your products are where to start, washer makers , smile at your dreams. in the name of allah, the most merciful, the most merciful, hello, dear and respected viewers, at one o'clock in the morning, the chief spokesman of the armed forces, in response to the support of some western countries' leaders for the zionist regime, said that we remind the leaders of the united states, england, france and germany to stop supporting the deteriorating regime of the evil, law-breaking israel. take the terrorist and his child, sardar abolfazl shikarchi said, you know very well

that the islamic republic of iran has proven that it was not a belligerent and does not seek to expand the war, but if anyone , including you and that desperate and helpless regime, we will cut off his legs more powerfully than the previous answer to the aggressor and wicked israel . the chief spokesman of the armed forces continued: "if we have shown you a part of this divine power of the brave and powerful men of islamic iran in the operation of true promise, and with the sound of missiles and anti-enemy drones from your advanced radar and air defense systems and we passed through the so-called iron dome that you donated to the zionists and we plowed the military fortresses of that fake and criminal regime . illegitimate fools and terrorists,

do not throw yourself into the oven of burning fire. the political deputy minister of foreign affairs warned that if the enemy makes another mistake, the zionists should know that they will not have 12 days and iran's response will be less than a few seconds. zionist, in my opinion, a strategic error in the crime of damascus is that it was a legitimacy to actually provide a serious test of the military and defense capabilities of the islamic republic of iran , that is, if they did not do this , these conditions would not have been provided, and this their strategic mistake , as a rule, if there is rationality in the zionist regime they should not repeat with another mistake. because repeating

another mistake, they should expect a harder, faster and more urgent blow this time, the zionists should know that they will not have a 12-day deadline. in fact, the answer they receive will not be measured in days or hours, but in seconds. and this is the authority that the islamic republic of iran, when it decided to treat the zionists in order to protect its national interests and national security , it also had a plan for their next mischief . others let it continue, they should know that when the zionists

make a mistake to the embassy of the islamic republic of iran in damascus, which is under the jurisdiction of iran, they will receive a harsh response. they will receive the bigger one. the foreign minister told his english counterpart: iran does not welcome the escalation of tension in the region, but. it is surprising that while several thousand tons of bombs have been dropped on the oppressed people of gaza in 6 months, england is worried about iran's response to the zionist regime's brutal attack on diplomatic facilities. is. concerned about renewed tension in the region, following iran's response, the british foreign minister

said about the developments in gaza: "during the recent un resolution , we tried to establish a ceasefire and we are looking for this." david cameron emphasized. we ask israel not to take action because we do not want what happened recently to be implemented again and more widely. all juma and sunni scholars supported iran's powerful response to the recent attack of the zionist regime. i feel proud of what happened and thank god our fighters are brave our men have a tooth breaking answer and a firm slap in israel's face. attacking a consulate or an embassy anywhere is an attack on a country, and we

have the right to respond to what israel has done. you hit and you eat.

with this operation, we broke the enemy's army and proved the authority of the holy nizam corps of the islamic republic of iran to the world by the praise of god. it is a given, this is not a general move, this is a given choice, make one more move , be sure that iran will raze israel to the ground, just as the great leader said , punishment of the aggressor is necessary. yes, this attack that iran made on israel was in response to the attack that it made on the embassy of the islamic republic, that is , it attacked the territory of iran, so it was necessary for the islamic republic to respond in a good way until the next part

of the news at 2 am.

courtesy and respect to each and every one of our dear and respected viewers of the higher program , we are at your service with another debate on the topic that the ministry of mines and metals to form or not? you know that it was in 1990 that the ministry of industry, mining and trade was merged with the ministry of industry, mining and trade . and we want to say clearly that we had the ministry of heavy industry, we had metal mines, and i would like to ask you that the industry and mines, which are now in one ministry , have their critics and some say that these ministries should be reorganized. be separated, you know that for example, we are talking about the ministry of commerce that the powers

of the ministry should be separated to this ministry . now some experts believe that in the field of mines , due to the extent that the ministry of industry now has a trade body, mines are also disrespectful to them, and it should also be removed as a ministry. but on the other side, there are some people who believe that this issue will cause the government to expand and make the government bigger, and it is not very good for this to happen. this ministry of industry and trade can also deal with mines . if you are interested, please follow this discussion with us. please join us and let's see how the debate will turn out. well, here in our studio, mr. askarzadeh, the secretary of the iran iron and steel association , is present as a supporter of the issue that i presented to you , as well as mr. taheri, a member of parliament and the former head of the islamic council's tradition commission, as an opponent. this is the ministry of home affairs , i would like to start with mr. taheri and the question, mr. taheri, where does your opposition to the formation of the ministry of minerals and minerals come from? in the name of allah, the most

merciful, the most merciful, i also offer greetings and a good time to the honorable viewers and guests. that the mine is very important, we have serious backlogs , this is a serious demand of the system, we have many capacities that have not yet been used, this is one. it is a fact that we are the same in many other areas , we have many potential capacities and we must turn them into action. the ministry of mining industry is a busy ministry and there are many things to do in this ministry. it is also a correct principle, but if something is not done well or incompletely , we must think that it should be corrected by creating a new structure, this is a wrong thing, past experience.

