader from an african culture. and later, tina brown on whether journalism has gone off the deep end.

white house spokesman robert gibbs minced no words about the cover story in "forbes" magazine this week. it was, he told me, a new low

for journalism. conservative author dinesh disouza writes president obama has adopted an anti-colonial world view from his kenyan father who, by the way, left the family when he was 2 years old. the article says of the president, "he adopted his father's position that capitalism and free markets are code words for economic plunder. he must work to wring the neocolonialism out of america and the west. cleanly the anti-colonial ideology of barack obama sr. goes a long way to explain the actions and policies of his son in the oval office. the invisible father provides the inspiration." the piece was embraced by house speaker turned news commentator newt gingrich. >> it's really a stunning insight to say what if he is so outside our comprehension, only if you understand kenyan anti-colonial behavior can you begin to piece together, and that that's the most accurate

predictive model for his behavior. >> but some conservatives were appalled by the "forbes" piece. >> and it also sends a message, and i say this as a republican, there are a lot of other people who are the descendants of african traditions. are they not welcome in our party? do we not think they're real americans? >> liberals, meanwhile, focused their fire on newt. >> newt gingrich i think has hit a new low, playing to the birther fringe of the republican party, accusing the president of the united states of having a kenyan world view. >> debra saunders, you wrote this week that the media and others are taking newt gingrich's pronouncements way too seriously. but he's not just some talk show blowhard. he's a former speaker of the house. >> he's also a walking blurb. i mean, everything is the most astounding revelation. and if anything is trendy and it has a lot of polysill labic words to it he's going to jump on that surfboard. of course he said something

about that. he's asked about dinesh d' souza but it's just silly. i think the white house was right about the dinesh d'souza piece. i don't like psychoanalyzing the president. i think there are better things we have to do as journalists. i think this was psychobabble, it wasn't even psychoanalysis. dinesh d'souza. you know how you've got to have a gimmick. it's like i grew up in mumbai and obama grew up in indonesia as a kid so he's got to have this world view. it's a 1i8y construct. and as you pointed out there were mistakes in it too. >> d'souza told me this was a psychological theory he had devised. what do you make of this argument that o'babama is adopt these anti-clonal policies and believes in this because of his dad? >> i think americans in general forget that the individual is separate from the sins of the father, that somehow a belief

system is passed on through oz mossis from the father to the son especially when they last met when they were 10 years old. look, we've seen these sinister psychological profiles of presidents that began with woodrow wilson. we saw a lot during nixon, clinton, george w. bush. they're always hyperpartisan and hyperparanoid but rarely do they leap to the cover of a respected national magazine like "forbes." and that's part of the trouble here. it's a sign of the rise of the partisan media. and the columbia journalism review was right to call this snaer journalism. >> let me pick that point up with craig crawford. robert gibbs really went after this. he said there was no fact checking, some facts were left on the cutting room floor. now, obviously steve forbes the editor in chief was a republican candidate. what do you make of the magazine's decision to put this on the cover? >> i think it was not only a cover story but cover for politicians like gingrich to connect to this birther movement, even though this article does not assert that he was born anywhere but hawaii because i think a lot of politicians like gingrich are looking to do that and that's

what this accomplished. this author in particular in the past has been a foundation for these kinds of things. he wrote a whole book claiming that cultural icons, american icons like britney spears caused 9/11 by outraging islamic values, offending islamic values -- >> i've never heard those two words in the same sentence -- >> i know, britney spears -- and a lot of politicians like pat robertson went on to say yeah, it's the godless american cultural leaders who caused 9/11. and that was -- that's what this author accomplished in that case. >> dinesh d'souza told me he explicitly rejects the whole birther movement and he told me he drew this from obama's own memoir, "dreams from my father." "here is a man, the article says, who spent his formative years, the first 17 years of his life, off the american mainland in haw haurks indonesia, and pakistan with multiple subsequent journeys to africa." well, hawaii may be off the american mainland -- and by the

way, he only visited pakistan once as a college student. so your thoughts on that briefly. >> that was a real problem in that piece because i do consider hawaii part of the united states, whether it's part of the mainland or not. and he did spend some time in indonesia. i read the book. and one of the -- he talked about when he went to indonesia sort of becoming more might is right in his thinking when he was a kid there. so i just don't know where that -- where these ideas come from. this is a mystery to me. that "forbes" printed this and gave it that is a mystery. >> okay. i've got to go. by the way, the article says that -- blames obama for an export-import bank loan to brazil, which in fact was done by a commission that had no obama appointees on this at the time. that was just one example people pointed to. john avlon, debra saunders, craig crawford, thanks very much for joining us this morning. and coming up in the second part of "reliable sources," glenn beck, michelle obama, and one outlandish tabloid tale is 1yu69 one part of today's media

