0
0.0
Apr 27, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
that probably hasn't undergone the kind of renovations that you think it's part of the charm, elliott, i know you also have some details from this day in the courthouse what did we learn? so a day of trial looks like this. >> it's i mean, there's actually quite a lot more than the last know. it doesn't a lot more than the last couple of days. and its, and its done since it today, wasn't adept hey of major bombshell testimony, but there were some very interesting both human moments because this all deals with sex, money, and allegations of lies. and so we can talk through some of the most compelling that's a testimony here. interestingly, there was cross-examination were stormy, where the purpose of stormi daniels came up and this whole question of why did the trump organization have her name and her phone number? and this was on cross-examination because the emanation from susan necklace the defense attorney, we can even read the portions of the transcript. they come up here nicholas asks, am i correct that prior to stormy daniels coming up to the office at trump tower, you recall hea
that probably hasn't undergone the kind of renovations that you think it's part of the charm, elliott, i know you also have some details from this day in the courthouse what did we learn? so a day of trial looks like this. >> it's i mean, there's actually quite a lot more than the last know. it doesn't a lot more than the last couple of days. and its, and its done since it today, wasn't adept hey of major bombshell testimony, but there were some very interesting both human moments because...
35
35
Apr 23, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 35
favorite 0
quote 1
jaime elliott, michael, preciate it. the conversation. anks so much. i look forward to havingt a few moreimes a month-long standoff in congress could be close to ending as the senate prepares to up four a d worth billions of lls for ukine anisrael money that the white house says both countries desperately needs will discuss and just moments riyad saves new album is breaking records starting business's never easy. the star naibe, eight months pregnant that's a different story with the chayce inke cart, we got up and running in no time earn unlimited 1.5% cash back on every purchase chase ink business unlimited car from chase for business why always the couch doesn't need to get a puppy school, get his little puppet diploma know must have been spending all this little guy when your questions about life turned into questions about money. there's erica, the virtual financial assistant to help you spend save& plan smarter only from bank of america what would you like the power to do missing out on the things you love because of asthma get back to better bre
jaime elliott, michael, preciate it. the conversation. anks so much. i look forward to havingt a few moreimes a month-long standoff in congress could be close to ending as the senate prepares to up four a d worth billions of lls for ukine anisrael money that the white house says both countries desperately needs will discuss and just moments riyad saves new album is breaking records starting business's never easy. the star naibe, eight months pregnant that's a different story with the chayce...
90
90
Apr 23, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 90
favorite 0
quote 1
elliott. i mean, let's just jump in on this what do you make of what we're hearing in our side panel they're these little tidbits coming from inside the courtroom. the prosecutor seems to be saying over and over to the judge, like, hey you gotta do something about this, right and there's a fine line that the judge has to tell here, and these are all the things the caitlin and paul were talking about. >> number one, where is the line between what is protected speech from a candidate and someone who is interfering with the administration of justice in his own trial. and some of those are quite delicate. now, the michael cohen question is going to be a much tougher one because as they said, you have two people who are sort of going after each other and sniper public going after the jurors is really a problem. and i think if there's anything that the judge is going to respond to directly, its those statements about the jury pool. >> well, until that point, i mean, trump was speaking out about the
elliott. i mean, let's just jump in on this what do you make of what we're hearing in our side panel they're these little tidbits coming from inside the courtroom. the prosecutor seems to be saying over and over to the judge, like, hey you gotta do something about this, right and there's a fine line that the judge has to tell here, and these are all the things the caitlin and paul were talking about. >> number one, where is the line between what is protected speech from a candidate and...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
. >> well, notable to hear you say craziness of trump's absolute immunity claim, elliott, what did you what do you make of what no, i think you're you're absolutely right. >> i think the court in sort of recognizing well, i think trump's team in conceding that some things might be official acts and some things are not really open the door to the supreme court to say, well, we can't decide what's an official act and what isn't. we're just going to send it back down to lower courts to figure out now to be clear, the supreme court could have resolved this issue back in december and we're not even talking about that hearing at which remember, judge florence pan talked about the drone strike by seal team six or when a block before that, the supreme court have this issue because jack smith's team took it to the supreme court, said, we would like you to expedite this ruling. can you please rule on this issue and they chose not? two for this reason. they want to keep their hands out of it to some extent and push it back down to lower courts. >> and because jack speedy trial thing was absurd on
. >> well, notable to hear you say craziness of trump's absolute immunity claim, elliott, what did you what do you make of what no, i think you're you're absolutely right. >> i think the court in sort of recognizing well, i think trump's team in conceding that some things might be official acts and some things are not really open the door to the supreme court to say, well, we can't decide what's an official act and what isn't. we're just going to send it back down to lower courts to...
