but yes, the hello, i'm going to a chan. you are tuned into modus operandi. as the saying goes, he who controls the money controls the world. nobody really knows who said it, but it's generally accepted as fact. and when it comes to money and banking, there is no family more famous than the rocks childs. so in february of 2024. when lord jacob ross child a 4th generation banking site on died, world leaders lined up to pay their respects this week. well dig into not only his passing, but how this family has shaped the world as we know it. all right, let's get into the m o. the

they've been lying eyes, they've been demonized. the rocks, child's name, synonymous with the banking and finance industry, recently suffered a loss in the family. jacob ross child a 4th generation barren and banking site out on europe passed away of natural causes in his home town of london at age 87. in late february of 2024. his families, wealth and prestige, often overshadowed by a conspiracy theories surrounding the families empire, which began in the 18th century at one point they were the world's richest family. so today is global leads, all queued up to pay their respects. former u. k. prime minister, tony blair described the late lord jacob as quote, a towering figure in britain's jewish community and the presidents of israel, isaac hertzog said this quote, with his passing. we bid farewell to

a great man who carried the historic legacy of his family with pride and humility, working always for the well being of britain, israel, and jewish communities all over the world. and so from the napoleonic wars to the suez canal, ross child's name forever etched into a world history books. for more on this will turn to find the show. shawn stone. he is a filmmaker historian and author, his book called new world order, a strategy of imperialism. is available now. shawn, thank you for making some time for us. so 1st option, jacob rothschild, as i mentioned, he's a 4th generation baron in the u. k. he carry the title, lord, so lord jacob is how one might formally address him. why to the main stream media referred to him in such a way? i mean what's the difference between lord or baron and the term oligarch?

i mean, i feel like the latter is used as a majority of and the other 2 are like somehow good or, or noble. what's your take on that? my take is that's the essence of the british empire, right there in these titles. it's something that i think a lot of people sort of, it is a cognitive dissonance around you could call it. and then the ability to, to face the fact that the british have this aristocracy of titles and the, you know, a king. right? things like this that in most of the world we think we find a noxious if not obscene. or as you mention, we might say, well, that's just an oligarchy. it's just an older one, you know, basically when from, in the modern, in the modern invitation of oligarchs, we think often times of, you know, russians that have made a fortune and the like oil or, or raw materials or things like this in the ninety's. so they're new money, right? and that's kind of the way that the imperialist would look at it. well,

the new money or the old of barks they just needed if they can hold that money. and they can basically sustain it for a couple generations. and they get to become titled aristocrats and that it shifts almost to the old. the old money is respected while the new money is kind of looked down upon. right. so here's the passing of jacob. he is regarded as a sort of the last of that breed or of that generation. the old guard, if you will. but is that necessarily true given that the rocks child's have legitimately kept banking as the family business? i mean, there are now some 7 generations deep. what does the rocks child's name represent in the world of finance? i'm not going to go to the extreme that some conspiracy if there is, say, when they think of the nature of thinking itself. and they say, well it's, it's the rock child's behind everything. and, you know,

there's not an expert in the right child history. there's a, there's a lot of books on the subjects, as i say, some are more conspiratorial than others. but the truth is that, yes, the rothschilds by nature and have been a sense, you could say, a conspiratorial conspiring that once they left uh, you know, their home, their homeland to germany and basically started to send the family. it was the, the original design. i think it was a meyer who sent his sons off to the 5 capitals and in europe, and basically had them see to set up major banks and ultimately in some places like in france and, and ending with it seems that they sustained, obviously to the present day, well, and maybe in germany and other places they didn't sustain is as well. the point is that the intention was always to create this sort of thinking empire and become major finance years of w. name it of a vampire of, of, you know,

and pop both positive and negative senses. so the raj, how's art inter, currently in, intimately entwined with the financial system that we know in, in america, in england because of their relationship with for example of, you know, the bank of england and becoming a part of the establishment you could say being, getting, getting royalty titles, things like this and, you know, huge financial empire that they've created. they're not the only banking family. they're not even necessarily the oldest banking family. but certainly you can say, you know, for very, for reasons, for example, going back to how they set up in england. part of the great mythology that they created was during the napoleonic wars. and i believe it was nathan, my child, the time who was heading up the child bank, he basically had an amazing network of intelligence. and they found out through their network of intelligence that the point had lost the bottle of water loop. so they actually started to they using their intelligence as a say they made it

