after independence say and i have a lot of questions and i'm looking forward to this. lawrence a day one trump supporter that respects ron desantis as well. i can't wait to see that. thank you very much, tomi. and thanks for watching this week week and tune into will cain and also my show tomorrow, tammy bruce is in for the great sean hannity. tammy: welcome in for this special edition of hannity, i'm tammy bruce. in a 6-3 decision, the court ruled that biden's student loan forgiveness plan was? fact un-institutional. chief justice roberts that delivered the majority opinion said "six states sued arguing that the hero's act is not authorized along cancellation plan, we agree". democrats knew this plan was unconstitutional from the beginning. likely knowing it would be

reversed and given another opportunity to blame republicans. >> people think the president of the united states has the power for debt forgiveness. he does not. he can postpone and delay and he does not vascularized that powe. they were an act of congress. >> the left spent the day complaining about the decision and many celebrated the victory for millions of hard working taxptaxpayers and eric schmidt haunched this lawsuit as attorney general of the state and schmidt wrote on twitter that the bailout was "fundamentally unfair, unlawful, and cynical employee and without loans would not have to pay off soon. senator schmidt joins us now on

more with today's critical decision. great job, sir. of course one of the frustrating things that this kind of thing takes so long. remarks >> this is a big win for taxpayers and this ask the rule of law and zero authority at all and the constitution or any statutory authority that will allow the president of the united states with a stroke of a pen to wipe out half a trillion dollars worth of student loan debt up to a trillion. so it's a big win for taxpayers. it's also, you know, a big win for working folks. i mean, lot of people paid off their student loans and they chose a different path for people to subsidize this and it's a fundamental fairness

argument number two and number three as you touched on, it's a cynical ploy by joe bide ton get votes and saw it our way and unconstitutional and it's no authority and a cynical attempt and i'm sure they're going to be up to something new and today we should celebrate the big win and big win for taxpayers in the rule of law. tammy: what's amazing is also that by doing this, they take time effectively to illegitimately educate the american public that something's possible and we've got more and the president of the united states does this and people -- some americans will think, what happened and he thought we could do it and this doesn't -- doesn't this just make our -- affect the legitimacy of the government and make it even worse for the average american looking for it?

>> i think, yes, and i think it's important what the supreme court did today on top of some other decisions they maid, whether it's epa with the major questions and what you're seeing now thankfully is a narrowing of what these unilateral executive actions for the impact and broader administrative state and these kinds of decisions are supposed to be decided with the people's branch and article one branch and congress. guess what, you can send them there and send them home and send them back and these unelected bureaucrats.

>> senator schmidt is have the senate and congress and the president can maintain a emergency status for the rest of the country. >> right. you want to you want to ban gas going for that and this was a case that i was ag and now bringing the heat.

>> that's what we need and weave seen that happen and because of work and senator, i appreciate you joining me tonight and congratulations. tammy: all right, now, the supreme court rejected biden's unconstitutional order today and the student loan battle is not over during an address at white house following in decision, outlined new actions to try and ram through his bailout without congress once again. watch this. >> i know millions of americans in this country feel disappointed and discouraged and even a little bit angry but the course decision of today on student dead. i must admit i do too. i'm announcing a new path consist with the day's ruling to provide student debt relief and as quickly as possible.

we'll ground the new approach in a different law than my original plan. so called higher education act. you've got a great column and very, very district about your opinion about what he was doing here and where do you think this does go for now and will he be successful in some other fashion? >> well, this new path is designed to avoid constitutional path; right? what he's supposed to do is go to congress and just go to congress and say everyone wants to have a great idea and get it passed but he knows it won't pass because there's formidable opposition to the concept of lad

this new path and like going from going to the higher education and what's interesting about that and in favor of the hero's act and he served and it was obviously not the intent of congress and rather short act benefiting veterans this could be done through that language. but the problem that he's going to have is threefold first. this new path is more limited

