is diesel has to be addressed. so what we're doing there is any kidding they get the bottle of them or not? the issue i've had um is the issue of the damage done by the shit. oh wow. yes. and it has to be addressed. i mean the has to be the priority full but be able to add that. yeah, there's an article on the website, friends of the uh, that describes 10 ways that show is destroying the find that i guess nigeria is just the tip of the does he ice book? this is all the international way back, the top of the the, the fiber buddy program. now, once again, we now post the show every single day used to do it weekly. now we're doing a daily, we hold no punches here, like the other guys. so look for

a truth bomb number one. iran retaliate with an attack but seems more like good. ok, creator, truth, all number to reading the yahoo is most dangerous game. truth bomb number 3. dick cheney for president who was saying that i'm going to tell you, i'm rec, sanchez, this is direct impact of the . okay, let's get started with what you need to know about this retaliatory strike by iran on israel, by the way, the key word there. retaliatory, let me say it again, retaliatory, and it, by some chance you see or read reports on this and some other news platform, plenty of them and they don't to you in on that term that word. well then stop

reading or turn them off because they're lying and they're spinning. you ok, so yes, you're ron fired some suppose a 300 project dials, some combination of drones and missiles, none of them. precision guided by the way. they also seen some cargo ship, which happened to have some 17 indian nationals on board, something india then like by the way on board the ship was 17 indian nations. and then you came out of time feed operation, said the west was these 92 kilometers northeast off were general. an area of close to the state of farm was that farms the entrance to the gulf? now i mentioned that because this is a kind of thing where 3rd countries like india could get caught up in this kind of these types of actions without intended consequences of course. and, and that's why the world is on edge m, as in the world shouldn't be on edge be ronnie, on the top was a show of force. but let me play with those words a little bit. let me just play

a little bit here. if you'll allow me right to make a point, it was a show of force, but in actuality, not so much force as it was. show. what am i say? yes, iran looked tough with its missile attack into israel, which a piece many of its citizens. as you saw and some of these celebrations on the street to pair up or what as we look at these folks who obviously are saying finally our government did what it needed to do was the wrong truly trying to effect maximum damage on its nemesis. think of that question i just asked, was it trying to effect maximum damage on its nemesis? israel? the answer is obviously no, it was not. in fact, iran, dave ample warning. it put out a statement that after it's volley,

it would expect that both sides all sides really cuz it was started the united states as well. would consider this matter resolved. this is it, we're done no more. that's not fight anymore also or the wrong. well, really serious, if it really want to inflict maximum harm, what did of use more deadly weapons which would have, by the way, it would also not have given the us and this real a 5 hour heads up. you know, like imagine you're going to hit somebody and you say i'm gonna hit you. i'm gonna hit you 5 hours of that. in fact, the missile attack only injured one person according to the reports i've seen. it may change. 99 percent of the projectiles were intercepted. now were the us and israel in the on the google condense. it sure seems like it. oh, and by the way, don't be fooled when you hear a report from the state department or the pentagon. delivered of course, by their p r. agents in the national us media. what this one us official with

direct knowledge of the conflict in israel tell cbs news. president biden told prime minister benjamin netanyahu. america will not participate in a retaliatory strike on iran following saturdays drone and missile attack. okay. that what you just heard, right there is at minimum, a deceptive statement. and here's why. who do you think is shooting down those incoming drones and missiles as we are the united states of america? i'm a blocked in the white house, as i liked to say, that decision was made to do that there. our military is very much involved in this already, and though it seems at this point, like both sides are doing their best to let this be a momentary bar fight. it's important to compare these 2 attacks at this point. the, in other words, what got us here, right? what got us to this place where we are right now. first and last. not forget the as railey attack on a rainy m. m. c. is really a strike destroyed

a building belonging to a ron's embassy in damascus. according to a rainy and state media, ron's revolutionary, god said one of the senior commanders was among the dead. he's rails and military didn't comment, but it's thought to regularly strike a ron linked targets. did you hear what you just said? regularly striking ron link targets? i mean, when that language makes it sound like it's no big deal, no big deal. one country without notice bombs, another country. that's a violation of international law. oh, they also destroy an embassy that belongs to a 3rd country. that's a violation of the vienna convention, at least then they assassinate, assassinate, not one, but 2 iranian officials. that's a violation of every law known to man. oh yeah,

they regularly do this, says cbs or whatever. so, so let's play this out. let's play out this comparison again is real bombs, that embassy killing many, including as rarely officials, pardon me, including many stop there. right? is really officials. right. uh and iran now comes in and says missiles meant to shoot down others and injures one person. and so on the one hand, you have somebody bombing an embassy in another country and this estimating leaders . on the other hand, you have a country single. by the way, we're going to shoot a bunch of missiles, but we're going to give you notice. so you can shoot them all down which is more serious, which was done with the actual malice. you tell me. but here's an even more important question that brings us to the real wild card and all of this which should be concerning to the entire world. the question is why we know that israel started this latest situation, but why? why did they started for better said why they to keep started and by see,

