encircle the magnificent golden fountains. then a different kind of gold, at a french jewelry house, the paris 2024 medals set with tiny fragments of the eiffel tower, and encased in bespoke louis vuitton trunks. heightened security means every apartment overlooking events will be searched. this boston native shows around her magnificent paris home. look at this! she has volunteered to greet athletes when the games begin. >> it is such a beautiful city. i want everyone who comes here to have a wonderful experience and walk away, fall in love with it like i have. >> reporter: back here with that spectacular view today, the french will unveil their outfits for the opening ceremony, tuxedos, tres chic, right? that does it for us today. jose diaz-balart picks up our coverage right now.

good morning, it is 11:00 a.m. eastern, 8:00 a.m. pacific. i'm jose diaz-balart. we are tracking an incredibly busy day on capitol hill. just moments from now a veteran boeing engineer will testify before a senate subcommittee that the 787 dreamliner could break apart in midair due to safety flaws. the president of colombia university is defending her handling of antisemitic incidents on campus and accusations she failed to protect jewish students after october 7th. and in two hours, the senate will open the impeachment trial of homeland security secretary alejandro mayorkas, the first impeachment of a cabinet member in almost 150 years. but, we begin this morning with the very latest from former president donald trump's hush money trial, that is now taking shape after hundreds of new yorkers were summoned to court this week. seven have now been sworn in to serve as jurors in the very

first criminal trial facing the former president, centered around hush money payments made to stormy daniels. prosecutors say trump falsified business records as part of an effort to bury a story about a sexual encounter daniels alleges she had with trump. trump had pleaded not guilty to all 34 counts, and denied the affair ever happened. there is no court today, jury selection resumes tomorrow morning to fill the 11 remaining seats. joining us now, nbc news senior national political reporter jonathan alan, msnbc legal correspondent lisa rubin, both have been inside the courthouse during the trial, catherine christian, former assistant district attorney for the manhattan d.a.'s office, she is also an msnbc legal analyst, and former republican congressman carlos curbelo from florida, an msnbc political analyst. so, lisa, what do we know about the seven jurors who have already been selected? >> jose, they're a cross section of new yorkers.

we have got two attorneys on the jury, we got two residents of harlem, we have an oncology nurse, a salesperson, a teacher, and a software engineer. one of the things i find notable is that several of the jurors are young, appear to be in the early stages of their career, for example, one of them said that a year and a half ago, before they started the job that they're in now, they were in college and so we can infer from that the person is in their 20s. the other thing that i find interesting about these folks is that none of them have small children at home. that may be in part because at the very beginning of jury selection, judge merchan said that anybody who was unable to serve either because they were unable to be fair and impartial on one hand, or because they had other responsibilities that rendered them unable to serve could leave with no questions asked. that may have resulted in a number of people with care giving responsibilities, including young mothers of young children, taking themselves out

of that pool. so what we're left with is a number of people on this jury who are either childless or have adult children and grandchildren. >> so, catherine, seven jurors selected in this period of time. is that typical? >> that's very fast. i call it remarkable. there are only maybe a handful of judges who can do it that quickly. particularly for this type of case. when i say it is remarkable, because on a regular case with a no name defendant it doesn't happen that quickly. but clearly judge merchan is moving it fast, if you saw yesterday, it was he -- he was on a go. and he worked over time, typically court ends at 4:30, he went over an hour to get those seven jurors. and he told those seven jurors who are now sworn jurors to come back monday at 9:30, which means judge merchan intends to have a jury in place on monday, so there can be opening statements. >> and so, catherine, why do you think it has been a remarkably

fast process, versus other more traditional, i guess, court cases? >> two reasons, one, the judge, judges are controlled, judges are the ones that really can move the process along. two, there were 96 people who were called, 50 automatically said as lisa said i can't serve, i can't be fair and impartial, it could be because they don't like trump, they love trump, or as lisa said they had care giving. what was left were clearly people who there were not a lot of issues, there were challenges for cause, granted. and the lawyers both sides used a number of their peremptory, but as i call them, they were normal people, who would want to serve, who will take this seriously, both sides hope. >> and, john, in a new piece, you describe the way both sides are grappling the reality that most people have an opinion one way or another about donald trump. what did you see from both sides and the judge? >> yeah, i mean, what catherine said is so important.