a killing on the stock market. basically by doing all kinds of tricks, you know, pretending like they thought, you know, they basically initially made it seem like the british had lost. so people started selling their stock, then the routes came in through their agents and bought it up and bought up the stocks cheap and they made of killing. so again, the rothschilds have been involved in shady dealings over the years. and i'm that who knows how deep that they know that the dark side of the banking goes. um, but you cant say uh, going to that question that this is the end of the rothschilds, financial and part, i mean, this is an empire that has been entwined with the federal reserve system, the central banks of the world for centuries. now i don't think that they're going anywhere and in the immediate future, let's say okay. a they may have pioneered the so called art of hedging stocks. then on wall street, i don't know if they necessarily pioneered it, but certainly the, you know, they, they look if you,

the more you look into like the history of banking and often times it was taught in twined with intelligence or religion. you know, you look at the nature of going back to the times of the greeks for example, and how the coins was held in the temples of the gods. and so you can say that it, not, obviously the romans were involved in this kind of thing of creating religions. and that's essentially making people, you know, pay the coin to the, the temple. that's why to the present day, right? these, these religions have a religious exemptions. so the idea of manipulating the masses when it comes to finance this, this is kind of goes back to the origin. i would say of, of, of banking itself. and that this proceeds the rothschilds. they think they're just in a new actually they actually had one point where the new money and how about some of the more toddress a business connections with family. i would say would rather we all forget given that the rocks child's planted roots in the u. k. more than 200 years ago,

and at one point they were among the world's richest families, especially there in london. they were quite tightly net among london's leads, like with b maxwell family. as in go in maxwell's and now convicted british socialite sex trafficker, i mean her dad, robert maxwell, was allegedly really good friends with the late baron. according to depositions from one of the lanes personal assistance. miss maxwell used to brag about growing up rubbing elbows with the rocks, child, and a director at one of the rocks. child's banks called robert maxwell's 65th birthday bash. he called it the party of the decade. yet the main stream media went on this sort of defensive spree upon lord jacob's death, citing all the silly conspiracy theories and, but when you really look at the family and how closely tied they were with going maxwell's family and her ties with jeffrey epstein, i don't know,

isn't there kind of some cause to talk? well, i think it's deeper than that. i mean, to me, the most clear personality that was close to jeffrey epstein in some ways his benefactor and she introduced them to many people and potentially even the clinton's and maybe even prince andrew. i mean it's, we're not entirely clear, but we know that she was very close to, to jeffrey epstein. and that's lynne forrest or who became rothschild in the year, i believe, 2000 when she married into the family. so she basically was, uh, came from, you know, a good, wealthy background and obviously very connected, you know, sort of, uh, you could call the american, um, the intel it, you know, it intelligentsia or, you know, what do you, what would you say? did not the oligarchs of america, but yeah, almost you could say the oligarchs of america. and so that's why she was able to box it up to, to buy into, to marry into the right child family. um, but yeah,

when for us to to write child was intimately connected to epstein and frankly someone that a, someone should have had taken a deposition from her, you know, and then put her under oath on things as to uh you know, what she was involved in what she knew about his his trafficking operations, especially because her brother actually owned a private terminal in a jersey airport that jeffrey i've seen use for some of his sex traficant operations. and coming up next in europe, defining wars shaped by the rocks child's family. find out how we'll discuss it when we return with shawn stone, said type m o will be right back the the

what is part of the blog post that isn't the deepest view of us in building the word part. is it something deeper, more complex might be present? let's stop without glitches that stuff out of as the

car accepted. and i'm here to plan with you whatever you do. do not watch my new show. seriously. why watch something that's so different. whitelisted opinions that he won't get anywhere else. welcome to please or do have the state department, the c i a weapons, bankers, multi 1000000000 dollar corporations. choose your fax for you. go ahead. change and whatever you do. don't want my shell stay main street because i'm probably going to make you uncomfortable. my show is called stretching time, but again, you probably don't want to watch it because it might just change the way you hello and welcome defrost the full force. here we discuss the wheel in the

welcome back to the m. o i manila chance sean stone filmmaker and arthur is back with us. thanks for sticking around, shawn. so let's get into the history of this 300 year old banking family and, and why they're still even relevant today given, reportedly, they're not even among the wealthiest families of the world anymore. why do today is bankers like jamie diamond at jp morgan chase, for example, still turning to this, this making family from my understanding america's jp morgan began as a subsidiary of the rocks trial bank in europe. right. so i don't know, has this sort of family legacy then just shaped modern banking. she oh, you mean huge. i mean, the, this is what, this is where i say, you know, when it comes to the american history, um, there's other historians that are much more expert in terms of the amount of influence, the, the rothschilds i had in terms of american finance. it's clear that the america and

that the rothschilds had agents in america. um, so that was new j. p. morgan, an agent of the rothschilds in particular, i don't know that i know that as you say he's his original partner p body was a, was in england, and morgan was trained in england. so essentially he was, you know, he respond by the, the, you could say like, the bank of england should the private, a private, that central bank very much what the federal reserve in america had, which again was probably established by morgan. and it was, it did, i think it was morgan junior at that point. but the point is that the, at the morgan bank was very integral in establishing the federal reserve system. so, yes, these, you know, these banks learned, you know, these bankers learn from each other. they, they operate, they work together. they, they have to, they, you know, they transact. and when it comes to, you know, establishment the rout child's were essentially be one of the most established,