i mean prime minister, be nathan, yahoo! the prime minister, by all indications, can only keep his job stay in office and even avoid going to jail for corruption, so long as he can prolong escalate his country's war foot. continuing the war and gaza killing palestinians. right, is in fact not good for the us, but it is good for the prime minister. and what about starting a war between a ron and the united states, starting a war between a ron and the united states? that would obviously be horrible for us, for the united states. it wouldn't danger the lives of countless us men and women in uniform, not to mention the citizens of iran and the soldiers of iran as well. but once again, wouldn't be so bad for the prime minister. you must remember what a leg has done to you says on our from holy bible and we've amended remember, and we are fighting our trucks array that troops in combatants who are now in gaza

. that is nothing. yeah. who using the hebrew bible as a reference for it and reason to kill palestinians and perhaps others. but he seems to be suggesting is that the i'm on kites and their descendants, presumably the palestinians in this case are said to be cursed and forever and must be eliminated for what they did in 2 ancient israel. if it sounds crazy to you, it sounds crazy. to a whole lot of people around the world. but while most fee, that type of talk is dangerous, from a karl rove in perspective, it's actually very effective. karl rove, you may remember was the us advisor, the president george w bush. you openly talked about how the disastrous iraq war was good for the president's approval ratings. he was right. do you know who and when us presidents achieve the highest approval ratings of all time here in the history of our country,

the united states. let me help you, according to dell, if i just looked it up the highest was president truman, after he dropped an atomic bomb on hiroshima, the scare soviet liter, joseph stall. it is a pretty rating sword, the 87 percent that anyone surpass that has anyone surpassed that? yes, george w bush had the highest premium ratings ever in our country when after he sent troops into iraq and afghanistan, his approval rating past truman's. and with the help of the media, is it 90 percent 90 percent? joining us now to talk about it. somebody who i consider a perfect guest for this conversation maybe is agree by the way with some of the things i said. professor mohammed mirandi is also uh, by the way, he's a professor at the university of k ron and has been a frequent guest on this show. we're also joined by a still on got audio. i'm showing off and pronouncing my ours that way. we could

say you're still in colorado, he's going to editor for our lives, news magazine, the cradle gentleman. i'm not sure where i want to begin, but i guess professor, i'm going to start with you. and i said a lot there. but i did find it that it seemed to me, please correct me if i'm wrong. you're wrong. did everything possible to attack? well, not really attacking. am i right? i would say that the stripe was very calculated and carefully managed. and that it could have been much more severe and very deadly. but it wasn't simply a spectacle what the iranians did in response to the uh, is rarely impression on your, on your sovereignty and syria. mm hm. and the time of the embassy was it. the

writings warmed everyone before and what they wanted to do, and then they sent a large number of drugs for the as well. but the drones were old to drones. none of them were the more modern and more technologically developed drugs . so they were very cheap and they had no technology that could be compromised. and therefore, when those drones reach as well, the writings knew that the americans would, uh, and you're absolutely correct. americans play the main role in downing the most of the drones and the miss house. mm hm. you run is knew that these jobs would be attacked and that they would be down. but that was the objective. the ronnie is wanted the americans and these riley's to use their most advanced technology because they're very expensive and they're limited number of miss house. and also

because the, their, their best technology. so you run, gained a lot of intelligence. so can you didn't, can you characterize for me the thinking behind that because you're right. it looks to me like iran was very careful, tactical, almost mechanical in the way they approach this. they wanted to make noise, but they didn't want to make too much noise. they wanted to get attention, but they didn't want to get that much attention. they want to hurt israel, but they don't want to destroy israel or even come close to it. what is the mindset in tehran? do you believe professor, you're there, you've talked to people behind this type of approach as well. there again, the 2 things. one is that as i said, they wanted to deplete theirs, their, their weapon systems themselves, and they wanted to learn about their capabilities. okay? and this is riley's in the americans by the estimates put forward by

this raney's spent over $1300000000.00. whereas the ronnie and drowned and a series of mist files that were old. again, none of them had the wrong key technologies. they were also fired. those were also down, but all of these were decoys. and then they were tab between 10 and 20 missiles that were sent that were fired, that were directed towards 2 targets, one in the north and intelligence gathering center and one an air base and the south that was used to attack the embassy and also to carry out the genocide and causes those missiles got through. and so that the serious missiles, which were somewhere between $10.20, they all made it through, but all of the others that were decoys, and all of them combined probably costs it costs like 1015000000 dollars. i don't