and it is very specific of what type of loans could be forgiven and not coming to the scope of the current plan. second he's got to go through rule making. maintaining in the promises and continually point to the republicans and conservatives as mean bigots. and talking to the american people and depressing them and disappointing them and making them look at their neighbor and getting them to be angry and it's not gold involving some third party. he's the one that's sold you the watch and the whole time many of

us were saying, look, this is 23409 going to work but because they're picking this other act, it's likely to go through the next election. he'll be able to campaign on this issue. and i -- my guess is a lot of these students are going to feel more victims than chumps. they're going to feel like they had real money that was taken away trust worthy them by this court and the court is just saying there's a place you go in the constitutional system for money and it's a block down the road from where you live. >> it's not only about targeting republicans but the rhetoric about the court itself has come back. as though they didn't learn anything when it came to the reaction after the dobbs decision, by they're going to doubloon on that it would seem. >> i agree, tammy, it's really dis-stressing to here -- distressing to hear this inflammatory rhetoric and these are justice that delivered a

number of victories to the biden administration include ago huge victory where they upheld the immigration policies of the president. they have not hesitated to vote for the president when law and the constitution was on his side. it wasn't on his side here. he was openly circumventing congress and using this attenuated argument involving these acts and they were rightfully, you know, going to calm dawn on the side of the constitution and you know have the same court of court packers saying we've got to get rid of the court and expand the court and these types of attacks. these justices are trying to get it right and i think they've got a lot right this week. s major free speech victory will resinate for decades and it's a huge victory for free speech. >> it's rather amusing when it's a decision that the democrats

like suddenly the court is not evil and when it's a decision they don't like, it's evil and has to government they're like toddlers. they just can't -- they just don't get it. jonathon turley. thank you, sir. the left's melt down over the decision immediately and take a look at how they reacted to the news. >> does this ruling potentially disproportionately impact women and do you think it's a setback for gender equality? >> well, it's definitely a setback for social mobility through education. >> it is extreme treatmentists out of touch -- extremist out of touch court has now failed our families, failed our students and honestly, they've failed at upholding american values. values and ideals. >> this is a tragedy if you care about inflation and equal opportunity and fo fo folks that have much to meet as a tragedy and tragedy is a result of the

strategy and we sometimes forget that and >> these decisions are essentially making it harder for a range of communities to go to college and seek a higher education and that's outrageous and unhappy with today's rulings and others are in fact renewing their calls to pack the court. what kind of impact will it have on biden's order that came with an estimated price tag with more than $400 billion. it's like close to half a trillion. what will that have on the economy? here with reaction, author of the best selling book get trump, harvard law professor and

athoraof the new trial of the century, greg jerkins retrocochlear and professor, let me start with you. this -- those -- the rhetoric that's being used, it's like they want a summer of riots and they want the american people to not be -- not really understand what your take? jot three major decision of religion, decision and ray norauthority are all traditional liberal decisions. liberals don't want race to be considered. justice douglas in court history said no, race can't be

considered. liberals generally favor free speech. liberals favor legislatives over executive authority and irony is that six render liberal decidecisions and so called libs rendered decisions that were ill liberal. it really tells us how our country has changed so dramatically. real liberals and real conservatives have more in common than either with the extremist orad cals on both sides. >> excellent points because you're absolutely right. those that grew up and were on the left, these were issues that mattered to us and they still matter to us, and it is very strange that it's the conservatives that are delivering these kinds of decisions that are really at the core of the american value system. your new book deal withs of course the monkey -- the scope's monkey trial. an issue that normally you'd

learn about in school but nobody is learning about these things and where they stand. how do you think americans are really going to respond here? is it going to be -- well, is it going to be that kind of victimized road rick that's going to push people or think that in general americans understand these types of decisions. >> they resuscitate efforts to pack the high court. they're like sore losers to change with they're not winning and the political backlash would be severe and polls consistently show vast majority of americans are against packing the court. they correctly view it as cheap manipulation for partisan gain, but it's also an attack on the separation of powers that would undermine contract and expand

