91
91
Mar 1, 2024
03/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 91
favorite 0
quote 0
so if that holds true, jack smith would then just be starting. let's say we get that vision and it goes against president trump's claims. now, the case goes, starts moving forward again. you have about another three months of pretrial machinations before that thing could finally get in front of a jury. so that puts him with something else to do in july and he's now trying to squeeze mar-lago in there. >> well, he is saying jack, they're saying july 8th, the trump team says they want to ask the election, but they're also saying, well, also maybe august 12, is it what is the tactical advantage to that date >> so like jack smith, they're asking for the world they wanted after the election. they know they're not going to get that. they asked for that once before earlier in this case, and that was rejected. so now they're saying if you're going to put it on before, let's have it start on august 12th. coincidentally, august is the month that the dc case could possibly if everything goes right for jack smith, could possibly get on the calendar, but not
so if that holds true, jack smith would then just be starting. let's say we get that vision and it goes against president trump's claims. now, the case goes, starts moving forward again. you have about another three months of pretrial machinations before that thing could finally get in front of a jury. so that puts him with something else to do in july and he's now trying to squeeze mar-lago in there. >> well, he is saying jack, they're saying july 8th, the trump team says they want to...
0
0.0
Mar 1, 2024
03/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
jack smith wants it sooner. the defense later. it says it won't be fair unless it's much later as an after the election and john keynes election year journey all over the map, taking him to pennsylvania tonight to see how seniors view a race between the two oldest presidential candidates ever good evening. thanks for joining us. we begin tonight, keeping them honest with immigration, the issue americans now called their top concern according to recent polling. today, president biden and former president trump made dueling visits. the texas southern border, biden to brownsville, trump to eagle pass, to cities about 300 miles apart. two candidates who each in his own way has failed to fill fix a broken and severely overburdened border security and asylum system. president biden and many believed by omission, by not making the problem enough of a priority until recently, even after a year of increasing numbers of people crossing the border and rising border encounters which set new records and don't trump by commission. he's actively
jack smith wants it sooner. the defense later. it says it won't be fair unless it's much later as an after the election and john keynes election year journey all over the map, taking him to pennsylvania tonight to see how seniors view a race between the two oldest presidential candidates ever good evening. thanks for joining us. we begin tonight, keeping them honest with immigration, the issue americans now called their top concern according to recent polling. today, president biden and former...
0
0.0
Mar 1, 2024
03/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
feet jack smith drag his feet. you got to remember i wasn't part of this case during the investigative phases. they could have brought this indictment much earlier. they didn't at the time we had mar-a-lago, which was going very fast that's a lot of activity. january 6, which was sitting there pretty much at a standstill. all the sudden, he brings his snap indictment and all of a sudden the next few weeks realize, oh, shoot, i forgot to interview a whole bunch of witnesses. the timing of the indictment is something that's control. another thing >> all right. we'll leave it there doj are >> confusion. like that? >> well, we'll leave it there with the two of you on that one. does that conversation i think it doesn't matter. it's doj >> i think that's a longer conversation. we'll have to continue another de elie, mr.. tim parlatore. thank you both very much >> thank you. >> and next, the dual at the border, the rhetoric, the promises, and biden's dare her to donald trump standby >> my best reputation is ruined. >> it'
feet jack smith drag his feet. you got to remember i wasn't part of this case during the investigative phases. they could have brought this indictment much earlier. they didn't at the time we had mar-a-lago, which was going very fast that's a lot of activity. january 6, which was sitting there pretty much at a standstill. all the sudden, he brings his snap indictment and all of a sudden the next few weeks realize, oh, shoot, i forgot to interview a whole bunch of witnesses. the timing of the...
0
0.0
Mar 12, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
i find it unimaginable that jack smith had any knowledge that mr. mueller was going to come forward with this because i know that that is the last thing he wants. and he has a strong stance against attaining juries. i also, in my own mind, as an attorney, have some questions about his lawyer was thinking in letting him, in letting him go on with this. on the other hand, there is significant factual support for the evidence that he laid out. and they can prove almost everything he talked about without him. he adds color, significant, but keep in mind they have a lot of this stuff on video. they have testimony from other people who participated in mar- a-lago in terms of assisting mr. de la vega and some of the obstruction activity. i don't think it is not harmful but it is highly unusual and i am sure that we will see mr. butler again on tv. you have said that if donald trump doesn't win, he is going to jail. you are confident that these trials are actually going to happen? >> well, i am confident that it will happen at some point if he is not the el
i find it unimaginable that jack smith had any knowledge that mr. mueller was going to come forward with this because i know that that is the last thing he wants. and he has a strong stance against attaining juries. i also, in my own mind, as an attorney, have some questions about his lawyer was thinking in letting him, in letting him go on with this. on the other hand, there is significant factual support for the evidence that he laid out. and they can prove almost everything he talked about...
0
0.0
Mar 1, 2024
03/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
jack smith mean for trump? >> well, erin, what you're seeing is prosecutors trying to find a way to box out the former president and his legal team. because as you as you noted, what they're trying to do is delay this to the point where it makes it impossible for tanya chutkan and the dc trial to find find room on the calendar. they know that obviously, given the fact that this that the that the immunity question is now before the supreme court we anticipate that what they're going to do is look for something that will make sure that that the dc judge doesn't have room on the calendar between now and november to sketch chilling new trial. and so what jack smith is doing here in making this request is trying to at least have the judge in in in florida put a put on the calendar a date of july 8th. now, we don't know whether she'll go for this. there are a lot of complicated issues because this has to do with classified info aileen cannon, the judge, there has pretty much been been helpful with the former presiden
jack smith mean for trump? >> well, erin, what you're seeing is prosecutors trying to find a way to box out the former president and his legal team. because as you as you noted, what they're trying to do is delay this to the point where it makes it impossible for tanya chutkan and the dc trial to find find room on the calendar. they know that obviously, given the fact that this that the that the immunity question is now before the supreme court we anticipate that what they're going to do...
0
0.0
Mar 1, 2024
03/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
smith gets his way and gets this july 8th start so if jack smith gets a july 8 start, we do probably get a verdict before the election. and so there are two routes. one is based on jack smith's own estimation, you'd probably get the end of trial around august 19, trump's estimation is it's going to take a longer period of time for the trial so that you get a verdict and the end of trial around september 16th. but both of those, uh, well, before both the alliance, while before the election, that's right. so that's why the july 8 and whether or not the judge cannon goes with the justice department is key to that outcome. >> so ben doesn't mean do you think there's any coincidence that smith makes this move a day after the supreme court said it would hear arguments on trump's immunity while he's in office. and they said that they're going to take that up and that means that likely will not get a verdict by election day in any scenario. >> it does mean that it means the florida case is the one that can move forward. the quickest. >> i >> don't think it's an accident, but i think this hea
smith gets his way and gets this july 8th start so if jack smith gets a july 8 start, we do probably get a verdict before the election. and so there are two routes. one is based on jack smith's own estimation, you'd probably get the end of trial around august 19, trump's estimation is it's going to take a longer period of time for the trial so that you get a verdict and the end of trial around september 16th. but both of those, uh, well, before both the alliance, while before the election,...
