gb news. >> very good evening to you. it's 11:00. i'm aaron armstrong it's11:00. i'm aaron armstrong in the gb newsroom. iran risks provoking an uncontrollable regional escalation. a warning from world leaders following last night's attack on israel. g7 leaders, including lord cameron, have condemned iran's attack and say they stand ready to take further measures. israel says it will exact a price from iran, but its war cabinet is split on the timing and the scale of the response. however, the white house says the us won't take part in any retaliatory strikes and iran has promised to launch a much stronger assault if israel retaliates. the un retaliates. the u n secretary—general, retaliates. the un secretary—general, antonio guterres, has told members of

the security council civilians are paying the highest price now is the time to de—escalate . is the time to de—escalate. >> the middle east is on the brink. the people of the region are confronting a real danger of are confronting a real danger of a devastating, full scale conflict . now is the time to conflict. now is the time to defuse and de—escalate. now is the time for maximum restraint . the time for maximum restraint. >> rishi sunak earlier revealed raf planes took part in a number of counter drone strikes overnight. he says had iran been successful, the fallout for regional stability would be hard to overstate. israel has urged its allies to prescribe iran's revolutionary guard as a terrorist group , revolutionary guard as a terrorist group, and revolutionary guard as a terrorist group , and shadow terrorist group, and shadow foreign secretary david lammy says the government should act . says the government should act. >> this highlights, once again the extreme danger of the irgc and the iranian guard. we have said that we think that it

should be proscribed and it is for the government to come forward with new plans to proscribe them and to deal with this issue of state actors that would behave in this appalling way that wreaks terror on a wider community, a cabinet minister has insisted the government's rwanda plan is on track with flights due to take off within weeks. >> health secretary victoria atkins says the home office is, quote, ready to go , despite the quote, ready to go, despite the troubled bill still making its way through parliament. no airline has been named to transport asylum seekers. transport the asylum seekers. rwanda state owned carrier has turned down a request. the prime minister repeatedly said the minister has repeatedly said the flights would take off by spring, date has spring, although no date has been set more than 250 been set and more than 250 survivors of the manchester arena bombing are taking legal action against mi5. 22 people died in the explosion in may 2017 and hundreds more were injured. lawyers representing injured. lawyers representing injured survivors confirmed they've submitted a group claim to an independent judicial body. an inquiry found the bombing may

have been prevented if mi5 had acted on intelligence received in the months before the attack. its director general , ken its director general, ken mccallum, has apologised for m15's mccallum, has apologised for mi5's inability to prevent the atrocity . you can get more on atrocity. you can get more on all of our stories by signing up to gb news alerts, the qr codes on your screen or you can go to gb news. com slash alerts. now it's gb news. com slash alerts. now wsfime gb news. com slash alerts. now it's time for headliners . it's time for headliners. >> hello and welcome to headliners. i'm josh howie. i've got newspapers. i've got comedians, i've got ray addison's ty, and i've got an autocue . anyway, tonight i'm autocue. anyway, tonight i'm very happy to be joined by kerry marx. and i'm also joined by louis shaffer, yeah. yeah, yeah . louis shaffer, yeah. yeah, yeah. >> starting early. >> starting early. >> how are you both.7 >> how are you both.7 >> how are you both.7 >> how are you .7 i met my hero

>> how are you.7 i met my hero yesterday in >> how are you? i met my hero yesterday in southampton , and i yesterday in southampton, and i was in southampton. which was. which was a surprising joy. so shout out to the people of southampton. that's great. did you get recognised a lot in the street? i at this particular place, i got recognised by. by two okay. two people. okay. >> was oap home. no. >> it was an oap home. no. >> it was an oap home. no. >> okay. and it's ivor, ivor cummins . if you can find out who cummins. if you can find out who that guy name check out. >> how are you. i get recognised all the time, you know. exhausting, no. happy to be here. tend be here on here. i tend to be here on sundays. like you don't sundays. it's like you don't trust with real yes trust me with real news. yes that's exactly what it's just trying out, warming you in. trying you out, warming you in. >> now. >> but you've got the tie now. you're up the schedule. >> i'm here on two. yeah. >> i'm here on sunday two. yeah. >> i'm here on sunday two. yeah. >> wait minute. >> wait a minute. >> wait a minute. >> insulting you by. by default. >> sunday is the only day they let me host. what's going on here? have a quick here? right. let's have a quick look front pages . look at monday's front pages. the israel vows revenge as the times israel vows revenge as the world calls for calm. daily mail it's time for the world facing evil empire in tehran . facing evil empire in tehran. the i iran masked and uncontrollable wider war with israel attacks g7 nations warn

the financial times israel weighs options after iran attack. there's a bit of a theme here. the guardian us warning as israel weighs up response to iran's attack and the daily star will add a few more lifeboats on the new titanic . the new titanic. >> kerry, first up, we have the guardian. >> oh, yeah. >> oh, yeah. >> let's start with the gentle, sweet story , shall we? this is sweet story, shall we? this is the attack on israel by iran of, 300 missiles and drones, which could have been extremely tragic if it wasn't for the. well british forces and american forces and of course, the iron dome and the jordanians and the saudi arabians. yes. that's right . actually, i was going to right. actually, i was going to add that they who have, have having to show their hand now, which is getting quite interesting, but there's a lot going on here. there's, there's a lot of posturing to see who can push what to, to, to force something to happen. and, and

biden is saying that america will not be brought into a counteroffensive, which seems like a very weak position because i think that they're testing to see how strong america's reaction is going to be, as well as anything else. but there's several things about this mention not this which i'll mention not that, just just sort that, well, just just sort of skirt around little bit is skirt around it a little bit is there's we keep hearing, there's things we keep hearing, which israel, is falling for which is israel, is falling for it, which i'm hearing a lot. israel shouldn't respond because they shouldn't fall for it. i heard same after the, heard the same after the, october 7th attack. that october 7th attack. is that israel fell it as if it was israel fell for it as if it was a trick, as if it was so small that they could have just just brushed but this brushed it away. but this this attack have completely attack could have completely destroyed . massive. destroyed israel. it's massive. if hadn't ballistic if it hadn't been ballistic missiles. totally . yeah, missiles. yeah, totally. yeah, yeah. and for a tiny country, the other thing i want to say is ikeep the other thing i want to say is i keep hearing how israel is losing the pr war, which i don't think people fully understand. the here. israel has to the numbers here. israel has to lose pr war always, because lose the pr war always, because there's only 15 million jews in there's only 15 million jews in the that's why. it's the world. that's why. it's because it doesn't matter what the everyone the morality everyone thinks. it's morality , but