it really doesn't serve anyone either the prosecution or the defense or judge merchan for anything other than a perception of a fair trial for these jurors to all be able to separate whatever they may feel about donald trump from the question of whether the, you know, facts apply to the law suggest or beyond a reasonable doubt prove that he's guilty. we have seen the judge also trying to make sure that this is an impartial jury, in particular, when objections were raised by trump's council yesterday after social media posts were surfaced by trump's team. there were questions about whether some of the judges based en what they posted on social media could be fair. we saw the judge agree with trump's lawyers in a couple of those cases that those jurors could not be seen as impartial because of what they had said about him in the past, and also in one case the judge said you're going too far here, because it was basically one of

the perspective jurors' husbands posting something. there has been a lot of care taken in this. i think by the end of the process, the jurors will have been advised repeatedly that they need to focus on the facts at hand and not anything else and if you have ever been on a jury before, that's a pretty solemn thing and i suspect most if not all of them will take it very seriously. >> and, lisa, the judge admonished trump for saying something in the direction of a jury yesterday, the judge said he will not have any juror intimidated. what could the judge do or consider that if trump steps out of line again? >> jose, early in the trial judge merchan gave trump something called parker warnings. that basically included the warning that although donald trump has a right to be present during his trial, he can waive that right if he engages in misconduct during the course of the trial. so, one thing that he could lose, if he continues to behave in a way that the judge finds

not consistent with the administration of justice is to take him out of the courtroom and have the trial continue. i don't think he will do that on a first or a second offense. but that is certainly available to him. the other thing that is available to him is to hold him in contempt of court. again, we know that criminal contempt in new york city can include a punishment of up to 30 days in jail and some fines. i suspect that the sticks that judge merchan has available at his disposal include jail time and banning trump from the courtroom. he's hoping, however, that just the threat of using either of those will keep donald trump primarily in line. >> lisa, how would it actually physically be carried out if you want to get a defendant out of the courtroom? do you just physically take him out? how does that work? >> look, we're talking about somebody who is not the former president of the united states, they are escorted out of the

courtroom by law enforcement specific to the court. where you got somebody on the other hand who is entitled to secret service protection, i'm not sure how that would work. there is no historical precedent for it. my guess is that he would enter some sort of order after a trial date, banning him from coming back if that were to occur. it depends on how flagrant the violation is. it is judge merchan's hope that we don't have to get there, and that by admonishing the attorneys yesterday that we don't have to go down that road. no one wants to be in the position of presiding over a trial where a criminal defendant is absent. >> so, carlos, after his trial yesterday, trump went to a bodega where in 2022 a clerk fatally stabbed a man in self-defense. d.a. bragg initially charged him, that clerk, with murder, eventually dropped the charges. what is the former president's political message here? >> well, jose, if we follow donald trump closely, he has

used all of these legal controversies, all of these indictments and trials as part of his political campaign. we know that during the primary it really worked out for him because a lot of republican primary voters perceived him to be a victim, someone who is being persecuted by the left. that really consolidated his support. now what he's trying to do, primary is over, he's looking at what are the voters, who are the voters he can speak to that he can steal from democrats, so, in this visit, what do you see? minority voters, he goes to a town where a lot of minority people live, republicans think that donald trump can win more black and hispanic voters than he did last time, and also looking for sympathy because he believes, republicans theorize, that minority voters will be sympathetic to what donald trump is going through. that they will be able to relate to him because he is going through this difficult legal situation, so, everything trump does, legal defense, also

combines with a political element to try to boost his chances this november. >> so, now that trump is going to have to be in court almost every day or every day, how could he use that in his campaign going forward? >> well, to your point, earlier and to congressman curbelo's point, we saw yesterday how he was using it to his advantage, not only does he go to a bodega and broader question of whether he's appealing to hispanic voters, minority voters by going to that bodega in the neighborhood, but particularly with the back story behind that. in the 2020 campaign, his campaign concluded that every time he talked about cracking down on crime, it was helpful to him, particularly with hispanic voters. so, we're seeing him deliver that message there. also delivering the message that d.a. bragg has not prosecuted crimes, particularly serious violent crimes, and so we're seeing that matched against what he's saying as an unfair, unjust targeting of him for political

purposes. so, yesterday was a perfect microcosm of a lot of the arguments that he's making. in addition to that, we'll see him i think during this -- according to his aides, during this period when he has wednesdays free go out and do some campaign events, maybe locally, maybe on the east coast, and then on weekends we're more likely to see some of the traditional trump rallies. he's going to make the argument he's being prosecuted as a form of persecution and to stop his political ambition and those of the republican party and we have been hearing it for a long time, we're going to continue to hear it more and he's got visual evidence he would like to show of him being in court to support that now. the d.a. believes he has committed crimes for which he should be held accountable. >> and, lisa, meanwhile, jury selection resumes tomorrow morning. what can we expect? >> jose, one of the things i'm really interested in and watching for is whether or not the defense has the opportunity