0
0.0
Mar 3, 2024
03/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
jack smith of course is not a principal officer. inferior officers can be appointed if congress by law vests in the head of the cabinet department the power to appoint a senior officer. congress has passed no law vesting the attorney general the power to appoint a special counsel like jack smith. congress has a vested power to appointed inferior officers and the secretaries of energy, education, transportation and hhs it has not done so with the justice department when therefore jack smith appointment is illegal and unconstitutional. every single thing he has done since he was appointed a year end a half ago is illegal, no and void. >> i want the american people to understand your background. you used to serve as a top legal advisor to a former attorney general of the united states you and i worked with the office of legal counsel which is considered that legal constitutional brain trust of the federal government. you are not coming out of left field you are looking at the constitution, you are looking at the statutes and saying thi
jack smith of course is not a principal officer. inferior officers can be appointed if congress by law vests in the head of the cabinet department the power to appoint a senior officer. congress has passed no law vesting the attorney general the power to appoint a special counsel like jack smith. congress has a vested power to appointed inferior officers and the secretaries of energy, education, transportation and hhs it has not done so with the justice department when therefore jack smith...
0
0.0
Mar 12, 2024
03/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
smith the same way. >> i do not have the sufficient information with respect to jack smith east investigation to provide a comment on it. >> if president biden in his testimony to you knew the exact date, january 20th whatever it was, 2009 when he game vice president and the day when he left become vice president january 20th, i guess the first would have been january 20, 2009, el knew the dates right. if he knew the exact date and the instant beau biden died would that have changed your decision not to bring a prosecution? >> sir, i cannot engage in hypotheticals what my decision would have been with different facts. i made a decision based on the facts and circumstances i was presented with and we identified during our investigation. >> it appears to me the minor discrepancies as far as dates after a long period of time was not the basis. it was not the basis for your decision to decline to prosecute. you didn't have the facts. he acted differently than trump. he voluntarily provided the documents and complied with the justice department and didn't try to obstruct justice. those were the re
smith the same way. >> i do not have the sufficient information with respect to jack smith east investigation to provide a comment on it. >> if president biden in his testimony to you knew the exact date, january 20th whatever it was, 2009 when he game vice president and the day when he left become vice president january 20th, i guess the first would have been january 20, 2009, el knew the dates right. if he knew the exact date and the instant beau biden died would that have changed...
0
0.0
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
jack smith's team said they won't violate that, but how can they say that now? there could be delays because, you know, co-defendant's attorneys are talking september 9th as the absolute earliest. that's in violation of the 60-day rule. >> well, yeah, but it's not just that, there's a federal prosecutor's handbook for dealing with election offenses, and it makes it very clear that federal prosecutors are not supposed to take actions which interfere in elections, particularly election outcomes. jack smith waited, what, two years, two years to actually file this, these indictments, long after he had the evidence needed for that and, frankly, right as the campaign season for '24 was starting. so his denials that he's not trying to interfere with the election, i just think they fall flat. elizabeth: yeah. same with, you know, the georgia 2020 case. they waited years to file that too. >> right. elizabeth: let's get your reaction, tom, to cnn's ellie hoenig on the classified documents case going to trial in july or august. watch this. >> jack smith has now concluded i
jack smith's team said they won't violate that, but how can they say that now? there could be delays because, you know, co-defendant's attorneys are talking september 9th as the absolute earliest. that's in violation of the 60-day rule. >> well, yeah, but it's not just that, there's a federal prosecutor's handbook for dealing with election offenses, and it makes it very clear that federal prosecutors are not supposed to take actions which interfere in elections, particularly election...
0
0.0
Mar 15, 2024
03/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
jack smith won a conviction. donald was a likely buys presidential contender in 2016 and that was reversed in 2016 eight-zero. jack smith is a political scud missile who sent in to take out presidential contenders like he did with bob mcdonald. on the presidential immunity argument there is president in the civil context. the president of the united states is a -- is immune from civil prosecution or the perimeter of his official acts under that nixon case we discussed 40 years ago. if federal judges are immune from criminal prosecution absolutely immune from criminal prosecution, and so are members of congress, why wanted the president of the united it would destroy our country. another example besides biden and riley is president obama and his legal advisor, now federal circuit judge david baron on the first circuit court of appeals in bostodavid baron advised president obama it was lawful for obama to order an extra traditional drone strike on two american citizens including a minor. if obama is not immune from
jack smith won a conviction. donald was a likely buys presidential contender in 2016 and that was reversed in 2016 eight-zero. jack smith is a political scud missile who sent in to take out presidential contenders like he did with bob mcdonald. on the presidential immunity argument there is president in the civil context. the president of the united states is a -- is immune from civil prosecution or the perimeter of his official acts under that nixon case we discussed 40 years ago. if federal...
0
0.0
Mar 12, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
>> no. >> was anybody interviewing with jack smith or his work? >> i do not have the basis to answer that question. >> your summation, which we treat as thoughtful and unpolitical, we should treat decisions by jack smith the same way to your knowledge? >> i do not have sufficient information with regard to jack smith see investigation to provide any comment on it. >> let me ask you this, if president biden in his testimony to you, knew the exact date, whatever date it was when he came vice president, and when he left as vice president, and it would be january 20th -- he knew the dates exactly right, and if he knew the exact date and the instant that his son died, would not have changed your decision to bring about prosecution? >> i cannot engage in hypotheticals, and what i did was make a decision on the facts and circumstances i was presented with. >> it appears to me, and i think it would appear to the american public, that these minor discrepancies as far as dates after a long period of time was not the basis, it was not the basis of your decis
>> no. >> was anybody interviewing with jack smith or his work? >> i do not have the basis to answer that question. >> your summation, which we treat as thoughtful and unpolitical, we should treat decisions by jack smith the same way to your knowledge? >> i do not have sufficient information with regard to jack smith see investigation to provide any comment on it. >> let me ask you this, if president biden in his testimony to you, knew the exact date,...