monitor. but first are the media playing an inflammatory role in all these religious and racial controversies? an in-depth conversation with tina brown. and later, the new york jets get penalized for unnecessary roughness toward a female correspondent. but she's the one getting tackled by the media. down the hill? man: all right. we were actually thinking, maybe... we're going to hike up here, so we'll catch up with you guys. [ indistinct talking and laughter ]

whew! i think it's worth it. working with a partner you can trust is always a good decision. massmutual. let our financial professionals help you reach your goals. everything you need to stretch out on long trips. residence inn. ♪ everything you need to stay balanced on long trips. residence inn. i but i justve my 5 employcan't afford it.ance, i have diabetes. i didn't miss a premium payment for 10 years. and i'm worried if i lose my job, i won't be able to afford insurance. when i graduated from college, i lost my health insurance. the minute i got sick, i lost my insurance.

not anymore. not anymore. not anymore. america's healthcare reforms change lives for the better. to find out how it can help you, visit us at americasfairhealthcare.org it's not just fair, it's the law.

every week it seems we examine some new embarrassment for journalism, lowering the bar

a bit further each time. hype, sensationalism, rushing to publish without the key facts. the american media sometimes resembling the tabloid hucksters in london. who better to talk about that than a woman who's well known on both sides of the atlantic? tina brown edited the british magazine tattler before coming over to take over "vanity fair" and then "new yorker." now she's taking over the digital world with a launch into the daily beast. i spoke to her earlier in new york. >> tina brown, welcome. >> good to be here, howie. >> this is in some ways an ugly time in america. you have an obscure pastor threatening to burn korans, you have the mosque controversy in new york, you have the phony accusations against shirley sherrod. are the media playing an inflammatory role? >> the media's undoubtedly playing an inflammatory role to the extent that at this point cable tv is only about conflict and the web is there to amplify it. but the fact is it is what it is. the media isn't going to change.

that aspect of life isn't going to change. so it actually behooves people who are actually facing controversial things to be very, very careful when they're going in that they're not going to start pressing all these buttons. >> why are you so willing to accept it as a fact of life? it seems to me, especially if race is involved, if religion is involved, if some fringe character like this pastor terry jones is involved, we not only obsess on this story, we practically create the story. and you're saying that i should just accept that because that's the way it is. >> well, i don't think it's attractive to accept it, but i think we live in a world where there's massive aspects of the media which can't in any sense be controlled. i'm talking about social media. i'm talking about what a sarah palin can post on her facebook and it goes viral. so whatever the so-called responsible media are doing, there's so much other media that it drowns out anyone who's playing responsible in the media. >> part of that drowning out includes the increasing polarization in cable news. any night you can turn on fox and msnbc and see their hosts sniping at epa otheach other ant

wonder does that remind you of the labor and tory papers in britain? >> the difference is because there are so many papers in britain and because the quality of the quality papers is so good and because it's a smaller country where everybody can pick one paper that it speaks to, that polarization in fact isn't really nearly as influential as cable news is here, frankly or to polarize the country. everyone knows that the london mail is a wildly inflammatory tabloid newspaper but people kind of recognize it for what it is, which is kind of vaudeville, if you like. >> and yet in the cable arena you have more and more republicans only appearing on fox news, more and more democrats only appearing on msnbc, and it seems to me that it kind of reinforces the partisan views of those who watch, who already may be leaning to the left or the right. >> i tell you what i do think is a great danger, is that in the web world now we're seeing that -- i'm told that soon we're going to see a situation where, for instance, when you type in

"mosque" on google if you're somebody of the tea party's persuasion you're going to get one kind of search coming to the top and if you're somebody of the more liberal persuasion you're going to get another answer coming to the top. >> because the -- >> search can be tooled soon to the self-selecting searcher. >> so the google guides are going to anticipate what you want and give it to you and by doing so in a way insulate you -- because we all rely on -- >> we're going to be echo chambers of our own making which is extremely dangerous because it will mean we just reinforce our own prejudice, hysteria sxig norns. it's a disastrous notion, which why we still need to fight for media that is objective, that is fair, that has standards. >> i love to read people i disagree with. as long as they're not utterly predictable and you're going to get the same talking points every time. on this same topic, glenn beck has become an influential and certainly divisive figure.