not the only again, there's not the only major banking family of england or of europe. but that they, you know, they became notorious for, for, for various reasons. and partly you can say partly it was, you know, anti semitism. i suppose. i mean, there is, there is something to be taught. be careful about when we look at because the morgan empire is, is probably as, as dark in its own way. and you know, and so we can't just say it's, it's, it's only jewish thing. it's basically um, but the rothschilds were very much the banking establishment of, of england in particular. and they had, as i mentioned, agents in america. i think august belmont comes to mind as a very famous, a guy who was sort of instrumental in the various loans and things during the civil war time period in particular. also in terms of it was a bit of a king maker. i believe when it came to us presidents so you have to kind of look at this whole network that is, you know, the raj on network and again,

very much better historians and i that will tell you, you know, that we need the intricacy of these things i'm looking at belmont was the chair of the democratic national committee. right from 1860. so there you go. talk about the democratic party of that time, which was essentially the party of, of, you know, secession, or you could say, you know, of the, the, the confederacy. so that was a rothschild agent. so again, there's, there is reason to suspect rothschilds conspiracies. there is some, you know, there is evidence that effect, but you have to kind of really research carefully because there are times things that are alleged to be said by rothschilds, for example. um, there's a famous quote, you know, i care not who i give the control the nation's money and i cannot who makes the laws that was apparently the founder of the rothschild dynasty. that said it. but if you look, if you really look into it, you can't find any evidence that he did say that there's going to describe them. that's why i say sometimes it's be careful when it comes to the history about things that are kind of, you know,

accepted as truth with in fact they're just mythology belmont. hm. okay. i don't know that name. so i'm gonna have to look into that. thank you. so much for that. so they have also funded they being the rocks childs, they have funded some of the world's biggest projects and wars. i mean quite literally, back in the early 18, hundreds the rocks child's funded, the british troops to fight against napoleon by smuggling gold across the english channel, financing the duke of wellington's troops. and in the 20th century, the rocks trials were one of the finance years of the suez canal. why and how did one family get so entrenched in foreign affairs? you know, generation after generation after generation. you know, i don't think it's a surprise shouldn't surprise us me. think about the nature of what the british empire, what it was, it controlled about a quarter of the world's land land mass had at,

as high as peak. right. that included in the, the commonwealth countries, canada, australia mean these obviously major land masses, but that's if you're, if you're in wind with the bank of england, if you're one of the major banking houses of england at that time, of course, you're going to get access to all the empire, and that's actually where the relationship seems to started with this. a rhodes, who was one of the great impaired british imperialists of the late 19th century when he went to south africa, a few people sort of to be yours. for example, that's basically us as a rhodes creation. he was, is, you know, it was the total races, the look down at the local africans and, and use them for slave labor. basically in the mines and diamond mining and gold. and i think i was an anglo american gold i think was essentially a is. but the point is that he was this massive imperialist who was a racist who believed the british empire had to control and ruled the world that he wanted the british empire to control of africa. he actually talked about the beginning of the holy lands. he wanted to between corporate america and to the

british empire. that was, and he decreased in a basically his executor, the executor of his estate, was, who was it was a lord, i think a was a baron. mcdaniel rothschild, i believe, was the, the knew it was one of the rothschilds there in rochester, was the executor of rhodes, the state. and so the point is that he was very much the say the financing of the rothschilds seems to been intertwine with rhodes. as endeavors and in his will and in his, in his, in his decreasing of monies. he basically established what the route the wrote scholarship. and they basically promoted what, you know, the round table groups that were all about sort of strategizing to perpetuate the british empire, as i said, to me and corporate america to get the holy lands. so it's, it's not a surprise to see the rothschilds entwined with the british empire, and it's endeavors to control the planet as much as they could. and so, circling back to lord jacob and his legacy,

he apparently took great pride in his philanthropic work in his latter years, specifically in israel. and you know, as a jew himself, where he was chairman of the yacht, had a div foundation. it provided funding for the construction of the connect it the supreme court and in just the last year, the new national library given his british jewish identity, the the generational boat loads of money given to politicians in britain and the amount of money the family has given to israel, is it a stretch to say that this is part of why u. k. officials via mentally back israel in this brutal campaign and gaza? so it may look, you can't. you can't disentangle british policy from the creation of israel, as i just mentioned with social roads in is in as well. and it is vision. and it was to re incorporate toilets and the british were the ones