0
0.0
Apr 22, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
it was interesting, elliott williams, who's also with us in the opening statements. trump's defense team really called michael cohen and admitted liar setting has an obsession with getting those were their words, an obsession with getting the former president. what do you make of the way they went after cohen? i am not surprised by that at all. >> a core element of what defense attorneys do is undermine the credibility of prosecution witnesses. i say this as someone who worked on narcotics cases, a lot where you've got guys with homicide convictions or sex assault convictions that you're calling up as witnesses. and the defense it's capitalizes on that and says that, look, you lazy to the jury, you can't believe this person, michael cohen does have at least one prior conviction for lying under oath. now, everything he's expected to say is likely to be corroborated by number one documents and number two, the testimony of other witnesses, but the defense would have been and remiss if not hammering michael cohen's credibility issues, it is defense attorney work one-on-o
it was interesting, elliott williams, who's also with us in the opening statements. trump's defense team really called michael cohen and admitted liar setting has an obsession with getting those were their words, an obsession with getting the former president. what do you make of the way they went after cohen? i am not surprised by that at all. >> a core element of what defense attorneys do is undermine the credibility of prosecution witnesses. i say this as someone who worked on...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 1
elliott, i think one of the prosecutor christians challenges throughout the traveled, particularly with david pecker, is moving from well, we all had an implication and we all thought that what donald trump wanted was to affect the campaign to a real understanding that that's what he wanted. now, you can convict someone on the basis that well, we just thought this is what the defendant wanted, but and trump is now seated between his attorneys, emil bove and susan necklace but it's it's a stronger case to be made that there was some clear directive or so on. >> so really it's just a question of overwhelming evidence or not. >> this is a great detail el la pecker is smiling in the direction of the defense table well aka trump, there are human moments at trial. i mean, it's a bunch of human beings that were months close. apparently, david pecker is still thinks he has some sort of i mean, they haven't spoken in a while but doesn't harbor any hatred for donald trump, saying nice things about if it's only three other witnesses attacked, he's been saying david pecker is very nice, but okay. >
elliott, i think one of the prosecutor christians challenges throughout the traveled, particularly with david pecker, is moving from well, we all had an implication and we all thought that what donald trump wanted was to affect the campaign to a real understanding that that's what he wanted. now, you can convict someone on the basis that well, we just thought this is what the defendant wanted, but and trump is now seated between his attorneys, emil bove and susan necklace but it's it's a...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
our panel of experts or is back with us, write down and elliott williams prosecution has concluded their questioning more than at least five, six hours. it went on and on and on. now the defense is cross-examining as we all know, did the prosecution achieve what they were trying to achieve? yes. what they were trying to achieve is number one, put david pecker in the room with donald trump in august 20 2015, pardon me. >> but put the two of them in the room, established the scheme establish an understanding of how catch and kill and the business model of ami and the national enquirer or worked, they needed to do that. >> now, again, you put the testimony out in the world and then have the defense have their way with them and they are going to beat him up. we're seeing it now on the screen as well. they're ready talking about his profit motive merely saying, oh, you weren't a charity sort of saying that we'll look, you run this to make the money to. but but as far as what prosecutors needed to do, of course, they succeeded because right now trump's attorney is asking me pecker to describe
our panel of experts or is back with us, write down and elliott williams prosecution has concluded their questioning more than at least five, six hours. it went on and on and on. now the defense is cross-examining as we all know, did the prosecution achieve what they were trying to achieve? yes. what they were trying to achieve is number one, put david pecker in the room with donald trump in august 20 2015, pardon me. >> but put the two of them in the room, established the scheme...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
. >> interesting elly, elliot williams is with us as well before this redirect elliott, what did you make of the defenses cross-examination? >> i think the defense did what they had to do. the point and of cross is the score is a score as many points as possible against the witness. and the main things here in the absence of a major bombshell that they could extract are number one attack the witnesses credibility. do you remember these things that you said you did and they pointed to a few instances where a statement he'd made didn't quite match a document and they made those again, the case won't rise and fall on them, but they can dirty up the witness a little bit. also, a big thing they focused on were these catch and kill, or at least dirt at least articles, schemes that involve individuals other than politicians making the case that well, not just donald trump, but arnold schwarzenegger or mark wahlberg also were parties two arrangements if ami, in which we engage in the same conduct you are accusing us of having committed a crime and doing so muddy the waters as to whether thes
. >> interesting elly, elliot williams is with us as well before this redirect elliott, what did you make of the defenses cross-examination? >> i think the defense did what they had to do. the point and of cross is the score is a score as many points as possible against the witness. and the main things here in the absence of a major bombshell that they could extract are number one attack the witnesses credibility. do you remember these things that you said you did and they pointed...
0
0.0
Apr 30, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
and, you know, it's interesting, elliott, they're spending a lot of time talking about the access hollywood video tape, which of course all of us remember. but the judge has ruled they can't show it to the jurors. why? >> because the video itself could be seen as prejudicial to the defendant vacant. speak about what the fact that it existed, the fact that people had reactions to it, that there were communications about the video, there's sort of things we're seeing here, the aftermath and the fallout, but the evidence itself, as conveyed on the video just runs afoul of evidentiary rules and they just don't want to get a lot of questions about that tape, the impact it could have on the whole situation, certainly he and i know elie honig has had this happen to him to what trial there are there is information that's in the world where you have the words of a defendant, the words of a wetness, a document, a piece of clothing that for whatever reason can't be brought into court it would help your case and would help establish that the defendant the defendant's guilt. >> but for whatever reason h
and, you know, it's interesting, elliott, they're spending a lot of time talking about the access hollywood video tape, which of course all of us remember. but the judge has ruled they can't show it to the jurors. why? >> because the video itself could be seen as prejudicial to the defendant vacant. speak about what the fact that it existed, the fact that people had reactions to it, that there were communications about the video, there's sort of things we're seeing here, the aftermath and...