he strongly objected to him . despite the friendly relations we have, this thing you did is not in my national interests, and i object to you regarding the discussion of what the uae did in the two meetings you mentioned, both about russia and coming to china and from the uae's point of view asking iran to negotiate with the uae over the three islands of the persian gulf, not saying that these islands belong to the emirates, saying to negotiate with each other . and the exchange that happened between saudi arabia and china or the uae and china that you gave and you confirmed the trade, which means that china came based on its own interests and signed this statement. the statement

was collective and not bilateral. well , do we need to disturb our own friendship with china and our strategic relations with china? we summoned the chinese ambassador, our foreign minister talked to his counterpart on the phone, the president took a stand, we strongly condemned this move by china, so that the chinese sent their own deputy prime minister to iran and said no to the totality of the islamic republic of iran. we respect that the same thing was done in relation to china and russia, you see russia and india have relations with each other, don't they have differences, the same saudi arabia that you mentioned , saudi arabia has a very sad relationship with america, but in russia, syria, the west asia region , it has differences with russia and china. to do.

they also have differences, because every country's foreign ministry , as a principle , has friendly countries, if the countries were not to have differences , the foreign ministry made sense . it reduces these differences and increases commonalities. we have strategic relations with china and russia. yes, yes somewhere we also have differences. the leaders are now dissatisfied with the fact that we support the integrity of the currency of georgia. in the caucasus region

, we do not have compatible positions, but we are friends. let's leave mr. khosrash to your presence and i am against the false dichotomies that the chinese and the russians take a stance on iran's vital and territorial interests and we return our relations to the level of hostility because of this stance. i definitely disagree with it , but the point of my discussion was that in the situation where the islamic republic of iran has declared that these seghan islands are part of the horizontal integrity and vital and territorial interests of iran, the support of china and russia to refer this issue to international forums or the international court of justice the layer itself is surprising. but

my point is to understand these contradictory behaviors and the paradox of my point is that the relationships that today there are relationships based on data and relationships from a structural state to a functional state. in fact, data has changed and position has changed, in other words, relationships based on position. at the same time, relative or subject and case relations are formed, that is why the alliances in the new system, both in the regional and international fields, are very unstable and fluid. therefore, in this sense, i am referring to the fact that we must get out of these dualities in the form of these conceptual tools of today's world and see and recognize again that mr. ido.

if we accept these cases, it is practically giving priority to one a regional issue over an international issue , giving priority to some countries over other countries is fundamentally harmful and harmful for national interests. because you are living in a regional situation where saudi arabia can take full advantage of these parallel relations and simultaneous partnerships with competitors, that is

, take necessary advantage of china, russia's competition with the united states of america and european countries, but you are due to cancellations in fact before the transition order. most of the cancellations seem to be ideological cancellations if the world was bipolar and we had a strategic and strategic alliance with the russians, i would definitely accept your argument . you also mentioned the neighborhood policy and the priorities that should exist. what is your assessment, how much should we focus on the development of the neighborhood policy in international relations and

our own foreign relations? mr. pakin, if you know the price you can see that there is a debate in bilateral communication, which usually and always defends the horizontal integrity of the islamic republic of iran, but in multilateral meetings, a statement is usually prepared by the host. a country may not agree with all the provisions of that statement. but the whole statement is to respect the table. he accepts the band and the members of the other members of that assembly and then announces a reservation , which means reservation, and then announces it in a place where, for example , i disagreed with this clause. for example, we in the organization of islamic cooperation recently made a statement.

exporting, which was a symbol of the unity of islamic countries, in one paragraph of these statements raised the issue of the government in the occupied territories, that is, a palestinian government, a government. israel, today's opinion of the united nations, we were against this, but we did not reject the principle of the statement, we did not say that we do not accept the whole statement because of this issue, because this will threaten the unity of the islamic world, we accepted the statement, then immediately expressed our reservations , we said that we are talking about holding a referendum in the occupied territories of resistance to the referendum with the presence of christ. jews and muslims, that's your own story you know, therefore, this does not mean that that country has deviated from its position, not for the sake of expediency , it decides to accept that statement at a summit