it's about the morality, but it's really not. it's really that there were constituents that if there were constituents all down country all up and down this country where mps really where the mps were really worried about what their jewish constituents thought because there numbers there were large numbers of myth, media worried myth, the media were worried about there hundreds about it. if there were hundreds of thousands jews marching of thousands of jews marching every , that story every week, then, that story would heard more. every week, then, that story woti d heard more. every week, then, that story woti thinkieard more. every week, then, that story woti think that'snore. every week, then, that story woti think that's a»re. every week, then, that story woti think that's a that's >> i think that's a that's that's an easy answer. the fact is, that even there were is, is that even if there were no constituents who supported the directly the palestinians directly because they were, you know, of that ethnic group or whatever, the people tremendous the people of this tremendous amount of anti—israel feelings, because israel is an ethno state and the and there's a war between the, the, the people who are team world, who hate ethno states and the people who support. i don't know if that's who don't hate ethno states. >> yes, they there's a bunch of there's a bunch of other ethno states. there's this specific ethno almost 100, one ethno states almost 100, one ethnicity, loads of them. >> and, no, no one's against nafive >> and, no, no one's against native american reserves. they're the navajo reserve is three and a half times the size

of israel. what would you expect if you went there? and it's a sovereign state. what would you expect to see? expect to see expect to see? you expect to see navajo wouldn't you? expect to see? you expect to see nav wouldn't wouldn't you? expect to see? you expect to see navwouldn't . wouldn't you? expect to see? you expect to see nav wouldn't . yeah. dn't you? you wouldn't. yeah. >> mean, i would disagree >> i mean, i would disagree with you, lewis. >> would say it's religious >> i would say it's a religious war. >> there's only one >> except there's only one religion kind of war. religion who's kind of at war. yeah, that makes no, yeah, if that makes sense. no, in terms islamic republic in terms of the islamic republic of , it seems to be of iran, it seems to be a religious war for them. >> for jews, it's religious war for them. >> forjews, it's like it's >> but forjews, it's like it's not a big deal. >> no, there were two wars going on. one war is against states. is this there's a kumbaya going on with open borders and people being all the same and one at whatever identity you want, but you can't have a nationalistic identity. and that is that is part of this thing. yes, there's anti—semitism, there's anti—israel, but but there's still the idea that israel is an oppressor by keeping these people out. sure. yeah. yeah, sure. do you agree with me to go back to what you were saying? >> there's definitely a view people have. >> yeah, but to go with what you were saying, kerry, the analogy

that which that i read online, which i thought quite interesting, thought was quite interesting, was shot and was if someone shot you and you were wearing bullet—proof were wearing a bullet—proof vest, doesn't mean that vest, it doesn't mean that you're just going to then instantly shooter instantly forgive the shooter or just go it. just kind of go ignore it. >> look, there's difference >> look, there's a difference between punishment and, reacting to stop something escalating. you know , and if, if all of you know, and if, if all of these attacks are , are testing these attacks are, are testing ground for, for a larger attack, then i think israel is going to respond to it. well, that's the other thing not do. i'm not sure. look, i would love to hear of a better, i wish personally wish netanyahu wasn't in charge, wasn't running the ship during all this. and i wish that there was, some other plans or ideas other than either attack back or just take it, which is not an opfion just take it, which is not an option for israel . well, nehhen >> well, this is it. so, there are some positives, though, lewis. you could argue, even though the big negative one, you know, obviously a child has died, and, they israel has

revealed its kind of strategic hand. revealed its kind of strategic hand . so now, if this was to hand. so now, if this was to happen again, iran knows where the counteroffensives are going to be coming from and can then deal with them accordingly. but what i'm trying say here is what i'm trying to say here is lewis, sorry, is that there could some positives we could be some positives here. we have saudi arabia have seen that saudi arabia coming israel's defence and coming to israel's defence and jordan , saudi arabia just before jordan, saudi arabia just before the show just revealed that they believe or know that the whole reason that october 7th happened with the backing of iran backing hamas was because of iran's threat of normalisation with saudi arabia and israel. so peace is happening in the region in a way . it's peace is happening in the region in a way. it's drawing these other countries together, right? >> no peace is not happening. it's just that my friend of an enemy of a friend, an enemy of an enemy is my friend. and that's what israel is to iran, to the saudis , is not to the saudis, is not necessarily they could be becoming friendly enough. it is enough to start a friendship or i mean, that's how the world

works. maybe it is, but it's not bringing peace to the world because the sunnis and the shias hate and there's hate each other. and there's nothing can be done about nothing that can be done about that or whatever. >> i mean, all i know is taking our personal, the three us as our personal, the three of us as a what happened? our personal, the three of us as a lot what happened? our personal, the three of us as a lot closenat happened? our personal, the three of us as a lot closer to happened? our personal, the three of us as a lot closer to kerryened? our personal, the three of us as a lot closer to kerry after deaung a lot closer to kerry after dealing right. a lot closer to kerry after dealing right . next a lot closer to kerry after dealing right. next up, dealing with you right. next up, we have the times, louis. >> times . all right, well, >> the times. all right, well, this is a little different story. this is. can we go back to stories where i can make fun of louis? >> i'm much more. >> i'm much more. >> we're going to get there. >> we're going to get there. >> worry, don't worry. >> don't worry, don't worry. >> audience. >> audience. >> stories >> we have a lot of stories where the mickey out of where we take the mickey out of louis. i'll tell you something. >> that's what me a great >> that's what makes me a great guy, you can make of me. guy, is you can make fun of me. i'm so strong. you know this. i'm so strong. you know this. i'm the royal you i'm like the royal family you can make fun me. oh, yes. can make fun of me. oh, yes. >> it'sjust can make fun of me. oh, yes. >> it's just fun can make fun of me. oh, yes. >> it'sjust fun hurt >> it's just fun to hurt you because you love it. >> it exactly. i love it, >> i love it exactly. i love it, i know, but you know what? that's what i love about you. i love because i think love about you. because i think to let's do this to myself. anyway let's do this story, britain send, story, is that britain may send, may, send migrants to may, may try to send migrants to costa rica. this is is costa rica. this is this is a fallout because rishi sunak and the tories trying to do the tories were trying to do the rwanda going

rwanda thing, which ain't going to they're to happen. and so they're looking countries to looking for other countries to do that. third country do that. quote, third country processing processing deal processing thing processing deal where they bring where they where they bring immigrant . immigrant migrant immigrants. immigrants, migrants, asylum seekers. illegal immigrants into this depends on which political party supports. >> yeah. >> yeah. >> i'll i'll say i'll say it if they're illegal immigrants and some the countries they came some of the countries they came up were coast, costa up with were ivory coast, costa rica, botswana . and rica, armenia and botswana. and louis rafe is very well travelled. been to costa travelled. i've been to costa rica and you could not say that costa is a place that's costa rica is a place that's unsafe. it is fantastic. it's one those most beautiful one of those most beautiful countries in in the americas. it's and, and so it's amazing. but armenia is a country that's about to be taken over by the, by the azeris. they've already taken over land of the azeris. they're like very precarious as a nation . and ivory coast is in a nation. and ivory coast is in sub—saharan . sub—saharan. >> you're not taking it so, kerry, because this is why the government lost its case in the supreme court, was because rwanda was deemed unsafe. yes. so finding another country that is would surely get over