0
0.0
Mar 5, 2024
03/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
jack smith, i don't think is any better. leticia james is terrible. she campaigned on i will get trump, i will get trump and then it goes before a trump hatingthd deal. the public understands it. i'm lucky i'm able to explain it to the public because if you weren't able to elax>ic wouldn'd believe what they see. so i don't want to win this way. look, i want to win based on my policies are to cut taxes, we're going to get interest rates down and you'll be able to buy homes again. you can't buy a home today, the interest rate is soi want to wi. i want to stop the war in ukraine with russia. i want to stop what's happening in israel.e been attacked if i were president. ukraine would never have ever been attacked if i was president. you wouldn't have had inflationh energy prices. i had low energy prices and kept them there, very easily. and probably may be caused t war with ukraine because putin became rich all of a sudden, it went up so much. i watched president biden talking about putin. putin became very rich because at $100 a barrel, he's got so much
jack smith, i don't think is any better. leticia james is terrible. she campaigned on i will get trump, i will get trump and then it goes before a trump hatingthd deal. the public understands it. i'm lucky i'm able to explain it to the public because if you weren't able to elax>ic wouldn'd believe what they see. so i don't want to win this way. look, i want to win based on my policies are to cut taxes, we're going to get interest rates down and you'll be able to buy homes again. you can't...
0
0.0
Mar 20, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
what he's saying about jack smith and this type of probe. take a look. >> they're breaking every law to persecute us. it's been one witch hunt and phony investigation after another. these are ridiculous indictments. the single greatest witch hunt of all time. it's all run by the doj. it's crooked stuff. they're crooked people. deranged jack smith. they had no -- i got four indictments. >> is he right or wrong? >> i mean, the way i see it, if these were his personal -- personal documents and -- or he's allowed to have these by the pra, why would you need to ask questions about video footage? why would you possibly move the documents when they are coming to retrieve them? to me it just doesn't make any sense. on top of that, why would you put two lower level employees in the position they're in if you did nothing wrong and these are your own -- these are your personal documents? >> so you're saying that in the way that he acted, trying to hide, and the people that he brought into it, you think you observed part of a coverup? >> i -- i -- i thi
what he's saying about jack smith and this type of probe. take a look. >> they're breaking every law to persecute us. it's been one witch hunt and phony investigation after another. these are ridiculous indictments. the single greatest witch hunt of all time. it's all run by the doj. it's crooked stuff. they're crooked people. deranged jack smith. they had no -- i got four indictments. >> is he right or wrong? >> i mean, the way i see it, if these were his personal -- personal...
0
0.0
Mar 31, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
>> there is no way that jack smith is going to succeed to the jury instructions. if he does, the case is over. secondly, it's a head, trump wins, tells, his losing. there is no way he will let that happen. the problem is judge cannon did not issue an order here of jury instructions. just said parties, i want you to engage in the following scenarios. it's loose enough that i think it's not enough for jack smith to go directly to the 11th circuit yet. what will happen is jack smith is going to push back and say hey, what you are doing here is really erroneous. your interpretation under the presidential records act is wrong and you need to think about this again. rethink what you just did. if she won't, we will take the extraordinary step. i do think the 11th circuit going to reverse, repudiate. dropped the case entirely. >> you are there in palm beach. what are you hearing from folks about judge cannons case in the handling of donald trump? >> people think it's appalling, what has been happening. they're very anti-cannon. trump's biggest supporters silent about it o
>> there is no way that jack smith is going to succeed to the jury instructions. if he does, the case is over. secondly, it's a head, trump wins, tells, his losing. there is no way he will let that happen. the problem is judge cannon did not issue an order here of jury instructions. just said parties, i want you to engage in the following scenarios. it's loose enough that i think it's not enough for jack smith to go directly to the 11th circuit yet. what will happen is jack smith is going...
0
0.0
Mar 19, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
so how does jack smith get this? can he do a pretrial ruling on appeal? normally you can in a criminal case. can you get a written saying 11th circuit help me, the judge is wrong on the law as evidence by her proposed scenarios, we need you to intervene so she doesn't give the wrong instruction, and that's what people need to understand. jury instructions, these are instructions given to jurors to tell them what the law is. but if her law is wrong going in, the jury is screwed. they have no options left if they're being told by the judge to apply the wrong law. >> and the framing in these two binary situations seems a bit premature, certainly out of left field. >> not even premature, it's just flawed, it's wrong, and then it's premature as well. >> carroll lenning, thank you so much. everyone else stick around. when we come back, donald trump may have finally run out of options realizing he may have to raise half a billion dollars somehow in the next six days. the reality of this deadline is finally sinking in and it is freaking him out. raging at the jud
so how does jack smith get this? can he do a pretrial ruling on appeal? normally you can in a criminal case. can you get a written saying 11th circuit help me, the judge is wrong on the law as evidence by her proposed scenarios, we need you to intervene so she doesn't give the wrong instruction, and that's what people need to understand. jury instructions, these are instructions given to jurors to tell them what the law is. but if her law is wrong going in, the jury is screwed. they have no...
0
0.0
Mar 27, 2024
03/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
jack smith whatever happened to jack smith where is that guy? jack where are you man. jack, is that even a real guy. jack smith a bees jack spratt's wife could eat no fat, no lien, no lien, no lien no lien. please don't take my man. >> greg: jim i still understand the cut the money down to 145 billion who do you right the check to when there's no victim. if they say he has to send the check to new york city that means the money is disappearing. who is the victim i don't get this. >> exactly. >> he also says it's an honor who else would say it's an honor to pay that. he said he would pay it in cash if he has to you know who will show up with pounds of cash. >> greg: 145,000,001-dollar bills. >> and the rest in pennies. >> greg: i think he should do that i think tyrus came up with the idea. >> disney other commercial where he's on the two-dollar bill like actual ones we will pay in that. >> greg: 70, 80, you are them and bears himself. tyrus is this still backfiring and democrats? >> i feel i'm watching old movies were the villains just keep telling you what they are goi
jack smith whatever happened to jack smith where is that guy? jack where are you man. jack, is that even a real guy. jack smith a bees jack spratt's wife could eat no fat, no lien, no lien, no lien no lien. please don't take my man. >> greg: jim i still understand the cut the money down to 145 billion who do you right the check to when there's no victim. if they say he has to send the check to new york city that means the money is disappearing. who is the victim i don't get this. >>...
0
0.0
Mar 2, 2024
03/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
smith and puts this in july as jack smith has asked for, the florida case, there's nowhere for the dc case to go, but i think what is at the heart of this and trump's team says, well, it shouldn't be about politics, but the trump legal team has less worried about the classified documents case and not necessarily because it's less problematic, but because i think they understand the appearance former white house aides, the former attorney general, the former or the current governor of georgia. all these aids marching in to talk how trump tried to overturn the election is more damaging to his political prospects than even the classified documents. >> all of that. and in a jurisdiction in florida which is much more favorable to him with a much better jury pool in front of a much more trump friendly drag show for all of those reasons, i agree with you. that's what they want. >> jennifer rodgers, elie honig, we'll be watching closely since whale these fun deadlines to wait for. thank you. both for being here on a friday night up next at the white house tonight, president biden made this an
smith and puts this in july as jack smith has asked for, the florida case, there's nowhere for the dc case to go, but i think what is at the heart of this and trump's team says, well, it shouldn't be about politics, but the trump legal team has less worried about the classified documents case and not necessarily because it's less problematic, but because i think they understand the appearance former white house aides, the former attorney general, the former or the current governor of georgia....