today to do their research on the 96 jurors who will be part of tomorrow morning's pool. assuming that they have from last night through all the way through today and tomorrow morning to do so, expect them to come armed with more social media profiles and other ammunition to try and excuse jurors for cause. that's particularly true since of their ten peremptory challenges, they already used six. that means they have four remaining challenges to strike jurors for any reason whatsoever, and they're going to have to use those judiciously. their alternative is to try and convince judge merchan there are jurors who are incapable of being impartial, and they will rely on whatever evidence they can glean from the internet to do so, particularly because they have these 96 jurors' perspective names. >> thank you, all, so very much. congressman curbelo, stick around. still ahead, what the u.s. is doing right now to prevent a fullout war from breaking out in

the middle east. here at home, we're just hours away from a senate showdown as it takes up articles of impeachment against homeland security secretary alejandro mayorkas. and moments from now, a boeing whistle-blower about to tell congress why he claims the 787 dreamliner could break apart midair. we're back in 60 seconds with what he exclusively told our very own tom costello. you're watching "jose diaz-balart reports" on msnbc. you're watching "jose diaz-balart reports" on msnbc. and year after year, you weathered the storm and just lived with the damage that was left behind. but even after all this time your thyroid eye disease could still change. restoration is still possible. learn how you could give your eyes a fresh start at tedhelp.com. my frequent heartburn had me taking antacid after antacid all day long but with prilosec otc just one pill a day blocks heartburn for a full 24 hours.

for one and done heartburn relief, prilosec otc. one pill a day, 24 hours, zero heartburn. here's to getting better with age. here's to beating these two every thursday. help fuel today with boost high protein, complete nutrition you need... ...without the stuff you don't. so, here's to now. boost. and we have breaking news, according to the faa website, alaska airlines asked for a nationwide ground stop. we are going to monitor this story for you and bring you any updates as we get them. meanwhile, any moment now, a boeing whistle-blower is set to testify before a senate committee about what he claims is the aerospace giant's broken safety culture. that hearing is getting under

way right now. but in an exclusive interview with nbc news, the whistle-blower, who is a boeing quality engineer, delivered his first on camera interview detailing his allegations that the company's 787 dreamliner planes could fall apart midflight due to assembly flaws. boeing disputes accusations the plane is unsafe. joining us now, tom costello, who spoke with that whistle-blower and jeff gazetti, aviation analyst and former faa and ntsb investigator. so, tom, what do we expect this witness to tell lawmakers today? >> can i first give you a caveat on the news about alaska airlines. we believe that's related to a computer outage, nothing we believe related to the ongoing discussions with boeing on capitol hill. as you mentioned, there are three actual whistle-blowers today testifying, right now on capitol hill, concerned about quality control lapses at boeing. we spoke with one of them yesterday here, he was on "nbc nightly news" and the "today"

show. he alleges the dreamliner fuselage is joined, pieces of the fuselage are joined in the manufacturing process, he alleges that there is too much of a gap, too much of a gap between pieces of the fuselage, and as a result, he worries and warns that the plane could go under enormous stress and that could lead to fatigue failure and the plane could break apart. take a listen to what he told me. >> the plane will fall apart at the joints, where the -- where we're talking about. once you fall apart, you're going to descend all the way to the ground. >> reporter: you think the plane could break apart in air? >> absolutely. >> okay, that's a very dramatic claim indeed. we would hasten to add the 787 dreamliner has flown millions of people safely for 13 years. boeing is out with a statement, we need to read what they said to make sure you understand, boeing says this is absolutely

inaccurate. it says extensive and rigorous testing of the fuselage and heavy maintenance checks of nearly 700 in service planes to date have found zero evidence of air frame fatigue. or any cracking whatsoever. nonetheless, because boeing's reputation has been so damaged over the last five plus years, its own word, it has been doubted and has in fact been undermined by its own actions, now you got multiple whistle-blowers on capitol hill. others who have contacted the committee, concerned about quality control breakdowns at boeing. >> jeff, how -- when you heard that, how serious do you think we should be taking that? >> we should be taking it very seriously, jose, but we should also take it in context of one particular whistle-blower concern. and this particular one, boeing is stating that it is composites, all of their data indicates no fatigue findings in the entire fleet. so while this may be a well

meaning, well intentioned whistle-blower, perhaps a -- he just didn't receive the kind of explanation he needed to receive from boeing with regard to the robustness of the 787 structure. >> so, jeff, the whistle-blower is a quality engineer. what kind of information would he have access to? >> well, day after day he bo have access to measurements taken with holes and he's alleging gaps being produced, and he is alleging he's not seeing the data to indicate the gaps, which are beyond boeing's specifications, are being carried out properly. so, he has day to day access, i don't know how much access he has to the corporate body of engineering data and test data that boeing says that they have to refute this whistle-blower's testimony. >> boeing is facing multiple investigations. can you update us on where those stand? >> it continues to be under

investigation from the ntsb related to the door plug blowout in january. an faa investigation on that as well. an faa investigation about the quality breakdown of quality control safety control inside boeing's facilities. there is also an fbi criminal investigation into that door plug incident because that is all about whether boeing violated a previous agreement following the max 8 crashes overseas. if that all seems like a heck of a lot, absolutely right. and boeing has been, candidly, its own worst ally in this because it has for the better part of five plus years, put out statements that then proved not to be true or were undermined by yet another incident. boeing recognizes they have a credibility problem right now, not just with the faa, not just with congress, but the american public and the airlines, which, of course, buy their planes.