that. >> i don't know whether that's what they're doing. it looks to me like they're just asking every single country. yeah. like, mean, is basically like, i mean, this is basically the africa. the whole of africa. >> do think they're going >> do you think they're going around is around like in an office? and is it where it like marathon man where they're around going, is they're going around going, is it it safe? it safe? yeah is it safe? >> yeah. but i think it might what might is they might what might happen is they might get yes from, loads these get a yes from, loads of these different and be different countries and we'll be able them choice, able to give them a choice, a little brochure where they can choose or south choose which, african or south american want american state they want to go to , they're apparently to, they're apparently looking for agree to for countries that will agree to the may be interested in replicating the rwanda scheme. it says here, but the rwanda scheme hasn't even happened yet. so if i was one of these countries, i would be successful, surely they successful, but surely they would this . would jump on this. >> like, sure, give us >> they'd be like, sure, give us £500 million and then we'll build all stuff then we build all this stuff and then we don't do anything with don't have to do anything with it because never to it because you're never going to send surely it because you're never going to sen(is. surely this is. >> and then they're doing >> and then what they're doing isn't there aren't isn't it. yeah. there aren't they, sold it off they, haven't they sold it off in rwanda. >> they yeah. >> yeah. they have. yeah. >> yeah. they have. yeah. >> is never it's never >> so this is never it's never going to happen. >> well that's not the point. it was to happen. it

was never meant to happen. it was never meant to happen. it was potentially was just meant to potentially happen. finish happen. right. let's finish with the and going the daily star. and who's going to carry me . oh, it's to do that? carry me. oh, it's a really exciting story. >> it is exciting. is it? you're a big of the film. a big fan of the film. >> is, some rich bloke >> this is, some rich bloke who's going to rebuild the titanic , and he's had the titanic, and he's had the brilliant idea of including lifeboats this time, which you'd think would be fairly necessary. >> i think a radar would be good. >> the problem with it is that the next film is going to be really awful. oh, it's just going to be nothing happens . you going to be nothing happens. you know, there's no it's not going to crash. oh no, no. >> you're mistaken. they're going get dysentery. they're going to get dysentery. they're going to get covid. they're going to get covid. they're going on it for two going to be stuck on it for two months. yeah. could months. yeah. this could be a great film. >> i think a of migrants, >> i think a load of migrants, i think should combine this think they should combine this with scheme is they with the rwanda scheme is they put immigrants in the put all the immigrants in the bottom then put bottom decks, and then they put the decks. the upper decks. >> lot slaggy english women >> a lot of slaggy english women who are looking for a good time. you what, louis? yeah, you know what, louis? yeah, loads of them. >> you're wasted a >> louis, you're wasted on a sunday here, right? we've just told the front pages what's what coming have same with

coming up. we have the same with reina's sunak reina's residence. sunak sabotage

welcome back to headliners i'm josh howie a completing this minion is carrie marks and louis schaefer. carrie, starting with monday's telegraph. and it seems the bbc is being as impartial as even eve r. >> even >> it's the newsnight, story of an interview with angela rayner , an interview with angela rayner, it says newsnight admits admitting which surely that counts as itself out if it admits you emit and emit anyway emitting beergate comparison from segment recorded last month after concerns from labour staffers . and i'll just clear staffers. and i'll just clear all that up because that didn't make much sense as a thing. this is to do with the investigation into claims that, miss rayner wrongly which house wrongly declared which house was her address on the her permanent address on the electoral roll, which is, of course, criminal offence . and course, a criminal offence. and this the story pertains to, the interview , for newsnight, in

interview, for newsnight, in which they cut part of the interview where she was asked whether she would take responsibility for this and step down, and the argument is that they decided to take it out because it wasn't relevant at the time, because she hadn't been charged yet by manchester police, on the other hand, it's a bit suspicious because they also had a call from the labour party, straight after the interview saying, hey , just interview saying, hey, just knock that on the head, and they said, yeah, maybe we should do that because she's on our side. and they said, oops, we didn't mean that . mean that. >> yeah, but why? >> yeah, but why? >> why what happened? >> why exactly what happened? >> why exactly what happened? >> do that? >> why wouldn't they do that? >> why wouldn't they do that? >> why wouldn't they do what why why wouldn't out? why wouldn't the bbc cut it out? >> because labour why wouldn't the bbc cut it out? >> are because labour why wouldn't the bbc cut it out? >> are going cause labour why wouldn't the bbc cut it out? >> are going t01se labour why wouldn't the bbc cut it out? >> are going t01se their abour why wouldn't the bbc cut it out? >> are going t01se their new r party are going to be their new bosses. the bbc is big bosses. because the bbc is big brother broadcasting impartial? they're supposed to be impartial , but you love them. you love them. this country like, loves them. this country like, loves the bbc. the bbc, the bbc. what i don't all right. i love you don't all right. >> sorry. you know they're all

right. >> but you don't mind them if you don't. if you don't mind them. the point is, is that the bbc, if the bbc if we didn't pay for the bbc, no one would care if they'd cut anything out. they might find it interesting. oh, look, the bbc cut it out. but because we pay for it because they're not supposed to cut it out . out. >> i actually disagree with you because it's than because i think it's more than the money. it's the trust that we it or not don't have we have in it or not don't have in it as an institution , i find in it as an institution, i find they don't deserve any trust. >> well, i mean, because because i believe that less and less so, for sure. >> but when you read an incident like this and you see them. yeah, it feels to me like carrie that they're they're sort of merely mouthy trying to get out of it, because the way he says, oh , no, it was still definitely oh, no, it was still definitely impartial. but the way his excuse was like, oh, it didn't really matter, because technically the police weren't investigating. but actually, the question was, if you were found to be guilty, well , question was, if you were found to be guilty, well, you'd only ever be found to be guilty if

the police were investigating. so it just seems like they're trying to just come out on a technicality here. >> agree with you, >> i generally agree with you, but the same time, got but at the same time, i've got i'm willing to give a little bit of benefit of the doubt. >> been there's >> i think there's been there's been times recently where been more times recently where the shown questionable been more times recently where the that, shown questionable been more times recently where the that, shonbe questionable been more times recently where the that, shonbe discussed|ble bias that, should be discussed more but one more and looked into but one like could well be that like this, it could well be that he simply left it out the he simply left it out of the interview, not feeling it was that that time. so that important at that time. so i'm to. who the bbc? >> who owns it? >> who owns it? >> listen, this is not my country, who owns the country, but who owns the answer? answer. >> know what? forget the >> do you know what? forget the bbc for second. i want bbc stuff for a second. i want to you a question about to ask you a question about rayner of rayner because there's a lot of criticism seeing criticism that i've been seeing onune criticism that i've been seeing online and in editorials and other news channels where they kind of go, oh, what's the point of going into this? because raynen of going into this? because rayner, you know, she's labour, but it's you know, we're talking about £1,500 and an offence from ten years ago. and there's a part of me that, that, that, thatis part of me that, that, that, that is sympathetic that. but that is sympathetic to that. but of also talking of course we're also talking about right. and about hypocrisy, right. and whether lied or not. and whether someone lied or not. and then an elected official