and create chronic instability and legal chaos. the high court legitimacy would erode and public trust would diminish and in the case of decisions themselves would gyrate back and forth and expanded court might reinstitute affirmative action only to reverse it when the composition of the court suddenly changes whenever the punned lum of politics -- pendulum of politics swings the other way. joe biden was right decades ago as a senator calling fdr's court backing scheme a bone headed idea. it was in 1937, it is today in 2023. >> yeah, it's a remarkable that we've got this dynamic where we know that everyone involved understands all of this. they're not mistaken. they don't mean well. steve, you know, we've got an extraordinary amount of money in

the school loan dynamic and almost half a trillion, which alone i don't know the phrase but there's a legal rule if you will that if there's something of a major consequence, it requires congress' involvement for the economy if this had gone forward. what impact would it have had? >> isn't it ironic, tammy, we finally have someone in washington to save money for taxpayers and it's the supreme court. obviously joe biden doesn't want to do that and congress doesn't want to save money. they just want to save -- spend money in the trillions of dollars and borrow. but it's important for people to realize and one of the reasons big government is so destructive. what we do in washington is e we reward bad behavior and we

punish good behavior so who are the people who are the heros and people like my wife that paid their student loan on time. and they scrimped and saved and did the right thing. what's next, are people not going to have to pay mortgages or credit card debt? we're not doing a favor by telling young people even though you signed this loan, you're not responsible for your own behavior. i find that outrageous. >> what people -- some people are not working into this equation is all the people who did not go to college because they knew that that was a burden that they took seriously and they either couldn't -- you know, get the loan or if they did, they felt they had no real way to pay back something of that magnitude and here they are looking like, you know, talk about the goal posts being moved. economically.

>> it's a financial scandal and university should be on the top of that . not the taxpayer. >> that's a great point. i want to give the professor the last word here, a mono-who teaches at some of these ivy league places. do you think that's a fair criticism, sir? >> it is and it's a fair point to make that universities will benefit enormously from the supreme court's decision banning race as such, as a criteria for admission and make them look hard as individuals as individuals and that were no longer tolerate the idea that an extremely wealthy black kid with every advantage g get an advante

and admission over poor white kid that struggled with better grades. we have to take race out of government in every possible way. i was at the speech when martin luther king said i dream of the day when my children will be judged by the content of their character rather than the color of their skin. this was the supreme court decision yesterday, took us a giant step toward a color behind society, which is the america that the frames of our constitution and 14th amendment intended. >> beautifully put and you know they're going to fight it but the fact of the matter is we still are fighting to get to that point that dr. king wanted and we can do it. we've got to keep up the fight because they're going to fight this tooth and nail. gentlemen, thank you very much. great stuff here tonight. coming up, the supreme court is protecting american values, but those same bedrock principles are under assault in began. you won't believe the state's latest proposal. we'll explain as jason chaffetz,

carl mark wits joining us next. believe

>> justice neil gorsuch reaffirmed and said it fails to answer the fundamental question and american values are under assault in michigan and you won't believe this out of the state house passed a bill that could actually make using the wrong pronouns a felony in the great lake state.

it's now clear that civil rights have become a zero sum game for the left where the goal is no longer for americans to be treated the same. instead they want regular americans to bow down to every wish of the liberal mob. >> he wants to make sure that nobody like him ever gets that kind of help again and helps his self-image because he can lie to himself and fool himself and hate himself a little less for having gotten help all along his path to the supreme court. >> there's a ton more to unveil basic rights and basic decisions in every court in recent history. >> our country at great risk of returning to those old days when black and latin x and native folks, the people who built this country are shut out.