after that lincoln memorial rally, that huge rally. do you see him as something of a cultural phenomenon? what's your take? >> well, i do. i think he's a fascinating demagogue, actually. he really is a demagogue. and he has become sort of the white malcolm x in a strange way, the way he goes out there with this -- he's very much kind of -- it's white racial politics in a sense because he's really saying a lot of his message is, you know, that obama is a racist. i mean, all the stuff that we keep hearing about, hussein obama and the references to obama being undoubtedly kind of racist in the terminology. >> he's backed off that a little bit and now he seems to be talking a lot about god and america -- >> yeah, he talks about god, but when you drill down to what he's actually saying, he calls nazi and socialist and taking over the country. his language is extremely inflammatory. and he likes to play now revivalist religious bringer together. but he's playing a double game because actually he's a hypocrite. he's a tea party hypocrite. he's preaching one thing and

he's actually being another. >> speaking of the president, let's take a step back. how would you describe barack obama's coverage by the news media during the campaign? >> it was idolatry, i would say. pure idolatry. i mean, he had his rough moments, but the media drank the kool-aid in such gulps that it was really shocking to me. >> embarrassing? >> i thought it was embarrassing in the sense that it was so clear that they were in love with barack obama. i mean, i thought he was an extraordinary candidate. but i did feel that hillary clinton got an incredibly rough ride, that she could not in fact compete with the -- those who fell in love with the new story. because it was a great story. it was an "american idol" moment when obama spoke at that convention -- the john kerry democratic convention. an "american idol" like debut like susan boyle. he rose. >> and obama got the best

coverage of any presidential candidate in my professional lifetime or maybe in recorded history. and now you go to 2010. and the president is widely depicted i would say in the press as ineffective, as professorial, as too passive, as boring even. what happened in terms of -- did the journalists fall out of love with their heartthrob? >> well, there is for a start no way he could have met those expectations. >> no. we jacked them up sky high. >> there was no place to go but down. but i do think that what has surprised dismayed the media is they really felt he was a candidate, you had connected with him on some deep hopeful level. and actually, since he's been in office, his major flaw has really surprised us all, i think, is that his communications and connective skills have been the weakest part of his presidency. and that i think has baffled people. >> but to some extent he never could have walked on water the way he was portrayed in 2008. and so here's a guy who has gotten a fair amount done, if

you want to measure it by legislative success and yet we're just pounding on him. i'm not saying unfairly. because there is this sense he's not connecting with the public. >> there's this instinct which takes people one way or the other. for instance, i think we're hip no tiges ourselves now about the bad news in the economy to such a degree that it's out of control. if you talk to people from china and india and so on, they do not see the american economy in the same kind of dismal terms that if you turn around every publication says you're in. >> clearly there's a lot of pain. >> a lot of pain. >> long-term unemployed. people who never expected to lose their jobs -- >> the jobless recovery is a horrific and painful experience right now in america, but it's also -- we don't want to make it even more of a self-perpetuating philosophy so that -- >> and you think that is happening? >> i think it could happen because again, i think that the media velocity that goes on is such that you can also hypnotize yourself into a further

depression, you see what i'm saying, that the real depression is bad enough, let's not also psych ourselves into a place where we really feel that we've depressed ourselves and we're in some kind of paralysis. >> up next, more of my sit-down with tina brown as we turn our attention to london's tabloid troublemakers and whether print magazines still have a future. ♪ [ upbeat instrumental ] [ rattling ] [ gasps ] [ rattling ] [ laughing ] [ announcer ] close enough just isn't good enough.

- if your car is in an accident, - [ laughing continues ] make sure it's repaired with the right replacement parts. take the scary out of life with travelers. call or click now for an agent or quote.