we had rome, now i will give several examples , for example, this is commerce and the so-called mining industry , or before it was a small industry or once a mine, all of these have been experienced. the field of commerce is now in a ministry. and a minister can actually take care of all these matters, this in itself is a position and a good thing, he can control the entire chain , import these, export here, regulate these, and manage the work if these are separated. separate, this is what will happen first of all, when we say the ministry of mines and metals , how far do we mean the chain, assuming that we cut somewhere, for example, in the chain

, when you finally cut this piece, it will continue, so that the rolling steel industries want to be where they want to be, right? even if it reaches a lower level , cars, household appliances, and finally , there will definitely be a big difference between these two parts of the chain . downstream is this, and here people may actually forget that serious problems will occur, which means a large part of the cabinet's time and this two ministers should solve these differences. of course , there are many reasons. i will present them in the following sections . yes, mr. asak asakzadeh, please tell me the reason why you believe that this ministry of home affairs should be formed . how much do you agree with mr. taheri's statements ? and not at a price. i think that

we should follow the discussion from the beginning of the actions. as you know , the ministry of industry and heavy industry which was formed merged with each other and formed the ministry of industries , later it was merged with mines and metals, industries and mines , and later commerce was added to it and became the mining industry. trade in time. i can definitely tell you that there is no bachelor's degree for the construction of industries, mines, and metals, but when commerce was established with these, a great master's work was done . i remember that even the chamber of commerce came and compared 100 countries of the world. let's look at the structural conditions governing the world. what is the ideal governance system like? basically , there

was no serious difference between what was practiced in the metal mines and what was practiced in the industry . they were without you when they were without you it was going into the industry, that is, from the point that dr. taheri points out, where he wants to cut off, the point is exactly here, that is, as far as the company was with the company , it was related to the metal mining sector, and where it comes, it is in the public sector and the side. being customers of the industry sector , there is no difference with each other. by the way, in chains, we basically do not look at the lowest industry, in chains, we look at the production chain

. we will fully see what will happen in the construction industry is it exported or not, is it used in the construction industry , this is tying another sector to the mining sector and the so-called mining industry. let's produce, forgive me, mr. taheri is referring to the same issue and saying that if these two ministries are separated, these chains will be broken. if it is like this that the whole government department is related to each other, let's add, for example, housing and urban development to this, let's say sir , my housing is finally cement and i don't know tiles and tiles.

it will be used and this will be added to it , then let's say with the finance department and these too. this is not the reason for the merger, the reason for the merger must be an expert reason, that is, how can we help to organize the production chains and finally give a boost to the business environment , i believe that this happened well during the mining period. perhaps the most universal period of the department. mining and the mining industry of the country, of course, none of the experts can hide the fact that it was the best mining period in the country, and on the other hand , what happened now, now the mining is completely going to the sidelines , i agree with that part of dr. taheri's orders. look, mr. doctor, i'm sorry, it's not your time. see if, for example, we should

add housing because it is a consumer. well, if we take it the other way around, let's say, sir, however much we separate these things , it can be successful. ok, for example, i would say that in the production sector around 305 related to textiles, we should create a ministry of textiles. for example , we are having a lot of problems in the automobile sector. no one has been able to say that we should create a ministry of automobiles. it doesn't matter who can do this. it doesn't mean you come and say it. that because now the chain for example, the sheet is going to be used in automobile manufacturing , it doesn't matter , this is enough for now, for example, we will say this, then we will come to other places as well. what is the problem with this model now, later, i will tell you the problem now.

it has nothing to do with the structure, whether it will be solved or by changing the approaches , what is the mining problem now? we have a lot of problems, the investment is very low, what does the law say, the mining law says that when we take the government salary from the mine, 65% of this should come to the ministry and it will spend how much in the mine now. from these 60 so-called government salaries to the ministry, maybe 23, sometimes none, sometimes 5% , should this be separated from the ministry of home affairs, because the budget planning organization wants its budget with these government salaries. right now, if this money is returned to the ministry, they can do their exploration. we will have a leap in exploration. does it really want a structure or not? the government must accept that this money taken from government salaries is not returned to the ministry for capital expenditure.

next year, it wants to increase 3 times, this is a change of approach, now you can say that if a minister can do a lot of slandering, so let the minister come and let him, for example , instead of writing a letter once, 10 times. it is said in the permanent mining law that these 100 state salaries should not be spent, not a single rial should be spent on current expenses in five places, 65% should come to the ministry . for example, what do i know about the insurance fund of the mining engineering system? let's create the piece that even the fabric that is coming back now can't reach the money of that structure because the new structure needs new cost . i said one of the examples is behind

. i said that the exploration chain was in operation for 4 years before the government came and said, sir, we do not want to import mining machinery, and the mine experienced a sharp decline, on the pretext of width or whatever, or to support domestic production, they say , sir, there are companies that they can produce mining machines, then we will see the total of these products for mining machinery, for example, 10% does not meet the real needs of this mine. then you come and say, let's create a ministry of mining, that's all. well , if the import of machinery and industry is separated from this, it will only get worse because it is in charge of another ministry. there was another ministry of fabric , which was made now, later it was modified. that is, the problems that exist in the exploration and exploitation of the mining industry are not related to the structure that we should come and say that you should create a structure