>> this is a very serious change and for my point of view, a tragedy. >> is this leading to no women in colleges soon? who knows. >> they're invested in victim hood, it's awful. the learfield img continues its meltdown, a new disturbing pole shows pride in america continues to hover around historic lows with only 39% of respondents saying they feel extremely proud to be americans. we have jason chaffetz and karol

markowicz. thank you for joining me tonight. let's start with you, jason. you know, you hear this rhetoric when we talk about who's controlling things and the -- just the awful demeaning rhetoric. it's almost like people want there to be this chaos. they want there to be these division. is that too harsh or is that really what's going on? >> i'd go even further and say i think they prey on the idea they want systemic racism and i listen to those comments and the monitor and say it's so racist and demeaning so suggest that women or anybody of any sort of ethnicity wouldn't be able to accomplish what some white person would be able to accomplish. where did they come up with these.

they de-moralize and want special class and special privileges and how about fighting for equality and getting rid of the racism that they so heavily invest in. >> mr. keep this, is the dynamic and i was the president of the los angeles angespecially for years and told directly by a leading -- founding demonist of that organization when i complained we were making certain things worse and every now and then we need to rub salt into the wound and too successful, we won't be here when we'd be needed again later. what's your decision and what the left is complaining about now? >> history is repeating itself and first of all, ms. reed ought to go and figure out how her

personal social media sites were hacked and they were allowed to be portraying some of those rateful rhetoric in which she then said she didn't know how she managed to do. but put her aside and she should not be commenting on anyone's background. what the history lesson here is. in 154 when will the supreme court stood up for freedom and justice, the same way the supreme court did this month, a resistance developed and there were schools there were institutions that said they were not going to follow and not going to adhere. guess what, every single one of those republican representatives, if they were elected leaders, they were democrats. this is true today. unlike president eisenhower, unlike president eisenhower who

escorted the arkansas 9 to make sure their rights were protected and our president today, he stood up and said he was going to work to figure out how to contravene the season. halleluiah that if you are an american, the government isn't going to force you to violate your personal beliefs in order for you to enter the workplace. halleluiah. government should never be telling people they have to have do that . >> there's decline of americans feel pate ick and watch

what's -- pate i don't mean ick and what's going on and isn't that -- pat yacht ick and isn't that part of why the r are reac. something like to today's decision and clawing and tearing at their shirts and being dramatic about the end of civilization as we know it because a few decisions didn't go their way and that's really affecting people and look, for me, i'm an immigrant to the country and celebrate the day we came to america every year and coming up july to the my america verse reigns leading and i know this is the greatest, freest country and the problems we face and difficult times and even the joe biden administration and we can get past it and really we're so lucky to blake grupe a lesson to our children and that's what we give our kids to take away

and you are blessed and lucky to be american and think that every single day. >> that's a great i want to be. jason a lot of people are looking at the free speech decision as being >> basic constitutional thorps and they all things they embrace and the american civil rights movements about not being punished for being different. being able to express yourself differently and that's what we fought for and now we seem to be turning that around and we've become the thing that we said was so bad in the beginning by trying to shut down people. >> i haven't been able to get past these democrats and these people on the far left who have preached for their whole lives about diversity and have a diversity of thought and heaven

forbid you should be shunned and shut down and be in prestigious prison and the idea if you use a pronoun improperly on purpose in the state of michigan that you're going to get a $10,000 fine? i mean, who in the world thinks that that is the american way? that that's consist with the first amendment? shame on michigan. they are better than that. i can't believe that they continue to support that regime there in michigan. >> well and that's what they have in europe. it's about the offended being able to determine if someone committed a crime based on their feelings. that's not a rule of law. that's a madness of law. all right, everyone, thank you so much for being with me tonight. up next, our two-tiered system of justice is alive and well. the latest on the hunter biden prep with matt whitaker and

justin crowley when sean hannity continues.

mr. senna's into nature. professor kot's into science. but together, we work! like our senokot laxatives. to relieve occasional constipation,

senokot's made from the senna plant. refined by science to be reliable. perfect match! just like us! hmph! senokot. ♪ ♪ when you graduate, they graduate. visit finishyourdiploma.org to find free and supportive adult education centers near you.