>> and, jeff, i mean, tom was bringing up the major issues that we have seen over the last just couple of recent years, those two fatal crashes involving their max 8 planes, the door plug falling off the max 9, now this. what are your concerns with the company? >> well, my concerns mirror tom's concerns. right now they lost the trust of the regulator, the faa, congress, the public, or they lost a level of trust. when things like this come up, they can't be easily dismissed away. and this particular event, though, with this whistle-blower, the quality engineer, it might be a case of piling on. every little thing that boeing does that is even accused of being wrong gets a lot of attention. and as tom indicated, that's because boeing hasn't had a good recent track record of building the trust with the american people and the traveling public. >> hey, jose, i need to stress one point, can i stress one point?

>> please, of course. >> if you have an emergency landing, that is a normal part of every single day. there are more than a dozen emergency landings a day because a light goes off in the cockpit, they want to be sure, or a medical emergency. and i've used this analogy, but it is important. if you buy a brand-new car and you drive off the lot and the engine falls off, that's the carmaker's fault. if you fail to maintain it, and eventually you don't put any oil in it and the engine burns up, that's your problem. we need to distinguish between maintenance issues with the airlines, if you have a plane that goes off the end of the runway, that's not boeing's fault, right, or if you have an engine problem, boeing doesn't make engines, these are different issues, compared to very serious quality control breakdowns inside boeing. >> so, jeff, and tom, if you would, stand by, we're going to go right into capitol hill, that hearing is getting under way. the three whistle blowers have just been sworn in. let's take a listen. >> chairman blumenthal, ranking

member johnson and honorable members of the subcommittee, thank you for convening this hearing. my name is sam salehpour and i'm a quality engineer at boeing. i have over 40 years of -- i have over 40 years of experience as an engineer. i'm not here today because i want to be here. i'm here today because i felt that i must come forward because i do not want to see another 787 -- i do not want to see 787 or 777 crash. i have serious concerns about the safety of the 787 and 777 aircraft and i'm willing to take on professional risk to talk about them. first, a little bit about me, i came to the united states in 1973 and got a mechanical engineering degree from university of missouri where senator hawley is from. after that, i work for companies that were involved in space shuttle. i had a friend who worked on the

space shuttle, he was always complaining about the quality of the o rings we had in the space shuttle rocket boosters. he was scared they might fail. he raised his concerns and he was heard and he wasn't heard and seven brave astronauts, including the teacher in space, died when the "challenger" o rings ultimately failed. just as he predicted. at the moment, i know that if i were ever in a similar situation i would have to come up and speak up. i have analyzed boeing's own data to conclude that the company has taken manufacturing short cuts on the 787 program that may significantly reduce the airplane safety. and the life cycle. since 2013, there have been serious issues on the 787 program, not proper closing

thousands of gaps in the assembly of the fuselage on major joints. boeing's standard says these gaps must be closed, usually by a small shim or filler called a shim when they exceed 5,000th of an inch. this seems very small. boeing's pr team likes to call it the width of a human hair, when you're operating at 35,000 feet. details are that the size of a human hair can be a matter of life and death. in a rush to address the bottlenecks in production, boeing hit problems pushing pieces together with excessive force to make it appear that the gaps don't exist, even though they exist, the gap didn't actually go away and this may result in premature fatigue failure. effectively, they are putting out defective airplanes. i respectively -- i repeatedly produced reports for my supervisors and boeing management, demonstrating that

the gaps in this 787 not being properly measured or shimmed in two major joints of the 787, evaluating from boeing -- from the 29 inspected airplane data, i found gaps exceeding the specification that were not properly addressed, 98.7% of the time. i want to repeat that, 98.7% of the time the gaps that they were supposed to be shimmed, they were not shimmed. the other issue that i found when you have these gaps, and you drill through them, you get some debris in the stackups. this is known to be a problem, you know, not a good thing for the airplanes by boeing, but boeing data also, you know, from the inspection of the data shows that the debris ended up in the gaps 80% of the time. again, you know, you have debris in the gaps 80% of the time. i want to make clear that i have

raised these issues over three years. i was ignored, i was told not to create -- not to create delays. i was sold frankly to shut up. at one point, boeing management got sick of me and raising these issues and moved me out of the 787 program into the 777 program. under 777 program i found problems again. i found that boeing started a new process to build the airplane, without taking into consideration the design of the airplane and how the airplane was designed. as a result, i witnessed severe misalignment when the planes were assembled. boeing manufacturing used unmeasured and unlimited amount of force to correct the misalignment. and this also weakened the airplane in the long run. i literally saw people jumping on the pieces of the airplane to get them to align, i call it the tarzan effect, among other