with the ball for declaration to tell who to tell the child's it was. it was one of the is one of the rock tiles i can't remember which, which was it was barren line or rock child that ball for rights to desolate famous declaration. basically expressing that the british government supports the, the creation of a jewish homeland. and that is what becomes israel, right? and that's during the 1st world war and you could, some people argue that it was, it was designed, the british calculated that decision during the 1st world war because they wanted to try to get america more basically more fully in involved in the, in the 1st world war and that there was basically, it was, it was committing also at the same time, don't forget that the british and french were carving up the middle east already during, with the sites the co plan. so essentially they were regional. we defined lines to make sure that they continued their imperial,

their imperialist designs in the middle east. so the idea of having a israel, basically there is a potential the stabilizer of eric power, eric nationalist power, let's say, right? as they were carving up the sides because carving up what it was carving up, saudi arabia separating that, you know, the, the separate and jordan from, from the saudi can kingdom and ravia creating syria, creating live in all these different countries that weren't necessarily, that wasn't necessarily as we saw in lights and radio, that wasn't necessarily what the odds wanted, right? it was imposed upon the bodies colonial. so the british had a strategy. they seem to my mind, you know, to a very late me, even though they recognize in the white papers during your occupation, in the twenties and thirties, they knew the essentially, that the idea of bringing in a massive population of, of immigrants, right? jewish immigrants to that, what became what was in palestine, it became his real was the stabilizing, the understood that but something about simultaneously, as you mentioned,

the rothschilds about jobs were buying a plant in palestine. and they have the money to do it. so often times when it's argued that well, you know, the, the, the args that we're living in palestine didn't own the land. well, that's a lot of the rock, how the money came to buy up those, those properties, those lands and. and so by the time that you know, you have the, the end of the 2nd world war and the mass migration coming of, of, of jews to the, you know, to palestine, even though they were still the minority. they obviously had a lot of financial benefactors to be able to, to fight and defeat the local era population there. so again, you can't disentangle israel's existence from the british decision to basically create the jewish homeland and to support its creations throughout its its entire endeavor as a, as a, as a colonial power there. all right, last sean, your final thoughts on, on this family and, and i don't know,

maybe lord jacob himself, i mean, honestly, lord jacob, i don't know enough about i think one thing that says come to mind that people really should be kind of in, you know, he's a curious about is, is the relationship with marina brockovich, the very famous sort of almost self proclaimed which the, you know, the artist who's all about spirit cooking. and there's a famous photo of mit. a jacob brought child with marina brockovich standing in front of both satan summoning his legions. pad photo alone is very indicative of it's, it's, it tells you a lot there. yes, i remember that picture, and unfortunately, i got to leave it right there. there. ross childs fascinating family love them or hate them. sean stone. thank you so much and be sure to check out his book called new world order. thank you so much for this conversation, shawn. thanks for having me. no, that's good to see you. all right, that is going to do it for today's episode of modus operandi the show that dig deep

into foreign policy and current affairs. i'm your host manila chance. thank you so much for turning in. we'll see you again. next time to figure out the m. o, the take a fresh look around his life. kaleidoscopic isn't just a shifted reality distortion by how of tired vision with no real opinions. fixtures designed to simplify will confuse really once a better wills, and is it just as a chosen few fractured images presented as 1st can you see through their illusion

going underground? can the russian states never as one of the most sense community best of all sense of the in the 6595 must be the one else calls question about this even though we will then in the european union, the kremlin media mission, the state on the russia to day and split the ortiz phone that came in our video agency, roughly all the band on youtube tv services. for what question did you say from stephen twist, which is the,

the, are my little store because the model grid? i got you. no problem seeing it, i'm out of the nose off any 30 minutes. yeah, side of the drive i showed my brother through he was sudden to help people for a lo so now i never looked at searches as being the same. well, i guess i lost my list of the outcome of chicago police. it'd be gang chicago is like, you get for the police, you lose your life as another crime. same could have been a doctor or nurse could have been the next president. we can't keep losing people out here. the

a pessimist place explains also to the total total of this, but i will tell you when you move them more than 3 to 40425 to 37 training here. okay. one second, please. sure. the signal is yep, no recording, well, no problem, no recording. okay, oil in the space next to the toner, then you'll have what you want us to do any problem. what's the point of the

research thing? you might wanna just look what stiffness plays through them. we're just me much further into what you do more with extensive proposal. that means we've, we've got some type of a little flash applied all most often you might have my fault and i, you don't know if it's on the phone with somebody about the, the, the, what would you put them which a fiscal year to all of us ok, the 1st one is the life, the new cost, the folks just me, it's just this chilling welcoming it'll push. it needs a new system because this was just wondering if these are the things that you have to show in which i am going to just go to broke into some noise. there's a with the official.