lunches and so this with cease 5 to pave the way for long term peace. the 1st 18 months long comb 6th broke out between call 2 between the 2. johns all me and the graphic support forces complementary power, mystery, creep night. besides is being willing to concede off the, dissolving the civilian governments in 2021 crew. approximately 15000 people have been killed and over 8000000 displaced. finally, the following thing. south sydney's international policy consultant chad, case assessment of the piece to it's not really what i think when talking about any declaration, any piece agreement, you need to main warren size. and when we talk about the issue, the sudan doris says, which is a rapid support forces led by the former vice president mohammed him. don't do that, no one is admitting and to sit in on full judgment by president of this the job

behind these to be will have to be in the negotiating table. so anybody can agree, anybody can negotiate really commit declarations. but if you're not bringing the warrant sections or on the ground taking territory and fighting each other, then you're not gonna make much progress. and this is the big open in the room. how is that? how do we bring the ones access to the table and bring the inclusive piece to the people's together? so when you get a piece agreement in sudan, immediately you're going to see stability and selves to them because a lot of my friends, a letter with b, g 's, a lot of people are flips, who had to sell, so that so, and there's a semblance of piece and there's pieces return to this so that a lot of people are returning and they return during the depression of the displaced people and the attorneys on the people itself. so that i can see the conflict and sued in is impacting south sedan. and i myself as a citizen itself, so that i can attest that piece and the reason is necessary for all of us. and when the stuff that i'm spacing is challenges, as a nation in 2013, you saw the impact that the conflict had on the region have accomplished. the

impact on it will be on sudan, continued governance. now the student is having a conflict. we need all the various stakeholders to play a role in bringing piece to this complex. thanks very much for watching the lord all the stories we've been discussing. you kind of course head over to our website policy dot com, the, [000:00:00;00] the, the hello i'm and electron,

you're turned into modus operandi with the death of queen elizabeth, the 2nd in 2022. many around the world said this was the sun finally setting on the british empire, less than 2 years into the reign of king charles the 3rd. the royal family is now played with more controversy than ever before. we'll discuss these author romanticize royals and see if the facts align with the fairy tale. all right, let's get into the m o. the is a family whose story goes back hundreds of years and spans the world over. the house of windsor is a story, one for some there the beloved heroes of world history books, and for others, there are the villains who oppressed and exploited nearly one 3rd of the planet and

loved them or hate them. there is no dispute that the late queen elizabeth clan, left an indelible mark on the world, shaping it to be what we know it as today. now under the reign of king charles houses and turmoil, the freshly coordinated king rule word to be suffering from advanced pancreatic cancer with an unsubstantiated prognosis of just 2 years left to live. here to break it all down is a good friend of the show. sean stone, sean is a filmmaker historian and author of the book, new world order, and you can learn more about shawn's work at shawn stone dot info. so shawn, let's start with the revelation that king charles has cancer. now he assumed the throne in the fall of 2022, after his mother, the longest reigning model monarch, the late queen elizabeth the 2nd. after she passed away, his official coordination was just may of 2023, less than

a year after that. this cancer news. but little else is known about his health. you know exactly what sort of cancer, what stage it's in, et cetera. why is the palace keeping so mom about this? and should they be so private? should they should? that's it, that's a, that's a, that's a tough question. you know, because who am i to speak for the royalty this? this pretends this facade that has been going on for over a well over a 1000 years now in england. and, you know, it's, it's not a surprise to me. i hate to say it, but i can, i can tell you exactly how just do a mixture of, of intelligence and tuition, of other people, you know, as intelligence as like intelligence services types. so basically that's like i knew that charles is rain would be very short lived. let's put it like this. and so i'm predicting that whether it's through passing or just simply stepping down