0
0.0
Mar 2, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
okay, it's a couple of weeks apart, jack smith and trump. but does this mean that we are very likely to see the -- case then begin before the fall? or could the judge still do other things? >> the judge still could do other things. it's, and i think with this particular judge, it is pretty hard to predict where she comes out. my guess is they're -- betting that she goes with the trump proposed dayton with the smith proposed state. it's going to depend on her calendar. but again, what surprises me most about this is that, it's what it tells us i think that jacks mitt is saying, there ain't no way i'm getting to this election case before the election. >> fascinating. and again, it's been a flurry of filings. because this leading candidate for the republican nomination is also a defendant in several different jurisdictions. david, i'm going to tell you this. and i'm not just saying this because of our history. we appreciate your arguments, and your counter arguments. >> when we come back, -- choice, and your rights. stay with us. -- choice, and
okay, it's a couple of weeks apart, jack smith and trump. but does this mean that we are very likely to see the -- case then begin before the fall? or could the judge still do other things? >> the judge still could do other things. it's, and i think with this particular judge, it is pretty hard to predict where she comes out. my guess is they're -- betting that she goes with the trump proposed dayton with the smith proposed state. it's going to depend on her calendar. but again, what...
0
0.0
Mar 8, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
shortly after jack smith's team submitted their filings, the judge overseeing the case aileen cannon scheduled a hearing for next thursday. joining our conversation, former deputy assistant attorney general harry litman is here and former acting assistant attorney general for national security at the justice department and msnbc legal analyst mary mccord is here. rick is still with me at the table. mary, let me ask you, jack smith's paper tells us most of what we know and from his paper and filings, he seems to be calling bs on all of trump's moves and arguments. is that a fair read? >> i think in legal terms that's what he's doing but using different verbiage and it had to be said. i mean, some of these motions, the motion to dismiss based on presidential immunity is based on an argument that mr. trump while he was president designated all of these classified documents as personal and, therefore, that was within the scope of his official acts that he should have immunity for. so you don't even have to get to the question, says jack smith, of whether a president, a former president i
shortly after jack smith's team submitted their filings, the judge overseeing the case aileen cannon scheduled a hearing for next thursday. joining our conversation, former deputy assistant attorney general harry litman is here and former acting assistant attorney general for national security at the justice department and msnbc legal analyst mary mccord is here. rick is still with me at the table. mary, let me ask you, jack smith's paper tells us most of what we know and from his paper and...
0
0.0
Mar 2, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
but, today they got shut down, at least on one front by the jack smith team about this idea that you can't start a trial within a couple months of an election. obviously, you know a lot about these things. >> sure, the question that judge cannon and her rulings has favored the defense, even her reasoning has gone out of its way to find fault with the government and to side wherever possible with the defense and ways that i think continue to be pretty shocking. remember she's the judge that was reversed twice, before the case was indicted we do know the trial date, she made various comment saying that she thought that the date that was sought by the government in july was unduly, optimistic. she asked a lot of questions of the defense about not having a trial at all, and certainly not in the lead up of the election. i was surprised she brought up the doj internal rule, because the internal rule of the department down in any way give rise to the defense, they are not enforceable in any court, they are just internal gots to the department. that's something that the judge knows well havi
but, today they got shut down, at least on one front by the jack smith team about this idea that you can't start a trial within a couple months of an election. obviously, you know a lot about these things. >> sure, the question that judge cannon and her rulings has favored the defense, even her reasoning has gone out of its way to find fault with the government and to side wherever possible with the defense and ways that i think continue to be pretty shocking. remember she's the judge...
0
0.0
Mar 3, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
it was not necessary and you will look at the indictment on the jack smith brought. it has nothing to do with those proud boys. in fact, it doesn't make the claim that trump actually instigated the riot. as based upon his planning of this. so what were they waiting for? and i think merrick garland made a historic, historic mistake. >> history will look back one day and see if this, in fact, was a contributing factor in all of this. melissa, jennifer, think you so much. please stick around to help answer this question when we come back. when a conflict of interest actually conflicts of interest? we are talking about the case against d.a. fani willis in georgia, next. s ) at fisher investments we may look like other money managers, but we're different. (other money manager) how so? (fisher investments) we're a fiduciary, obligated to act in our client'' best interest. (fisher investments) so we don't sell any commission-based products. (other money manager) then how do you make money? (fisher investments) we have a simple management fee, structured so we do better when
it was not necessary and you will look at the indictment on the jack smith brought. it has nothing to do with those proud boys. in fact, it doesn't make the claim that trump actually instigated the riot. as based upon his planning of this. so what were they waiting for? and i think merrick garland made a historic, historic mistake. >> history will look back one day and see if this, in fact, was a contributing factor in all of this. melissa, jennifer, think you so much. please stick around...
0
0.0
Mar 12, 2024
03/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
you're exactly right because he told us when jack smith goes after president trump, joe biden says, how could this happen? what data was in those documents that could compromise sources and methods? it's irresponsible so joe biden knew the role rules, you know, he knew the rules and joe biden told us he knew the rules. so mr. her, why did he break them? >> the conclusion as to exactly why the president did what he did is not one that we explicitly address in the report the report explains my decision to the attorney general that no criminal charges were warranted in this matter. >> i think you did tell us. i think he told us mr. page to 31. you said this president biden had strong motivations. that's a key word. we're getting a motive now, president biden had strong motivations to ignore the proper procedures for safeguarding the classified information in his notebooks. why did he have strong motivations? because you next word, because he decided months before leaving office to write a book, to write a book that was his motive. he knew the rules are broken because he was writing a book.
you're exactly right because he told us when jack smith goes after president trump, joe biden says, how could this happen? what data was in those documents that could compromise sources and methods? it's irresponsible so joe biden knew the role rules, you know, he knew the rules and joe biden told us he knew the rules. so mr. her, why did he break them? >> the conclusion as to exactly why the president did what he did is not one that we explicitly address in the report the report explains...