then being an elected official possibly care possibly soon. so do you care about story or do you think about this story or do you think it's been blown out? >> you know we've we've all >> you know what we've we've all done scummy things like that. >> i'm not saying. >> what i'm not saying. >> what i'm not saying. >> oh, i'm not saying i have i'm not saying i have. i don't want to be a you know what the worst thing is? i don't want to be accused of a hypocrite. we've all whatever we've done. all done whatever we've done. the is, the fact is what the fact is, the fact is what i don't like what angela rayner did. care, did. i'm not i don't care, tories. labour. on, a pox tories. labour. come on, a pox on the country. i care that the that people love the and that people love the bbc. and i think the bbc should be defunded. and if you love the bbc you love it. and if you don't, you don't have to pay for it. >> okay, let's change. >> okay, let's change. >> the story is also really about rayner. but yeah, let's move on monday's guardian. move on to monday's guardian. lewis with news the tory lewis with news that the tory party's executives, o lewis with news that the tory party's executives, 0 axis, are ganging their bow. ganging up on their present bow. >> in the guardian >> yeah, this is in the guardian and the senior tories fear, and as the senior tories fear, johnson will sabotage johnson and truss will sabotage sunaks election campaign. well, that article be written in that that article be written in every campaign there's always going to be differences. and

that's parliamentary system. going to be differences. and thatlike parliamentary system. going to be differences. and thatlike rugby. amentary system. going to be differences. and thatlike rugby. allentary system. going to be differences. and thatlike rugby. allentalallystem. it's like rugby. all the all the players have to go. >> but you don't think that that tony blair sorry is going to be coming. >> you know when you interrupted me. >> no, no okay. but i'm just saying that's big point that saying that's a big point that you made. lewis. lewis, i've been not been very good at not interrupting so interrupting you. all right? so has good? has he been good? >> up for a second. but >> so shut up for a second. but the point is, i'm going to stop you on that point there, because. >> no, this isn't a typical thing where the ex—leaders a thing where the ex—leaders of a party to and ruin party come in to try and ruin the election of the present leader. so i just wanted to stop you please. you may you there. now, please. you may continue. well, why? you there. now, please. you may continuebecausevhy? you there. now, please. you may continuebecause you think that >> just because you think that that it true. and that doesn't make it true. and that doesn't make it true. and that point i that wasn't even my point that i was to to . was about to get to. >> why am i in the middle? >> why am i in the middle? >> my point is because. because daddy are fighting daddy and mummy are fighting now. is that is now. chateau sean is that is that the point i was making, that the point i was making, that this is just a typical article in the guardian undermining the tories. they're trying to show the tories are arguing with themselves. the tories have a fixed tories don't have a fixed position. the tories tories are crumbling. point crumbling. that's the point i was about to get to. >> okay, well, what do you what

do you think my feeling is? >> well, johnson and truss might sabotage sunak election campaign. sure what campaign. i'm not sure what election really election campaign there really is to sabotage at this point, apart from the tax bribes, he's probably, going to offer later in the year to try and get himself noticed again. i don't know what he is and what he's about, particularly on that. has there any interest or any quotable so who quotable value, anyhow, so who are about ? are you talking about? >> no, i'm saying what i'm saying that rishi sunak saying is that rishi sunak should, of being should, instead of being worried about they're to say, about what they're going to say, he giving a message he should be giving a message that's he's a that's strong enough. he's a leader. he should be leader. yeah. he should be saying of leadership leader. yeah. he should be sayingthat of leadership leader. yeah. he should be sayingthat is, of leadership leader. yeah. he should be sayingthat is, is of leadership leader. yeah. he should be sayingthat is, is oienough;hip value that is, is big enough that it doesn't matter what. and they're able to state their opinions. i mean, they're worried they're because worried. they're worried because truss's ten truss's books coming out ten years west, which years to save the west, which i hopeis years to save the west, which i hope is better than her book 50 days as mp. and, i really i really don't know because i feel like, i feel like rishi should be the one who's taking the leadership here rather than complaining. and then they're going to try and undermine me. it seems a bit pathetic. >> you're saying, can i don't

know, i'll add. know, i'll just add. >> don't know why he doesn't >> i don't know why he doesn't just them. enough just buy them. he's got enough money. he should buy all of us. >> what that's the. >> that's what that's the. >> that's what that's the. >> yeah, that's right. the >> yeah, that's right. but the question you're assuming question is, is you're assuming this true. this story is true. >> that some >> you're assuming that some that have been speaking that people have been speaking to the guardian. the tories the guardian quite senior. guardian says here quite senior. >> yeah, exactly. okay. >> look, i don't think they're going to be making up a story now, do you know that's the guardian? >> they could well be exaggerating the story. i don't well, the story is well, no, because the story is on bedrock of last week. on a bedrock of last week. >> you had a tory mp who endorsed another party in this case, reform, and they didn't do anything about it. they didn't take the whip away from the whole thing about the conservatives is normally they're very prideful their they're very prideful on their discipline within the party. and it we get closer it seems to be as we get closer to the election, this is falling apart. when have two apart. and when you have two leaders prominently in the leaders very prominently in the media and you have, obviously we have boris johnson coming to work here, during the election cycle when you when they're not for you , it could cause damage.

for you, it could cause damage. yes, sir. you may go is. >> no, no. >> no, no. >> you want to go to the toilet, right? >> is that is that what is the motive of the guardian for promoting this? >> no. their motive . >> no. their motive. >> no. their motive. >> yes. >> yes. >> and that's that's what we need to tell the people. and everything in the newspaper, of coui'se. >> course. >> but that doesn't all lie . no. >> but that doesn't all lie. no. >> but that doesn't all lie. no. >> you can have motive and then still focus on something that serves your interests. that is still male. now still true. anyway. male. now kerry, do you think rishi will use pull out method , this use the pull out method, this is, rishi sunak blasting . is, rishi sunak blasting. apparently he blasted the european court over the overreach on net zero and tory row, pulling out of human rights body ahead of rwanda. this also this is around the strasbourg. >> if you're blasting, you should pull out of the human rights body. >> yes. this is the story of, let me see. 2500 swiss women of average age of 74, who are

claiming and i think they've won their case, haven't they, that, they have a greater risk from heatwaves, which i would have thought is probably because of the between them, the menopause in between them, and, and so they've sued and they've won, because they're the most vulnerable group apparently, which i'd like to think climate change targets hysterical activists, in which case i'd be all for it, i suppose what it is, they can't do much that they want to push the governments to do more for climate change. so it's almost like the al capone thing of getting him tax evasion. getting him on tax evasion. instead, they're instead, it's more now they're getting they're getting government. they're trying government getting government. they're tryi|damage government getting government. they're tryi|damage it government getting government. they're tryi|damage it does�*rnment getting government. they're tryi|damage it does to nent getting government. they're tryi|damage it does to older the damage it does to older women, i suppose are this women, which i suppose are this is case. but this could this is the case. but this could this could precedent to loads could open a precedent to loads of sweaty climate change courts of sweaty climate change courts of the future, where everyone will be suing governments. >> yeah, but it's just another example of team world, which is the european of justice the european court of justice trying to trying to dictate about britain . the question is, about britain. the question is, is britain a is the uk a sovereign nation and all all rishi sunak has to do is say,