because of health. things like this that charles was really just an intermediary step. and i think a lot of people expected this to, to williams assuming this wrong. yeah, i figure the sad irony here was that, you know, queen elizabeth just kept going and going and going, you know, never stepping down. and charles awaited his chance to roll. he's now in his seventies. he waited a long time only to be diagnosed with cancer a year later that this one would have put it. i think, you know, to be honest. it was, you know, again, this is an american perception perhaps. but i don't think a lot of people have really expected charles to to be k. there was a lot of talk even when elizabeth was around that, which just sort of pass, you know, right away to william that he was really the heir apparent. and charles was sort of the idiot, son, i hate to say, well, i mean,

that's kind of the way that he presented to be honest, ever since the days of diana, you know, and when it was sort of the divorce was obviously very messy from the world perspective, you know, that like having to go through that, that experience, i'm sure right the they like to keep it all classy and clean and divorces aren't that and that from that point forward i think um, you know, it's, it was really kind of just for view the charles was, was, was a kind of the intermediary for his, for his son. well, then a month after king charles is announcement, princess kate, middletown wife of the future. king william. she puts out a social media video announcing her cancer diagnosis and that she's undergoing chemo therapy. no specifics there either. but then she gets roiled in this sort of weird botched photo re touched drama for you came mother's day. i mean, i get that she's a royal, she's a celebrity and, and get subjected to perhaps unfair and,

and certainly on equal scrutiny. but at the end of the day, she saw a person right of me. she's a mom of 3 young children. she's fighting cancer, shouldn't she being granted a little grace or given some slack here it has, as i said, the beginning, you know, the appearance of the pretense of royalty. there is no humanity in it. i think princess diana was, was in a great expression of that in the ninety's. you know, she, she was hard pressed by the royal family, the by the, the, the, all the drama that came around the divorce, the attacks, the, you know, the way that she had to basically show up in the world. it was, it was a lot of stress for her. and i think that it, kate is living through very similar, you know, dramatics, let's say the scheming that goes on because it's the same whether it's a, you know, political administration is one thing, right? we know that as f d r said if it's happens in politics, you know,

it was planned that way. well, imagine you're a part of a family of dynasty, right? that's hundreds of years old and has to, has to, let's pretend, hey, that's the whole point. it's all about pretending it's all about selling an image. keeping up this pretense that we, we have this sovereignty in this power that the rest of you wish to admire. and we can see they sell. i mean, how much news and media is just focused on the daily happenings, right. of, of someone in the royal family it's, it's the celebrities of, of, of europe, right. of, of england in particular, it's that old celebrity attraction that, you know, sells magazines in america as well. um, that's what the real family is. so you, knowing that understanding that this liberty side of things, you know, i understand pretty well like how much the private side is used basically for exploitation and also hidden. because if too much is developed from the private, you can end up losing the fascination. you don't want to lose your audience as they

say. and of course, the whole, you know, the british and the british commonwealth is the audience of everything happening with kate. so of course it would be nice to say yes, she's a human being with the royal family as well. he could say this ironically is not quite human. all right, so princess kate is taking this reprise of royal duties for obvious health reasons . but prince harry and wife american actress megan markelle, have simply chosen to step away from the royal family in its entirety. now they're just living, i guess the celebrity life in california. next to oprah. for her part though, meghan markelle told oprah in an interview before the queen died, that she felt the family was racist towards her. i mean, she doesn't name names, but in fact, and i'm paraphrasing here. she said she and, and her 1st baby archie were discriminated against. the palace has fervently denied these allegations. but given the royal families,

no history of conquest and colonialism. kind of not a far fetched idea. we know racism exist. why does the world care more about this particular allegation? i don't know if the world well, i don't know if the world cares more and necessarily it's more sensational, right? the media can play it up because it's being charged against someone who's received at that time. you know, the queen is as powerful person as and so of course, you know, if you're making allegations against awful people, it's going to be played up as long as the media wants to play it up. as we know, there is often times allegations made against profit people that are suppressed. so in this case, the media want to play it up. and there's probably some truth to it. i mean, again, the nature of this monarchy, this british empire has been one. as you mentioned, of, of conquest at one point at the height of the empire, they control the quarter of the planet. so that was, you know,