. china also accepts the statement of the persian gulf cooperation council. it is accepted because of the same bad beliefs that they mentioned and the benefits it has, but then declare it explicitly. we defend the integrity of the currency of the islamic republic of iran. this is a second debate about the neighbors that you mentioned. again , this issue of priorities is raised. neighbors are a priority in every country's foreign policy. that is, if they say that the foreign policy of a certain country has been successful, they will look at how this country's relationship with its neighbors has been, for example, turkey. one of the criticisms that are raised against turkey is that it has not been able to have good relations with its neighbors , not with syria, not with iraq, not with armenia, and in this way, now russia must give priority to iran over the philippines, china's characteristic

for pakistan in relations. foreigners give priority to sri lanka, this is a natural thing, well , considering this issue, we are looking for it to be a priority for us with the 15 countries we have. regulate its cooperation in various political, security, economic and cultural fields, that is why we have raised the issue of regional security in the persian gulf, we believe that our neighboring countries in the persian gulf can, with the help of each other , secure the region they don't need trans-regional countries, we are raising the same issue in the caucasus of central asia, without the interference of foreign countries, countries in the caucasus in central asia, especially. for example, after the qorbagh war, they can sit together and ensure the security of the region, like the meeting of 3 plus 3 that we had in

we held iran and many of our neighbors welcome this issue. we are in the economic sphere of most of our neighboring countries. we are cooperating with them , so i would like to mention one or two points before entering the topic of the region, which i forgot to present in other discussions. see when we talk about a multi-aligned system, which is more and more basic. functional relations instead of structural relations , in principle, there is no more polarity, no matter what pole we say now under the title of "east" or "west", it is actually us. we are witnessing a kind of non-polarity in the international system. in such a situation, one of the axes that mr. pak

hayin points out is that the upstream documents that the policy is neither eastern nor western are fundamentally incompatible with today's fluid and dynamic world. we cannot understand the realities of today's world with this principle and with these glasses and based on it. let him make a decision, when you can be neither eastern nor western, when you can have a lack of commitment or spend a negative balance to be a bipolar system, which this bipolar system, of course, seems to be in the cold war period was a flexible bipolar system, in which non-commitments could play a role between these two poles, but in a world where there is no polarity, basically neutrality and absence. the commitment loses its meaning. this is the first point. the second point is that

in a situation where there are dynamic and fluid relationships and thematic and case partnerships instead of exclusive and stable partnerships, we should put all our efforts into targeting instead of the trend of a relationship. and another relationship on the diversification of the foreign policy portfolio. that is , as far as possible, our relations, especially with the big powers, where we actually have good relations let's deepen it qualitatively and quantitatively, there is a difference between east and west. in my opinion, in the current situation, we should change the policy of neither east nor west into an east and west policy, that is, today's world is a world which, due to the lack of polarity in it, is definitely us. we cannot

make a decision looking at the past, if we do not diversify our foreign policy portfolio, iran's dignity and value in both regional and international relations will be harmed, god forbid, because the great powers will become actors in the competition among themselves. comment and present. raise the price of the relationship and pay the price make them feel that the only options for that actor , for example, are not iran. in our foreign policy, in the current situation, we are somehow or in a situation where the russians and chinese know that in this situation, we are not like saudi arabia, we are not like the uae, and the only option is in the current situation, where we are facing the unilateral sanctions regime of the united states, the only options

are the presence of russia and china, and this cause of abuse can be provided by the neighborhood policy, but in the regional field , i must mention conceptual developments. the liberals already have a word in the regional sphere they put forward under the title of integration, convergence, where there was another term under the title of spillover, which actually. cooperation spread from soft areas to hard areas like the european union. basically, the concept of convergence and what liberals consider in international relations.

