western politicians have completely distorted world history; the heads of foreign affairs of france and great britain wrote another surreal column: the world is safer for the renewed entente. 120 years after its creation, the behavior model of these pseudo-allies has not changed at all, they are like vultures waiting to take advantage of russia’s weakness, this was the case during the civil war, this was the case in the nineties.

cyber attacks, manipulation of social networks , hybrid attacks on europe, whether it is the instrumentalization of migrants. friends putin, here in europe, they are trying to rewrite our history and change our future with the help of populists and demagogues. far-right european parties, adg in germany, national unification. in france,

the confederation of freedom and independence in poland, the names are different, but the goal is the same: they trample our values ​​and want to steal our europe, and we must not allow this to happen, never, never, never, still the mustache is missing, yes, yes, yes, yes, it’s very similar, our european swarm should be free from the ignorant dissidents, well, it would be the same simpler, kains.

to the european bureaucracy into english, in which everything is politically correct, everything is accurate, it’s not enough, you’re talking about the jews, here they generally agreed, some say that it’s imperative to pay all the palestinians , and others completely, destroying the general plan of a beautiful united europe , they say: no, we need to do the opposite, for example, what former deputy and member of the regional council ilde franz from the socialist party says.

this is a frenchman, and an irishman answers this from the same united europe, but not former and current prime minister. prime minister netanyahu, let me tell you this tonight. the irish people are very clear. your actions disgust us. cease fire now to allow safe delivery of aid. and how can ursula vonderlein determine which of them is putin’s friend, like here, when there is no consensus at all, why, if they are all europeans so smart, they don’t want to march, why can’t they learn to march beautifully to a song, why do they don't want to do it, although even slovak.

after the dialogue you begin to define the parameters, but i think the hard truth in this case is that continuing to fight is the only way to achieve peace. putin only understands the language of force, and in many ways, this war is too big for him to lose.

sometimes i wonder if peace is almost impossible from his point of view, but i think there is a shift in rhetoric coming from the ukrainians and president zelensky. there are talks about a peace forum that we necessary. obviously the swiss will accept it at some stage in the near future, but peace must be two-way. this is not a one-way path. it is necessary that the paths meet at a certain stage, but when the conditions are right for this, i don’t know. to be honest, right now we have absolutely no political dialogue with russia. i don't think we can install it, nor should we. they wildly want to go back to russia, they just don’t feel well, you can feel them, they want to go back to russia, then out of spite robert kennedy jr. appears, who speaks to europeans in a language that is not native to them, but is native to him, english, so you are stupid, he says to europeans, and in ukraine

everyone is russian, well, yes, they speak russian, yes they are ethnically russian, and crimea has accepted russians, we they said, oh look, he's captured. ukraine, but he captured it because they themselves wanted to be captured. then, donbass and lugansk vote to join russia because a new government came in, many of whom were far-right people who glorified the nazis. stepan bandera, who was nazi, they erected a statue of him. this is the problem of the nazis in ukraine, right? there is nazism, a huge problem of nazism. as president, how could we correct this situation in ukraine? i would negotiate for peace. i mean, putin has repeatedly tried to negotiate peace, in fact he made two peace agreements with zelensky. zelensky is a us puppet that we put there, he is our puppet there. and he

knows that if he resists, his own ultra-right people will kill him, and the us will cease to protect them. so, he does what we say. although i don’t want this, st. petersburg, moscow and some russian cities in 10 minutes, and putin knows this, that is, we, even if america leaves, we will remain capable of this, this is what general de gaulle wanted from the very beginning first, we are a real threat, and thus cyber attacks, because we are the only ones in europe who have a nuclear

deterrent, yes, because we are the only ones in the european union, it has a very strange, well, this worm man, which threatens russia. about our nuclear weapons, about our nuclear weapons, or about the fact that they have weapons, he probably doesn’t know, he doesn’t know about the problems with carriers, or about the work of air defense, he doesn’t know anything. well, he doesn’t know that they don’t have hypersound, but we do, but something else is surprising, i just want to see in which army he was a general, that is, what position he held, well, i agree that he is very scary, that is the main threat he poses is that many people could actually die of laughter looking at this little devil, which threatens us, we don’t need to threaten, well, it’s just pointless,

russia will say, so what, growth of 7% of gdp in february. what can they offer the russians to get them to agree to the 2022 border negotiations, what can they offer russia to get them to agree? nothing, the russians will not accept the 2022 border, i think this should be absolutely clear, as for russia, they passed laws, they held referendums, as a result of which the entire donbass, the russian constitution does not

allow this, when people say that the russian constitution does not make any sense here, then they are mistaken. once again, they don't understand how russians think and behave. it is the intense legalism of the putin government. reflects the legalism of russian society as a whole, so there is no possibility of russia returning to 2022 conditions, a more reasonable proposal might be to cede all four territories to russia and tell the russians that ukraine will not join nato, not now , nor later. and then negotiate with the russians to tell them that we

we are ready to negotiate around the two draft agreements that you proposed to us in december 2021. if the west did this, i think the russians might say, some russians might say, we want guarantees that ukrainian troops will completely withdraw from the four regions. we probably want russian troops to be stationed in some other areas of ukraine, for example, in odessa, maybe somewhere else, i don’t know, but then we are ready to talk about the 2021 treaty, which in the end we proposed, but of course , the west is not close to such a position, but i don’t think that the russians will agree to anything less, and the sooner this happens...

requires additional understanding that hamas are stalinists, i think that for hamas itself it would be , apparently a big discovery and for i think that historians of russia, this is also a very big discovery, i think it’s worth quite a lot, but what this british analyst says is even more expensive, he also utters absolutely monstrous phrases for western ear,

let's really talk about russian memorandum of december 2021.