204
204
Mar 2, 2024
03/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 204
favorite 0
quote 3
cannon signaled that jack smith's suggested july 8th trial date would be a no-go because the trial time frame for all the motion work that has to be done would be far too c compressed tt totally makes sense. of course trump's lawyers want this travesty to be postponed until after the election. i have an idea, how about holding off until and unless joe biden is brought up on charges for his own concealment of government records? all right, meanwhile, not a good idea to keep digging when you are already sinking but that's what smith's office did when his associate intimated that the judge wasn't moving quickly enough to which he tersely replied i can assure you that in this building there is a good deal of judicial work going on. oh. now, our reporters david spunt and jake gibb son are reporting that if they had to choose a date for the federal appeal, trump's legal team said they could do august 12th to avoid running right up until the election. of course, if a trial takes, let's say, six weeks, which is what they're projecting, keeping trump in a courtroom, now, that's the ultimate in e
cannon signaled that jack smith's suggested july 8th trial date would be a no-go because the trial time frame for all the motion work that has to be done would be far too c compressed tt totally makes sense. of course trump's lawyers want this travesty to be postponed until after the election. i have an idea, how about holding off until and unless joe biden is brought up on charges for his own concealment of government records? all right, meanwhile, not a good idea to keep digging when you are...
0
0.0
Mar 14, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
donald trump would be able to end both federal prosecutions against him by special prosecutor jack smith, who would be instantly fired by donald trump, and the two state prosecutions against him in new york and georgia would be forced into at least a four year delay until donald trump is no longer president. if donald trump wins, then justice loses. if donald trump wins, human decency loses. if donald trump wins, then all is lost. and as of tonight, most american voters know that. joe biden is going to win millions more votes than donald trump, but this is the country where you can come in second with the voters and still become president. still win. thanks to the perversion of democracy the founders called the electoral college. and as of tonight, not enough people in a handful of so- called battleground states who will decide this election understand the stakes of this election. not enough people in those few states yet understand what they will lose if donald trump wins. and so, we begin tonight with what is now the most important of those stories that we will be covering this year, b
donald trump would be able to end both federal prosecutions against him by special prosecutor jack smith, who would be instantly fired by donald trump, and the two state prosecutions against him in new york and georgia would be forced into at least a four year delay until donald trump is no longer president. if donald trump wins, then justice loses. if donald trump wins, human decency loses. if donald trump wins, then all is lost. and as of tonight, most american voters know that. joe biden is...
0
0.0
Mar 9, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
jack smith is saying, wait a minute. not only were these not your own personal property, this is some of the most sensitive military information, reportedly including even nuclear secrets. >> classify, exactly. news book reports that jack smith is set to fire language coded briefs, if you well. so the public cannot learn the names of the witnesses for fear they could be put in harm's way. could judge cannon decide she wants the names unredacted. >> reporter: ciardi has decided and that is when jack smith went nuclear. we don't see him making any kind of statements. his expression in the courtroom when the judge was thinking about making the names public, he was apocalyptic. he says what we all know that when people were trying to hold trump accountable and their names were made public. terrible things happen to them. there is 24 witnesses who trump wants to hold -- wants to have the whole world know. jack said, it is just wrong, even on the lot but even on the cases the judge sites to support her rolling don't say what s
jack smith is saying, wait a minute. not only were these not your own personal property, this is some of the most sensitive military information, reportedly including even nuclear secrets. >> classify, exactly. news book reports that jack smith is set to fire language coded briefs, if you well. so the public cannot learn the names of the witnesses for fear they could be put in harm's way. could judge cannon decide she wants the names unredacted. >> reporter: ciardi has decided and...
0
0.0
Mar 12, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
. >> a key hearing in jack smith's classified documents case against trump is set for this thursday. meanwhile, there's also news today on trump's first criminal trial, the hush money case in new york. a trump filing today saying he may blame his lawyers for the criminal chemo, but he'll try to do that without losing the attorney-client privilege. joining me now is joyce vance, former u.s. attorney and msnbc analyst and co-host of the hashtag sisters in law podcast and co-host of the strict scrutiny podcast. two of the very best getting us started this evening. joyce, i'd like to begin with you. for today in the hur hearing, no new evidence was heard. no perry mason moments happened. did anything occur in this hearing to change the fact there's been only one president, former president trump, that is facing criminal charges for mishandling classified documents? >> you know, katie, this hearing underlined the distinction between donald trump and joe biden for anyone who's listening. it's very clear when you read hur's report and when you hear hur repeat his report out loud at the requ
. >> a key hearing in jack smith's classified documents case against trump is set for this thursday. meanwhile, there's also news today on trump's first criminal trial, the hush money case in new york. a trump filing today saying he may blame his lawyers for the criminal chemo, but he'll try to do that without losing the attorney-client privilege. joining me now is joyce vance, former u.s. attorney and msnbc analyst and co-host of the hashtag sisters in law podcast and co-host of the...
0
0.0
Mar 1, 2024
03/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
so we've got donald trump, jack smith, judge, aileen cannon altogether what was it like in there >> all in the room? judge, aileen cannon had a lot of media things to walk through. she didn't ask that many questions for a hearing that had so many details that they needed to deal with and even trumping in the room in the same place as jack smith. >> it was >> a little bit more a relaxed than in past hearings where i've sat in the courtroom and watched each of these people look at each other or glance at each other, trump appeared to be a lot more relaxing facts than in past hearings. he didn't whisper much with his attorneys as he's done previously. he instead sat there, he listened pretty passively for most of the hearing is the arguments were being made but dana at a couple of points, there were heated arguments being made, especially whenever donald trump's defense lawyer, todd blanche put out on the table what is really the thing that nobody had had wanted to talk about in this case up to that point this morning, and that was this idea. of the election. should this case go to trial b
so we've got donald trump, jack smith, judge, aileen cannon altogether what was it like in there >> all in the room? judge, aileen cannon had a lot of media things to walk through. she didn't ask that many questions for a hearing that had so many details that they needed to deal with and even trumping in the room in the same place as jack smith. >> it was >> a little bit more a relaxed than in past hearings where i've sat in the courtroom and watched each of these people look...
0
0.0
Mar 2, 2024
03/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
jack smith has moved expeditiously. so trump is doing what any defendant would do in that case, but he'd run out of time if garland had gotten off the dime. that's the bottom line. what else? i love this part of the show, you know, i do if people don't vote third party, this cycle, they never will. i have to say, eric in god if i'm talking about the 2028 election, i'm not talking about third-party candidacies. if this cycle doesn't at least produce a legitimate three-way or three-way plus contest where somebody gets on the debate stage, right? allah? ross perot, then i to give up, i to give up because this, according to all the data is the cycle where people are yearning. gallup says a plurality or independence than not publicans or democrats. people want a choice. >> give it to them. one more. if i've got time not closing the border will cost biden the election. he cannot win private account. i got to say that poll today, the combination of the gallup data and mohammad yunus, the editor in chief, dissected it for us. a
jack smith has moved expeditiously. so trump is doing what any defendant would do in that case, but he'd run out of time if garland had gotten off the dime. that's the bottom line. what else? i love this part of the show, you know, i do if people don't vote third party, this cycle, they never will. i have to say, eric in god if i'm talking about the 2028 election, i'm not talking about third-party candidacies. if this cycle doesn't at least produce a legitimate three-way or three-way plus...