and that led to how many desks, for example like india is you know, what, it needs various indian families that occurred as a result of the various policies you know, from the, for the british, imposing upon them, uh, shifting their economy. obviously, throughout africa they're within all kinds of brutal wars and not just, you know, for a conquest of things like gold and diamonds. right. but the establishment of institutional systems that were based on exploitation and you know, so there's long history here. obviously, you can argue that also the british empire, like the roman empire, which was also brutal, lead to the establishment of what is now, you know, considered modern civilization the legal structures, the economic structures. they're based from those british modalities. and so obviously it's not just, you know, the crown, but the crown is a very powerful entity in itself and its own right in terms of the land, whole thing in terms of the nature of, of the influence, right? they have sovereign immunity,

these kings and queens in their family. so there's um, there's a lot that can be said in terms of the influence that they've had. and, and it's interesting, i think that, you know, this notion of megan and harry sort of fleeing that establishment. i don't know that i personally question how much is this? you know them just wanting to live their life without being under constant scrutiny and under cost and well, i guess they are under cost scrutiny, but let's say like under the protocols of the royals, right. the way that we talked about now, you know, with kate, it's like you're under constant protocol and decorum. whereas these guys are like, listen we, we want to enjoy them. the rich is the well, the status that comes with it, but want to be able to be, it has some freedom and that's probably what they're doing at some level. all right, coming up next. some people are above criminal prosecution. they claim by divine right. as a sovereign, how does this antiquated ideas still exist in the 21st century?

we'll discuss it when we return with sean stones. the type em all will be right back. the the a good one. yeah. that you attempted to do to fix that amount. apache sat there for the show and then it will here job to left for the cause of a dish into this one, for the defense of the supplement is such a button and not to mention in person. once did you lose? you asked what times they for us in the media. i know people, there's only 2 reasons to do so with the city,

the new country can piece of us going to be present? good. it was working monday morning to work it down. stimulus the industry on is it? what's money profile says really left, so should william farmer shots, monuments. so we have court guy started or, or decision day. monday i'm able, was a man was the ones that ridiculous on the what is the best one today and but 22 left on that one. so that's what it was that you want to set. i'm showing total suspect pretty show can was i'm patient. did it for she's kim, those are the best. do what i mean? there's a push out the welcome back to the m o m l a chance. johnstone. thank you for sticking around with us. so shawn in, in queen elizabeth, final years. she had a lot of a personal and fam, we strive to deal with specific ways surrounding her younger son, prince andrew,

and his ties to be deceased, finance, ear, and convicted sex offender, jeffrey epstein. andrew is basically an accused child rapist, according to virginia to fray. the queen then basically banished andrew from all of these royal events. but as well, status has protected him from being served lawsuit papers from being expedited to the west. his title has saved his hide from prosecution. if the royal family are mostly just figureheads, why are they seemingly above international law literally are mean sovereign immunity is exactly that. it's offering immunity, which means that really, you know, once you're a sovereign, you are above loss because the laws are written for commenters. i mean that's, this is my fundamental problem with the nature of royalty in, in, in, in the old world capacity, you know,

my mentality is like every human being should be regarded as well by the nature of the divinity, right? that's just part of the american constitutional conception or the declaration that we are created very much in the biblical sense in the image of god, by the power of god, right. with certain in a unalienable rights, that's not a british conception. the british conception is, is very much rights taken from the king's basically whether it's through magna carta, whether it's through various, uh, you know, barons and other titled nobility, right, nights and others trying to basically assert their rights. these are the, this is crown that had, basically, that was, you know, in the old was very much continuation of roman imperialism. right? the idea that the, the king is the christ of the christ. that figure, i'll say the god of are the most, the, the, the god on earth works through the king or the queen. right?