in fact, a new topic or a new proposition that can be. let's propose for the most regional doctorate of iran , the regional connection chain, which is very important in this regional connection chain of geography and historical and civilizational connections of iran based on this geography and the connections of the history of iranian civilization to four sub-systems and the bottom of the eurasian system, the persian gulf, and south asia can actually be reached from the side. the other axis of the regional connection chain is definitely the role of the corridor, the role of transit, that is, in other words , the regional transfer of goods and policies, on this basis, iran can become the potential of practical issues and the sphere

of influence and determination to eastern europe, central europe and... north africa, even reach us. well , we have 6 minutes, 3 minutes for your war , 3 minutes. the international system has never faced the lack of a pole. being and no change in the world could take place unless one of these two poles declares an opinion and declares the issue after. the collapse of the soviet union. americans say that the world has become unipolar, which means that there is no more east. the only pole is america. and this whole world should be subject to the policies of american aggression and domination. the islamic revolution disrupted this game and announced

that we should look for a multilateral group. let's seek to present a polar opposite to american unilateralism, and this issue is now one of the characteristics of the order. it is a new world in which the occurrence is one of the undeniable characteristics of the transition period, and all my experts believe that there is a multilateral front, as opposed to a one-sided pole , that is, america appreciates the knowledge that it has an important multi-axis seal. russia, iran, china and some non-aligned countries, latin american countries , african countries, all of which follow multilateralism , so we cannot say, because now america is an absolute pole, so we should have a relationship with russia just as we have with russia. china is a friend, we have the same relationship with america

who has sanctioned us and is doing all kinds of hostilities against us. we have to establish a relationship with the united states in the same way, this is not logical at all. you see, libya had the same idea. the libyans thought that the only pole in the world that is the leader is the united states. therefore, applying the opinions of the united states is the same as what the united states gave us. he says destroy your missile system , destroy the influence of eaton's logic, the revolutionary mr. gaddafi did this, when he did this , the united states, as we are talking about the existence of partisanship in the country of democracy in libya, is a different point. it is a one-sidedness in the world where there is a lack of polarity in the practice of domination and hegemony, and one

-sidedness is going down. i am talking about the lack of polarity. this non-polarity will include the us and other great powers as well. this is an exceptional situation that in the history of international relations, we rarely face such a situation, or maybe there is no history at all. this is that today, if there was a polarity, china would have provided military assistance to the russians. china has a relative lack of military assistance to russia, if it was a polarity and that america used to be unipolar, today india bought oil from russia under no circumstances. the sanctions against the united states of america were loyal and followed it, but in the current situation, we

are actually witnessing the escape and escape of great powers such as india and china from the ring of western and united states of america sanctions against russia. if the world had a polarity, today saudi arabia same with relationships. with america , it did not deepen its relations with the russians and the chinese. thank you very much. we are higher than any or higher today wherever we are.

they have arrived at the same time as the sun rises.

the crowd is increasing moment by moment. i was here since 6 o'clock and i came with my sister. i still haven't found her. why wasn't the last page in place ? mashallah, the crowd has come to celebrate our eid , god willing, and we came with the hope that, god willing, we will perform this prayer soon behind our master, imam al-zaman. this year, with the presence of my son,

we came to pray behind hazrat agha.

the image of children, teenagers and young people with their families today has given the mosque a festive atmosphere, here in the procession of eid al-fitr prayers, colors of a collective joy. after a month of prayer and

the holy month, a state of fear of god came to us. god willing , we will be able to continue the covenant we made with god, and we will stick to that covenant. big iranian house is a well-equipped and specialized digital house in an area of ​​more than 5,000 meters.

he opened the irani palace of qom. all kinds of mobile phones, personal computers , tablets, gaming devices and other digital accessories, with incredible prices, and long-term contracts, a digital equipped house in the great iranian house of qom. art takes us to a world of colors and designs, knots. a knot is lost rather than a carpet let the city of carpets remain the most valuable place of iranian handmade art, with the advice of the most expert experts, the variety of prices in accordance with each installment purchase cost , the unparalleled breadth and variety in the city of carpets, with the largest specialized reference of hand-woven carpets in the country.

in the name of allah, the most merciful, the most merciful, o allah, peace be upon muhammad and the family of muhammad, and hasten their fate , i wish you a good morning, dear viewers. khari gave the result to the opponent in the asian championship freestyle wrestling competitions. in the first wrestling match of the iranian representatives in the first five weights of this competition , ibrahim khari in the weight of 57 kg lost 108 results to the indian competitor and we have to wait.