[ female announcer ] something unexpected to the world of multigrain... taste. delicious pringles multigrain. multigrain pops with pringles.

more now of my conversation in new york with tina brown. >> this phone hacking scandal at

the "news of the world" in your home country, where the newspaper, you know, tapped into the messages of all kinds of celebrities, british royals, maybe even diana, you referred to that murdoch paper as a squirming zoo of lowlife. but that doesn't mean it's not popular, right? >> it actually means that's why it's popular. >> but that's interesting to me because why do brits tolerate, why do the british people tolerate these kinds of tactics? we saw it with the sting against sarah ferguson. where reporters lie, where they will do anything to get a story, they will break the laws. certainly a pull people from "news of the world" have gone to jail. or do they secretly love it? >> well, "the news of the world" has always been a sort of quote yellow journalist rag. the tactics have spread beyond "the news of the world." that's the issue, really. not that the news of the world, which has always been a squirming zoo of lowlife. it's just that all of a sudden there's a ton of other papers that do the same thing. there used to be such a thing

really as the sort of popular tabloid that was a popular punchy paper but it didn't have -- >> still sort of responsible journalism. >> still sort of responsible. but actually a lot of these kind of tactics are going on in other tabloids. >> why is there no pushback against that? why do they not seem to pay a price at least from my distance across the atlantic? >> well, you know, the problem is that so much of the media is actually owned by rupert murdoch. he owns the quality papers too, the two biggest ones. >> the "times" and the "sunday times." >> pushback from "the guardian," which is not owned, not part of that group. you are getting pushback from the "telegraph." you are. but a large portion of the media is now owned by news international. so i'm not suggesting that the "sunday times," for instance, or the "times" uses such tactics as the "news of the world" does. but there is a kind of -- there's a lot of media out there that is of the same persuasion. and that -- >> and if other people see that it works. >> and the success of it, it's a bit like with fox news. if you start the glenn becks of the world, the stuff they do and the stuff they say is very popular. and it actually it means that the other cable channels are

chasing for that success. >> i've seen that once or twice. you became pretty well known as the editor of vfrn rfrn and then of course as the editor of "the new yorker." is it more challenging in some ways to put out the daily beast and deal with an online publication where you're virtually always on deadline? >> i'm absolutely loving it. and i finally found something commensurate to my own impatience. >> is that the secret? >> yeah, it is. it's alive. it's fresh. you know, i'm actually really loving it. and of course the challenge is to keep your standards up while being fast. but i've got a really great staff who understand that there is such a thing as rigor and standards while doing it on the run. and it's not easy but it can be done. and i think we've created a really good journalist m culture there. we now have over 5 million unique visitors. we've just been nominated as one of the five best news sites in "time" magazine, which was very thrilling because we were right there underneath the "guardian" newspaper. so we felt really good about that since we're only a little toddler of not even 2 yet.

>> but someone who group liking to hold a magazine or newspaper in his hands, was it just a mental adjustment to not have a paper pruroduct? >> it was a mental adjustment. i still love print. and i'm not one of the people who think print is dead. i think it's always going to have its role. yes, i miss that sometimes. but i am really enjoying the mobility and the nimbleness of having been able to grow a company in which i've been, you know, a founder and develop it out from there. there's nothing quite as thrilling as having your own company that you share with a group of wonderfully like-minded, you know, partners who, you know, are allowing us to be a journalistically sort of free and easy. >> but you don't think that speed fuels superficiality and sometimes mistakes? we all -- >> you can -- >> -- feel that pressure. >> you can make mistakes, and we do. and we try to make sure that we correct those mistakes quickly. but what i am finding is the best writers can write fast because it's not that they are being sloppy.

they have to be able to think. so if you want something really good done, go to a really smart person because they know what they think. >> what about a magazine like "newsweek," which is in the process of being sold? in fact, there's been rumors you that might be a candidate to -- >> i think it has a future. i'm not one of these people who thinks that "newsweek" doesn't have a future. i think it's a great brand. i think they had a very good issue this week, as a matter of fact, on the gates piece was terrific. >> could you be part of that future? >> i very much love what i'm doing, howard. i feel very much that i'm in the web world and i'm loving it. so i haven't really thought about it. >> but magazines in general are hurting. fewer people are reading them. fewer people are always watching tv news. fewer people are picking up newspapers, although they do go to newspaper websites. there is this sort of mentality now that the web is not only the future, that it might be the only future. you're not ready to give up on print? >> no, i'm not. i think the web is powering the future. without question. i think that the energy of the web is going to end up reversing what we expected, which was that

magazines would sort of have a website or newspapers would have a website. i actually think that the digital is powering the print now. but it doesn't mean to say the print doesn't have a role. i just think that the emphasis has flipped. >> so are you getting less sleep these days as a digital journalist? >> i sleep like a baby. >> tina brown, thanks very much for joining us. >> thank you, howie. and after the break, are we still arguing about female reporters in locker rooms? christine brennan on why the pundits are piling on a woman who covers the new york jets, in a moment. [ manager ] you know...

i've been looking at the numbers, and i think our campus is spending too much money on printing. i'd like to put you in charge of cutting costs. calm down. i know that it is not your job. what i'm saying... excuse me? alright, fine. no, you don't have to do it. ok? [ male announcer ] notre dame knows it's better for xerox to control its printing costs. so they can focus on winning on and off the field. [ manager ] are you sure i can't talk -- ok, no, i get it. [ male announcer ] with xerox, you're ready for real business.