>> hunter biden gets away with everything and and now learns that the u.s. attorney in dc who close the 2020 primary campaign and by the way, joe wasn't even asked about his son's plea deal at all during a live 20 minutes interview on msnbc. that was the same interview that he walked out of while the cameras were still rolling. that's right. here now with reaction former acting attorney general matt whitaker, john levine of the new

york post and host of the monica crowley podcast, i it's monica crowley. maybe donald trump should change to joe biden is announce at one of his giant ral rallies and be donald biden and maybe everything would fall away or maybe that's not a great idea. >> yeah, well, maybe, but probably not. i mean obviously the left and this department of justice are trying to get donald trump however they can. they this recent news that you mentioned about them trying to file additional charges maybe in a different jurisdiction demonstrates the bias against donald trump and they'd not be happy with the venue in florida and the judge in florida and move additional charges in places like new jersey or somewhere else. i mean, that is exactly the problem with the entire thing, tammy. >> it really is a perfect symptom and become ago cartoon.

they noticed that the american people know it's a cartoon. and they know it's, you know, that nobody has really been pushed off the cliff and the wiley coyote is not going to smash on the ground and we have no faith? what the doj is doing. john levine. they know they might have a problem. they're going to keep trying and there's these other cases as well. even people not pro trump if you can refer to some people that way, i know there are, i don't know any of them. they're realizing this is like too much. it's, you know, the left never knows when to stop. >> right, i think this ultimately will have to be adjudicated in the 2024 presidential election. i think obviously as you said, the evidence is overwhelming that there is a two-tiered standard of justice going 20, portion 50, 100 charges potentially for donald trump, huntser biden ends up with two peanut misdemeanors after a six

year probe. i think if we end up with a republican in the white house in 2024, you'll see very swift action and very little confidence in christopher way and possibility additional -- ray -- christopher wray. >> we mope that would be the case and the fact of the matt service connected that donald trump has been the only one to really come from the outsider status not really care about what the system thought about him. i don't know if there's anyone else who really is still in that position who would be able to -- without resistance and look what happened to trump. really enact the kind of changes that we want. >> yeah, the strength of donald trump from the very begin asking that he is and always want an outsider into the elite

political system. the system continues to try and destroy him. donald trump for the last eight years since he's been on the national political scene has steered down the deep state, stared down the permanent administrative state. taken on the globalist. taken on all of the vested interest that do not put the american people in america first but rather their own interests to empower and enrich themselves and he's the only one that has taken them on. taken all of their incoming and is still has to try and take them out and donald trump does. donald trump does and we know

what the deep state is capable of, tammy, we better nominate somebody who has the courage and the experience to stare them down and fight back ken polcari act the kind of reforms we're talking about once selected. >> matt, we understand what donald trump is able to co. we know what the federal government was able to do against him with really no repercussions. this is something, you know, people say oh, the americans are exhausted. we're exhausted with being lied to. is there's a path for any american president and public and understand what's happened here and what's at stake? >> yeah, i'm sure there .s in fact, if you look at the administration i served in with donald trump even with the russian collusion hoax and all the other destructions including covid, the effectiveness and the things that were done was really extraordinary and the economy

flourished, you know, americans were at all levels were more successful than ever and, yes, they absolutely could do that. >> it's a good reminder that we will win this and just a matter of which road we take. everyone, thank you very much. now, up next. democrats have gone wild across the country this week. what's new? pushing racial division harder than ever. leo terrell and elder join nerve nucleus next when this special edition of hannity continues.

hi, i'm michael, i've lost 70 pounds on golo. i spent thousands on other diets that didn't work. on golo, i spent a couple hundred bucks and got back down to my high school weight. you're not gonna believe this thing is possible but it is. buying a car from vroom is so easy, all you need is a phone and a finger. just go to vroom.com, scroll through thousands of cars. then, tap to buy. that's it. no sales speak, no wasted time. go to vroom.com and pick your favorite.