you know what, screw the european court of justice , okay? european court of justice, okay? >> for ofcom reasons will make the peace sign as the opposite , the peace sign as the opposite, of that you can't you can't swear on. >> what did say? >> what did i say? >> what did i say? >> i don't want to say i'm sorry. >> i'm sorry. >> i'm sorry. >> okay. and also, the european court of human whatever court of human rights, whatever it sorry, i apologise it is, i'm sorry, i apologise for cursing. >> right. oh, didn't >> all right. oh, i didn't realise that cursed for surely realise that i cursed for surely the larger point is . the larger point here is. >> so what? in terms of the impact that switzer is going to have on reaching net zero and what impact that's going to have on the world temperature? i understand the reasons behind it in getting you sort in getting you can't sort of tell do it if tell other countries to do it if the countries aren't, but the small countries aren't, but the small countries aren't, but the unusual case. the really unusual case. >> really unusual be >> so it's really unusual to be suing, suing courts over suing, suing the courts over a government decision on climate. i think we've had anything like that. >> well, it seems like this is still kicking off. whether we're going to leave, it's going to be brexit part der guardian x louis and mi5 really dropped the ball on mi5. on this one mi5. >> remember i came to >> i remember when i came to this country, it always looked like and, manchester arena

like m15 and, manchester arena attacks survivors take legal action against mi5, which is the local like it's the fbi of this country. and this is 250 people. they're suing the government because the government didn't stop the libyan bomber named salah ben abadi when they supposedly had 22 bits of information saying the guy was was a, was going to do this. information saying the guy was was a, was going to do this . the was a, was going to do this. the fact is, is that is that it's almost impossible to stop terrorism. i mean, a lot of times it is stopped , but a lot times it is stopped, but a lot of times it goes through and you almost feel for mi5 when there's like, i've read this, 40, 50,000 jihadis in the country that they're, they're tracking. that's a lot of people to track that are going to slip through that. >> he came through back from, what, four days before the bombing. yeah. but isn't it the case? carrie that it's always easier to look in easier to look back in retrospect and go, oh, that's so obvious. >> well, as a legal retrospect, expert, yes , of course it is,

expert, yes, of course it is, also, i don't know, this this is, it's once again, it's another unusual case, and it's quite interesting, but i'm not sure whether it's a good thing or not. we don't know. so as you're saying, we don't know how many how many many cases they how many terrorist they have terrorist attacks they have stopped, a worry stopped, but there is a worry with a case like this. is will it force mi5 to be more transparent ? and is that a good transparent? and is that a good thing for an intelligence agency? will they have to, reveal of their methods, reveal some of their methods, their so on in their thinking? and so on in order to show that they did do the work on this, on the other hand, if they didn't, then i suppose they be accountable. >> and when you have, family members, course, are members, of course, who are when's funny stories? when's the funny stories? the funny coming in funny stories are coming up in the next we're halfway the next section. we're halfway through. patience with the next section. we're halfway thro another. patience with the next section. we're halfway thro another. and patience with the next section. we're halfway thro another. and coming ce with the next section. we're halfway thro another. and coming up,rith the next section. we're halfway thro another. and coming up, we one another. and coming up, we have sparks with badenoch on the attack grade saying there's too much attack and how to

welcome back to headliners. and getting straight into monday's independent. and seems like michael grade is a headliners fan . fan. >> yes, this is ofcom chair michael grade says tv has become exploitative, patronising and cruel. yay, yay. i mean, he's still involved in this guy michael grade. he's like, he's like basically he's broadcasting royalty . he was channel 4. i've royalty. he was channel 4. i've read he was itv, his father was a somebody. his grandfather basically invented movies in this country, i think. yeah, did some amazing stuff. and now this poor guy, michael grade, i really feel sorry for him. he's 81 years old. he's he's basically ending his life. if he dies soon in the office of censorship of media , which is censorship of media, which is what ofcom is. he's a censor and he was on, on boom radio. he was on boom radio, which is not even on boom radio, which is not even on tv. and podcast. >> basically, it's a podcast. >> basically, it's a podcast. >> yeah. and he's in jo brand, who's lovely. he lives in my neighbourhood as a kid, similar in to mine. and and he's

in age to mine. and and he's he's whatever he said , he's derived whatever he said, he's derived whatever he said, he shouldn't it. it's like he shouldn't say it. it's like having goebbels, who was a censor . okay. talking about i'm censor. okay. talking about i'm not is. i'm not saying not saying he is. i'm not saying that, but i'm saying he's a clerk of the state. he is the official censor. >> but he made some great television back in the day. >> and the point of the story is, and i did i not give him credit? >> no. >> no. >> but the point. no, you did. but the point of the story is kerry. surely. yeah. that what he's is there's much he's saying is there's too much reality there's much as reality tv. there's too much as he people being used reality tv. there's too much as heentertain people being used reality tv. there's too much as heentertain peoplee being used reality tv. there's too much as heentertain people aseing used reality tv. there's too much as heentertain people as opposedd to entertain people as opposed to entertain people as opposed to comedy. drama? yes. educational documents educational programs, documents his great television that we had from the 80s. >> 90s i don't fully disagree with him, actually. i think what he's saying is, you know, when we started getting rid of the, received pronunciation on tv and i kind of understood that at the time, but everyone wanted regional they wanted time, but everyone wanted re tonal they wanted time, but everyone wanted re to be they wanted time, but everyone wanted re to be about they wanted time, but everyone wanted re to be about us. they wanted time, but everyone wanted reto be about us. i they wanted time, but everyone wanted reto be about us. i wasay wanted time, but everyone wanted reto be about us. i was atwanted time, but everyone wanted reto be about us. i was at aanted it to be about us. i was at a comedy club once. there was a comedian on the stage and someone in the audience stopped and went, there's nothing about us, about us, mate. there's nothing about

us. that's, us. i was going, yeah, that's, that's interesting that's why it's interesting because not. don't because you're not. oh, i don't want to know the public. want to know about the public. there are people who are trained performers and so on. >> right , but performers and so on. >> right, but so what? >> he's noticed that it's tv has become exploitative, patronising and cruel, as you just noticed, you where's he been? it's you know, where's he been? it's been this for while. been doing this for a while. >> and did he have? how was >> and what did he have? how was he in at the time he involved in that at the time at 4 or itv? at channel 4 or itv? >> he not have some >> did he not have some involvement in the television business? >> i think not known >> i think he may not have known how much it was. >> reality was going to blow up and more about us, and everyone obe more about us, about us. about us, about us. >> but did say, did he >> yeah, but did he say, did he say i'm sorry? >> i don't care about your lives and i don't your and i don't care about your accents. and think the public accents. and i think the public love themselves. >> there is >> well, there's much there is an economic factor an economic, economic factor here course, a here because of course, it's a lot to make reality tv. lot cheaper to make reality tv. exactly. the other thing exactly. that's the other thing and easier arguably. >> happened >> are you also happened with the like the the soaps, you know, like the soap opera stan and at first there's two running ages and there's two running for ages and then they make there's two running for ages and then cheap they make there's two running for ages and then cheap rubbishy make really cheap rubbish tv and people to it. please people want to watch it. please don't talk about us. >> i'm right in the room, mate, now. because does now. and then because he does actually news actually talk about gb news