0
0.0
Mar 13, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
what does that reflect on the part of jack smith? >> first of all, we don't know that they haven't recovered them. it could be they have determined all of those boxes were returned to mar-a-lago or somewhere else, that they essentially follow trump around wherever he went. i had a conversation with someone on your team tonight about our shared recollection that when trump showed up in new york last year for a deposition in a new york attorney general civil fraud case, he was seen outside trump tower with personal aides carting those very same sorts of bankers boxes. look, there is a reference in the indictment to the fact that carlos de olliva and others shuttled those boxes to mar-a-lago. >> in the back of my mind this is all pure speculation, i should warn everyone at home. that it seems jack smith probably more than anyone else at the department of justice has noods the aprieveiated calender within which he's working. like he built a federal indictment on january 6th made for speed, let's get it done. that is very much up in the a
what does that reflect on the part of jack smith? >> first of all, we don't know that they haven't recovered them. it could be they have determined all of those boxes were returned to mar-a-lago or somewhere else, that they essentially follow trump around wherever he went. i had a conversation with someone on your team tonight about our shared recollection that when trump showed up in new york last year for a deposition in a new york attorney general civil fraud case, he was seen outside...
0
0.0
Mar 13, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
i think jack smith has adopted a surgical approach. he has determined based on the teams experience that further superseding the indictment is to know one's benefit of that means if and when the case were ever to be tried that we would see some of the things brian butler talks about in the interview come back and make a reappearance at trial including his testimony. >> there is been a fatalist attitude about this because it's unlikely to happen before november but there's a 50% chance that joe biden is the president come the end of november it means this trial could actually happen. i do wonder what you think the timeline is for this given canons and decision to set a date. >> a lot depends on what the supreme court does on immunity. trump has made multiple dismissals and two will be dealt with but presidential immunity is not one of them. depending on what the supreme court does the case could go away or come back to judge cannon to determine, even if he is immune, for acts that are alleged to be official. does the stuff in this indic
i think jack smith has adopted a surgical approach. he has determined based on the teams experience that further superseding the indictment is to know one's benefit of that means if and when the case were ever to be tried that we would see some of the things brian butler talks about in the interview come back and make a reappearance at trial including his testimony. >> there is been a fatalist attitude about this because it's unlikely to happen before november but there's a 50% chance...
0
0.0
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
but on top of that, you also have this argument that some are making. >> jack smith's team announced the 60-day rule and unwritten rule of justice department they're not supposed to take action within 60 dais of an election to avoid influencing it. it's regarded as not pop aretivm and i take that to mean they expect that trump will lose the immunity claim and that they will be able to begin a trial against him after labor day and run that trial through election day if that's how long it takes to try it. so i think that, you know, to the extent that people are looking at what happened today and saying the law fare campaign has failed. i would point out to people that a defendant is required to be in court for every day of a criminal trial, and i think these guys are planning to try him from september to november. neil: that would be very disruptive for donald trump in the middle of a presidential campaign assuming he's the republican nominee and if he's convicted on any of the charges, how that would resinate. the consensus seems to be a conviction changing the game. i'm not so sure a
but on top of that, you also have this argument that some are making. >> jack smith's team announced the 60-day rule and unwritten rule of justice department they're not supposed to take action within 60 dais of an election to avoid influencing it. it's regarded as not pop aretivm and i take that to mean they expect that trump will lose the immunity claim and that they will be able to begin a trial against him after labor day and run that trial through election day if that's how long it...
0
0.0
Mar 4, 2024
03/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
but jack smith come i don't think there is any better. letitia james is terrible and get iowa, and it goes before a campaigning judge. the whole thing is a rigged deal. the public understands it. i'm lucky that i'm able to explain it to the public because if you were not able to explain it, the public wouldn't know. they would believe what they see. so i don't want to win this way. look, i want to win based on my policies are better. we will cut taxes, get interest rates down, buy homes again. you can't buy a home today because the interest rates are so high. i want to win unsafe borders and stop wars, stop the war in ukraine with russia. i want to stop what is happening in israel. israel would never be attacked if i were president. ukraine would never ever be attacked if i was president. you would not have had inflation. inflation was caused by high energy prices. i would have kept them down easily. and probably maybe caused were with ukraine because putin became rich all of a sudden. it went up so much and i watch president biden talkin
but jack smith come i don't think there is any better. letitia james is terrible and get iowa, and it goes before a campaigning judge. the whole thing is a rigged deal. the public understands it. i'm lucky that i'm able to explain it to the public because if you were not able to explain it, the public wouldn't know. they would believe what they see. so i don't want to win this way. look, i want to win based on my policies are better. we will cut taxes, get interest rates down, buy homes again....
0
0.0
Mar 10, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
that is why jack smith is saying these aargue. s designed to delay the trial. >> the stormy danielles hush money case, will the consequences be a slap on the wrist for trump? >> i don't think so. you have to remember this same conduct was charged federally by the southern district of new york. and michael cohen was charged and convicted with exiting federal election fraud. and he served three years in prison for that. here are the charges are that donald trump falsified business records but in order to conceal or commit that same federal election law violation as well as violating other laws, l. again he could face prison time. somebody has. these are serious charges and should not be underestimated. >> yesterday, ty cobb was not impressed with trump in the new york civil cases. will trump keep his attorney on the team? >> if the civil cases where she is on all of the briefings for appeal he added another lawyer an appellate lawyer the same lawyer who argued in the dc immunity appeal. and so he has added lawyers but as of now, ali
that is why jack smith is saying these aargue. s designed to delay the trial. >> the stormy danielles hush money case, will the consequences be a slap on the wrist for trump? >> i don't think so. you have to remember this same conduct was charged federally by the southern district of new york. and michael cohen was charged and convicted with exiting federal election fraud. and he served three years in prison for that. here are the charges are that donald trump falsified business...
24
24
Mar 19, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 24
favorite 0
quote 1
what are jack smith's options here? >> well, there is a reason you've never seen anything like it. i don't think bradley and i have either. last week, bradley was trying to come up with the best yiddish phrase for this and i have sort of 2m words for you. michigan, which is what this is, because the choice that was given by judge cannon to the parties is to ask jack smith, so please draft a jury instructions seeming that the earth is flat and the second one is please draft a jury instruction assuming that the earth is square. so the second m word is mandamus. mandamus is the ability -- it is not an appeal. it is for extraordinary actions by a district court that so clearly violate the law that you can appeal it right then and there. it is a very tough standard, but at this point, what she did today is so nutty, and so against appointed bradley has been making, which is that the 11th circuit has actually already decided this issue and what she has proposed is against what the 11th circuit is already reversed her on, so i really think to the extent that you think that she is engaging
what are jack smith's options here? >> well, there is a reason you've never seen anything like it. i don't think bradley and i have either. last week, bradley was trying to come up with the best yiddish phrase for this and i have sort of 2m words for you. michigan, which is what this is, because the choice that was given by judge cannon to the parties is to ask jack smith, so please draft a jury instructions seeming that the earth is flat and the second one is please draft a jury...