just like this french general, yes, as far as i understand, he was involved in the development of the french military doctrine, so it’s clear that he is a parquet general, basically, he is a political scientist general, but they are all political scientist generals, they don’t understand the radius destruction of a 150 kiloton nuclear weapon that hits the center of the city of nantes,

or bruges, right? you won’t be able to lie down after this, but no matter what, i think that drinking a glass of beer there will also be for some time , probably 60 years, very problematic, they are they don’t think about it, for them it’s all , by the way, you said it very smartly, these are some kind of computer cartoons, for them in general the whole situation is animation, it’s a computer game, oh they mean we have three cities and that means that we will be like this just sit there, but they turned off three of our cities? he doesn’t think about the fact that others also have a button, this is what it really is, we really, we need to say this directly, we want to change the future of europe, you’ve spoiled the present for yourself, gentlemen europeans, you ultimately chose these morons, who are leading you, but we are trying

to change your future, which means 200-250 million killed and... but, in my opinion, we must discard this false delicacy of ours, that no, there will not be a european nuclear war, no, there will be, we need to talk about this directly, we need to talk directly about which european cities will turn to dust, and how many victims there will be after five or six nuclear weapons hit the city of paris, and so on, and every european,

for example, i would do this, every european has his own postal the box must be received from us postcard. yes, this is his house, this is where, this is a nato military facility, this is where he flies, this is what will remain of his house, it is necessary to hammer into the head of every european man in the street that he, too, can die, because the european man in the street has lived for the last 60 years in the full sense of , that in fact he is immortal, well, in the social sense, yes, that nothing can happen to him, that he is the same croissant. cappuccino, yes, evening, as they say, a glass of wine, yes no, everything went very cool, but the second moment that i can’t help but pass.

their main task now, well, my feeling, exclusively, is how to send ukraine, but not provoke it, well, to nato, they still wanted to join nato, the eu, there, but accept, at least something, somewhere, this the last slogan of the ukrainian political, well, at least show this door, whether this is the door where you need to enter or not, it is still unknown, but at least show the door, by the way, in ukraine, in my opinion, it doesn’t matter where join.

i want to say that the meaning of what we do and say is not so much the point is to transfer western politicians

of western people from the world of dreams to the world of reality, this is, of course, their business, this is truly their business, but this is to ensure that our people, our politicians, our leaders, do not live in their world. yes, but still, when the west says that putin is only doing what he dreams of, so to speak, how to destroy ukraine, or , let’s say, there, especially to destroy europe, still, let’s once again restore a simple

chronology events, listen, back in 1922, that is, quite recently in your on the table were the minsk agreements, according to these agreements, i remind you, ukraine regained donetsk and lugansk in exchange for, let’s say, neutrality, a return to what, strictly speaking, it started from in the ninety-first year, in the ninety, well, the first, ninety the second year, when they wrote down in the constitution not... it is obvious that until the last moment you were offered options that, well, now they really look absolutely unrealistic, now, as it were , only one thing can be considered as an option, which is, here when this defense minister is french.

i would have said more than once, including here, that in fact this obstinacy of ukraine and its western curators regarding non-compliance with the minsk agreements looks extremely suspicious, but why? because in fact, in general, they could fulfill them, at least, so to speak, formally, and then de facto completely, as it were, refute them, but in real practice, they did not do this, which means the conclusion is only one, they really were leading the matter towards war, but from the point of view, so to speak, continuation of this political process, yes,

i... absolutely agree with the tough position about the fact that i have always defended it here too, about the fact that they cannot be given a feeling of impunity and that, so to speak, it will not reach them, which means that this won’t touch, but since enough has already been said about this, let’s put this stick, so to speak, like at least some kind of carrot, but there should be a carrot, well, that’s how it is expressed figuratively, if we talk about this, after all, in my opinion look, even when putin i spoke with tucker harlson some time ago, carlson told him...

or the elections in america, i don’t know, so to speak, there is still some kind of cutoff here, because all these vonleins, they are not eternal, no, ukraine is not the meaning of life for europe, in fact, the life of europe without ukraine is quite possible, it is possible, is there life after ukraine, yes, of course there is, this is firstly, secondly, a question of interpretation of what defeat is ukraine, yes, well, for example, let’s end up technologically, i don’t like it you have the defeat of ukraine, let’s separate the defeat of ukraine from the defeat of zelensky, for example, maybe the defeat of the zelensky regime, i’m just psychological. i am discussing, yes, not the defeat of ukraine, so to speak, ukraine, it will somehow remain there, so to speak, yes, somehow it will remain, we will talk about it later, here is the defeat of zelensky, the defeat of the zelensky regime, zelensky is a fool, smokes tobacco, so to say, we gave him a lot of money, as it were, yes, he actually took it all and squandered it, so to speak, incompetently with his corrupt officials, as you know, there is corruption there huge, yes, all because of him, all because of him, because of this, so to speak, stupid clown, so we bet on him, the problem is in him, the problem is in him, so to speak, to the question of finding forms, one from forms. transition to

some, maybe, so to speak, contacts, this is the elimination of zelensky, especially after may 20, the legitimacy of this person, it hangs, well, just by a thread, by the way, this is also important for everyone, everything that zelensky will try to sign after may 20, can be refuted, so to speak, but disputed, as would definitely be any other person who came to power in ukraine, if it, so to speak, remains, we must take this into account, including, well, in some kind of, so to speak, and such behind-the-scenes political schemes that will still be or there is, there, yes, that’s another question, that’s it... this is unambiguous, maybe there is a calculation for this, but nevertheless, this is one of the forms.