know that which is what you have left there, which is a painting number compared to what we usually talk about in, in, in military terms of state. but let me bring you into this. i want to ask you a question about maybe nathan. yeah, i'm going to share with you something that i believe as an american that i think my country should site to be in it then. yeah. and it's something probably it came to this. if you continue for your own political purposes or for whatever purposes you may think of mr. nathan. yeah. who if you continue trying to start a war between us the united states and the ron, we are a going to hold you accountable for that. we are not going to respond, we are going to stop giving you funding for anything else you do. and we may consider breaking the relations that we presently have with your country. why is it so hard for my country to say that to someone who seems to be acting like an outlaw a good day? they seem to be trying to get to that point. now when you hear uh when you hear joe

bite and he's so angry now understand that when you see all the western media, all of us started trying to make the issue the, the general sided as a result of other policies, a one man to positions a one man, instead of the size of this project, instead of the, you know, 75 year a history of the organization of palestine. mm. that tells you that, that find out who a hobby and also his days concert, so to speak. but the anything but it stay on hold on a minute even now there's nothing for this. one of the 1st words out of jo biden's mouth when he heard that there had been this somewhat loose and attacked by iran on uh, on uh, israel this weekend. the 1st words out of his mouth for something like to be effective. we stand behind 100 percent israel, etc, etc. instead of being at least a little more tablet and saying something like, we understand this is a difficult situation and we really wish, as we all had not attacked iran just for this on. but nonetheless,

we will help israel in any way we can. i would understand something like that. but the immediate response was where we're going to go to war for as well. if we have to at the same childish and stupid to me, tell me how i'm wrong. indeed. no, no, not in the, you know, like they for 5 iron class does a bite and said, today, one of the piece i called is sacrosanct. you know, this is the level that they will go to defend after they've been israel against, against the rest of the world. so i feel like at this point, joe biden is a man that is even, we need to give up his own companies on re election just to protect it, just to get the drug down into our work with it. all right, that, uh, in the end of our for us line there seems like something inevitable just because of why the driver presents. so the reason for the region of west asia, which is, you know, not leaving on the right has demonic order. not leaving on there. are you in the corner order? yeah, it is the same type of china rush i represent. and there are so many people in this

country who are now starting to see the difference between real threats and made up threats. and maybe that's what we need to talk about when we're, i'm take a quick break. i want to come back and ask our professor mirandi about that the perception of what the united states is intending to do or shouldn't do. i mean, is there a difference between the bible ministration and the trump administration when it comes to this matter? remember, uh, president trump assassinated a israel, pardon me, a, uh, the ronnie and liter. so what is the difference? we're gonna talk about that stay right there. we're going to be right back. the show seemed wrong. just don't you have to shape out the application and engagement. you close the trail.

when so many find themselves will support. we choose to look for common ground. the the russian states never is as tight as on the phone in the most sense, community best, most all sense and up to 5 must be the one else calls question about this, even though we will then in the european union, the kremlin media mission, the state on russia scooting and split the ortiz vote net, keeping our video agency roughly all the band on youtube tv services. for what question did you say a request,

which is the the

the say welcome back coverage. sanchez and i have enjoyed by professor mojave, randi from toronto as well as a stay on korea. and my thanks to both of you gentlemen, the professor let me uh, begin with you. by the way, i wasn't trying to leave the impression in case you may have gotten mad at the beginning that i wanted to ron to buy or how and brimstone into israel and punish every part. know that, that's not what i was trying to say. i just wanted to comment on the calculated and careful way in which this whole thing was addressed. maybe more importantly is now that a step on a 9 you overheard is talking about the reaction from the binding administration, which i thought was a bit happened. um, how do you see the bite and administration thus far as reaction to all things iran, you and i had a good chance to talk back when,

during the trump administration. i thought the truck was really hard on iran, in some cases more stern, perhaps unnecessary, maybe even a little and just do you see a difference here, or is it the same old, same old as we say here? well, when it comes to iran, the us political establishment and the mainstream media, they've always been very irrational. and they basically have been influenced by the sinus lobby. and barry says extraordinary, when the united states supports the genocide in gaza, then it's obvious that the united states is going to support any atrocity that is ready regime carries out. and of course, since the iranians have always been the key supporters of the policy, i mean, cause there's only no country in the region or in the world that seriously supports the policy and people in their resistance against the occupation and against ethnic