0
0.0
Mar 3, 2024
03/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
jack smith has argued this is a matter of national importance, we want votes to know before they go to the polls. on the other side, there are millions of pages in discovery, why speed if up this trial because to speed if it up would also potentially appear if political. howard: yeah. either way, you get a lot of -- >> kind of a rorschach test. howard: yes. >> depending on where you are is how you view this case. howard: and special counsel jack smith knowing the trial was already being delayed, for how long we don't know, he's also handling the classified documents case. expected to take about six weeks. he wants to start in july, trump says august. is this a little like college basketball before the shot clock where one team wants the hurry-up offense and the other is slow-walking everything? >> and the funny thing is the idea of a speedy trial in our legal system is generally to the benefit of a defendant. they have the right to push and say, come on, my justice is being delayed. it's not that it goes to the prosecutorial side which is how it feels in this case. there's no denying t
jack smith has argued this is a matter of national importance, we want votes to know before they go to the polls. on the other side, there are millions of pages in discovery, why speed if up this trial because to speed if it up would also potentially appear if political. howard: yeah. either way, you get a lot of -- >> kind of a rorschach test. howard: yes. >> depending on where you are is how you view this case. howard: and special counsel jack smith knowing the trial was already...
0
0.0
Mar 1, 2024
03/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
jack smith is now suggesting that they move the start date for that trial in the classified documents case down in mar-a-lago, a move that comes just one day after the justices slam the brakes on the case against trump and washington for his efforts to overturn the 2020 election results late this evening, the special counsel's office filed this new motion that you're seeing here, asking for donald trump and two of his co-defendants to stand trial beginning july the 8th one other co-defendant, a little bit after that, the special counsel's team wants to get basically at least one case heard before election day in november. trump's legal team responded with a now familiar retort saying that a fair trial cannot be held until after the 2024 presidential election is concluded. i'm quoting them but they did offer another date this year and the judge who has been mired in some controversy in this case, judge aileen cannon is expected to hash it out in a >> hearing tomorrow in florida that could be critical to the future of the classified documents case i'm joined tonight by an attorney who u
jack smith is now suggesting that they move the start date for that trial in the classified documents case down in mar-a-lago, a move that comes just one day after the justices slam the brakes on the case against trump and washington for his efforts to overturn the 2020 election results late this evening, the special counsel's office filed this new motion that you're seeing here, asking for donald trump and two of his co-defendants to stand trial beginning july the 8th one other co-defendant, a...
0
0.0
Mar 12, 2024
03/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
so the indictment brought by jack smith. the very terms of your analysis, jack smith's indictment actually counseled against and was counted against bringing charges in this case. is that correct? >> i'm sorry, congressman. i don't follow your drift there. >> you said there is already deterrence, there is a prosecution out there in a prior case related to classified documents so we don't need to bring another case to establish value. that was the essence of your analysis, correct? >> congressman, what i'll say is that i will stand by the way and specific words in which i characterize my assessment of deterrence on page 254 and 255. >> my time is out, per verse implication here, by the terms of your analysis made it less likely that the president would face charges by jack smith bringing an indictment. thank you, i yield back. >> mr. chairman, unanimous consent request. i ask unanimous consent to enter into the record two documents, first the superceding indictment against donald trump in the southern district of florida wher
so the indictment brought by jack smith. the very terms of your analysis, jack smith's indictment actually counseled against and was counted against bringing charges in this case. is that correct? >> i'm sorry, congressman. i don't follow your drift there. >> you said there is already deterrence, there is a prosecution out there in a prior case related to classified documents so we don't need to bring another case to establish value. that was the essence of your analysis, correct?...
0
0.0
Mar 13, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
what does that reflect on the part of jack smith? >> we don't know that they haven't recovered them. they may have determined that all of those boxes were returned to mar-a-lago or somewhere else. they followed trump around wherever he went. i had a conversation with someone on your team tonight about our shared recollection that when trump showed up in new york last near for a deposition, he was seen outside trump tower with personal aides carting some of those very same sorts of banker's boxes. look. there is a reference in the indictment to the fact that carlos talavera and others shepherded boxes onto a plane as trump was leaving from florida to head north. it never disclosed however, that ryan butler as trump employee number five was among them, and we don't know for sure what happened to those boxes or what was inside. he mac do you feel confident? in the back of my mind, this is all pure speculation. i should warn everyone at home. it seems that jack smith probably more than anyone else at the department of justice has underst
what does that reflect on the part of jack smith? >> we don't know that they haven't recovered them. they may have determined that all of those boxes were returned to mar-a-lago or somewhere else. they followed trump around wherever he went. i had a conversation with someone on your team tonight about our shared recollection that when trump showed up in new york last near for a deposition, he was seen outside trump tower with personal aides carting some of those very same sorts of...
0
0.0
Mar 1, 2024
03/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
jack smith said as he is ready july 8th. donald trump's team said they could do august 12th if they have to. it remains to be seen what judge can and will do. it ended around 3:00 this afternoon. >> and donald trump was there. >> donald trump was in the courtroom, jack smith was in the courtroom, neither spoke. something interesting is in the southern district of florida, there are four locations where this trial could be held. it is possible she could move to west palm beach and i say possible because donald trump is commuting 70 miles from palm beach in a motorcade. if there is a trial that lasts ten weeks, it could take five weeks apiece. he could be motorcade eating every single day. >> it still means a case before the election in the case could be adjudicated and done before the election. >> if you add on the ten weeks in the middle of august, this is another important point, middle august, mid-september and october and in another two weeks it could add with a verdict right near the actual election. we have to see what
jack smith said as he is ready july 8th. donald trump's team said they could do august 12th if they have to. it remains to be seen what judge can and will do. it ended around 3:00 this afternoon. >> and donald trump was there. >> donald trump was in the courtroom, jack smith was in the courtroom, neither spoke. something interesting is in the southern district of florida, there are four locations where this trial could be held. it is possible she could move to west palm beach and i...