here, he's asked here, he says. or he's asked about because of course we do have ofcom . have the ofcom. >> oh, you read right to the end of the story. >> i do read right to the end of the story. that's what i'm known for. the first for. i look at the first paragraph he says paragraph and basically he says here want our here we don't want our broadcasters owned run broadcasters being owned and run for and for political reasons, and i just want very clearly to just want to say very clearly to mr lord grade that one mr grade lord grade that no one owns and for green. owns me and vote for green. moving on to the times and lewis, what do you think of this nickname? bellicose badenoch , nickname? bellicose badenoch, this is, this is i love her. i love her glasses. they're like something out of the 1960s. it's a very artistic something my mother would wear. but kemi badenoch attacks gender cowardice at the nhs, politics and police. she's saying this isn't . this in the in the isn't. this is in the in the result of the cass report , which result of the cass report, which basically said what they're what they doing at the tavistock they were doing at the tavistock centre places with centre and other places with trans children was kind of wrong i >> -- >> and it's more than kind of wrong, very wrong. >> and i'm being i'm trying to moderate myself, but and, and it

should definitely stop. they're not supposed to trans kids. unless of course the kids are involved in some kind of study and people are watching them. so bafic. and people are watching them. so basic . basically, the cass basic. basically, the cass report said nothing and kemi badenoch saying that public bodies have been captured. yeah but but the problem is and we've seen this before, when the tories kind of tried to right some of the madness of the last few years, then they put , put some of the madness of the last few years, then they put, put in these, they changed laws. >> but the institute is the police, the nhs don't implement them. and that seems to be the problem. right, well i think they're going to be forced to make some, some changes now since report. right since the cass report. right >> but i'm talking about like, the hate, the hate, the hate laws, the hate when the, laws, the hate speech when the, the police reporting it. the police were reporting it. >> personally i think >> okay. personally i think there's this is the way change always works. always get too always works. we always get too dramatic. too far, over dramatic. we go too far, over the top and then we come back to something that makes a bit of sense. but really, we need to, as a society, to get better at learning to recognise social

contagion and how spreads. contagion and how it spreads. i'm a lot of i'm quite sure that a lot of what's going over the what's been going on over the last will look back last few years will look back in the is just a fad the future. more is just a fad of the times. i know people don't to that right now don't want to see that right now in in in a few decades time, you're going see films you're going to see films representing, 20, 20 and you're going wearing he going to see people wearing he him badges and everyone will laugh and go, we used to do that. you know what? >> you're totally you're totally right. all fashion. right. this is all fashion. >> think i think people >> and i think i think people only you've for quite only when you've lived for quite a start recognising a while, you start recognising all the signs of that and it always goes far. always goes too far. >> i with you. i just >> i agree with you. i just don't that's really what don't think that's really what this not this story is about. that's not what saying. this story is about. that's not thwho saying. this story is about. that's not thwho are laying. this story is about. that's not thwho are you,]. this story is about. that's not thwho are you, josh, to decide >> who are you, josh, to decide what is about. what the story is about. >> is very clearly no >> the story is very clearly no it isn't. >> it's the people he's >> no, it's the people he's talking about identity. talking about gender identity. >> one way and >> he's read one run one way and i'm reading, no, there is no other this what the other way. this is what the headuneis other way. this is what the headline is and what the words in article which in the article are, which are about our institutions. >> josh, josh, you've got to be out. it. and like i out. you've fight it. and like i say, in the seat has say, the person in the seat has to more angus deaton and less ian. >> thank you louis. okay. thank you so much.

>> but can i just say can i just say that that carrie is right calling that's i'm calling it. that's what i'm saying was watching saying because i was watching i was a stranglers video was watching a stranglers video from 19 early 1980s, and from the 19 early 1980s, and they had girls in punk, punk, girls, whatever. and they , they girls, whatever. and they, they were like hundreds of them punk girls. and you thought if you were there, you would think, wow, the world is ending with all mohawks. yeah. all the shaved mohawks. yeah. >> anecdote >> louis, that anecdote is why we have a month this we do have a host month this time, carrie. and a moral conundrum for three to conundrum for three idiots to mull right now , this mull oven oh, right now, this is. i think it's very morally interesting story. this the interesting story. this is the dutch woman who's, physically healthy and she's choosing euthanasia at the age of 33. is that correct? i think at the age of 33, putting the youth into euthanasia , as it were, it's euthanasia, as it were, it's a very morbid story. and i have very morbid story. and i have very mixed feelings on the, on the, on the subject euthanasia. anyway, because i'm generally quite it in that i think quite for it in that i think there's a lot of people who should it personally. but should choose it personally. but i i it's ridiculous

i also, i think it's ridiculous to force live a life to force people to live a life sentence for having not done anything you're anything wrong. if you're not enjoying life and it really you're going to you're certain it's not going to improve , i think everyone should improve, i think everyone should have. and your have. it's your body and your choice as far as i'm concerned, i'm quite libertarian like that. yeah, at the same time, yes. yeah, but at the same time, yes. >> and agree with that. >> and i agree with that. >> and i agree with that. >> same time, does >> but at the same time, does this open a door where this though open a door where younger mental health younger people and mental health will it open the door? it is >> does it open the door? it is open door. there was 9000 open the door. there was 9000 people killed. want to people killed. if people want to die, die. if you're die, they could die. if you're having such a bad living, having such a bad time living, you anybody to take you don't need anybody to take your you can just and your life. you can just die. and if you're dying that way, if you're not dying that way, you jump off a bridge, which you can jump off a bridge, which i recommend. you can jump off a bridge, which i yeah,commend. you can jump off a bridge, which i yeah, that'sand. good. >> yeah, that's not good. >> yeah, that's not good. >> i mean, it >> well, i mean, it's it is interesting terms what interesting in terms of what she's talking about, her mental anguish this has been anguish here. this has been going on within the netherlands for a couple of decades now. but the problem is, is that the system, like any systems , can be system, like any systems, can be exploited. there was someone on free speech nation, i think, about whose mother about a year ago whose mother had psychiatric issues, and she basically got this euthanasia. and that it

and her son argues that it happened wrongly, that it was pushed through too quickly, too easily . that seems to be part of easily. that seems to be part of the problem. and i do think there is a it's complex differentiation between older people or anybody with sort people or anybody with some sort of illness disease or, of fatal illness or disease or, coming to the end of their life and in pain. and what we're talking about here, which is psychological pain, i'm very i feel very blessed that i don't i don't suffer from either of those. so it's hard for me to empathise. but of the big empathise. but one of the big factors say here whether factors they say here is whether it can be whether they allow it to happen is whether louis, it can be treated. and the argument that pain, there's that psychological pain, there's no hope for it, i would say, is a weak one. >> it's it really it's a really weak one. it, it i'm going to say something i don't think i've ever said. it goes against god and, and, but that's not even my reason. my reason is , is you reason. my reason is, is you shouldn't, you know, if someone came to you and said, know came to you and said, you know what want my too. if you what i want my arm, too. if you came somebody said, i my came to somebody said, i want my arm shouldn't arm to be eaten. they shouldn't eat even if they were