[ male announcer ] with xerox, you hear what they're up to now? some in congress are getting squeezed by the special interests again. trying to delay action and give polluters free reign to keep dumping toxic pollution into the air. the air our children breathe. letting big oil lobbyists get their way again, and again, and again. it's a last-minute bill, written by special interests, looking for a payback. washington politicians need to get off the dime, and not let corporate polluters off the hook.

you probably never heard of ines sainz before this week or her mexican network, tv azteca. but the reporter who covers the new york jets has suddenly gotten a dose of media celebrity. she says she was the target of cat calls when she was in the nfl team's locker room. "the new york post" saying that coach rex ryan had some of his players run drills so they accidentally ran into sainz. the jets have apologized but the narrative has taken an unusual twist, with some pundits kicking ines sainz around like a used pigskin. and interviewers questioning whether she is the problem. >> various women's media groups have thrown their weight behind her even as she undermines every hard-working woman sports reporter who knows the game. >> ines, what i'm driving at is

that some people are saying that when you call yourself the hottest reporter in the -- in mexico and you're wearing tight jeans, et cetera, that people say you shouldn't be shocked if the men respond to you with cat calls. how do you respond to that? >> i don't believe that my dress is the point of the discussion here because i do not done anything to provoke it, the teams or the players. i believe that i only go to work my job and if the jeans are or not in the way that they like it or not, that's not my problem. >> joining us now to talk about this curious case and the obstacles facing female sports reporters, christine brennan, contributor to abc news and a sports columnist for "usa today." so when you first heard about this, did you empathize with ines sainz? >> oh, absolutely. yes. because we're talking, howie, simply about a workplace issue. and as having done this for 29

years, and there's more than 1,000 women covering sports in this country -- >> and you've been in your share of locker rooms. >> i certainly have. covered the redskins in '85, '86, and '87 and been in hundreds of locker rooms. absolutely. and the fact that it was reported by other new york journalists that she in fact didn't do the early reporting but it was other -- >> she didn't file a complaint. >> that's correct. >> there was this group called the association for women in sports media which she's now criticized that he said she was treated unfairly. >> i helped start it. four women started our group and i was the first president from 1988 to 1990 of the association for women in sports media. i'm very proud of our group and what we've done this week. absolutely. >> what do you make of some of these commentators, and i could have played five more, saying it's about your dress, you dress too provocatively, what do you expect. what do you make of that line of commentary? >> i'm shocked. i'm absolutely shocked, howie, that that is the conversation in 2010. what we're talking about here as you well know, the new york jets have control of who gets into their practices as journalist reporters, what have you. they credential the media. and they gave a credential to

ines sainz. and so me that is the end of the conversation. if the jets didn't believe she was a working journalist, they didn't -- a working reporter, whatever, they did not have to give her a credential. once you give anyone a credential, you have to treat them right. it's a workplace. i know it sounds like a strange workplace -- >> because guys are with towels and some of towels and some of them are naked, but that's where you get the interviews after the game. >> if barack obama said, follow me into the locker room after a basketball game, all the reporters, male and female, would come in. it's not something we want to do, it's something we have to do for our jobs. >> the notion -- the day this happened, she dressed in a regular blouse and jeans, but if she dresses flashy, you would say, so what? >> any organization gives credentials and also decides not to credential people. if you give a working media credential to a journalist, you have to treat them right. end of conversation. >> and the national football league have now asked that all teams be trained in the sensitivity of dealing with female journalists which seems a