they have defined right to rule. and basically then they grant power is the grant titles, the grant lands, right? the grant you liberties. that's the old mortality of, of the legal system. and we all actually still operate under those same conceptions, right? our, our legal system is all derived from that and wouldn't know whether it was the king's or in america became the government. but it was in many ways the opposite of this more, let's say the, the american principle, which is really like the biblical principle that like it's actually god that is giving us our rights as every one of us equally as humans. and then we get to sort of come together and decide, okay, what powers we give to, you know, governments or whatever police force is right? but it's fundamentally supposed to be for the people in america drinking and obviously not the same. so that's, that's to answer your question and along along the way, why he can get away with this. and then into more, you know, in a more interesting capacity. it's not just a,

it is not just him. the whole royal family has been in imbued with pedophile charges for going back to me, at least to lord mount that. don't forget who was the cousin to the queen was very influential in prince philip, who i think was a very nefarious figure within the real family. but obviously philip was the husband of elizabeth, non baton was notorious pedophile across the world and on the tories for, for a look into that, look into it. basically look notorious for trafficking and in the, especially like the indian, you know, young indian boys and things like this. and yeah, not that and actually was, i believe brought jimmy salbal into the folder was connected was very close to jimmy's apple who became very, very close to the pro family. right. and who was apple, the tories pedophile of cross decades protected by this establishment. sample was so close to the royal family that they assigned him to at one point to try to

liaise between diana and charles during their divorce. so the, you know, the idea of, of, of the these roles being involved with pen ophelia had this, this, this is a, this is an old and problematic issue that has never really been on, or i yeah, rule for me, not for me as a solver and i guess seems profoundly outdated, but that's just me. i'm not a royal watcher. so all of this is actually news to me, but also not shocking either. if that makes sense. um. now, speaking of sex scandals, another sex scandal has recently been felt the palace this time concerning hip hop mobile, sean p diddy combs photos have surfaced a prince, william and harry hanging out with duty who is now accused of similar crimes. as jeffrey epstein that we should know at the time of this taping,

did he has not had any charges brought against him despite you know that big federal raid on his home in los angeles. currently the palace of scrambling the distance, the 2 princes from duty, with all these things taken into account. are we beginning to see the fall of the house of windsor is, is the crown crumbling? i think, you know, honestly, with the, with the passing of elizabeth. there was something a sort of symbolic, right, in terms of that passing and ever since then again, they said there's, there's this, there's a, there's a expectation that this is about the preparation of william what william do, right, when he assumes this wrong, will he see that sort of arthur and figure to say, listen, you know, this is we need to this band, this whole 1st is mockery that we know we call the real royal family and royalty in the modern age. it's just, you know, we need to dissolve, this will be, do that in the magnanimous sense and say, i'm not above you, you know,

let the people, we are all the same. or will they just simply try to carry this on? because again, i mean there's a lot of as much as the psychology right. the, this ecology that people have when they, they think of their royalty in england. i've, you know, i've talked to it over the topic over the years and i was just always fascinated by like, why you, you know, why do you still have to get king or queen in that capacity? and they, it was like this and installed you right. i guess the same way that in america we have this delta for our founding fathers. it's, you know, this are 3 enrollments. you know, it's been like, well, it's tradition and they've just the not, they've been the sort of stabilizing for us. and there's a mythology that, that develops around, you know, i guess around that concept of king queen ship in your, you know, in that land. but they also, it's not just figure heads, you know, they literally have a huge amounts of holdings. in fact, i think if you really got to the heart of it, who owns the land of england, and i would fight,

i think you'd find that it's basically the crown that owns the land and reads it to people or, or gives you know, title and holdings and things like this, but you need to think of the needs the entire structure, right, of, of, of love and being late and not just things. and obviously, no talking about the commonwealths, which as i mentioned, one point, you know, is a quarter of the planet, the lost in the, the last, you know, parts of the last parts of africa. but there's still a huge number of countries around the world, including canada, australia, and others that are part of the commonwealth. and so, is it the co pays at the crown, the still owes that land, right? that seated, it basically said here you, this is, you can have a home rule, you know, and you can have a kind of, you know, some kind of authority over it, but fundamentally it's still belongs to the crowd. so it's a very, very complicated to actually dissolve the monarchy and it would affect all, have huge gratifications, you know, across the entire commonwealth and, and as into starting with, with england, which is, you know, still a very wealthy country in the world,