eat your arm. even if they were even into eating you just even into eating arms. you just don't this is. they're don't do this. this is. they're killing people. most. who are the people are dying? the people who are dying? europeans it's so morally wrong. it could even be racist. you might even consider that it's the death. it's the death of europeans. >> yeah. okay. exciting. >> yeah. okay. exciting. >> she might ruin assisted dying for the rest of us. >> okay, well, exciting news in the times for those of us, against the most evil people in the world. louis >> well, that is a very. i agree with you. this is user dash cam to slap litter louts with £500 fine . told. and this is, fine drivers. told. and this is, this is, buckinghamshire council has is asking people turn your you know turn in litterers. if you know turn in litterers. if you see somebody throwing a coke can out of . excuse me, am i can out of. excuse me, am i allowed to say that a soda pop can out of the out of the can extra careful. out of the can send it, send it. i mean, yeah, i got to be careful. i didn't even do the story. we were having such a good time, you know, we got to do the show by ourselves. carrie, i love you so

much , i love you. much, i love you. >> doesn't it make. am i wrong that it makes the car go faster? if you throw the rubbish out? >> you could try that one in court. course we have court. but of course we have this the nanny state this idea of the nanny state people. each other people. dobbing each other in a little bit, but the same little bit, but at the same time, is an evil and time, litter is an evil and they. i think they be they. i think they should be paying they. i think they should be paying cares you think. paying cares what you think. >> got a panellist >> josh, we've got a panellist here. are the host asking here. you are the host asking for him. >> you are lewis. lewis. shut up! i'm trying to get to up! carrie, i'm trying to get to him. >> i know i saw i saw someone walking along the street just a few days ago, and she had, like, a bag of crisps and just threw it over her shoulder. and somehow arrogance that, somehow the arrogance of that, l, somehow the arrogance of that, i, able to report i, i want to be able to report her straight away or do something . yeah, actually something. but yeah, actually i don't. like be able to don't. i'd like to be able to say to her which say something to her which what's else and what's your what else did? and she with them. but at she got mad with them. but at the same time, do worry about the same time, i do worry about this idea public reporting. >> in. there's no >> dob them in. there's no reward, just the final section to go and some shockers with cash and a reason to get cash pay and a reason to get religious. some health religious. some x—rated health advice for men and women

welcome back to headlines. let's go to the mail. and kerry, is this why you insist on paying your dealer by card? >> this is, a really important study. i wouldn't make fun of it. it's the study that appears in the journal of economic behaviour and organisation, where they have discovered that people psychological people feel more psychological pain when they pay cash than when they use a card, because they can just tap the card and it's done. whereas cash is counting it and seeing the money and feeling it. it says here the pain of they bothered doing this, pain of paying is this, the pain of paying is higher for poorer people. this is what they discovered , people, is what they discovered, people, people without money find it more difficult. and they also say also for those who are excessively frugal. so yes, it turns out that mean people aren't particularly happy about spending money, which is not surprising to be honest. actually, i feel the opposite about this. i'm much happier

about this. i'm i'm much happier spending cash spending money. that's cash because, accounted for. because, it's not accounted for. it's like it's non—money. if i pay you my it's like it's non—money. if i pay you my card , i declare it right. >> you don't declare it, you don't order it. and i'm very, very good. >> i'm very good. but if i pay you with my card, my bank balance goes down. if i pay with cash, my jacket lighter. cash, my jacket gets lighter. i don't it. it doesn't don't even notice it. it doesn't show it's irrelevant. show anywhere. it's irrelevant. it's not. and it's not about, taxes. it's more about just seeing number change. what seeing that number change. what do you think, lewis? >> it cause you spending >> is it cause you pain spending money well don't >> is it cause you pain spending moneto well don't >> is it cause you pain spending moneto make well don't >> is it cause you pain spending moneto make a well don't >> is it cause you pain spending moneto make a w> do you want to give me some money? >> yeah. yeah, yeah, it is. when you give people money, you just want to make you happy. >> me money. >> yeah. give me money. >> yeah. give me money. >> will give you money, >> i will give you money, i will. you didn't plug your, your mugs there, lewis. >> personally, i think >> i know personally, i think that future, that this whole, the future, you know, in know, with the whole chip in hand, you should be able hand, i think you should be able to like, an electric shock to get, like, an electric shock every time spend and

every time you spend money. and that sort of. that way, it'll it'll sort of. yes. know, you. yes. you know, defer you. >> i like it, yeah. >> i like it, i like it, yeah. >> i like it, i like it, yeah. >> carry the telegraph story reminds me famous reminds me of that famous christian proverb. if you can't take mohammed the mountain, take mohammed to the mountain, bnng take mohammed to the mountain, bring mohammed. bring the mountain to mohammed. >> yeah, it does do that, doesn't way, the crazy >> in a way, the crazy proselytising christians are finding ways of spreading finding new ways of spreading the is an italian finding new ways of spreading the who is an italian finding new ways of spreading the who started1 italian in priest who started preaching in bars. people bars. he's found that people aren't going to the church. they're going the bar to they're going to the bar to avoid so he's going to the avoid him. so he's going to the bar let them get away bar to not let them get away with i think. i think he with it. i think. i think he should to spaghetti should be going to spaghetti houses. could be pasta. houses. he could be a pasta. pasta never mind. carry pasta never mind. let's carry on, his next thing is on, i imagine his next thing is going to be brothels and then s&m dungeons and just not let them go and hide anywhere at all, and he's going into the all, and so he's going into the bars and he's telling them about god they're saying, yeah, god and they're saying, yeah, yeah, interesting. yeah, that's really interesting. you're isn't it? yeah, that's really interesting. youthis isn't it? yeah, that's really interesting. youthis you isn't it? yeah, that's really interesting. youthis you know isn't it? yeah, that's really interesting. youthis you know what?t it? yeah, that's really interesting. youthis you know what? this >> this you know what? this sounds like this guy going to the to proselytise or the pub to, to proselytise or whatever to preach, it's just it's some random nutter in it's just some random nutter in a in london. it'sjust it's just some random nutter in a in london. it's just this a pub in london. it's just this is english people are. is the way english people are. there's just some guy, he just says, i'm for a