'70s or '80s problem. here's rush limbaugh weighing in on ines sainz, take a listen. >> ines sainz knows what she did and does attracts men. she knows that she has an asset, depending on the part of you're coming from, boobalicious, bootylicious, you got it. >> unbelievable. what's happened this week, coming out of the woodwork, all sorts of neanderthals or neanderthal-like opinions that have come out that have basically had a conversation about an issue that has been resolved for 25 years. women have been in the nfl locker rooms, equal access, male and female locker rooms for 25 years. and men are allowed in women's locker rooms. that is also settled. you've got all these people chiming in on issues they know nothing about, and i would include mr. limbaugh, and it's time to -- it's 2010 and we don't have to discuss stuff that has already been resolved. >> but here's a column in which

ines sainz takes a shot at this group that you helped found. and she says, a group of news people and communicators, eager to make an even bigger scandal out of the situation, have moved women's rights backwards at least 50 years. >> i disagree. i've spent the better part of a week defending a woman i'll never meet, ines sainz, and proudly, as have so many other women, howie. we didn't want to do it this week, we didn't pick this battle, but it came to us and we have taken the battle on. and i'm very proud of that. again, i would say that new york reporters who cover the team, they were the ones that broke this story. they were talking about catcalls and hooting in the locker room. i've never dealt with that, and that is completely over the line. rex ryan, the coach of the team, leading these drills to throw a football near here, that sounds like something right out of a fifth grade playground, not out of a workplace. so i'm proud to have talked about and dealt with this issue and defended miss sainz and i certainly hope she would understand why we did that. >> just briefly, once the jets apologize, i would have thought

that that's sort of the end of the story. and yet the story really became about her. you saw some of those interviews. >> i know. i think it's because it was new york, because the jets had a day off. you know, it was the weekend, it was the opening season of the nfl. >> the male attitudes here are not entirely enlightened in your view? >> i don't think so. the good news is the nfl spoke with its very big voice saying, we're not revisiting this issue, and that's important. >> christine, thank you. still to come, a maine newspaper apologizes for a story about muslims praying, glenn beck gets slimed by a tabloid, and the time magazine tornado photo that seemed to come out of a time warp. our media monitor, straight ahead. ♪

everything you need to stretch out on long trips. residence inn. ♪ everything you need to stay balanced on long trips. residence inn. our points from chase sapphire preferred are worth 25% more on travel. we're like forget florida, we're going on a safari. so we're on the serengeti, and seth finds a really big bone. we're talking huge. they dig it up, put it in the natural history museum and we get to name it. sethasauraus. really. your points from chase sapphire preferred are worth 25% more on travel? means better vacations. that's incredible. believe it...with chase sapphire preferred your points are worth 25% more on travel

when booked through ultimate rewards.

time now for our media monitor. and here's one i can hardly believe. last week on september 11th, the "portland press herald" ran a story that began, "muslims from throughout greater portland gathered at the portland expo on friday to celebrate'd al firth one of the holy fest festivals in islamic, marking the end of the month-long ramadan fast." 300 people showed up. it was a perfectly nice feature story. the next day, editor richard connor apologized to his readers, profusely. many saw the front page photo and story as offensive. the paper offered no balance to the story and should have handled the matter, quote, greater sensitivity to the painful memories stirred by the anniversary of 9/11. are you kidding me?

this was not a story about a controversial mask or a terrorism or a koran burning. what o'connor did was cave in to criticism from readers who don't think there should have been a front-page story about muslims and couldn't wait until the next day to read about the 9/11 remembrances. connor's apologize was embarrassing. here's what i found laughable. i don't usually pay attention to al-alram and i might have thought little of this photo, showing the egyptian president in the forefront during the recent mideast peace talks at the white house. but the bbc reports that the newspaper doctored the photo. here's the original. president obama was in the lead, not the president of egypt. not exactly subtle. this one kind of blew me away. there were a couple of tornadoes in new york city this week and "time" magazine was on the case. "time" posted a photo on twitter of a twister passing the statue of liberty.

no, it wasn't fake, it's just that the picture was taken in 1976. a little late, but at least that was an accident. here's what i don't like. lots of people say lots of somethings about glenn beck, some of it fair, some not so fair. but "the globe" supermarket tabloid has accused him of -- >> glenn beck sex tape scandal and the mystery woman behind it. oh, i had to read it. prepare yourself, it's me in green lighting -- no. glenn beck sex tape shocker! michelle obama behind the savage attempt to ruin the president's number one enemy. yes. somewhere in here, too, a man had a alien baby or something. but you can believe this story, sure, sure, sure. >> sure, must be true, i mean, have you heard michelle deny it? pretty far-fetched, even for "the globe." beck dealt with it for what it was, a joke. speaking of beck, two other tv ys