improper methods. i raised concerns internally. i was sidelined, i was told to shut up. i received physical threats. my boss said i would have killed someone who said what you said in a meeting. and then this is not the safety culture when you get threatened by bringing issues of safety concerns. i hope that your work on this issue signals the boeing that they must make real changes and get back to building the airplane safely. i'll be more than happy to answer your questions. >> thank you very much, mr. salehpour. mr. pierce? >> good morning. thank you for inviting me today. my name is ed pierson. my father was a washington, d.c. homicide detective and my mom was a nurse. i learned the importance of telling the truth from them, my teachers, and coaches. and this was reinforced at the

naval academy. the military demands people tell the truth and admit their mistakes, because if you don't, people will die. since the first boeing max airplane crash, i spent every day thinking about the victims, their families, and the millions of people that fly boeing airplanes. i'm here today to share four key messages, first, the manufacturing conditions that led to the two 737 max disasters, also led to the alaskan accident and these conditions continue. in 2019, i testified as a boeing whistle-blower, i had previously warned the 737 general manager, before the max crash, to shut down the factory. i also warned boeing's general counsels, the ceo and the board of directors before the second crash to shut it down.

they ignored my warnings. during my 2019 testimony, i described the chaotic manufacturing, the horrible job government authorities were doing investigating the two crashes. the world -- >> here is the testimony of the second of three whistle-blowers that are today at the senate, at this hearing, when talking about their experience in working in boeing and the fact that according to them, quality control issues were not being followed or at least their quality control questions were not answered to their satisfaction. i want to bring back jeff guzzetti, former faa and ntsb investigator. so, jeff, this is -- these are very serious allegations about people who say they were in very important, critical times of either building these airplanes or certainly continuing to build

these airplanes. and that they saw very serious issues being -- occurring in the production and manufacture of them and they were saying they were ignored for many -- in many things. >> yes, jose, these are -- anytime anyone makes allegations like this, in a commercial airplane factory, it should be taken seriously. and -- but, again, they are just allegations. i must tell you, i'm a little bit skeptical of some of these allegations, just based on my knowledge of how commercial airplanes are built up, and also from information boeing has provided to the public, to the media, about their buildup process and just being in the faa and seeing how the faa follows along whenever there is a problem. that said, employees shouldn't have to feel this way. they shouldn't have to feel like they're being retaliated against. so the climate, the culture

within boeing still needs to change, so when you have people that have complaints about serious complaints about how an airplane is being produced, you need to address those to the complainant's satisfaction. and apparently that hasn't happened in these cases. that said, there is a lot of different issues coming up with regards to 787, 777. i just -- i just don't think that there is a significant problem right now in the fleet of 787s and 777s. that said, these whistle blowers need to be heard and the faa needs to investigate. >> yeah, jeff, thank you so much for being with us. and we have just to expand on a story that we told you about, as we began this part of our program on alaska airlines and the statement that they have released a statement and i'm just going to read it to you because it says, this morning we experienced an issue while

performing an upgrade to the system that calculates our weight and balance. a ground stop for all alaska and horizon flights was instituted at approximately 7:50 a.m. pacific. we're working to resolve the issue as quickly as possible. apologizing for the inconvenience and encouraging guests to check the status of their flights on alaskaair.com or the alaska app prior to heading to the airport. this from alaska airlines as they had to institute a ground stop for all alaska and horizon flights. again, the issue, very clear, different from what we have been seeing on capitol hill, is that they experienced an issue performing an upgrade to the system that calculates our weight and balance. up next, we'll tell you what you should expect in just over about an hour when the senate begins its impeachment trial against homeland security secretary alejandro mayorkas. you're watching "jose diaz-balart reports" on msnbc. as you're watching "jose

diaz-balart reports" on msnbc. infused with vitamin b3 and hyaluronic acid, st. jude commercials on tvubg and wondering, is that place legit? those commercials are nice, but is that a real thing? and having lived it, i can say for sure that money is being put to incredible use. i've never once had to wait for insurance to approve a test or approve a medication. we didn't have to worry about any of those things thanks to the donations. and our family is forever grateful because it's completely changed our lives. (vo) verizon small business days are coming. april 22nd to the 28th.

get a free tech check. and special offers and deals. don't miss out. partner with our experts today. ♪♪ i've got two kids, with another one on the way, which means i'm at the pharmacy a lot. insurance helps to cover the cost, but not as much as you'd think. fortunately, my pharmacist told me about singlecare. it's a free service that gets you discounts at your local pharmacy. now i always check singlecare to see if it beats my insurance, and then i just choose the option that gives me the best price. when you're managing a growing family, there's no reason to spend any more than you have to! visit singlecare.com and start saving today. ♪♪