says, oh, i'm here for a purpose. he's just some boring blowhard people. blowhard just lecturing people. it for 40 minutes. yes. it says for 40 minutes. yes. yeah, bit too long to yeah, that's a bit too long to do anything. yeah. >> he says he met the pope. he doesn't know the pope. remember him? but it's probably cause he got drunk. yeah, yeah. got him drunk. yeah, yeah. >> stan just >> lewis is the daily star. just doing here. doing a humblebrag here. >> is , this is. >> yeah, this is, this is. experts men to to, do. we experts urge men to to, do. we have to we have to discuss this to ejaculate 21 times a month. for the sake of truth, this is one of those stories that is complete and utter rubbish. it's done by harvard university, which used to be the most prestigious school in america and one of the most in the world. and can't trust it. world. and you can't trust it. you trust harvard you can't trust harvard university. says university. it basically says they they analyse university. it basically says tilot they analyse university. it basically says tilot of they analyse university. it basically says tilot of people they analyse university. it basically says tilot of people , they analyse university. it basically says tilot of people , and hey analyse university. it basically says tilot of people , and theyinalyse university. it basically says tilot of people , and they found; a lot of people, and they found out that men who that men who were the healthiest are men who ejaculate 21 times a month. but maybe it's because they're happiest, maybe because they don't have disease like prostate disease. so they they can do it's a chicken and the egg . i it's a chicken and the egg. i think it's a what i call a coral

story. it's a correlation association linked to. it's just it's a non—story. >> i mean, i think at your age you would say that, wouldn't you?i you would say that, wouldn't you? i mean, kerry, you're a little bit younger, a bit more vital. what do i do? >> i do everything i can to stop myself getting prostate cancer, and so you're going do this? and so you're going to do this? >> this very, very >> i take this very, very seriously. i thought we seriously. and, i thought we already knew this. anyway, why is it taking me so to get is it taking me so long to get to the fun stories? yeah. so. yeah. and they're saying yeah. and i, they're saying there's loads of health benefits, improve quality, benefits, improve spum quality, gives immune system gives your immune system a boost. migraines, reduce gives your immune system a boo risk migraines, reduce gives your immune system a boo risk of migraines, reduce gives your immune system a boo risk of heart graines, reduce gives your immune system a boo risk of heart disease reduce gives your immune system a boo risk of heart disease andice gives your immune system a boo risk of heart disease and so the risk of heart disease and so on. but they're also warning that, despite the health benefits, you can do it too much. and there are warning signs i you, like if your signs i tell you, like if your penis bright red and glowing, penis is bright red and glowing, i whole point of this i think the whole point of this study just so people study was just so people could go their wives . go to their wives. >> want me to get cancer? >> do you want me to get cancer? >> do you want me to get cancer? >> yeah. yeah. >> yeah. yeah. >> the. yeah. >> no. is the. yeah. >> no. is the. yeah. >> let's do the final story, kerry, actually, it's the male to us off. to finish us off. >> now, now we're to >> oh, now, now we're on to women having more orgasms as well. everyone well. so. hey. everyone wins.

yeah everyone wins today, more orgasms midlife . this is, orgasms in midlife. this is, it's basically the same story saying that there's benefits for women and that this woman is. she doesn't say who it is here. by she doesn't say who it is here. by the way, this woman just that the opening thing is, i'm going to you something. few to tell you something. few people it's very odd, kind people will. it's very odd, kind of, introduction of, isn't it? the introduction to and thing she wants to this and the thing she wants to this and the thing she wants to tell women is that they should, touch themselves up a little think little bit more, which i think is should should is they should you should definitely and then she definitely do that. and then she goes about how out goes on about how dried out their vagina. >> to the end , >> anyway, coming to the end, i'm surprised. it's a shame we can't. it's a shame. >> medical science. >> medical science. >> it's a shame we can't go to lewis because he would tell us that obviously fake and that this is obviously fake and a non—story. the nearly a non—story. the show is nearly oven a non—story. the show is nearly over. a quick look at oven let's take a quick look at monday's pages. times monday's front pages. the times israel the world israel vows revenge as the world calls for calm. the daily mail it's calls for calm. the daily mail wsfime calls for calm. the daily mail it's time the world faces evil empire in tehran at the i, iran risks an uncontrollable wider war with israel, attacks g7 nafions war with israel, attacks g7 nations warn financial times

israel weighs options after iran attack the guardian us warning as israel weighs up response to iran tax. daily star will add a few more lifeboats on the new titanic. that's it for tonight's show. thank you to kerry and lewis. headlines back tomorrow at if you're watching at at 11 pm. if you're watching at 5 tuned for breakfast. 5 pm, stay tuned for breakfast. goodbye >> that warm feeling inside from boxt boilers. sponsors of weather on gb news. >> good evening. welcome to your latest gb news weather from the met office. so there has been plenty of showers around in the north, all thanks to an area of low pressure situated out towards uk at towards the north of the uk at the but it will slowly the moment, but it will slowly move its way towards us through the weekend and into the rest of the weekend and into the rest of the weekend and into the of monday. the start of monday. high pressure stay by pressure does stay close by towards south and west for towards the south and west for a time, bringing some clear skies through evening. through the sunday evening. but those north and those showers in the north and west their way south west slowly push their way south and eastwards as we through and eastwards as we go through the hours monday the early hours of monday morning, turning particularly the early hours of monday mornilacrossiing particularly the early hours of monday mornilacross northern cularly the early hours of monday mornilacross northern partsy the early hours of monday mornilacross northern parts of heavy across northern parts of

england. see england. and we could even see some snow across the high ground of and will a of scotland. and it will be a chilly night here, temperatures dropping single dropping into the low single figures in the south figures and even in the south around 8 degrees. monday around 7 or 8 degrees. monday starts chilly , but quite a starts a bit chilly, but quite a blustery start to the day. not brisk northwesterly winds help clear that band rain across clear that band of rain across the through monday the southeast through monday morning, leaving a drier day. there be some sunshine there will be some sunshine around, but some showers quite quickly developing from the northwest , these turning wintry northwest, these turning wintry across of across the high ground of northern scotland, northern england and scotland, and it will be a much chillier day than we've seen the day than we've seen over the weekend. struggling to reach much above 12 or 13 in south much above 12 or 13 in the south and reach and even struggling to reach double the north. double figures in the north. tuesday a bit drier tuesday does start a bit drier for though. there for most of us, though. there will plenty of sunshine will be plenty of sunshine through morning. still, the will be plenty of sunshine thro13h morning. still, the will be plenty of sunshine thro1 or morning. still, the will be plenty of sunshine thro1 or 2 morning. still, the will be plenty of sunshine thro1 or 2 showers|g. still, the will be plenty of sunshine thro1 or 2 showers around the will be plenty of sunshine thro1 or 2 showers around across odd 1 or 2 showers around across northern parts, and northern and western parts, and perhaps bubbling up across perhaps a few bubbling up across eastern but eastern parts of england. but there should be plenty of sunshine however, sunshine around. however, temperatures still close to average. a few showers average. still a few showers around wednesday and around on wednesday and thursday, are hints thursday, but there are hints of something later something more settled later in the and temperatures the week and temperatures returning average . returning closer to average. >> like things are heating >> looks like things are heating

up as sponsors of up boxt boiler as sponsors of weather on

isabel were with you all the way until 9:30 this morning. >> the headlines on this monday, world leaders call for calm as israel vows revenge against iran following those attacks over the weekend. >> rwanda back in the headlines today as the government teases the prospects of flights within weeks . weeks. >> yes, it's two years exactly since boris johnson announced his plan to send people to rwanda. parliament is back today . there will be votes. the government is confident of getting this bill finally into

law in the next few