0
0.0
Mar 1, 2024
03/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
>> i think what jack smith is motivated by is not november. i think it's by june which is the end of the supreme court's term. and i think all he's thinking about is making sure that there's no ambiguity whatsoever about what the supreme court said. so the one thing we know that is that by the end of june, the supreme court will have rolled one way or another on this executive immunity claim and this trial is set for one to proposed date is one week after the close of the immunity thing. >> we always talk about it in the realm of the election interference case. but trump's also claiming that in the classified documents case and you heard jim trusty saying there that he thinks he can have an argument on part of it, but it's also the willful retention in the obstruction of the efforts to investigate to try to get them back. that is also at play here and also trump was not an office. can argue presidential immunity if he was two years out of the office. >> yeah, absolutely. so like even under the nixon versus fitzgerald case for says than the lan
>> i think what jack smith is motivated by is not november. i think it's by june which is the end of the supreme court's term. and i think all he's thinking about is making sure that there's no ambiguity whatsoever about what the supreme court said. so the one thing we know that is that by the end of june, the supreme court will have rolled one way or another on this executive immunity claim and this trial is set for one to proposed date is one week after the close of the immunity thing....
0
0.0
Mar 1, 2024
03/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the supreme court trumps jack smith. the supreme court will be attacked no matter how it rules. and former house speaker nancy pelosi has already declared that the supreme court is placing itself on trial by hearing the appeal. the appeal on the immunity issue. no, the court is doing its job to protect the constitutional order after democrats decided they couldn't trust the voters to defeat mr. trump. and, as we talked, about it's not only the immunity issue but also the colorado ballot access issue which effects a lot of states on that issue. >> shannon: it does. super tuesday is upon us. colorado and maine are two states where you had some form of court or official there say that they didn't want president trump on the ballot. they are waiting to hear from the supreme court. so we will see when we get that, but, if former speaker nancy pelosi doesn't like the idea that the has taken this up, she should actually talk to special counsel jack smith about that. because in a filing last december, he said that the supreme court wo was the only by that could solve this question of im
the supreme court trumps jack smith. the supreme court will be attacked no matter how it rules. and former house speaker nancy pelosi has already declared that the supreme court is placing itself on trial by hearing the appeal. the appeal on the immunity issue. no, the court is doing its job to protect the constitutional order after democrats decided they couldn't trust the voters to defeat mr. trump. and, as we talked, about it's not only the immunity issue but also the colorado ballot access...
0
0.0
Mar 19, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
for jack smith to get her recused from the case, it takes a high burden. you have to show that she's biassed and it's rare for an appellant court to remove a judge from the case, but every time you see the rulings and delays that she builds into the case, you have to believe she's getting closer to that line. >> let's go to another case in georgia. trump's legal team started to maneuvering after fani willis was kept on the case. what are they trying to do there? >> donald trump wants to delay that case, and it's going to be delayed past the election anyways. he thinks maybe there's a chance to get her disqualified and that would kill the case and it would get reassigned to the same prosecutor that may not share the same zeal as fani willis. it's something called an interlock tory appeal, and it means you could take the appeal right away instead of waiting until the trial is over. donald trump likes to appeal everything possible, because the longer he can delay things the better his chances of never being put on trial in any of these matters. >> garrett, me
for jack smith to get her recused from the case, it takes a high burden. you have to show that she's biassed and it's rare for an appellant court to remove a judge from the case, but every time you see the rulings and delays that she builds into the case, you have to believe she's getting closer to that line. >> let's go to another case in georgia. trump's legal team started to maneuvering after fani willis was kept on the case. what are they trying to do there? >> donald trump...
0
0.0
Mar 2, 2024
03/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
this really does push things back for jack smith. let's say that the president has, is found not to be immune, jack smith, and then go to the trial. but the supreme court, they won't issue a ruling until may or maybe even june. and then that will push the trial judge has said the parties need, you know, as much as three months to prepare for the trial. if that pushes it right into september which is, i mean, talk about a tough decision for merrick garland. are you going let that trial proceed in the middle of a campaign? >> well, to be very clear, department of justice guidelines would say that you would absolutely not allow that trial to continue because they have a very firm rule written around the justice department interfering or using prosecutions or engaging in prosecutions in a a way that can affect the outcome of elections. they've always struck very strongly to that. by the way, ask hunter biden whose own prosecution we now know was delayed multiple times because of the fear that this would somehow interfere with joe biden a
this really does push things back for jack smith. let's say that the president has, is found not to be immune, jack smith, and then go to the trial. but the supreme court, they won't issue a ruling until may or maybe even june. and then that will push the trial judge has said the parties need, you know, as much as three months to prepare for the trial. if that pushes it right into september which is, i mean, talk about a tough decision for merrick garland. are you going let that trial proceed...
0
0.0
Mar 4, 2024
03/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
i think that the odds favor jack smith on the outcome. but, you know, the supreme court could very well decide that it agrees with the result but not the rationale of the d.c. circuit. there's a lot of unanswered questions on presidential immunity that may have given justices discomfort. they may want to see some greater delineation of lines trying to show when a president does have immunity in future cases. there are members of this court who take a very robust view of executive power and privilege. once they make that decision, it will return the mandate to the trial court. is it possible that they could still hold a trial before the election? yes. but allegations against the court that it's slow walking this case are, as usual, overwrought and undersupported. i mean, the court is actually moving at a much faster pace than it usually does. examples that people have raised in the past are distinguishable as to why the court moved a little faster in those cases. i think we have to take a moment here to understand the weight and the gravit
i think that the odds favor jack smith on the outcome. but, you know, the supreme court could very well decide that it agrees with the result but not the rationale of the d.c. circuit. there's a lot of unanswered questions on presidential immunity that may have given justices discomfort. they may want to see some greater delineation of lines trying to show when a president does have immunity in future cases. there are members of this court who take a very robust view of executive power and...
0
0.0
Mar 6, 2024
03/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
on those charges brought by special counsel jack smith. and then there are another of other trump related cases including ones a little bit more amusing there's a trademark dispute over the phrase a trump too small a california man who does not care for the former president was to trademark that phrase. and sellar t-shirts and knickknacks displaying it. the biden administration is opposing him and said you cannot trademark the name of a political candidate against tha. canvas wishes. t the biden administration defendant donald trump interest in that use of his own name. we have a whole range of different cases from amusing to the deadly serious involving mr. >> wall street journal supreme court correspondent thank you so much for joining us. >> thank you for having me. ♪ c spans a "washington journal" our live form involving you to discuss the latest issues in government, politics, public policy. from washington and across the country. coming up wednesday morning david weigle discusses the super tuesday results. what they mean for the pr
on those charges brought by special counsel jack smith. and then there are another of other trump related cases including ones a little bit more amusing there's a trademark dispute over the phrase a trump too small a california man who does not care for the former president was to trademark that phrase. and sellar t-shirts and knickknacks displaying it. the biden administration is opposing him and said you cannot trademark the name of a political candidate against tha. canvas wishes. t the...