37 past the hour. today on capitol hill, the senate is going to begin its impeachment trial for homeland security secretary alejandro mayorkas. he's the first cabinet member to be impeached in nearly 150 years, the second in u.s. history. earlier today, nbc news asked secretary mayorkas what the senate should do with the impeachment articles. >> the senate is going to do

what the senate considers to be appropriate. as that proceeds, i'm here in new york city on wednesday morning, fighting online child sexual exploitation and abuse. >> joining us now, ali vitali, nbc news correspondent david noriega, and back with us, former congressman carlos curbelo. ali, what can we expect in the senate today? >> well, there is what we know, which is that they'll likely kick off around 1:00 p.m. and then after that, unless anything significantly changes in the next two hours, we're not really sure how this hearing and this moment on the senate floor is going to go. that's because there was an attempt overnight to make an agreement about the hours of debate, and the motions that would be offered on the senate floor, during this mayorkas impeachment. and that was objected to by one of the conservative senators, senator eric schmitt of missouri, who says he doesn't want to, in his words, aid

senator schumer is lighting the match to set hundreds of years of precedent on fire. what he's saying there is he wants to have a trial, and there have been a group of conservative republican senators pressuring senator schumer to do that. i heard from republican senators who say that they don't think that mayorkas has done enough to be impeached, but they worry about the precedent it would set to just simply dismiss these allegations against him. it is why we're seeing senators try to come to agreement on being able to debate this for several hours as opposed to just immediately dispensing with it. but regardless of how this ends up shaking out, jose, what the reality is in the senate is that they don't have anywhere near the amount of votes they would need to actually convict the homeland security secretary. that's not going to change here. >> and so, carlos, it is very clear that it is not going anywhere in the senate, but there is a precedent or concern of precedents being set, i guess on both sides on this. >> well, jose, on the one hand

what republicans want is as long a process as possible because they want attention on the issue of immigration. there is no question that this is political, there is no question that there isn't a clear case that the secretary committed high crimes or misdemeanors as the constitution outlines the process for impeachment and removal. but this is about november of 2024 and republicans want to drag this out as long as possible because they know that the longer that this trial is ongoing, the more the country is going to be focused on the issue of immigration and that's where they perceive a big advantage in this election. >> david, you've been covering this story and you spoke recently with the secretary. what did he tell you and what is the impact, you think, of what has been going on in the border to this political move on capitol hill? >> yeah, jose, so when i sat down with the secretary recently, his main point was

that the immigration enforcement system of the united states, as it exists now, is not designed to handle the kind of migration that we're seeing at the border. when i asked him directly about the impeachment, here's what he had to say. >> we are enforcing the law. accusation is we're not. that's unequivocally false. fundamentally, our system is not equipped to deal with migration as it exists now. not just this year, and last year, and the year before. but for years preceding us. and we need that system fixed. we cannot unilaterally resource ourselves, we need congress and it requires a whoistic solution. >> his position is that the situation on the ground on the border cannot change without major congressional action. now, the politics of the impeachment are one thing.

the reality and the policy on the ground on the border are another. the fact is anyone who looks at this objectively agrees that the u.s. immigration enforcement system is badly severely overwhelmed. that's a reality that has been true for at least the last three administrations. obama couldn't solve it, trump couldn't solve it and biden hasn't been able to solve it. in the process, the situation has become more and more severe. i also asked the secretary about the republicans' contention that he could solve this with executive actions in place under the trump administration. he rejected that wholeheartedly, said those executive actions didn't solve the problem in 2019, they're not going to solve the problem today, and the last thing i'll add is the nature of migration to the border changed dramatically in the last couple of years in the sense we're now seeing a massive rise in the number of migrants coming from far away countries, india, china, russia, not the usual countries we normally see, mexico and the northern triangle countries of northern america that creates challenges that

will be unique and difficult for any administration to address, whether it is a biden or a trump administration. >> unique challenges that each administration has dealt with in a different way. certainly president obama dealt with it one way. trump another way. and president biden another way. marcia, you worked for the department of homeland security under secretary mayorkas and two other secretaries before him. how has the security at the border issue evolved to what it is today? >> well, today we're obviously seeing higher numbers, but like let's just look at the irony of this situation that we're facing today. you just showed secretary mayorkas in new york city today announcing a new effort to fight child online sexual exploitation, yesterday he was on the hill, fighting for funding, before that, he was negotiaing -- not negotiating, but advising a bipartisan group of people on a border bill to actually solve the situation.