. friends may say that the minister spends little time, so let 's appoint a minister who spends more time, a minister. let's say that there is more ability here, it is important , but i just heard that once a week, for example, the minister makes time for mine meetings, for example, i go myself, these approaches must be changed. not creating new structures. thank you mr. askazade, what do you think? how much did you agree mr. kari so far? we definitely don't want to do a single cause analysis. but the structure is very effective. to say that we appoint a minister who has the power to control all these ministries together. well, we won't find such a person, mr. doctor. during these last few years you name a minister who has not been the minister of automobiles or the minister of market regulation. you can see the troubles of that sector. as a rule, let's leave it separately. by the way, i want to tell you that they say they

don't see us in the industry. for example, we had a meeting related to the industry. the field of health care is a pain in the ass when they say they don't know any connection at all. for example, the railway industry, the iranian agriculture industry, please forgive me. they don't care, i don't care if it's big or small we discuss the chain and the industrial units . we say that as long as b2b is considered as our chain, from then on it becomes our industry, where we in the so-called b2b space, that is, a company that sells its product as a raw material to another company for production. we say that the department is now upstream. our assumption is that if this happens, this department should be separate . of course

, my suggestion is not the ministry of mines and metals. what has become stronger in the troubles of industry and commerce let's do and let's name it, for example, ministry of mines and geosciences, let's concentrate all the geoscience data in one place, and by the way , a lot of work has been done in the exploration department, mr. doctor , and most of this data is in the hands of companies that do it themselves. giving the major part of it is at the disposal of the organization and the ministry of homes, which usually become documents inside drawers and closets, but if this happens. i would like to submit to you that if we , as an institution, are presented with your presence, that

everything related to earth sciences, the exploration of the oil sector will come in this field, the issues related to water and identification of water resources, let's collect a collection of earth sciences in this field and classify these data by chance. it is possible to say that part of it is security data, there is no problem in classifying them, but if they are classified in an accessible collection, it will be clear who wants to get what, this can solve the problem of the mining sector in a significant way, of course, you are right, when we in government law, for example , suppose we had a very clear law in article 43 of the sixth plan law, in article 14 of the mining law. it is very clearly stated and now to him 15% of the things you mentioned are related to the discussions of the provinces and infrastructure reform, and these are

the important issues. no, if these things had happened, you would not have gone back to the parliament to approve giving 1% of the sales to the provinces. the mine has now become a place that has no guardian . there is no one to defend the mining sector . he found that material processing has also been added to it, which means that we had a home ministry operating in the field of mining and mineral industries. please accept that it is such a ministry. it can be much more effective than that he can defend the structural problems and be able to smooth the conditions for the mine. in a situation, i don't know how we had the state rights to be divided. he ate his food at the restaurant and

counted with him once at the table. once at the door, when he was leaving, he said, "excuse me, please give me your food money again, because when the parliament came and approved 1% , this 15% of government salaries did not return to the provinces. do you separate that organization of the head of the fountain program , it will find a trustee, mr. doctor , this did not happen when i was in mines and metals . look at the conditions . in the ministry, in my opinion, i should also say his name, let me repeat it like this, god willing, he will get equivalent and earth sciences. well , right now, you are saying that the minister can't come to a government position , why is it that the minister of the position, according to your words , has been very kind to the death department, a meeting has been arranged for him. the part showing the defect of return to government rights is not in the ministry itself, it is not named somewhere the organization of the budget plan is the organization of the budget plan

that you cannot split. this is because the minister, in the maximum work that you said, told him, sir, that you must address the mining issue, the mine has been neglected , he came and said that it is okay, i will have one meeting a week for the mining department, is one meeting a week enough for the mining department? for the backward sector, if it doesn't have one , you should have a structure suitable for it. see that the ministry is a big ministry. first, let me

explain this in general. the sector, for example, has commerce , it has different industries, it has cars, it has mines. the government can have the minister play the role of the president and his deputy can play the role of the minister . now , are we coming to the country of the president? let's say there is a president and a first vice president. he should be able to coordinate these things. the president should be able to coordinate 19 ministries of home affairs with his first vice president . but we are not saying that we should do it all . a home ministry and the president are enough. yes, we are we are saying this because there is a chain related to each other . i told you that it can be separated then there will be a fight. look at this. i have an experience, mr. dr. hosseini. now our colleagues in the parliament say that being the minister of economy in mr. ahmadinejad's government, they say that we are 80 of the majority. the meetings

of the government board were litigation between commerce and the mining industry. 20% to the rest of the affairs, he said that this should be imported, this should be exported, this should not be brought, that the producer made a loss, this is what i want to say, see about the geological information should be unified, well, just now, we brought this in the law of the 7th plan. i want to say that this is not a structure we did our homework, it was done, now i want to present to the seventh program, mr. doctor, i don't want the seventh program, the seventh in law, in mining law