>> all right, left wing madness on full display across the country at multiple public hearing and start on the floor of the wisconsin state senate from madison. one senator from milwaukee had

harsh words for suburben suburb. take a look >> saying these additional police are needed because crime is spilling out into the suburbs. what about these babies who are being lost right in their own cities? who are born into poverty and then who died and then get a opportunity to change the suburbs. because they don't know a god [ bleep ] thing about how life is in the city. >> wow, dividing everyone; right? subsubburr ban folk and held its final meeting in sacramento with time allotted for public cement and here's how that went. >> time for a divorce. what do you get a divorce in you get half the money.

half the land. alimony. child support, attorney fees and everything else. so that's what we want. >> what do we want? when? now. >> what do we want? oo>> reparations. >> when? >> now. >> what do we want? >> reparations. >> when? gianno now. >> with the democrats, the agenda is simple, divide by race, gender, sexuality, income, it's all they know how to do. here with reaction to fox news contributor, leo 2.0 terrell and republican presidential candidate larry elder. gentlemen, thank you. leo, i see that and it's like the far left, it's marxist and rhetoric that's meant to depress people and create another summer of riots and people are looking at california and don't want to talk about the cost of this. what's your take on what california is up to with this? >> well, thank you, tammy. first of all, the democratic

party is dysfunctional. how can anyone based on those two videos, how can anyone become a member of the democratic party regard hag you just saw in reparation in california, tammy, do they get the memo and have they heard about the affirmative action ruling by the supreme court? reparations are unconstitutional. it violates the 14th amendment and racist. and you have said it correctly, this party divides people on race. let's not forget eric adams who called a new yorker a plantation owner. this parkty is antipolice -- party is antipolice and pro criminal and notwithstanding what happens in the supreme court and the reparation argument is absolutely idiotic and it's all a group of people that have a basically mob mentality to divide this country based on race. >> indeed. larry, you know, it's remarkable

in part especially that suburban comment and the idea that people that live in the suburbs and don't live in the city are less than or not worthy of. it's a very strange point of view because it's even now kind of gone down to that no lek larra structure in you live in the city or outside the city where do you think this is headed? >> where it's headed, tammy, is that that woman would probably like to deport all white people and, look, the democratic party is a party of slavery and they were a party of confederacy and voted less for the passage of civil rights act of 64 than did republicans and party of the welfare state that's caused for the destruction of nuclear camera and 70% of black kids enter the world with a father not marrying the mother and 13 public high schools in baltimore with zero percent of the kids

can do math at grade levels. 53 public schools, tammy, in chicago. zero pea percent of kids at math level and party that opposes school choice and i'm running for president and 40,000 individual donations and visit for me and get me up on debt bait stage in milwaukee and hold my beer. >> all right, leo. really, when we look at this, isn't it the democratic party that's -- this is the democratic party destroying the lives of people in this could be triple-demic. >> look at los angeles, new york, chicago, run by democrat, black mayors, and they're destroying their own cities and they're basically racist up to their own people. >> well, we got to go. we know this, we're spreading the word and we know we can do better. more hannity after the break. your wyndham is waiting. whether it's for the bucket lists... the free breakfasts and wifi... or the... romantic getaways? with 24 trusted brands by wyndham to choose from...

your wyndham is waiting. get the lowest price at wyndhamhotels.com my most important kitchen tool? my brain. so i choose neuriva plus. unlike some others, neuriva plus is a multitasker supporting 6 key indicators of brain health. to help keep me sharp. neuriva: think bigger.

>> tammy: welcome back to the special edition of hannity unfortunately that is all the

time we have left for this evening. i want to thank sean for letting me sit in this chair it is very much appreciated. a whole group of people great work to bring this program for you. read my column at amack.us or tammy bruce.locals.com have a great weekend i'll see you on monday, i'll be back. thanks everyone. ♪ ♪ . >> laura: i'm laura ingraham and this is the ingraham angle. thank you for being with us tonight. all right, two stories today about two great american cities on opposite sides of the country should be a major awakening for all of us. they reveal important truths about how america is fairing as we're about to commemorate our nation's independence on july 4th. and while politicians in both parties try to spin, we need the truth now more than ever. if you've been in la in the past few years you're not