what we're seeing on the other side is republicans introducing impeachment matters as a policy difference. there is no evidence here, no facts, this is political theater. and it is quite the juxtaposition, you see secretary mayorkas out there doing the work, focused on his work, while on the other side here they're playing politics as usual. >> yeah, and going back to the numbers, there has been a record number of border encounters since 2021, encounters were above 1.3 million this fiscal year so far. they're on track to surpass the last three years. the secretary has called the border situation a situation in crisis. how does dhs handle crises? >> well, the department is no stranger to crises right, they deal more with immigration, cyber, extreme weather. but in terms of the numbers at

the border, this is something that the border patrol does best. they deal with the situation, they process, and put people into immigration proceedings, but the fact is what secretary mayorkas said is true. we're experiencing a high number. we need to focus on the root causes of immigration before people land at our border, and the border bill that they were working on would have done just that. so, why couldn't republicans cross the aisle and vote on the bill, rather than cross the aisle and introduce articles of impeachment. it doesn't make any sense? we need more border patrol agents, more asylum officers, more funding for immigration judges, and money for the cities and states who are facing these encounters. >> and, ali, we're also expecting to hear today more from house republicans about the foreign aid bills, the ones that would benefit ukraine, israel and taiwan. where does that stand?

stand alones? all split up? what's going on? >> this is new, in the last 30 or so minutes, jose. the speaker of the house texting his members, what his plan is here, and it is going to be three distinct bills for ukraine, indo-pacific and israel. there is also an overarching rule over all of them. you have to vote on each of the substantial bills. within the bills there is going to be a fourth bill, republican priorities, that's going to include things like the repo act which allows this aid to ukraine to be loaned from frozen russian assets, a piece of this deals with accountability and security for the money and the aid that is sent to places like ukraine, and then there is also going to be a border piece that is new, and added, and i'm interested to see the text on this, because it is meant to assuage conservatives who were upset that speaker johnson yesterday said that their pet project border bill hr-2 was not

relevant enough to this ongoing package to be considered in its totality as something that can be added. so, a lot of moving pieces here, but i think to underscore something that as we're talking about the border writ large and these ongoing impeachment hearings, in my conversations yesterday, with senators and in my conversations with sources up here, david alluded to this, your panel alluded to this, this is not just a question of holding mayorkas accountable for republicans, there is also clearly a need to do something legislatively about the border. there was an opportunity for that, in the senate, a republican, a democrat and an independent, came together after weeks of negotiation to come up with something that could have gotten bipartisan support at least on the senate side, and it was killed in large part because former president donald trump wanted to keep this alive as an election issue. those senators, those aides, they worked on that, that was a possibility legislatively, it is just not anymore because the politics and the policy are so intertwined up here. >> yes, and carlos, they're now

two republicans that are calling for speaker johnson to resign. what is going on there? >> jose, being speaker of the house is a very difficult job, being a republican speaker of the house in recent decades is particularly treacherous and this will be the toughest week for mike johnson, this will be his biggest test because we know that motion to vacate is out there. marjorie taylor greene joined by thomas massie, want to remove the speaker, they're threatening him. if this ukraine bill does end up passing, how that unfolds will be the biggest test for speaker johnson. he's clearly worried about it. he went to stand next to donald trump just a few days ago to seek cover, to seek some strength from donald trump. but this is a big test for him. if he can get through this week, he might have a much easier time the rest of the year. >> ali vitali, dave noriega, marcia espinoza and carlos curbelo, thank you. i have another update on the news that we have been reporting for you just in the last half hour, moments ago, alaska airlines announced they have

lifted that ground stop, they requested this morning. the airline says travelers should expect some delays and to please check their flight status on their app, or online. but that ground stoppage has been lifted. coming up, the president of columbia university facing tough questions on capitol hill for the university's handling of antisemitism on campus. you're watching "jose diaz-balart reports" on msnbc. diaz-balart reports" on msnbc. with schwab investing themes™, it's easy to invest in ideas you believe in.

spot a trend in electric vehicles? have a passion for online gaming? or want to explore the space economy? choose from over 40 themes, each with up to 25 stocks identified by our unique algorithm. buy it as-is or customize to align with your goals. all at your fingertips. schwab investing themes. 40 customizable themes. up to 25 stocks in just a few clicks. ♪♪ ♪(voya)♪ there are some things that work better together. like your workplace benefits and retirement savings. voya helps you choose the right amounts without over or under investing. across all your benefits and savings options. so you can feel confident in your financial choices. they really know how to put two and two together. voya, well planned, well invested, well protected. every day, more dog people are deciding it's time for a fresh approach to pet food.