cleansing. so obviously the us hospitality and is rarely hostility will be focused on iran and that of course, whether it's trump or obama, or a bite in or bush. it really doesn't make that much of a difference. obama impose maximum pressure of sanctions to target ordinate ryan's trump. did the same to target ordinary, iranians abiding has continued with the maximum pressure of sanctions. all of them have spoken about all options being on the table and of course, bush as well. so there really has been a, continue it to what it comes to run. but the problem for the united states is that now they're pushing the region towards it. they do it dangerous situation. one thing that has changed after the attack on the running embassy is that the running as of now the band that b a b equation has changed. if this res,

attack iranians anywhere is not inside the work, not just inside the run and embassies, anywhere from now on the run is want to hit back at the is there anything missing directly and they will attack them very hard. then you will consider you consider when, but let me ask you the question from your point of view. do you believe that a wrong considers that when it is attacking sea floor or full throttle, the is riley's there really just as well are getting ready to be attacked back by both israelis and the united states. in other words, do they perceive a war with israel? as a war with america as well, if the united states strikes the iran, then the iranians will strike back at the americans very hard. and the riots have been preparing for 2 decades. 6, they have drone bases and missile bases across the country underground basis at the they have been designed to protect the wrong from the united states. if the

united states attacks iranians will expound the us from the rock using their their that, that even though their capabilities but also their allies in iraq will overrun us spaces and their bases in syria would collapse to because they're dependent on their occupation in iraq. but more importantly, you romwell strikes us base is across the persian gulf. and even more important than that, you, ron will strike those countries at host us spaces because it'll be seen as complicit. and if that happens, that means there will be no oil and gas coming from the persian gulf region, not just the persian gulf, but the yeah, yeah. and the global economic catastrophe. that will be worse than 1929. so i think there's a sort of balance of terror between your on, in the united states sort like between the soviet union and the united states. and that's what i think is the time the united states. and i think there are a lot of same people still same people in washington to recognize that. yeah,

so that perhaps maybe a bridge too far. but, but of course, the united states today is not being rational at all. the very fact that the united states is supporting this riley's carry out the genocide is demolishing the us. across the world is just drawing a soft power is just throwing is credibility, it's reputation, that's the image. but the united states seem handy. european seemed willing to sacrifice everything for this race about a minute left to step on. and i want to come back to you and ask you this question about this situation. the professor and i were just talking about, do you think as a student of the united states and his political policies, that there is something within the united states that could get away from this mindset of. busy or even perhaps those who think it would be good. people like john bolton, for example, recently said he wants dick cheney to be the next president. imagine that can separate us from that more. they months mindset that we have right now. do you see

it? i don't, i don't break. i know. yeah, i do hope that uh, maybe i would say a different answer, but i did not because this is on the, the, the, he started the states over the past. you know, it's 5060 years just war and more war and more worldwide because war is profitable because everybody else may be solved for the width of the companies that you're lucky. martin is your art, the x, your i, you know, north of grew man, they're all laughing all the way to the right time. cuz this is also one of the reasons why you know this, these big support for israel and all of a sudden they want to revive this uh, packaged for ukraine and east bro. $60000000000.00. so there's going to go, they're going to go into the pockets of the work on somewhere else. so you need to be looking at this book folders, you know, for the stuff all the, these companies and then see where the change can begin. yeah, you know, you just made me think of a line and maybe i should klein it but it's almost like i was just having

a conversation with both of you, including the professor about the united states of america and it's position, but it just reminded us it's not so much the united states of america anymore. it's the national security states of america. and that's, that's, that's a problem that we're gonna have to fix down the line. if we want to all get along better, i'm out of time. my thanks to both of you as usual, a professor my randi, good to see you again. my friend, thank you so much for sharing your insight with us. and as usual, good is good to be with you as well as them. thank you very much. before i go, i want to remind you of our mission here, what we try to do anyway. pretty simple. be silo the world. we've got to stop living and these little boxes truths don't live in boxes, too. sure. everywhere i'm rick sanchez, is what we're shooting for here. underactive tax. the

rally. her mother's us to store. okay. the model girl that i got you. no problem seeing that on the out of the know the thing arguments us out of the drive i showed my brother through he was trying to sell people for a lo so now i never looked at searches as being saved. well, i guess i lost my list. that's the outcome of chicago police. it'd be gang in chicago is what i can give you a photo of the police. you lose the there's another crime. same another.

this could have been a doctor. a nurse could have been the next president. ok, keep losing people out here. the . the headlines on off to you that as an aussie correspondent is released off to being held for hours in detention at the police. the airport with no reasons, given the, had been the heading that a couple of the ongoing protest in the georgia and capital process. and security council says a direct link has being filed between ukraine and last months, concert whole terror attack in moscow. boeing old. those involved will be an escalation of the conflict was the result of need m, yahoo snatching matters. the latest. the 3rd world war, the president nicholas without warning of the precarious situation, the world suddenly finds itself in us as west of nations owed to israel not to strike back either round.