but how much of the wealth is tied to you can call like, you know, the crown issuing grants of title and land and things like this. i don't know if a william might shake the house to windsor up or i don't know. i wouldn't suggest that he will. i mean, i think that would be fascinating if he did that. but as we, you know, as you were talking about, like, you know, are we seeing that the dissolution i, it's like, i don't, i don't know unless, unless william did something that was you know, structurally, again, or magnanimous and above the capacity of what we've seen. most, most kings would do okay. so more broadly, a minority of countries left in the world operate on a monarchy system. 43 of them to be exact. 13 of them outside of u. k. recognize the british monarchy as the technical head of state from tiny islands like popular new guinea to big ones like australia, as you mentioned,

our neighbors to the north, canada, even the nearby bahamas recognize charles as king is a time to do away with monarchies altogether. and if so, replace them with what? well, as i mentioned before, i made replace it with an american style, a constitution declaration, right? so basically you're creating a new system of, of trust where in the power of the grand torres, god, you know, the, the, the, all the, all knowing, all loving benevolent creator and the trustees of the governor of the government. and you know, in the end the beneficiaries are the people and then basically the, you know, the people are the ones that have to hold the trustees accountable for how things are going. and that's, and that's something that i think, you know, we, we know, we, we, we expect in america, obviously we've seen how the corruption is set in. now, you know, this a stablish in trench 2 party system is,

has made it very difficult overtime and user patient of a lot of rights we've seen just because of a so ready to again, just emergency powers and things like this. we know more powers and other things we've surrendered our many of our, our fundamental rights and liberties because of the expectations, the government will do it better and take better care of us and keep our security and all this nonsense. but if you know, if you think about the fundamental constitution bill of rights, declaration of independence, i think america has got the, the best form of government possible and this current, you know, innovation of humanity. all right. i would say, god have mercy on those who pursue an american style democracy. i mean, i would argue our democracy is currently in shambles. i mean, why would anyone want to mimic us? because to be because you've, you've created a federal government that was, that's as far beyond what the founders ever envisioned federal government to do any that is when a user patient of, of, of rights that were funded mental and enshrined in our bill of rights and the

expectations of, of, you know, where we, the people were supposed to hold the government accountable, and basically, due to a mass, huge amount of corruption and the basic surrendering of rights. every time there's an emergency which really started you can say with the civil war. but then got, you know, increased ever since 1933 with the roosevelt declaring emergency because of the, the economic emergency he wanted war powers. and ever since then we've basically been in a perpetual state of emergency. so whenever there was emergency, we just, well, the government is going to take more and more of your rights, more of the checks, you know, let's say the checks and balances system away. and as i said, the federal government was never intended to be as large and impactful in our, in our, in our economy, in our lives as it's become. all right, fair enough. i gotta leave it right there. shawn. unfortunately, shawn stone, filmmaker historian, author of the book, new world order. thank you so much for sharing your insights with us today. that's a pleasure,

thanks for having me. and that is going to do it for this episode of modus operandi the show that digs deep in the foreign policy and current affairs. i'm your host manella chance. thank you for tuning and we'll see you again next time to figure out the m. o, the, the,

the, the, the other unit on off what sky o'neills, fluid, the, when you talk with bob, bob, got them to move the weight of the money for the theater. if as little as the mid v, as the deputy justice of the, again, it's like us just do it really a couple i get those go coordinating a lot more to the doors of familiar with that said let's see, i don't know. blushing, but just as serious,

i think you said that we can see on there which assessment when you put his rodnick, i to get the, the, the, the action or it has, he woke up actually going on the ground broadcasting all around the world from the you a brutal day to a was the decline of us, probably accelerating rise of bricks, economic catastrophe, and west endurable in the bigger selection. yeah. in history, up to russia, pockets, i'm and bangladesh, the south africa and mexico india and the u. k. and in november, the usa, one trend full cost, it correctly predicted the us dot com crash, the us savings and loan corruption scandal, and the rise of gourmet coffee. gerald so then days founder and director of the trends research institute and publisher of the week the trends journal and he joins