developed with vets. made from real meat and veggies. portioned for your dog. and delivered right to your door. it's smarter, healthier pet food. (man) mm, hey, honey. looks like my to-do list grew. "paint the bathroom, give baxter a bath, get life insurance," hm. i have a few minutes. i can do that now. oh, that fast? remember that colonial penn ad? i called and i got information. they sent the simple form i need to apply. all i do is fill it out and send it back. well, that sounds too easy! (man) give a little information, check a few boxes, sign my name, done. they don't ask about your health? (man) no health questions. -physical exam? -don't need one. it's colonial penn guaranteed acceptance whole life insurance. if you're between the ages of 50 and 85, your acceptance is guaranteed in most states, even if you're not in the best health.

options start at $9.95 a month, 35 cents a day. once insured, your rate will never increase. a lifetime rate lock guarantees it. keep in mind, this is lifetime protection. as long as you pay your premiums, it's yours to keep. call for more information and the simple form you need to apply today. there's no obligation, and you'll receive a free beneficiary planner just for calling. what is cirkul? cirkul is the fuel you need to take

flight. cirkul is the energy that gets you to the next level. cirkul is what you hope for when life tosses lemons your way. cirkul, available at walmart and drinkcirkul.com. this is david's look of joy. and this is his john deere z530m mower. that delivers precision, speed, comfort, ♪♪ and a feeling we couldn't possibly put into words. ♪♪ you just have to get in the seat. ego, the number one rated brand in cordless outdoor power brings you the select cut mower. customize the cut with three interchangeable blades. it cuts for over an hour on a single charge. ego - exclusively at lowe's, ace and ego authorized dealers.

54 past the hour. tensions in the middle east sparking firestorms on college campuses. the university of southern california canceled a speech by this year's valedictorian, a muslim student, citing security concerns. this after complaints from pro-israeli groups citing the student's support for palestinians. >> reporter: controversy on campus after usc canceled the valedictorian's commencement speech citing safety concerns. she was chosen to be the valedictorian, selected from 100 students who applied. two pro-israel and jewish groups complained about the choice, pointing to her social media activity, specifically a link to a free palestine slideshow on her instagram which calls for the abolishment of the state of israel. >> the university has to make

the decision about whether this valedictorian and her propagation of anti-semitic vitriol online is worthy of being the representative of the class of 2024. >> reporter: she is shocked and profoundly disappointed that they are succumbing to a campaign of hate. >> unfortunately, it's clear, if you are a muslim student today, you don't expect the university, your administration, to stand by you. >> reporter: the provost says the issue is how to maintain campus security and safety. the decision has nothing to do with freedom of speech. the commencement typically draws 65,000 people. university leadership has not shared details about potential threats. >> it makes people uncomfortable but they aren't willing to elaborate on safety concerns. >> reporter: the controversy the latest example of heightened tensions related to violence overseas spilling over on college campuses.

right now on capitol hill, the president of columbia university is being grilled by lawmakers over the rise of anti-semitism at her university and what speech is and isn't protected on campus. her testimony comes after the explosive december hearing before this same senate -- i should say, house committee that resulted in the resignation of two other ivy league presidents. what's the latest out of the hearing, julie? >> reporter: this hearing is up on its two-hour mark. certainly, this professor, columbia's -- excuse me the head of columbia, she was supposed to be here in december's meeting that led to the ousting of two university presidents. they werepressed whether

genocide was against the code of conduct. she penned an opinion piece earlier denouncing that. that did not spare her from more questions from others on this panel. watch this. >> i share with you your repug repugnance at those remarks. on my watch, faculty that make remarks that cross the line, there will be consequences. >> what are the consequences in this case in. >> i have five cases in the moment who have been either taken out of the classroom or dismissed. >> is he one of those? >> he will never work at columbia again. >> he has been terminated? >> he has terminated. not just terminated. his files will show that he will never work at columbia again. >> reporter: jose, that faculty member that she was talking about is somebody who was hired

after the october 7th hamas attack against israel. they also questioned the head of columbia and the board of trustees members that were present about another faculty member who is still listed on the university's website, despite the fact that she said he has been terminated from his position, despite this, you can tell, jose, just bipartisan outrage on anti-semitism. in sitting in this committee room behind us, witnessing a portion of the testimony, you can tell that those questions are not only coming from republicans on the panel, but also democrats. some of them pointing out islamaphobia you have seen on college campuses. you can see there are protesters here, students at columbia included, who are pro-palestine who want their voices heard on the issue. the committee room is packed. they are not letting those students in because of that. this committee hearing is

ongoing. virginia fox, the chairwoman, said this won't be the last meeting to hold the college presidents accountable. >> julie tsirkin, thank you very much. before we go, some good news. the best news. one of our producers, kelly betts is back to work more than a year after she was diagnosed with cancer and had to take leave to focus on getting better. in february of 2023, she was diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia. kelly is in remission. her fight is not over. we will be supporting her every step to recovery. kelly, welcome back. you are an inspiration. we couldn't be more grateful that you are okay and back with us. someone who never, ever